[fw-general] ZF-2900
Hi All We have just come up against the issue as found in http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2900 whilst using 1.6.0 RC2 and the Zend_Rest_Client What is the recommended way to approach this? I can see 2 possible solutions currently 1. Create a validator for all TLD's (.com / .net / .org etc) 2. Allow an optional parameter to be passed to Zend_Uri::factory which allows the ability to disable validation What are the thoughts here? Regards Marco
Re: [fw-general] Status of Zend_Build / scaffolding
Hi Keith, thanks for the links. I was looking at Zend_Tool the other day and got lost somehow while reading it. So I will need to take a much closer look soon. I will also keep an eye on the development list. Thanks and best regards, Ralf
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input and Arrays
I was a little to quick with my idea of wrapping $value into an array. Apparently it is not that easy :). But still overwriting _validateRule and _filterRule is the right way to solve it in a custom solution. The permanently best thing however would be to write a patch that factors out array handling into a Strategy and propose it to the Zend Framework developers. Let's see if I find the time to do this. Christopher -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Filter_Input-and-Arrays-tp17131495p18992433.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input and Arrays
Kevin McArthur-2 wrote: > > Is there a way to validate array inputs with Zend_Filter_Input? > [...] > This info might be in the manual, but I can't seem to locate it. > Hej Kevin, if it's not in the Manual, read the code :). I also wanted to validate and filter arrays and I found that the way Zend_Filter_Input handles arrays is determined in the methods _validateRule and_filterRule. I have to mention that these investigations are based on SVN Revision 6309, 2007-09-11 20:38:27Z. In _validateRule you can find is_array($field) and in _filterRule you can find is_array($this->_data[$field]). This is the point where Zend_Filter_Input distinguishes normal values and arrays. The way Zend_Filter_Input actually handles arrays is that it applies the validation or filter to every element of the array. However it only handles 1-dimensional arrays. In case of multidimensional arrays it passes the arrays of the second dimension to the validators and filters. This can lead to some nasty bugs if you are not perfectly aware of this. For example Zend_Validate_Alpha casts the value it is supposed to validate to a string. If the value is an array it is cast to the string 'Array' which of course passes the alpha validation eventhough an array is not clearly alpha, especially if it contains numbers like array(5). I plan to extend Zend_Filter_Input in order to enable array validation and filtering. My idea is to overwrite the methods _validateRule and _filterRule in a subclass. The simplest way to allow array validation and filtering would be if the methods just wrap the value into an additional array like array( $value ) and pass it to the parent method. This way Zend_Filter_Input would always pass the real value to validators and filter, since it only recurses the first dimension. However this leaves the bug described above which makes some validators falsely accept arrays as valid. This could be countered by making the new methods _validateRule and _filterRule distinguish filters and validators, which can handle arrays from those which cannot and then react in some way in case of a problem. The distinction could for example be done by making array-aware validators and filters implement a certain interface. I haven't yet thought this through completely. I hope this helps :). Best regards Christopher -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Filter_Input-and-Arrays-tp17131495p18992326.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] ZF-3946 Zend_Form_Element_Submit ignores setValue()
In Jira, it says that 1.6.0RC2 is affected. I'm using 1.5.3 and I am affected by it as well. -- Thank you, Micah Gersten onShore Networks Internal Developer http://www.onshore.com
Re: [fw-general] Zend Db Table Relation on Oracle database
dying.angel wrote:
>
> is there a setting in the Zend DB initialization or somewhere that can
> convert the "?" To the oracle binding form (":bindName").
>
No, sorry, the ? placeholder is hard-coded and it is not configurable. This
is a design oversight.
If you use PDO adapters (Zend_Db_Adapter_Pdo_Oci), it should support both ?
and :bindName parameters for Oracle.
Regards,
Bill Karwin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Db-Table-Relation-on-Oracle-database-tp18987000p18987759.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Test and dispatching
Thanks, this will give me something to look at to make it work like I want. On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:24:54 +0300, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zend_Test still uses the entire dispatch sequence, which includes routing. Currently, the router overwrites the request with what it discovers in the environment -- using defaults if nothing is found. So, this is why your experiment didn't work. This tells me that we need to perhaps make one or more changes: * router and/or routes should not overwrite the module/controller/action unless actually found * modify Zend_Test's dispatch() method to use a null router when no URL is provided These changes should be discussed, however; each has benefits and each has problems.
[fw-general] Clear out a session from Zend_Session?
How would I go about clearing out a session within Zend_Session? I don't want to completely destroy it. I want to empty it out. A $_SESSION=null correlation with Zend_Session. The reason is, I have a site that we're debugging and QA'ing. I use Zend_Session to store user based information that is held based on incoming parameters. I would like to be able to clear a session out every time the script makes a query for a user's data (thus clearing out any old information from a past user). >From my understanding of Zend_Session::destroy() it renders the current session unsuable afterwards. I want to say Zend_Session::clear() and then keep using $this->session->myData --- Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gpcentre.net/
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Test and dispatching
-- Jani Hartikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 14 August 2008, 09:05 PM +0300):
> Is it possible to use the request parameters to dispatch
> to a specific controller with Zend_Test? For some reason it
> wouldn't work for me unless I provided an url.
>
> For example:
>
> $this->request->setModuleName('foo');
> $this->request->setControllerName('foo');
> $this->request->setActionName('foo');
> $this->dispatch();
>
> would not work. However, the following:
>
> $this->dispatch('/foo/foo/foo');
>
> worked just fine.
>
> I was wondering if there's something I was doing
> wrong or what could possibly affect the dispatching,
> if it should work with the above set*Name methods too.
>
>
> The reason I wanted to test without the exact url
> is because the url could change depending on the routing,
> but the modules etc. should always stay the same.
Zend_Test still uses the entire dispatch sequence, which includes
routing. Currently, the router overwrites the request with what it
discovers in the environment -- using defaults if nothing is found.
So, this is why your experiment didn't work. This tells me that we need
to perhaps make one or more changes:
* router and/or routes should not overwrite the
module/controller/action unless
actually found
* modify Zend_Test's dispatch() method to use a null router when no URL
is provided
These changes should be discussed, however; each has benefits and each
has problems.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
[fw-general] Zend Db Table Relation on Oracle database
Hello All,
First of all, I'm sorry for my english :)
I don't know if this question is already questioned or not, if it is please
kindly point me the direction.
I'm building my app with ZF 1.5, and trying to adopt the Table Gateway Pattern
that ZF provide with the Model / Zend DB Table Relation. But I can't applly the
findParentRow functions to the oracle, because the bind parameter is always
question mark / "?", is there a setting in the Zend DB initialization or
somewhere that can convert the "?" To the oracle binding form (":bindName").
Thanks.
Wishnu
--
(;^o^)-~ o O 0
[fw-general] Zend_Test and dispatching
Is it possible to use the request parameters to dispatch
to a specific controller with Zend_Test? For some reason it
wouldn't work for me unless I provided an url.
For example:
$this->request->setModuleName('foo');
$this->request->setControllerName('foo');
$this->request->setActionName('foo');
$this->dispatch();
would not work. However, the following:
$this->dispatch('/foo/foo/foo');
worked just fine.
I was wondering if there's something I was doing
wrong or what could possibly affect the dispatching,
if it should work with the above set*Name methods too.
The reason I wanted to test without the exact url
is because the url could change depending on the routing,
but the modules etc. should always stay the same.
--
Jani Hartikainen
http://codeutopia.net/
Re: [fw-general] Modules and Shared functionality
Hi Simon, SiCo007 schrieb: I am kind of in the same boat here, I find it frustrating that ZF doesn't handle or suggest a use of models. I fully understand why mind you now I have investigated, a model is essentially what anyone wants it to be!! Well, that's a very differently handled issue. Most PHP programmers treat models like the connection of a db to controllers. But from a design view they could be virtually anything, indeed they are a *Model* of your requirements. And for that how you would integrate a model of everything into a general framework like ZF? You can't. It seems to me that a lot is put into the controller in the docs and the framework as a whole but that most of the actual work should actually happen in the model! It should, yes. A controller is best viewed as an application that uses stuff from the model. If you create another client beside HTTP, like a CLI it should use the same functionality out of the model. That's the easiest way to see a model and a controller: the model is the core of your application, the controller is just your application layer, your API to the core. I would like to see a base class and maybe a best practice / example in the docs as a getting started, it's been my biggest hurdle choosing what metodology (read opinion) to follow over model useage!! Like I said before: there a billion different applications and many thousand clients possible. So how you could make a base class for every one of it? You easily can't. Google for stuff like modelling domains, layered architectures and application design. A three-layer application could be seen as: Top: UI, Webpage, CLI, API, Whatever client Middle (Core): your concrete application Bottom: Infrastructure (DB, Filesystem, Mails, XML,...) That's a minimum layered application. If you want to know where a specific method or class belongs in, you could ask yourself: "Do all clients have to use this method?". If the answer is yes, it is a core functionality and belons to the middle layer. If there are differences betweens clients (e.g. a CLI can't use web forms) it belongs to the top layer. That's the responsibility of a controller (or helper classes) of MVC then, and to delegate the work and make calls to the core.
[fw-general] Building a MVC-based Soap server
Hi there
I´m trying to build a soap server using the ZF MVC architeture, but I can´t
get it to work.
I have a Service model used as a gateway between the soap server and the
application logic.
class Services
{
/**
* Verify user credentials
*
* @param string $username
* @param string $password
* @return bool
*/
public function authenticate($username, $password)
{
// code to authenticate
}
}
On the other part, I have a ServiceController which I setup the wsdl
autodiscover and server
class ServiceController extends Zend_Controller_Action
{
public function wsdlAction()
{
$wsdl = new Zend_Soap_Wsdl();
$wsdl->setClass('Services');
$wsdl->handle();
exit;
}
public function serverAction()
{
$server = new Zend_Soap_Server('http://myhost.com/service/wsdl/');
$server->setClass('Services');
$server->handle();
exit;
}
}
Up to now everything works as expected, when I access
http://myhost.com/service/wsdl/ I get the XML describing the Service class.
Now comes the problem: I can´t make any requests to the server. Here´s what
I´m trying:
$client = new Zend_Soap_Client('http://myhost.com/service/server'); //
tryied http://myhost.com/service/wsdl/ too with no success
Zend_Debug::dump($client->authenticate('user', 'pass');
But the service is never called.
What I´m doing wrong?
Thank you
Re: [fw-general] Modules and Shared functionality
-- SiCo007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 14 August 2008, 02:50 AM -0700): > I am kind of in the same boat here, I find it frustrating that ZF doesn't > handle or suggest a use of models. I fully understand why mind you now I > have investigated, a model is essentially what anyone wants it to be!! > > I do think though as I progress that a model base class should be made with > a way to add helpers much like action helpers. Please note that there _is_ a proposal in the works for models: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=41564 I would suggest that you make your comments there for now. > I am going to do this now, using much of the action helper code as > guidance so that it should work in the ZF way. I've done the action > helper to load the models that's easy enough it's everything that goes > with it that seems to duplicate things already done for the action. > > It seems to me that a lot is put into the controller in the docs and the > framework as a whole but that most of the actual work should actually happen > in the model! It should -- and you could also claim that everything but Zend_Controller, Zend_Layout, and Zend_View can be used to support the Model. ;) > I would like to see a base class and maybe a best practice / example in the > docs as a getting started, it's been my biggest hurdle choosing what > metodology (read opinion) to follow over model useage!! Trust me, we plan on doing this. Please review the proposal linked above, and comment from there. Regardless of whether or not we adopt the proposal, we _will_ be documenting best practices in coming months. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Modules and Shared functionality
I am kind of in the same boat here, I find it frustrating that ZF doesn't handle or suggest a use of models. I fully understand why mind you now I have investigated, a model is essentially what anyone wants it to be!! I do think though as I progress that a model base class should be made with a way to add helpers much like action helpers. I am going to do this now, using much of the action helper code as guidance so that it should work in the ZF way. I've done the action helper to load the models that's easy enough it's everything that goes with it that seems to duplicate things already done for the action. It seems to me that a lot is put into the controller in the docs and the framework as a whole but that most of the actual work should actually happen in the model! I would like to see a base class and maybe a best practice / example in the docs as a getting started, it's been my biggest hurdle choosing what metodology (read opinion) to follow over model useage!! - Simon http://www.ajb007.co.uk/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Modules-and-Shared-functionality-tp18952739p18978746.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] Status of Zend_Build / scaffolding
I think those proposals may have been superseded by the new Zend_Tool_*, someone correct me if I am wrong. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Tool+-+General There is a separate development list here: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/zf-tool/ Check it out, there is currently a push to get feedback on the proposals. Keith Pope Web Developer -Original Message- From: Ralf Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 August 2008 08:51 To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Status of Zend_Build / scaffolding Hi, just a quick question. What is the current status of Zend_Build or any other initiative to get some scaffolding facilities for the Zend Framework? http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Build+-+Wil+Sinclair http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Controller_Front_Scaffold Thanks and best regards, Ralf -- allpay.net Limited, Fortis et Fides, Whitestone Business Park, Whitestone, Hereford, HR1 3SE. Registered in England No. 02933191. UK VAT Reg. No. 666 9148 88. Telephone: 0870 243 3434, Fax: 0870 243 6041. Website: www.allpay.net Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the allpay.net Information Security Manager at the number above.
[fw-general] Status of Zend_Build / scaffolding
Hi, just a quick question. What is the current status of Zend_Build or any other initiative to get some scaffolding facilities for the Zend Framework? http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Build+-+Wil+Sinclair http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Controller_Front_Scaffold Thanks and best regards, Ralf
