[fw-general] usage of Zend_Db_Table_Row
Hi There,
Congratulations on the 1.0.0 release, I am coming getting back to ZF
after 0.7.0 and its great to see very good progress. Excellent work.
I have a small question regarding implementing a Zend_Db_Table_Row
class, the documentation says the following.
9.6.5.1. Defining Custom Logic for Insert, Update, and Delete in
Zend_Db_Table_Row
The Row class calls protected methods _insert(), _update(), and
_delete() before performing the corresponding operations INSERT, UPDATE,
and DELETE. You can add logic to these methods in your custom Row
subclass.
I have a custom Zend_Db_Table_Row class that is associated with a
Zend_Db_Table object,
When I work directly on the Zend_Db_Table object and call the insert()
method I don't see that the protected _insert method of the row class
being called. I try to trace through the library code and I did not see
anything apparent that would perform this either. However retrieving a
row by calling createRow() method and calling the save() method does
call the _insert() method.
Is this the intended behavior ? if so then the example provided in the
documentation may not be correct,
Example code
//
class Account extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract
{
protected $_name = 'account';
protected $_rowClass = 'CustomRow';
}
class CustomRow extends Zend_Db_Table_Row_Abstract
{
protected function _insert()
{
$this-_data['created_by'] = 21;
}
}
//test cases
//This method works and calls the _insert() and I see the audit column
created_by populated with value 21 in the db
public function testAddAccountWithRow()
{
$a = new Account(array('db' = $this-__fixture));
$row = $a-createRow();
$row-account_name = 'Unit Test Code via createRow';
$row-save();
}
//this method doesn't work. With or without specifying the rowClass at
object creation
public function testAddAccountDirect()
{
$a = new Account(array('db' = $this-__fixture, 'rowClass' =
'CustomRow'));
$a-insert(
array('account_name' = 'Inserting Direct')
);
}
I apologize beforehand if I am asking something that has already been
answered, I tried to search across the mailing list and did not see any
relevant hits.
Nayana Hettiarachchi
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Hi, Just to clarify what Layout means? - I'm being told elsewhere that Zend_Layout is being accepted but I assume there's no proposal acceptance yet. I mean we have three varying methods of doing layouts - Zend_View Enhanced, Zend_Layout, and Matthew's Two-Step View - which differ primarily in how and where in the V and C they are executed. It got lost a while back in all the noise generated by the debate between me and Ralph which ended rather abruptly on the list but I'd like to see some consideration towards implementing both. The reasoning is simple enough - both are non-conflicting methods and each facilitates a preferred MVC practice in the community. Both current proposals are also not equal in scope and goals - another point seemingly lost is that Layouts is just one part of Zend_View Enhanced proposes. Those of us preferring View Helpers for reading Models into a View would usually prefer a simpler decorator approach in Zend_View that leaves the Controller out of the equation - we don't really want to be forced to use a multiple Controllers in place of a simple 25 line decorator nor to return to the status quo where we have to subclass Zend_View, adopt a Two-Step View (another custom plugin) or just take a leap and replace it altogether. Contrary to the growing belief, both Layout strategies shouldn't be considered as being in competition. I said very early on that implementing both could be a major plus to the community, and this should be given some weight going forward. Kind regards, Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Aaron D. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 11:05:35 PM Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out? Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
Re: [fw-general] header and footer
This is what i do, maybe it could be useful for you:
I have a file called portal.php, which is the main template and its
contents are:
?php
echo $this-render('header.php');
echo $this-render($this-tplMain);
echo $this-render('footer.php');
?
So, in my controller i've only to do this call:
?php
class IndexController extends Zend_Controller_Action
{
public function IndexAction()
{
$this-tplMain = 'index/index.php';
echo $this-render('portal');
}
}
Hope it helps
2007/7/11, Paulo Nei [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I wanna put header footer in all view templates.
But with ZF I don't got an easy way to do it:
* if I use something like hooks:
public function preDispatch()
{
$this-render('header', null, true);
When I call _forward() the header is rendered twice.
And I cannot put view variables in the header (for example, error
messages), because it is rendered before the action is called and the
variables are populated.
* if I call explicity in the action:
$this-render('header', null, true);
$this-render('someaction');
$this-render('footer', null, true);
I repeat too much code in all actions and HAVE to call
$this-render('someaction')
explicity
* if I call in the view:
?php echo $this-render('header.phtml') ?
I have to put it in all views...
* I can override the render() method in the controller, but it is too
complex for something too simple.
Someone have ideas?
Paulo
--
Xavier Vidal Piera
Enginyer Tècnic Informàtic de Gestió
Tècnic Especialista Informàtic d'equips
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
610.68.41.78
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
The problem with your new setup is that the model is still closely
linked to the table subclass (the gateway).
If you use a data source other than the gateway, you'll have to
rewrite your model interaction, 'cuz the insert() and update() etc.
functions may no longer be available.
Instead, try the following. It uses a factory as middle layer and
seperates the model creation from the datasource:
?php
/**
The model. Can be a child of an abstract model class to have a
generic way of getting/setting attributes.
*/
class Book
{
private $_id;
private $_author;
private $_title;
/** Other model methods (get/set or anything) */
}
/**
The factory middel class. Called library cuz of the neat example.
You could call it Book_Factory or whatever.
*/
class Library
{
private static $_dataSource;
/** Singleton */
private static function getDataSource()
{
if (self::$_dataSource == null)
{
self::$_dataSource = new Book_Table;
}
return self::$_dataSource;
}
public static function newInstance()
{
return new Book();
}
public static function persist(Book $book)
{
return self::getDataSource()-persist($book);
}
public static function deleteByID($id)
{
return self::getDataSource()-deleteByID($id);
}
public static function getByID($id)
{
$rowSet = self::getDataSource()-getByID($id);
$instance = self::newInstance();
$instance-useRow($rowSet-current());
return $instance;
}
public static function getByIDWithAuthorInstance($id)
{
$book = self::getByID($id);
/**
* Authors is the factory class for Author
*/
$author = Authors::getByID($book-author);
$book-setAuthor($author);
return $book;
}
}
/**
* Here is your data class.
*/
class Book_Table extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract
{
public function persist(Book $book)
{
/**
* You'd be validating and building the data array here.
* I made up the hasID just now... check if there's an ID.
*/
if ($book-hasID()) {
/**
* Don't forget to specify a WHERE!
*/
return $this-update($bookData, $whereString);
} else {
return $this-insert($bookData);
}
}
public function deleteByID($id)
{
$whereString = $this-getAdapter()-quoteInto('id=?', $id);
return $this-delete($whereString);
}
public function getByID($id)
{
/**
* Just return all results from here. The instancing logic
will be done in the factory
*/
return $this-find($id);
}
}
As you can see the factory class provides a great deal of
flexibility, without the model having to know anything about how or
where it's contents are stored.
Of course this is just an example and may be implemented in a
slightly different manner.
On 11 Jul 2007, at 01:35, Sam Davey wrote:
Hi Mark,
I've just finished refactoring my design using the feedback from my
original
post. I'll describe what I've done which might help you... or
others can
stop me in my tracks and tell me I'm going the wrong way about it.
First here is a simplified version of my structure
|-- controllers
|-- models
| |-- Product.php
| |-- Product
| | |-- Gateway.php
| |-- Manufacturer.php
| |-- Manufacturer
| | |-- Gateway.php
| |-- Distributor.php
| |-- Distributor
| | |-- Gateway.php
|-- views
Using the PEAR naming convension and folder structure this
illustrates 6
classes Product and Product_Gateway, Manufacturer and
Manufacturer_Gateway,
Distributor and Distributor_Gateway.
Basicaly my original models which extended the Zend_Db_Table have
now been
turned into Gateways to speak to the specific related table. These
look
something like this:
class Product_Gateway extends Zend_Db_Table
{
protected $_name = 'product';
private $_pager = NULL;
public function findByFilter($fValues, $perPage=NULL,
$offset=NULL)
{
// Custom find method which is why Zend_Db_Table was
extended
}
}
So currently my Product model only contains the following code
class Product
{
public function gateway()
{
return new Product_Gateway();
}
}
Now in my controller, in the ever present add, edit and delete
actions I
simply use the following code
$this-model = new Product();
$this-model-gateway()-insert($data); // or -update($data), or
-delete($data)
There is obviously data validation/filtering needed in the
controller to
prepare the data. But these two lines deal with the database via the
gateway.
Does this
Re: [fw-general] header and footer
I'll second that. I'm in the UK, and so it regularly feels like we have to wait for America to spin around into the Sun before it comes up again :) I wonder if there is a senior community member this side of the Atlantic who could be entrusted to perform the complicated manual restart? Regards, Mark On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:28, Pádraic Brady wrote: Isn't the Wiki always down? ;) It usually only goes back up late in GMT time.
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Is this still happening? http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend_View+Enhancement+VS+Zend_Layout+Throwdown I've never been to a Throwdown. Of course it's on the Wiki so right now I can't check it. Regards, Mark On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:54, Pádraic Brady wrote: Hi, Just to clarify what Layout means? - I'm being told elsewhere that Zend_Layout is being accepted but I assume there's no proposal acceptance yet. I mean we have three varying methods of doing layouts - Zend_View Enhanced, Zend_Layout, and Matthew's Two-Step View - which differ primarily in how and where in the V and C they are executed. It got lost a while back in all the noise generated by the debate between me and Ralph which ended rather abruptly on the list but I'd like to see some consideration towards implementing both. The reasoning is simple enough - both are non-conflicting methods and each facilitates a preferred MVC practice in the community. Both current proposals are also not equal in scope and goals - another point seemingly lost is that Layouts is just one part of Zend_View Enhanced proposes. Those of us preferring View Helpers for reading Models into a View would usually prefer a simpler decorator approach in Zend_View that leaves the Controller out of the equation - we don't really want to be forced to use a multiple Controllers in place of a simple 25 line decorator nor to return to the status quo where we have to subclass Zend_View, adopt a Two-Step View (another custom plugin) or just take a leap and replace it altogether. Contrary to the growing belief, both Layout strategies shouldn't be considered as being in competition. I said very early on that implementing both could be a major plus to the community, and this should be given some weight going forward. Kind regards, Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Aaron D. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 11:05:35 PM Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out? ___ _ Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
Re: [fw-general] header and footer
+1 to that. Please don't leave us this way ;) Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, Mark a écrit : I'll second that. I'm in the UK, and so it regularly feels like we have to wait for America to spin around into the Sun before it comes up again :)
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Hi Mark, When I checked it last, Ralph had yet to post a response there. If he does, and assuming the Wiki is up of course ;), I'll post another response and set a second question. Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 9:37:13 AM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule Is this still happening? http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend_View+Enhancement+VS+Zend_Layout+Throwdown I've never been to a Throwdown. Of course it's on the Wiki so right now I can't check it. Regards, Mark On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:54, Pádraic Brady wrote: Hi, Just to clarify what Layout means? - I'm being told elsewhere that Zend_Layout is being accepted but I assume there's no proposal acceptance yet. I mean we have three varying methods of doing layouts - Zend_View Enhanced, Zend_Layout, and Matthew's Two-Step View - which differ primarily in how and where in the V and C they are executed. It got lost a while back in all the noise generated by the debate between me and Ralph which ended rather abruptly on the list but I'd like to see some consideration towards implementing both. The reasoning is simple enough - both are non-conflicting methods and each facilitates a preferred MVC practice in the community. Both current proposals are also not equal in scope and goals - another point seemingly lost is that Layouts is just one part of Zend_View Enhanced proposes. Those of us preferring View Helpers for reading Models into a View would usually prefer a simpler decorator approach in Zend_View that leaves the Controller out of the equation - we don't really want to be forced to use a multiple Controllers in place of a simple 25 line decorator nor to return to the status quo where we have to subclass Zend_View, adopt a Two-Step View (another custom plugin) or just take a leap and replace it altogether. Contrary to the growing belief, both Layout strategies shouldn't be considered as being in competition. I said very early on that implementing both could be a major plus to the community, and this should be given some weight going forward. Kind regards, Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Aaron D. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 11:05:35 PM Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out? ___ _ Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
Interesting and I like Karol Grecki's suggestion about using __call() to
provide $model-insert() as an alternative to $this-_gateway-insert()
With Bill's comments and Sam's approach. I've found myself arriving at this
example. Is it viable? Any comments?
|-- controllers
|-- models
| |-- Product
| | |-- Abstract.php (My_Model_Record_Interface. isValid(), getTitle())
| | |-- Gateway.php (Zend_Table_Abstract or other data resource)
| | |-- HouseKeeping.php (Product_Abstract. Special use cases)
| | `-- MonthlyStats.php (Product_Abstract. Special use cases)
| `-- Product.php (Product_Abstract. General CRUD usage)
`-- views
Regards,
Mark Maynereid
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 00:35, Sam Davey wrote:
Hi Mark,
I've just finished refactoring my design using the feedback from my
original post. I'll describe what I've done which might help you... or
others can stop me in my tracks and tell me I'm going the wrong way about
it.
First here is a simplified version of my structure
|-- controllers
|-- models
|
| |-- Product.php
| |-- Product
| |
| | |-- Gateway.php
| |
| |-- Manufacturer.php
| |-- Manufacturer
| |
| | |-- Gateway.php
| |
| |-- Distributor.php
| |-- Distributor
| |
| | |-- Gateway.php
|
|-- views
Using the PEAR naming convension and folder structure this illustrates 6
classes Product and Product_Gateway, Manufacturer and Manufacturer_Gateway,
Distributor and Distributor_Gateway.
Basicaly my original models which extended the Zend_Db_Table have now been
turned into Gateways to speak to the specific related table. These look
something like this:
class Product_Gateway extends Zend_Db_Table
{
protected $_name = 'product';
private $_pager = NULL;
public function findByFilter($fValues, $perPage=NULL,
$offset=NULL)
{
// Custom find method which is why Zend_Db_Table was
extended
}
}
So currently my Product model only contains the following code
class Product
{
public function gateway()
{
return new Product_Gateway();
}
}
Now in my controller, in the ever present add, edit and delete actions I
simply use the following code
$this-model = new Product();
$this-model-gateway()-insert($data); // or -update($data), or
-delete($data)
There is obviously data validation/filtering needed in the controller to
prepare the data. But these two lines deal with the database via the
gateway.
Does this sound like an okay method to others? I realise it could be
abstracted further via the factory method to serve gateway objects, that
way other gateway classes could be created to save to flat files or XML
etc. But thats not really necessary for my application.
In answer to my original question about more complicated things such as
data required from joins etc... after further investigation of Prados
rather complex solution and in light of Bill's respose and Bryce's $0.02...
it looks like anything related to this issue should just be whacked in the
Product model... its looking sparce now anyway.
The reason I'm so interested is because a large proportion of my job
involves creating reports for people based on our data. Loads of reports,
and currently just in individual scripts away from any MVC architectue...
each with their own queries and perhaps queries within queries.
If moving over to MVC it looks like the queries and sub queries for all
these reports should just be shoved in corresponding models? Am I right?
[fw-general] Temperature conversions
I was trying out the temperature conversions and I realized I was
getting the wrong values. I looked at Zend/Measure/Temperature.php and
it seems the math is incorrect. Currently:
'CELSIUS'= array(array('' = 1, '+' = 274.15),'°C'),
'FAHRENHEIT' = array(array('' = 1, '-' = 32, '/' = 1.8,
'+' = 273.15),'°F'),
Should be:
'CELSIUS'= array(array('' = 1, '+' = 273.15),'°C'),
'FAHRENHEIT' = array(array('' = 1, '+' = 459.67, '/' = 9,
'*' = 5 ),'°F'),
I am incorrect about this? I'm assuming I'm missing something or
atleast doubt I'm the first person to catch it.
--Belmin
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
I've had a question about this too, though specifically it doesn't really deal with pulling one book. I was wondering what solutions people have for wanting to pull a set of books (to use the earlier example) from a category (say, biography) and then limit the list (for paging). I had guessed that the solution would be to get the relevant category row, then pull all the books for that category, (findManyToManyRowset) but there doesn't seem to be a clean way to limit the books. I'm most likely missing something. brian
[fw-general] Zend_Db_*_Oracle comments
I have been exploring ZF to implement for my client and found a few interesting things that I thought might be of interest to others using the Oracle oci8 driver. While not really broken, the support for the Oracle oci8 driver does appear to be missing a few useful / convenient features: The Zend_Db_Oracle driver ignores the 'host' parameter. This is only an issue when PHP is compiled with Oracles instant client which need not use TNS. For instance the following $dsn throws the following exception TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified Fails: $dsn = array( 'host' ='myhost', 'username' = 'zend', 'password' = 'zend', 'dbname'= 'xe', 'options' = $options ); This is not surprising since the instant client does not use TNS as stated. To get this to work you need to prepend the 'dbname' parameter with the host name, which although easy to do is not very intuitive. Works: $dsn = array( 'host' = 'totally ignored', 'username' = 'zend', 'password' = 'zend', 'dbname'= 'myhost/xe', 'options' = $options ); Perhaps this could be fixed in the next minor release? It would be backward compatible, and it would support the claim that Zend Core for Oracle is optimized for Oracle Database 10g client libraries. Support for different ports (other than the default 1521) in the options array would also be nice to have. (Creole for example supports both these features) Zend_Db_Statement_Oracle This class states that it does not support case folding due to a limitation of the Oci8 driver. The driver may not support case folding, but after a quick review of the code I was curious as to why this was not emulated, at least for results being returned as an associative array (objects would not be much of a stretch either)? This would be a great feature to have and save those looking for this feature from having to call the array_change_key_case() function on every row returned :-) Finally, curiosity has me pondering why the name of the public method Zend_Db_Statement_Oracle::_execute() is public. Should this not be a protected method since Zend_Db_Statement_Oracle::_prepare() is protected and neither appear to be designed to be called from a different scope? Craig Duncan
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
I create my models, and then spit the data to a View Helper called Table Render This table render utilises PEAR Structures so I can expose the data in many different ways, including an HTML table, CSV, XML, Excel, PDF etc. Just another abstraction layer to help with reporting, it also does paging, filtering and header ordering Would be nice if Zend could create somthing similar to this that binds in with the framework Ian Brian Caspe wrote: I've had a question about this too, though specifically it doesn't really deal with pulling one book. I was wondering what solutions people have for wanting to pull a set of books (to use the earlier example) from a category (say, biography) and then limit the list (for paging). I had guessed that the solution would be to get the relevant category row, then pull all the books for that category, (findManyToManyRowset) but there doesn't seem to be a clean way to limit the books. I'm most likely missing something. brian
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
I started following the gateway() approach then read the next posts. I'm thinking about making a model class and extending my models from that. The model class will have all the db_table methods like insert, update etc. My models will then all extend from the model class so that they have all the original table methods available. In the constructor or some init method or something they will set the corresponding db_table object for use. On 7/12/07, Ian Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I create my models, and then spit the data to a View Helper called Table Render This table render utilises PEAR Structures so I can expose the data in many different ways, including an HTML table, CSV, XML, Excel, PDF etc. Just another abstraction layer to help with reporting, it also does paging, filtering and header ordering Would be nice if Zend could create somthing similar to this that binds in with the framework Ian Brian Caspe wrote: I've had a question about this too, though specifically it doesn't really deal with pulling one book. I was wondering what solutions people have for wanting to pull a set of books (to use the earlier example) from a category (say, biography) and then limit the list (for paging). I had guessed that the solution would be to get the relevant category row, then pull all the books for that category, (findManyToManyRowset) but there doesn't seem to be a clean way to limit the books. I'm most likely missing something. brian
Re: [fw-general] Temperature conversions
The translation maths are from onlineconversions.com...
I could hardly believe that they would not see this sort of failure in their
data because they are there since several years and were one of the first.
Maths:
1 Celsius equals 274,15 Kelvin
1 Fahrenheit equals (-32/1.8) + 273,15 Kelvin
I see no failure here.
And the standard unit has no  included...
Sorry, but I dont see any problem on the mentioned lines.
To say it once more for all...
We can not expect what you mean...
We are no clairvoyants...
PLEASE PROVIDE ENOUGH DATA FOR REPRODUCTION
Greetings
Thomas
I18N Team Leader
- Original Message -
From: Belmin Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:41 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Temperature conversions
I was trying out the temperature conversions and I realized I was
getting the wrong values. I looked at Zend/Measure/Temperature.php and
it seems the math is incorrect. Currently:
'CELSIUS'= array(array('' = 1, '+' = 274.15),'°C'),
'FAHRENHEIT' = array(array('' = 1, '-' = 32, '/' = 1.8,
'+' = 273.15),'°F'),
Should be:
'CELSIUS'= array(array('' = 1, '+' = 273.15),'°C'),
'FAHRENHEIT' = array(array('' = 1, '+' = 459.67, '/' = 9,
'*' = 5 ),'°F'),
I am incorrect about this? I'm assuming I'm missing something or
atleast doubt I'm the first person to catch it.
--Belmin
Re: [fw-general] header and footer
Hi Paulo, From: Paulo Nei [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:50:51 PM Subject: Re: [fw-general] header and footer Thank you. Now it is more clear... Hope ZF will adopt standard ways to do this. I was seeking for something like Tiles (Java), that is commonly used with Struts; or like layouts in Ruby on Rails (that are based on naming conventions). Regards, Paulo Zend_View Enhanced's implementation of Layouts and Placeholders is a template based approach which works a little like the Tiles tag library in Jakarta. It's still a bit like comparing Apples and Oranges given the implementation differences, but the use of Placeholders in ZVE allows for some similar effects to Tiles - see the use cases on Layouts in my proposal (pretty simple use cases but the potential is there for more intricate uses). If ZVE layouts are adopted I'd be more comfortable allowing for some more intricate usage of Placeholders to provide a more Tiles-like system for those familiar with how it works in Struts. For now ZVE has a more simple minded approach where everything is declared within templates, and not much up-front declaration as you'd normally see if using the Tiles :insert tag. Best regards, Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Hey Paddy, I have time for this now, perhaps it would be good to start getting out thoughts on there? Ill go first (if the wiki is up) ;) Pádraic Brady wrote: Hi Mark, When I checked it last, Ralph had yet to post a response there. If he does, and assuming the Wiki is up of course ;), I'll post another response and set a second question. Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 9:37:13 AM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule Is this still happening? http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend_View+Enhancement+VS+Zend_Layout+Throwdown I've never been to a Throwdown. Of course it's on the Wiki so right now I can't check it. Regards, Mark On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:54, Pádraic Brady wrote: Hi, Just to clarify what Layout means? - I'm being told elsewhere that Zend_Layout is being accepted but I assume there's no proposal acceptance yet. I mean we have three varying methods of doing layouts - Zend_View Enhanced, Zend_Layout, and Matthew's Two-Step View - which differ primarily in how and where in the V and C they are executed. It got lost a while back in all the noise generated by the debate between me and Ralph which ended rather abruptly on the list but I'd like to see some consideration towards implementing both. The reasoning is simple enough - both are non-conflicting methods and each facilitates a preferred MVC practice in the community. Both current proposals are also not equal in scope and goals - another point seemingly lost is that Layouts is just one part of Zend_View Enhanced proposes. Those of us preferring View Helpers for reading Models into a View would usually prefer a simpler decorator approach in Zend_View that leaves the Controller out of the equation - we don't really want to be forced to use a multiple Controllers in place of a simple 25 line decorator nor to return to the status quo where we have to subclass Zend_View, adopt a Two-Step View (another custom plugin) or just take a leap and replace it altogether. Contrary to the growing belief, both Layout strategies shouldn't be considered as being in competition. I said very early on that implementing both could be a major plus to the community, and this should be given some weight going forward. Kind regards, Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Aaron D. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 11:05:35 PM Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out? ___ _ Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48225/*http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.phpwherever you're surfing.
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
No, I don't see Zend_Layout as accepted as is, and I have not been told that. In all truthfulness, I've expressed a concern to Matthew that the development of such component, be it spearheaded by a community member or not, be completely visible to the community as much as possible throughout the process. It can be argued that both proposals have merits. In fact, I didnt fully appreciate the use of partials until I saw your implementation, as an example. At the end of the day, I think it can be said that we all want the best solution. And in finding the best solution, we need to identify where this solution will exist, be it a Composite component in the top level pseudo-namespace, or as a hard coupled feature of an existing component (like the view or the controller, andi mentioned Zend_View_Layout). Whatever the answer, it needs to be scale-able and flexible, and also not loose sight that this framework can AND WILL be used in more environments than just the Web/http. preferred MVC practice in the community. Both current proposals are also not equal in scope and goals - another point seemingly lost is that Layouts is just one part of Zend_View Enhanced proposes. I am hoping this is addressed in the development process. Contrary to the growing belief, both Layout strategies shouldn't be considered as being in competition. I said very early on that implementing both could be a major plus to the community, and this should be given some weight going forward. I actually kinda agree here. BTW. If both implementations were to be implemented, there would have to be a very clear and consise guide to deciding which to use and when, as YES, they both do suit semi-overlapping but different needs. -ralph
Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule
Hi Ralph, Fire away ;), I'll be back online this evening and can likely post a response. The wiki is up for now - how long that lasts is hard to say... Ralph vs Confluence! Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Ralph Schindler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pádraic Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zend Framework General fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 4:50:06 PM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule Hey Paddy, I have time for this now, perhaps it would be good to start getting out thoughts on there? Ill go first (if the wiki is up) ;) Pádraic Brady wrote: Hi Mark, When I checked it last, Ralph had yet to post a response there. If he does, and assuming the Wiki is up of course ;), I'll post another response and set a second question. Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 9:37:13 AM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Release Schedule Is this still happening? http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend_View+Enhancement+VS+Zend_Layout+Throwdown I've never been to a Throwdown. Of course it's on the Wiki so right now I can't check it. Regards, Mark On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:54, Pádraic Brady wrote: Hi, Just to clarify what Layout means? - I'm being told elsewhere that Zend_Layout is being accepted but I assume there's no proposal acceptance yet. I mean we have three varying methods of doing layouts - Zend_View Enhanced, Zend_Layout, and Matthew's Two-Step View - which differ primarily in how and where in the V and C they are executed. It got lost a while back in all the noise generated by the debate between me and Ralph which ended rather abruptly on the list but I'd like to see some consideration towards implementing both. The reasoning is simple enough - both are non-conflicting methods and each facilitates a preferred MVC practice in the community. Both current proposals are also not equal in scope and goals - another point seemingly lost is that Layouts is just one part of Zend_View Enhanced proposes. Those of us preferring View Helpers for reading Models into a View would usually prefer a simpler decorator approach in Zend_View that leaves the Controller out of the equation - we don't really want to be forced to use a multiple Controllers in place of a simple 25 line decorator nor to return to the status quo where we have to subclass Zend_View, adopt a Two-Step View (another custom plugin) or just take a leap and replace it altogether. Contrary to the growing belief, both Layout strategies shouldn't be considered as being in competition. I said very early on that implementing both could be a major plus to the community, and this should be given some weight going forward. Kind regards, Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com - Original Message From: Aaron D. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 11:05:35 PM Subject: [fw-general] Release Schedule I see the roadmap, with some of the future things to be implemented in ZF, but is there a release schedule? Specifically I'd like to see when Zend_Layout is coming out. I was told it would be included in 1.1, but when is that due out? ___ _ Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48225/*http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.phpwherever you're surfing. Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
[fw-general] RE: Bug in Zend_Mail?
Daniel Freudenberger wrote: Okay finally I think a solution should be very simple. Changing the line ending from lf to crlf in Zend_Mime solves the problem. I guess the php windows mail() function expects the content to use crlf as line ending?! what exactly do you mean with Changing the line ending from lf to crlf in Zend_Mime? changing it in the zend library itself? all instances of lf in Zend_Mime? i have similar problems which constantly lead to: Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Mail_Protocol_Exception' with message '451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. ' in D:\adat\awebsites\ev-manager\mvc-site\lib\Zend\Mail\Protocol\Abstract.php:351 the solution for setBodyText was, to change from quoted printable to ENCODING_7BIT. but as soon as i attach a picture with base64 or any other encoding, i get the error. thanx mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bug-in-Zend_Mail--tf4004989s16154.html#a11544339 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Models, Objects and RDBMS - Best Practise
Okay I ended up with something like this
Class My_Model
{
private $_gateway;
private $_gatewayClass;
protected function gateway(){
$this-_gateway = ($this-_gateway) ? $this-_gateway : new
$this-_gatewayClass();
return $this-_gateway;
}
public function insert($data){
$gateway = $this-gateway();
$gateway-insert($data);
}
public function delete($where){
$gateway = $this-gateway();
$gateway-delete($where);
}
//other db_table functions such as insert and delete
}
class Category_Gateway extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract
{
protected $_name = 'categories';
}
Class Category extends My_Model
{
protected $_gatewayClass = 'Category_Gateway';
public function someSpecialFunction($column){
//special queries
}
}
Then of course I can do stuff like this
$category = new Category();
$category-insert($someArray);
$category-someSpecialFunction($someColumn);
Haven't tested the above. What I have is close to that though. Anything
seriously wrong?
On 7/12/07, Dylan Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started following the gateway() approach then read the next posts.
I'm thinking about making a model class and extending my models from that.
The model class will have all the db_table methods like insert, update
etc.
My models will then all extend from the model class so that they have all
the original table methods available. In the constructor or some init method
or something they will set the corresponding db_table object for use.
On 7/12/07, Ian Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I create my models, and then spit the data to a View Helper called Table
Render
This table render utilises PEAR Structures so I can expose the data in
many different ways, including an HTML table, CSV, XML, Excel, PDF etc.
Just another abstraction layer to help with reporting, it also does
paging, filtering and header ordering
Would be nice if Zend could create somthing similar to this that binds
in with the framework
Ian
Brian Caspe wrote:
I've had a question about this too, though specifically it doesn't
really deal with pulling one book. I was wondering what solutions
people have for wanting to pull a set of books (to use the earlier
example) from a category (say, biography) and then limit the list (for
paging).
I had guessed that the solution would be to get the relevant category
row, then pull all the books for that category, (findManyToManyRowset)
but there doesn't seem to be a clean way to limit the books. I'm most
likely missing something.
brian
Re: [fw-general] header and footer
-- Paulo Nei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 11:50 AM -0300): Hope ZF will adopt standard ways to do this. I was seeking for something like Tiles (Java), that is commonly used with Struts; or like layouts in Ruby on Rails (that are based on naming conventions). Layout support of one sort or another is scheduled for 1.1.0. Please subscribe to fw-mvc if you are interested so you can view announcements regarding the progress, and hopefully test it out during development! Rob Allen escreveu: Paulo Nei wrote: Hi, I wanna put header footer in all view templates. But with ZF I don't got an easy way to do it: You need what's generally known as a Two Step view. There are multiple ways to do it: 1. Front Controller plugin. http://www.nabble.com/Controller-and-View-Question-tf3462561.html 2. Zend_Layout proposal. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Layout 3. Zend_View Enhanced proposal. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33071 4. Extend ViewRenderer directly. http://akrabat.com/2007/06/02/extending-viewrenderer-for-layouts/ The wiki is down again, so I could have got the links to 2 and 3 wrong! Regards, Rob... -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Temperature conversions
But according to the 'Temperature.php' library
1 C = 275,15 K
1F = -1.7E+25 K (as oppose to onlineconversions.com that
says 255.92778 K)
Again, I might be missing something but that is what I'm getting.
Should I post code? Maybe I'm doing it incorrectly. Can someone else
test this?
On 7/11/07, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The translation maths are from onlineconversions.com...
I could hardly believe that they would not see this sort of failure in their
data because they are there since several years and were one of the first.
Maths:
1 Celsius equals 274,15 Kelvin
1 Fahrenheit equals (-32/1.8) + 273,15 Kelvin
I see no failure here.
And the standard unit has no  included...
Sorry, but I dont see any problem on the mentioned lines.
To say it once more for all...
We can not expect what you mean...
We are no clairvoyants...
PLEASE PROVIDE ENOUGH DATA FOR REPRODUCTION
Greetings
Thomas
I18N Team Leader
- Original Message -
From: Belmin Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:41 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Temperature conversions
I was trying out the temperature conversions and I realized I was
getting the wrong values. I looked at Zend/Measure/Temperature.php and
it seems the math is incorrect. Currently:
'CELSIUS'= array(array('' = 1, '+' = 274.15),'°C'),
'FAHRENHEIT' = array(array('' = 1, '-' = 32, '/' = 1.8,
'+' = 273.15),'°F'),
Should be:
'CELSIUS'= array(array('' = 1, '+' = 273.15),'°C'),
'FAHRENHEIT' = array(array('' = 1, '+' = 459.67, '/' = 9,
'*' = 5 ),'°F'),
I am incorrect about this? I'm assuming I'm missing something or
atleast doubt I'm the first person to catch it.
--Belmin
Re: [fw-general] view auto quoting
-- Kai Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Wednesday, 11 July 2007, 10:13 PM +0200):
does the view/view-helper do quoting automatically?
No, though there is a facility to do so by registering filters.
view-helper.php
?php
class Zend_View_Helper_JsConstant {
public function jsConstant($name, $value) {
echo 'script type=text/javascriptvar ' . $name . ' = ' .
Zend_Json::encode($value).';/script' . \n;
}
}
the value is printed with quotes and the json-quotes are escaped.
any idea who does this quoting and where to turn it off?
Not happening in Zend_View, unless you're registering any filters with
the Zend_View object. It may be happening in Zend_Json::encode(), but it
should only be occurring if the value is a string.
How are you calling the helper? simply as:
? $this-jsConstant() ?
or are you wrapping it in escape():
?= $this-escape($this-jsConstant()) ?
If the latter (escape), then omit the call to escape().
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input and accessing values that is not validated
Hi all.
I am having troubles with the new Zend_Filter_Input.
It is quite possible that I've missed something obvious, but here is my
problem.
?php
require_once 'Zend/Filter/Input.php';
$values = array(
'test' = '22',
'test2' = '22'
);
$filters = array('*'= 'Digits');
$validators = array('test2' = 'Digits');
$input = new Zend_Filter_Input($filters, $validators, $values);
echo pre;
var_dump($input-test);
var_dump($input-test2);
echo /pre;
?
This gives me:
NULL
string(2) 22
How can I access the filtered value of test, without adding a validator
for it?
(If I add test to the list of validators, it works).
Best regards,
Bjarte
[fw-general] Re: Zend_Filter_Input fields meta command with arrays problem
Guess I need to submit a bug report? Noone has any thoughts?
Josh
Joshua Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am having a problem with Zend_Filter_Input when attempting to validate
an array of values using the fields meta command. What happens is that
ZFI passes the array of values to my filter which correctly returns true
and then ZFI passes each value separately which fails. Here is my
code(simplified) pretty much straight from the doc:
$validators = array('password_check' = array('StringEquals',
'presence' = 'required',
'fields' = array('password0', 'password1'));
$input = new Zend_Filter_Input(array(), $validators,
$this-getRequest()-getPost());
$input-addNamespace('Local_Validate');
if (!$input-isValid()) {
}
What happens is StringEquals is called three times, once with an array,
and once with each string. Some debug output dumping the value passed to
my StringEquals validator produces the following:
array(2) {
[password0] = string(9) Testing1!
[password1] = string(9) Testing1!
}
string(9) Testing1!
string(9) Testing1!
So I looked into ZFI and it appears it handles arrays of fields (line 720
in ZF 1.0.0 v5344) but then it continues to evaluate all fields in the
data array *seperately* validating it against the current validator chain
which happens to be the validator StringEquals which only validates
arrays... which of course returns false.
Basically, it appears either I am missing something or having the fields
meta command set to an array will not work if the validator validates
that the value is in fact an array. Anyone else come across this?
Should my validator simply return true if the value is not an array? I'm
not sure I care too much for that work around. To me, if you pass the
fields meta command with an array value it should only validate the
array, not each seperately. Any help is appreciated,
Thanks
Josh
The following if stmt fixes the issue:
// Added the below if check
if (1 == count($validatorRule[self::FIELDS])) {
if (!$validatorRule[self::VALIDATOR_CHAIN]-isValid($value)) {
$this-_invalidMessages[$validatorRule[self::RULE]] =
$validatorRule[self::VALIDATOR_CHAIN]-getMessages();
$this-_invalidErrors[$validatorRule[self::RULE]] =
$validatorRule[self::VALIDATOR_CHAIN]-getErrors();
unset($this-_validFields[$fieldKey]);
$failed = true;
if ($validatorRule[self::BREAK_CHAIN]) {
return;
}
}
Re: [fw-general] view auto quoting
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
Not happening in Zend_View, unless you're registering any filters with
the Zend_View object. It may be happening in Zend_Json::encode(), but it
should only be occurring if the value is a string.
no filters registered at all. double-checked via
var_dump($this-getFilters());
How are you calling the helper? simply as:
$this-roles is array from db-select
json() is kindof shortcut to Zend_Json::encode
?php $this-jsVar('ROLES', json($this-roles)); ?
which results in:
script type=text/javascriptvar ROLES =
{\Writer\:{\role\:\Writer\}};/script
full helper-source:
?php
class Zend_View_Helper_JsVar {
public function jsVar($name, $value) {
echo 'script type=text/javascript';
echo 'var ' . $name . ' = ';
echo json($value);
echo ';';
echo '/script';
echo \n;
}
}
the whole thing is quoted twice and it seems to be the view's fault.
i have several ajax-controller which have no views and directly output
the json-objects in the actionAction()-methods like so:
echo json($db-selected-stuff);
it works as expected.
in the view-script the output is messed/quoted up and i have *no* idea
where to look for this strange behaviour.
any ideas?
kai
Re: [fw-general] view auto quoting
it works when directly outputting in the view-script *without* the helper like: script type=text/javascript var SNAME = ?php echo session_name(); ?; var SID = ?php echo session_id(); ?; var ROLES = ?php echo json($this-roles); ?; /script yours, kai
Re: [fw-general] Searching database
Hi josé! What kind of search should this be? Full-Text or matching (LIKE %$string% ) ? For Like execute a simple Query select . from . LIKE %$string% limit ... for full text i strongly recommend google-searching - many good articles about it =) (i think also zend has sth in their tutorials-section ... It was when I viewed it in Beginner Tutorials - Using MySQL Full-text- ... (26.01.06 ^^) I hope i helped ya out! regards 2007/7/11, José de Menezes Soares Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi friends, I would like to make a search for search user details in my database, how do I start with it? Best regards, José de Menezes
Re: [fw-general] Searching database
oh ... ;)
do a if(isset($_GET['query']) { .. make you search and display the results
} else {
show the question-form
}
regards
2007/7/11, José de Menezes Soares Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
if a type http://localhost/search?query=123, its ok
but if I type http://localhost/search it shows a notice undefined index
2007/7/11, José de Menezes Soares Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i want matching...
but i try to get $query = $_GET[query]
and there appears a message:
*Notice*: Undefined index: query in
*C:\www\was\application\controllers\FuncionariosController.php
* on line *81
*
2007/7/11, ViShap [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Hi josé!
What kind of search should this be? Full-Text or matching (LIKE
%$string% ) ?
For Like execute a simple Query select . from . LIKE %$string% limit
...
for full text i strongly recommend google-searching - many good
articles about it =)
(i think also zend has sth in their tutorials-section ...
It was when I viewed it in Beginner Tutorials - Using MySQL
Full-text- ... (26.01.06 ^^)
I hope i helped ya out!
regards
2007/7/11, José de Menezes Soares Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi friends,
I would like to make a search for search user details in my
database, how do I start with it?
Best regards,
José de Menezes
[fw-general] consultants?
Hi guys, Apologies in advance if this is not the place for this type of message, feel free to delete it if so. My company is making a move from old code to a more framework oriented, standardized solution. (We'd like to bring in outside help, and our non-standard way of doing things takes more time to spin them up than get the work done). So, we're attempting to move to the ZF so hopefully the MVC-ness of it will allow people to come in and contribute more easily. So, we're actually looking for someone to come to the office, and teach us a bit to get us started on this. Specifically the Model part of the MVC, but overall education is the goal. :) We're a Pittsburgh based company, and if anyone reading this has some time (and patience), and wants to try to make some money, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any inquiries for further information. Thanks - hoopes
Re: [fw-general] view auto quoting
Hi,
Kai Meder wrote:
$this-roles is array from db-select
json() is kindof shortcut to Zend_Json::encode
?php $this-jsVar('ROLES', json($this-roles)); ?
which results in:
script type=text/javascriptvar ROLES =
{\Writer\:{\role\:\Writer\}};/script
full helper-source:
?php
class Zend_View_Helper_JsVar {
public function jsVar($name, $value) {
echo 'script type=text/javascript';
echo 'var ' . $name . ' = ';
echo json($value);
echo ';';
echo '/script';
echo \n;
}
}
the whole thing is quoted twice and it seems to be the view's fault.
in the call to $this-jsVar you pass a JSON encoded value, which is a
string.
In the helper function you encode the $value a second time, hence the
escaped string.
Removing one off the json() call's will fix it.
Kind regards
Stefan
Re: [fw-general] consultants?
a quick tip: 1. use google and inform about MVC - there is a big amout of articles about it - and they are really good. 2. read the manuals of Zend Framework - they are (in most cases ;) ) very infomrative! 3. look at tutorials like the one from akrabat.com or the other ones listed and linked in the Debelopment-area of the zf-webpage! 4. read a little bit into the code and the start is very very easy =) regards 2007/7/11, Hoopes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, Apologies in advance if this is not the place for this type of message, feel free to delete it if so. My company is making a move from old code to a more framework oriented, standardized solution. (We'd like to bring in outside help, and our non-standard way of doing things takes more time to spin them up than get the work done). So, we're attempting to move to the ZF so hopefully the MVC-ness of it will allow people to come in and contribute more easily. So, we're actually looking for someone to come to the office, and teach us a bit to get us started on this. Specifically the Model part of the MVC, but overall education is the goal. :) We're a Pittsburgh based company, and if anyone reading this has some time (and patience), and wants to try to make some money, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with any inquiries for further information. Thanks - hoopes
[fw-general] fw-all list broken?
Hi, I am subscribed to fw-general, fw-announce and fw-all, but I only receive emails from general and announce, even though there are messages being posted in the other mailing lists that should be covered by fw-all. Anyone know why? Thanks, -- Jack
Re: [fw-general] consultants?
I think, if your system is running and you won´t change the database (Mysql to oracle for ex) the Database-Models are not needed (thats what I think ;) ) As Bill said, if you need someone doing things for you or supporting your start, the jobs-offers @ zend-page will be a good start! Otherwise: study the manual, read some code, look at the forums and maillists to read into the framework. AND: ASK! We are helping new interested people - for sure =) But say what concrete problem you have and we can solve it =) also its a good idea to search the nabble-pages for already asked questeions! me and myself - can´t even think about doing this job for you ... I have work for 2 months 24/7 here at my list ... sry ;) regards
Re: [fw-general] fw-all list broken?
No, but I have the same problem. I subscribed to fw-mvc separately, just so I didn't miss anything there...Do we just need to sign up for everything separately? Jack Sleight wrote: Hi, I am subscribed to fw-general, fw-announce and fw-all, but I only receive emails from general and announce, even though there are messages being posted in the other mailing lists that should be covered by fw-all. Anyone know why? Thanks,
[fw-general] Session data getting erased on another page
I am seeing a strange behavior using zend session. Here is what I have in my bootstrap: require( 'Zend/Session.php' ); Zend_Session::start(); On the login page, I am storing user-id in session (my own implementation, not using zend-auth): $_SESSION[ 'auth' ][ 'user' ] = $id; I can print_r the session on the login page and see the value is assigned. On surfing to another page, I see the value assigned to session-auth-user above is gone and the page is getting redirected to the login page again. What am i doing worng? Thanks, matt
[fw-general] Tutorial on session/auth/acl
I could not find a tutorial that integrates session/auth/acl. The manual in alphabetic is not that useful. Somebody please send me a link to any tutorials.
