Re: [fw-general] Status of Lucene Search Particulars?
Hi Jeff, Range queries are planned to be one of the first Zend_Search_Lucene module enhancements as well as wildcard queries. There is no any special data type for dates in Zend_Search_Lucene. That's the same for Java Lucene. Dates should be translated to strings to be indexed. Best representation is 'MMDD'. It keeps dates order and gives a possibility to use range queries for searching dates range. You can also combine user entered and programmatically generated queries through the API. That's useful for translating user entered dates into internal representation. With best regards, Alexander Veremyev. Jeff Kolber wrote: Hi there new to the list so wanted to start our by saying thanks to the team and the community for providing a really great framework. I am very keen on implementing Lucene in our php environment but am finding the (apparent) absence of date fields and range queries to be problematic. Can anyone let me know if these things are planned,pending,shelved, did I miss them somewhere ? incubator etc? thanks again. Jeff Kolber Lead Developer Roubini Global Economics, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rgemonitor.com/
[fw-general] Zend_Search Stop words
Hi,
We are implementing a stop word list and we have noticed an odd bit of
behaviour when doing searches and the order of stop words in the query.
Currenlty these are the stop words:
$stopWords = array('the', 'and', 'a', 'to', 'of', 'in',
'i', 'is', 'that', 'it', 'on', 'you',
'this', 'for', 'but', 'with', 'are',
'have', 'be', 'at', 'or', 'as', 'was',
'so', 'if', 'out', 'not');
If we do a query like: it is this it returns no results.
If we do a query like: this is it we get results.
I am just wondering if this is proper behaviour for the stop words and
searching?
TIA,
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Search-Stop-words-tf4049217s16154.html#a11501469
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search Stop words
Hi Andrew,
Query parser has some inconsistencies in stop words processing
(http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1624).
I am working on it right now and have just attached your comment to the
issue.
Thank you very much for your comments!
With best regards,
Alexander Veremyev.
Andrew Craft wrote:
Hi,
We are implementing a stop word list and we have noticed an odd bit of
behaviour when doing searches and the order of stop words in the query.
Currenlty these are the stop words:
$stopWords = array('the', 'and', 'a', 'to', 'of', 'in',
'i', 'is', 'that', 'it', 'on', 'you',
'this', 'for', 'but', 'with', 'are',
'have', 'be', 'at', 'or', 'as', 'was',
'so', 'if', 'out', 'not');
If we do a query like: it is this it returns no results.
If we do a query like: this is it we get results.
I am just wondering if this is proper behaviour for the stop words and
searching?
TIA,
Andrew
Re: [fw-general] Status of Lucene Search Particulars?
Thanks for the reply ... is there some place where I can monitor the progress of this? maybe a dev list? Jeff Kolber Lead Developer Roubini Global Economics, LLC 131 Varick Street, Suite 1005 New York, NY 10013 Tel: 212-645-0010 Fax:212-645-0023 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rgemonitor.com/ On Jul 9, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Alexander Veremyev wrote: Hi Jeff, Range queries are planned to be one of the first Zend_Search_Lucene module enhancements as well as wildcard queries. There is no any special data type for dates in Zend_Search_Lucene. That's the same for Java Lucene. Dates should be translated to strings to be indexed. Best representation is 'MMDD'. It keeps dates order and gives a possibility to use range queries for searching dates range. You can also combine user entered and programmatically generated queries through the API. That's useful for translating user entered dates into internal representation. With best regards, Alexander Veremyev. Jeff Kolber wrote: Hi there new to the list so wanted to start our by saying thanks to the team and the community for providing a really great framework. I am very keen on implementing Lucene in our php environment but am finding the (apparent) absence of date fields and range queries to be problematic. Can anyone let me know if these things are planned,pending,shelved, did I miss them somewhere ? incubator etc? thanks again. Jeff Kolber Lead Developer Roubini Global Economics, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rgemonitor.com/
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Search Stop words
Thanks Alexender!
When this is ready to test let me know if you want and we can test it on our
search index.
Andrew
Alexander Veremyev wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Query parser has some inconsistencies in stop words processing
(http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1624).
I am working on it right now and have just attached your comment to the
issue.
Thank you very much for your comments!
With best regards,
Alexander Veremyev.
Andrew Craft wrote:
Hi,
We are implementing a stop word list and we have noticed an odd bit of
behaviour when doing searches and the order of stop words in the query.
Currenlty these are the stop words:
$stopWords = array('the', 'and', 'a', 'to', 'of', 'in',
'i', 'is', 'that', 'it', 'on', 'you',
'this', 'for', 'but', 'with', 'are',
'have', 'be', 'at', 'or', 'as', 'was',
'so', 'if', 'out', 'not');
If we do a query like: it is this it returns no results.
If we do a query like: this is it we get results.
I am just wondering if this is proper behaviour for the stop words and
searching?
TIA,
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Search-Stop-words-tf4049217s16154.html#a11501884
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Status of Lucene Search Particulars?
Not all fixes/improvements are announced in mailing lists. But all of them are definitely listed in changelog. You can also subscribe to issue tracking. You have to register within JIRA to get this possibility (http://framework.zend.com/issues/secure/Signup!default.jspa). After logging in you will get Watch it option at the left side of page representing the issue. Range searching issue is ZF-400 (http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-400). With best regards, Alexander Veremyev. Jeff Kolber wrote: Thanks for the reply ... is there some place where I can monitor the progress of this? maybe a dev list? Jeff Kolber Lead Developer Roubini Global Economics, LLC 131 Varick Street, Suite 1005 New York, NY 10013 Tel: 212-645-0010 Fax:212-645-0023 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rgemonitor.com/ On Jul 9, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Alexander Veremyev wrote: Hi Jeff, Range queries are planned to be one of the first Zend_Search_Lucene module enhancements as well as wildcard queries. There is no any special data type for dates in Zend_Search_Lucene. That's the same for Java Lucene. Dates should be translated to strings to be indexed. Best representation is 'MMDD'. It keeps dates order and gives a possibility to use range queries for searching dates range. You can also combine user entered and programmatically generated queries through the API. That's useful for translating user entered dates into internal representation. With best regards, Alexander Veremyev. Jeff Kolber wrote: Hi there new to the list so wanted to start our by saying thanks to the team and the community for providing a really great framework. I am very keen on implementing Lucene in our php environment but am finding the (apparent) absence of date fields and range queries to be problematic. Can anyone let me know if these things are planned,pending,shelved, did I miss them somewhere ? incubator etc? thanks again. Jeff Kolber Lead Developer Roubini Global Economics, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rgemonitor.com/
RE: [fw-general] Allowing global variables with Zend Framework
I'm not aware of anything in Zend Framework that would require enabling, to permit usage of global variables or superglobals like $_GET and $_POST. But it's not clear what usage of globals you mean. Certainly the Zend Framework components themselves should not make use of global variables. So if there are any global that you need to use to specify ZF behavior, you need to pass these variables as arguments to class methods. Regards Bill Karwin -Original Message- From: kevin7654 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 5:34 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Allowing global variables with Zend Framework Hello, I'm trying to slowly migrate an app I've written over to the zend framework. The app currently relies on global variables, ie global $my_name, and it also relies on get and post values. Can I enable this with the zend framework? Thanks, Kevin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Allowing-global-variables-with-Zend-Fram ework-tf4042358s16154.html#a11483587 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Allowing global variables with Zend Framework
-- kevin7654 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Saturday, 07 July 2007, 05:34 PM -0700): I'm trying to slowly migrate an app I've written over to the zend framework. The app currently relies on global variables, ie global $my_name, and it also relies on get and post values. Can I enable this with the zend framework? There's nothing that prevents you from using globals or superglobals in ZF. However, that said, you can sometimes run into issues using globals that weren't first defined in the global namespace. Adding a declaration for them in your bootstrap will typically correct the issue. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] Extended $this-_helper-FlashMessenger;
Hello everybody,
Before FlashMessenger helper, I made a little FlashMessenger code with
Zend_Session like this :
public function init()
{
$this-session = Zend_Registry::get('session');
$this-view-flash_message = $this-session-flash_message;
$this-session-flash_message = null;
}
public function saveAction()
{
//some code here
//if success
$flash_message['state'] = 'true';
$flash_message['message'] = Ok;
//else
$flash_message['state'] = 'false';
$flash_message['message'] = Erreur;
}
So I'm using 'true' or 'false' as CSS class to have different display
for my message.
Is there a way to do this with flashMessenger helper ?
Thanks
--
Yannux
http://blog.onbebop.net
[fw-general] Release Schedule
I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out?
[fw-general] Problem with Zend_Mail and Japanese
Hello I have a zend framework based website with options for English and Japanese languages. Both languages work as expected in the website. There is a feature to send emails that also works well except for the Japanese chars appear garbled in the email client program. Below is a 'simplified copy' of the code I am using to send the emails. Any help or suggestion is much appreciated. Andres $gt = new Zend_Translate(gettext, languages/jp.mo) $mail = new Zend_Mail(UTF-8); $mail-setFrom([EMAIL PROTECTED], Website name); $mail-addTo([EMAIL PROTECTED], Name); $mail-setSubject($gt-_(Email subject)); $body = sprintf(h1%s/h1p%s/p, $gt-_(Hello), $gt-_(More text here... Japanese translation)); $mail-setBodyHtml($body,UTF-8); $mail-send(); Notes: 1) I do not think there is a problem with the jp.mo file as everything in the website (Japanese version included) is working ok. 2) When used in English, the emails look perfect. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-Zend_Mail-and-Japanese-tf4052746s16154.html#a11511581 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Lucene Partial matching
In Zend Search Lucene is it possible for query terms to partially match? Like Happy* matching Happyness -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Partial-matching-tf4052773s16154.html#a11511660 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
Hi, First off thank you to everyone who contributed to getting the first release out. The emphasis the framework puts on best practices has massively improved my analysis and development techniques (or should I say its improved my awareness... the rest will hopefully follow with practice). After finally grabbing the v 1.0 release I have started developing a system from scratch. I've been following Pádraic Bradys excellent tutorials on complex views and I've sorted out a layout and the basic CRUD operations of my systems elements. However this is where I get stuck, I'm not sure how BEST to initialize data in models for related record sets from an RDB. Let me explain. Lets take a simple example: 'A product is made by a manufacturer and can be in one or more categories.' I've created 3 models, product, manufacturer and category. Each extends Zend_Db_Table but offers a custom findByFilter() method which returns a result set based on data from a filter form. So far so good, it all works, I get data from the particular table the model relates to. My question in this... I don't just want data from the table the model relates to. A product has a manufacturer (therefore assume a foreign key 'manufacturer_id') so I want the manufacturer name as well. Or perhaps I want the categories the product is in. Or perhaps I want any other related data which might exist. This is fine when were talking about one record (an instance of a product HAS-A instance of a manufacturer... easy) Now don't get me wrong... I've been programming PHP for ages. I could do these things easily. I could throw method after method at my models until I have the functionality I need and I'll end up with something that works. But eventually my models will become bloated and I will end up with the maintenance nightmare I have with my current system. I'm after the best practice, not just an answer to what appears to be a simple query. * Can someone point me towards a description of a design pattern or a simple tutorial which clearly describes the BEST way to achieve this? Performance is key... I don't want to start creating manufacturer objects for every product in a result set just to get the name of the manufacturer of a product (or do I?). * Am I barking up the wrong tree... if I want a result set of all products and related manufacturer names do I simply write a method to get me this data? And if so then what if I want a slightly different result set? Do I just write another method and continue in this fashion as and when new needs arise? Cheers, Sam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Models%2C-Objects-and-RDBMS---Best-Practise-tf4052812s16154.html#a11511779 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Lucene Partial matching
The reason I ask if that the stuff I'm indexing can have 'tags' associated with it. I'm wondering the best way to store tags in a lucene index. Could it be put in a space separated unstored field? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Partial-matching-tf4052773s16154.html#a11511785 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
I've been having similar challenges in the application I'm working on. So far, I personally haven't ran across any sort of design pattern or best practice that really addresses this issue. I don't know how much this helps, but here's an idea I've been kicking around in my head. Set up your directory structure like so: app/ models/ Products/ Queries.php Defaults.php Validation.php Service.php Manufacturers/ Queries.php Defaults.php Validation.php Service.php Categories/ ... The basic idea is that you have one directory for each model, such as Products, and inside that directory are various classes centered on managing the business/domain logic related to the model. I was thinking about breaking the models down like so: * Queries.php: Thinest possible wrapper methods around SQL queries. So you'd have various methods for selecting Product result sets in the Product model. These queries shouldn't be restricted to one table; they should do whatever is required to get the correct results. It seems appropriate to put inserts/updates/deletes here, too. I'd make the actual SQL queries properties of the class, instead of burying them inside the methods; it would make easier to just override just a particular query. * Defaults.php: The methods here are used basically to provide a data model of sorts for blank CRUD forms, for entering new data. I was thinking there was a Zend_Db_Table method that returned new rows for inserting, based on the table, but I can't remember what it is. This would be sort of like that, but keep all your defaults for all the forms primarily related to the model in this one, separate class. Feel free to omit this if not applicable. * Service.php: The main API for getting things related to this model done. This is where the meat of the domain logic would lie. This class would use the other classes in the same model directory. It could actually use any class from any other model; whatever it takes to get the job done. The way I see it, the Views and Controllers would just exist to provide a UI to the API exposed here. This way, your application logic is separated from the front end, and you could access the same application functionality through a CLI script, a cron job, a web services interfaces, etc. * Validation.php: It just seems like a good idea to me to separate out the data validation code for the model into its own class. The Service class would just use this class to do data validation. Of course, if you don't want/need to separate it out, you don't have to. The thing I like about this approach is that, given a well-normalized relational database, it gets you out of the mindset of tying classes 1-to-1 with tables. So you're free to think in terms of joined result sets and the core business objects your application deals with. And the directory structure gives you the freedom to break down any given model's problem into as many or few classes as necessary to get the job done and keep the code maintainable. All that said, although I've been thinking about it for a while, I haven't actually implemented any of this yet. It sounds like a great idea to me, but then I could be totally off my rocker. :) So if this is crazy, or doesn't work for you, ignore it. Hope this helps, Bryce Lohr Sam Davey wrote: Hi, First off thank you to everyone who contributed to getting the first release out. The emphasis the framework puts on best practices has massively improved my analysis and development techniques (or should I say its improved my awareness... the rest will hopefully follow with practice). After finally grabbing the v 1.0 release I have started developing a system from scratch. I've been following Pádraic Bradys excellent tutorials on complex views and I've sorted out a layout and the basic CRUD operations of my systems elements. However this is where I get stuck, I'm not sure how BEST to initialize data in models for related record sets from an RDB. Let me explain. Lets take a simple example: 'A product is made by a manufacturer and can be in one or more categories.' I've created 3 models, product, manufacturer and category. Each extends Zend_Db_Table but offers a custom findByFilter() method which returns a result set based on data from a filter form. So far so good, it all works, I get data from the particular table the model relates to. My question in this... I don't just want data from the table the model relates to. A product has a manufacturer (therefore assume a foreign key 'manufacturer_id') so I want the manufacturer name as well. Or perhaps I want the categories the product is in. Or perhaps I want any other related data which might exist. This is fine when were talking about one record (an instance of a product HAS-A instance of a manufacturer... easy) Now don't get me wrong... I've been programming PHP for ages. I could do these things easily.
Re: [fw-general] ZF Application Variables?
To Jack, The most common and basic use of Application Variables are page counters. Decide how you would implement a page counter in Zend and you will have the mechanism for your application variables. A database seems like a bit much for a page counter. Although it would take care of race conditions. cheers, pat Jack Sleight wrote: Hi, Are there any plans to introduce an application variable type system in ZF? Something like this: http://www.leosingleton.com/projects/code/phpapp/ As far as I'm aware this is something PHP cant do. If this is something you would be interested in adding I would be happy to help with a proposal/coding/development. Thanks, Jack
RE: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Hi Aaron, We are spending this week on planning. This includes both defining the product lifecycle (major/minor/mini releases, how we branch, what goes into mini vs. minor, etc...) and also try and pin down owners + priorities for the various features. It will probably not be 100% final by the end of this week but it'll give everyone a clearer idea of how we think we should manage the various version releases, what the rought schedules should look like, etc.. In any case, Zend_View_Layout is high on our priority list and not a very big piece of work (a lot of headway has already been made by the various community members). So I believe this should move forward quickly soon and even if it's not in an official release you'll be able to pull it out of the incubator. Andi -Original Message- From: Aaron D. Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 3:06 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out?
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Thanks Andi for making Layout a priority (we were getting nervous =P). The next big thing is probably to open up discussion on Zend_Form. There's been some community discussion on the path forward but no real plan as of yet. Is there any specific plans for Zend_Form going forward? The proposal that is in the tracker is somewhat dated. For my vote I'm looking for something that can: - Create forms from an instance of a class or config file (not an abstract-class approach) - Validate/Filter Data - Integrates with the flash messenger and repopulates forms on failed validations (sessions) - Has appropriate view helpers to handle common form scenarios (array binding option lists for example) - Is sufficiently lightweight as to not intrude onto business logic/model logic. (there's been considerable debate on where the validation process stops [the checking for a free username scenario]) I'm sure theres a lot more, so anyone else who has an opinion, speak up. Kevin - Original Message - From: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Aaron D. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:58 PM Subject: RE: [fw-general] Release Schedule Hi Aaron, We are spending this week on planning. This includes both defining the product lifecycle (major/minor/mini releases, how we branch, what goes into mini vs. minor, etc...) and also try and pin down owners + priorities for the various features. It will probably not be 100% final by the end of this week but it'll give everyone a clearer idea of how we think we should manage the various version releases, what the rought schedules should look like, etc.. In any case, Zend_View_Layout is high on our priority list and not a very big piece of work (a lot of headway has already been made by the various community members). So I believe this should move forward quickly soon and even if it's not in an official release you'll be able to pull it out of the incubator. Andi -Original Message- From: Aaron D. Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 3:06 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out?
RE: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Cool. Don't forget to give us a case-study once you're done :) Andi -Original Message- From: Aaron D. Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:49 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule Awesome. I have a current application that's been expanded over and over. We're hoping to start rewriting it in a couple months, and are trying to plan everything out. Hopefully we'll see a good release of Layout before then (or at least see it completed enough to use). Andi Gutmans wrote: Hi Aaron, We are spending this week on planning. This includes both defining the product lifecycle (major/minor/mini releases, how we branch, what goes into mini vs. minor, etc...) and also try and pin down owners + priorities for the various features. It will probably not be 100% final by the end of this week but it'll give everyone a clearer idea of how we think we should manage the various version releases, what the rought schedules should look like, etc.. In any case, Zend_View_Layout is high on our priority list and not a very big piece of work (a lot of headway has already been made by the various community members). So I believe this should move forward quickly soon and even if it's not in an official release you'll be able to pull it out of the incubator. Andi
[fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input fields meta command with arrays problem
I am having a problem with Zend_Filter_Input when attempting to validate an
array of values using the fields meta command. What happens is that ZFI
passes the array of values to my filter which correctly returns true and
then ZFI passes each value separately which fails. Here is my
code(simplified) pretty much straight from the doc:
$validators = array('password_check' = array('StringEquals',
'presence' = 'required',
'fields' = array('password0', 'password1'));
$input = new Zend_Filter_Input(array(), $validators,
$this-getRequest()-getPost());
$input-addNamespace('Local_Validate');
if (!$input-isValid()) {
}
What happens is StringEquals is called three times, once with an array, and
once with each string. Some debug output dumping the value passed to my
StringEquals validator produces the following:
array(2) {
[password0] = string(9) Testing1!
[password1] = string(9) Testing1!
}
string(9) Testing1!
string(9) Testing1!
So I looked into ZFI and it appears it handles arrays of fields (line 720 in
ZF 1.0.0 v5344) but then it continues to evaluate all fields in the data
array *seperately* validating it against the current validator chain which
happens to be the validator StringEquals which only validates arrays...
which of course returns false.
Basically, it appears either I am missing something or having the fields
meta command set to an array will not work if the validator validates that
the value is in fact an array. Anyone else come across this? Should my
validator simply return true if the value is not an array? I'm not sure I
care too much for that work around. To me, if you pass the fields meta
command with an array value it should only validate the array, not each
seperately. Any help is appreciated,
Thanks
Josh
[fw-general] Re: Zend_Filter_Input fields meta command with arrays problem
Joshua Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am having a problem with Zend_Filter_Input when attempting to validate an
array of values using the fields meta command. What happens is that ZFI
passes the array of values to my filter which correctly returns true and
then ZFI passes each value separately which fails. Here is my
code(simplified) pretty much straight from the doc:
$validators = array('password_check' = array('StringEquals',
'presence' = 'required',
'fields' = array('password0', 'password1'));
$input = new Zend_Filter_Input(array(), $validators,
$this-getRequest()-getPost());
$input-addNamespace('Local_Validate');
if (!$input-isValid()) {
}
What happens is StringEquals is called three times, once with an array,
and once with each string. Some debug output dumping the value passed to
my StringEquals validator produces the following:
array(2) {
[password0] = string(9) Testing1!
[password1] = string(9) Testing1!
}
string(9) Testing1!
string(9) Testing1!
So I looked into ZFI and it appears it handles arrays of fields (line 720
in ZF 1.0.0 v5344) but then it continues to evaluate all fields in the
data array *seperately* validating it against the current validator chain
which happens to be the validator StringEquals which only validates
arrays... which of course returns false.
Basically, it appears either I am missing something or having the fields
meta command set to an array will not work if the validator validates that
the value is in fact an array. Anyone else come across this? Should my
validator simply return true if the value is not an array? I'm not sure I
care too much for that work around. To me, if you pass the fields meta
command with an array value it should only validate the array, not each
seperately. Any help is appreciated,
Thanks
Josh
The following if stmt fixes the issue:
// Added the below if check
if (1 == count($validatorRule[self::FIELDS])) {
if (!$validatorRule[self::VALIDATOR_CHAIN]-isValid($value)) {
$this-_invalidMessages[$validatorRule[self::RULE]] =
$validatorRule[self::VALIDATOR_CHAIN]-getMessages();
$this-_invalidErrors[$validatorRule[self::RULE]] =
$validatorRule[self::VALIDATOR_CHAIN]-getErrors();
unset($this-_validFields[$fieldKey]);
$failed = true;
if ($validatorRule[self::BREAK_CHAIN]) {
return;
}
}
