[fw-general] question about URL parameters after controller/action
i have the controller Thumb with the action resizeAction(), but for example if i have www.domain.tld/thumb/resize/some/other/params - is there a methods that returns the parameter part of the url (some/other/params) ? i find only the action module and controller settings inside the request object, the only way would be to parse the url and remove action&controller part... isn't there a smarter solution ? - best regards, Truppe Steven
Re: [fw-general] Damn wiki is down!
Alexander Johannesen wrote: > > On 8/26/07, till <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And what about installing Mediawiki? It has to be more stable when >> wikipedia uses it. > > We've been using JIRA and Confluence together under heavy load with > heaps of plugins and custom scripts and templates, and I have it yet > to go down on me after 3 years, except when updating the software. I > think there's something else at play here, possibly conflicts within > the same Tomcat context, or even JVM params. > For what it's worth, back at USC the IT department setup a Confluence server for by other departments/classes. It never had a very high load (I think my class was the only one that used it), but it was constantly going down. At one point it was bad enough that the professor just told everybody to write everything in a text editor, including edits to existing pages (just in case), and batch everything up until the next time the server was available. As to how much of this was Confluence's fault and how much was USC's fault, I couldn't tell you. But it's certainly not the first time I've seen a Confluence installation act this way. -- Trevor Johns http://tjohns.net -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Damn-wiki-is-down%21-tf4329386s16154.html#a12331523 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Damn wiki is down!
On 8/26/07, till <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what about installing Mediawiki? It has to be more stable when > wikipedia uses it. We've been using JIRA and Confluence together under heavy load with heaps of plugins and custom scripts and templates, and I have it yet to go down on me after 3 years, except when updating the software. I think there's something else at play here, possibly conflicts within the same Tomcat context, or even JVM params. Alex -- --- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps -- http://shelter.nu/blog/
Re: [fw-general] Damn wiki is down!
On Aug 25, 2007, at 4:23 PM, till wrote: On 8/26/07, Drew Bertola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: About half the time I need to check out the wiki, it's down. Any more permanent solutions on the way? And the issue system has been down too. :-( To throw in my 2¢... The fact that Confluence and JIRA always go down together suggests to me that Zend has installed the WAR/EAR versions in a shared J2EE app server, Tomcat, if memory serves. I maintain my own installation of JIRA -- but use the standalone distribution -- and have never had even a single hour of downtime that was not self-inflicted (messing with config files, installing plugins, etc.). Have you guys considered simply using the standalone JIRA and Confluence distributions? I know it's not as efficient to maintain two JVMs, but if it increases stability, surely that's an acceptable trade-off. If performance becomes an issue, you could always split one of the services onto a dedicated server since they're proxied anyway. -- Willie Alberty, Owner Spenlen Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spenlen.com/
Re: [fw-general] Damn wiki is down!
On 8/26/07, Drew Bertola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > About half the time I need to check out the wiki, it's down. Any more > permanent solutions on the way? Sorry to chip in here, and I know you guys are busy and so on, but it's been down all day I think. (At least my day - CET) Not that I (personally) require anyone to permanently check this, especially on a Saturday, but would it be possible setup Nagios or for example purchase services from Pingdom (0) (cheap + easy to setup) so whoever is in charge of the server gets an SMS when it's down. And what about installing Mediawiki? It has to be more stable when wikipedia uses it. And the issue system has been down too. :-( Can't the Confluence people help you guys? I mean, it looks bad for them as well when their software constantly has hickups. It's not like the current performance makes a great case study. Cheers, Till 0, http://www.pingdom.com/
[fw-general] Damn wiki is down!
About half the time I need to check out the wiki, it's down. Any more permanent solutions on the way? -- Drew Bertola - * PHP/LAMP Consultant, ZCE-1000 * * * * Tel: 408-966-6671 * * * * current resume: * * http://drewb.com/resume.pdf * -
Re: [fw-general] New Zend_Form Proposal
Today I've been working on updating the proposal by writing documentation on how to use my current implementation. Unfortunately the Wiki was (and is) down, so I couldn't update the proposal itself. Hopefully the documentation will give some more insight on how I want the _Form to work. The documentation, together with the (working :) implementation, can be found in this SVN repo: http://tools.assembla.com/svn/zfcomponents/ Jurriën On 08 Aug 2007, at 09:51, Simon Mundy wrote: Hi Jurriën At first glance I can see some immediate improvements over mine and Ralf's proposal. One thing particularly that interested me was the idea of an MVC helper that could be responsible for telling a form what data it has received by interacting with the Request object - this would address a concern that Martel had about performance and properly separating the logic from the presentation, rule processing and filtering. However as a long-term proposition I think that the Form should allow population and creation by means other than just integration - it should be able to stand alone. I'm not a huge fan of the factory - I think we'd lose a lot of the graceful class extension by forcing a factory class upon it and then supply user paths, prefixes, etc. that could be avoided by inheritance. I am still a big fan of the Zend_Db_Table approach, whereby methods such as 'init()', 'preDispatch', 'postDispatch' etc could be leveraged to allow a self-contained 'static' class (i.e. the logic is hardcoded into the Form Model) or to build a dynamic form from a config file. I'd like to flesh out these ideas in my head a little - I started trying to recode my original proposal but a) time got away and b) wanted to get the component leaders to respond as well so we can, as you say, get some good community feedback. Look forward to the email ping-pong Jurriën! :) Cheers Hi all, A few days ago I posted a new Zend_Form proposal. It takes a somewhat different approach than Simon & Ralf's proposal. It has been discussed a few times on #zftalk, but I feel that it could really use some community input. Please read it and comment on it at: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=36061 Thanks! Jurriën -- Simon Mundy | Director | PEPTOLAB """ " "" "" "" "" """ " "" " " " " "" "" " 202/258 Flinders Lane | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 Voice +61 (0) 3 9654 4324 | Mobile 0438 046 061 | Fax +61 (0) 3 9654 4124 http://www.peptolab.com
[fw-general] controller request get query problem
Hi.
I've encountered this problem while trying to retrieve GET query
variables from a request like this:
http://server/users/test/?name=inash&a=list
>From the action when I try $this->_request->getQuery('name'), it
doesn't return anything. Neither when I try getQuery with no
parameters, which should return all the get query variables.
My installation is ZendCore 2.0.1, Zend Framework 1.0.0 on IIS 6 with
Isapi Rewrite.
PS. and I couldn't access the wiki and issues. It gives a forward proxy error.
Cheers.
--
Inash Zubair
