Re: [fw-general] HowTo Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase + Zend_Session
2008/9/11 Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've a application bootstrap which relies on Zend_Session. And I want to test controllers with the new (not so) Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase. The problem is that Zend_Session is static: I also have opened a topic in the fw-mvc list blaming the presence of so many static classes in the framework components. Obviously you can reset some of them, like Zend_Test_* does with the front controller and the helper broker, but to me it feels like a workaround; also it means Zend_Session and other classes has to be aware of testing, while a class should have only one resposibility. -- Giorgio Sironi Piccolo Principe Ossigeno Scripter http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/ossigeno
[fw-general] Zend_Dojo_Form errors
1. Request object error
If you have errors in the request object when trying to make your forms to
use dojo, here is some clue. Dojo dijits uses some html templates and
.htaccess usually is not prepared for this.
.htaccess code:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule !\.(js|ico|gif|jpg|png|css|html)$ index.php
2. There is some error in the distribution that I have from zf. 1.6
I jave requests to this path:
http://zf.mysite.com/js/dojo/dijit/form/nls/en/validate.js
But then english version of this script is not there, is in the parent
folder.. just the english one.
http://zf.mysite.com/js/dojo/dijit/form/nls/validate.js
Can someone point how to make a good compilation of the dojo library so we
wont have this problems?
3. I want to validate a text field for emails. The below sintax is correct
as Zend_Dojo_Form_Element inherits from regular Zend_Form_Element to which I
can add validators for email. This means that dojo should make use of this
validator on user side or I have to add a special validator plugin of Dojo
itself in order to do the validation?
$email = new Zend_Dojo_Form_Element_TextBox( 'email' );
$email
-setLowercase( true )
-setMaxLength(40)
-setFilters(
array(
new Zend_Filter_StringToLower(),
new Zend_Filter_StringTrim()
)
)
-setLabel('Email')
-addValidator( new Zend_Validate_EmailAddress())
-setRequired( true )
;
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Dojo_Form-errors-tp19453531p19453531.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Problem with Zend_View initialisation...
Hi List,
I have a problem with my custom class of Zend_View.
In my bootstrap, i have instanciate a plugin wich initialize the
application like the Pastebin app of Matthew.
But i have a problem :
in my initView method of my plugin :
public function initView()
{
/*
* View
/
$view = new App_View_Page();
$view-setEncoding('UTF-8');
$view-doctype('XHTML1_TRANSITIONAL');
$view-strictVars(); // enables tracking/detection of typos and
misspelled variables in views
$view-headTitle('App');
$view-headTitle()-setSeparator(' - ');
$view-addHelperPath(BASE_PATH .
'/application/library/ZymFramework/Zym/View/Helper', 'Zym_View_Helper');
$view-addHelperPath(BASE_PATH .
'/application/library/ZymFrameworkIncubator/Zym/View/Helper',
'Zym_View_Helper');
$view-addHelperPath(BASE_PATH .
'/application/library/My/Lib/View/Helper', 'My_Lib_View_Helper');
$view-addHelperPath(BASE_PATH .
'/application/application/code/App/View/Helper', 'App_View_Helper');
$view-locale = Zend_Registry::get('locale');
Zend_Dojo::enableView($view);
$view-dojo()-enable()
-addStyleSheetModule('dijit.themes.tundra')
-setCdnBase(Zend_Dojo::CDN_BASE_GOOGLE)
-setDjConfigOption('parseOnLoad', true)
-setDjConfigOption('usePlainJson', true)
-setDjConfigOption('locale', (string) ResaSystem::getLocale())
-setDjConfigOption('isDebug', ($this-env == 'production')
? false : true);
/*
* ViewRenderer
/
$viewRenderer = new
Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_ViewRenderer($view);
$viewRenderer
-setViewBasePathSpec(BASE_PATH . '/application/design/views')
-setViewScriptPathSpec(':module/:controller/:action.:suffix')
-setViewSuffix('phtml');
Zend_Debug::dump(get_class($viewRenderer-view));
$viewRenderer-init();
Zend_Debug::dump(get_class($viewRenderer-view));
Zend_Controller_Action_HelperBroker::addHelper($viewRenderer);
/*
* Layout
/
$layout = Zend_Layout::startMvc($this-config-layout);
$layout-setView($view);
return $this;
}
But i met an error like this :
Error
exception 'Zend_View_Exception' with message 'script 'error/failure.phtml' not
found in path (/var/htdocs/app/application/modules/default/views/scripts/)' in
/var/htdocs/app/library/ZendFramework/Zend/View/Abstract.php:875
Stack trace:
#0
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/View/Abstract.php(783):
Zend_View_Abstract-_script('error/failure.p...')
#1
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Action/Helper/ViewRenderer.php(921):
Zend_View_Abstract-render('error/failure.p...')
#2
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Action/Helper/ViewRenderer.php(942):
Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_ViewRenderer-renderScript('error/failure.p...',
NULL)
#3
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Action/Helper/ViewRenderer.php(981):
Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_ViewRenderer-render()
#4
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Action/HelperBroker.php(171):
Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_ViewRenderer-postDispatch()
#5
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Action.php(512):
Zend_Controller_Action_HelperBroker-notifyPostDispatch()
#6
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Dispatcher/Standard.php(293):
Zend_Controller_Action-dispatch('failureAction')
#7
/var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/library/ZendFramework/Zend/Controller/Front.php(946):
Zend_Controller_Dispatcher_Standard-dispatch(Object(Zend_Controller_Request_Http),
Object(Zend_Controller_Response_Http))
#8 /var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/application/ResaSystem.php(195):
Zend_Controller_Front-dispatch()
#9 /var/htdocs/resasystem.com/light/public/index.php(9):
Bootstrap::run('development')
#10 {main}
In my Bootstrap :
$initPlugin = new App_Controller_Plugin_Initialize(APPLICATION_ENV);
/***
* Le front controller
***/
Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance()
-registerPlugin($initPlugin, 1)
-registerPlugin($localePlugin, 2)
-registerPlugin($navigationPlugin, 3);
In few words, it seems that my view renderer is destruct and replace by
a new one.
Can someone helps me ?
Thanks :)
[fw-general] [Paginator] several paginators per page + other issues
Hi list, First, I'm wondering if it's possible to have several paginators in the same page (I want to display them in the same page, but in different tabs). I'm asking this question because the example paginator control scripts use $this-previous (for instance), so I was thinking that several paginators per page could lead to conflicts. If the answer is no, is there a known workaround? Second question: I have a strange behaviour with the view variables. In my controller's init() method I declare a few view variables (ex: $this-view-trans = new Translator()) and I can't manage to access them in the paginator control script. I've tried to make a var_dump($this) and $this has the type MyView (which is fine, MyView is a custom class that inherits from Zend_View). But I get an error if I write $this-trans-some_method(), telling me Call to a member function some_method() on a non-object NB: Yes, I do a $paginator-setView($this-view) in my controller. Cheers, Olivier -- - *Olivier RICORDEAU* - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fw-general] Problem with Zend_View initialisation...
I think you should also check in the bootstrap for an existing dispatch check plugin which checks the request object and if it founds it malformed redirects this error controller/failure action. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-Zend_View-initialisation...-tp19453716p19454175.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Class attribute of label and element
If you are constructing the element with Zend_Form_Element you can use
$element-setAttrib('class', false );
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Class-attribute-of-label-and-element-tp19429978p19454369.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] [Paginator] several paginators per page + other issues
Hi Olivier, Olivier Ricordeau wrote: Hi list, First, I'm wondering if it's possible to have several paginators in the same page (I want to display them in the same page, but in different tabs). I'm asking this question because the example paginator control scripts use $this-previous (for instance), so I was thinking that several paginators per page could lead to conflicts. If the answer is no, is there a known workaround? I've recently implement paginator ( in simple use only 1 element by page ). I have put it in top and bottom inside my view and I've not found any trouble with them. in the view ?php echo $this-paginationControl($this-paginator, 'Jumping', 'paginator.phtml'); ? paginator.phtml is like the template found in docs. Second question: For this one I've no idea ... yet :-) I have a strange behaviour with the view variables. In my controller's init() method I declare a few view variables (ex: $this-view-trans = new Translator()) and I can't manage to access them in the paginator control script. I've tried to make a var_dump($this) and $this has the type MyView (which is fine, MyView is a custom class that inherits from Zend_View). But I get an error if I write $this-trans-some_method(), telling me Call to a member function some_method() on a non-object NB: Yes, I do a $paginator-setView($this-view) in my controller. Cheers, Olivier -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl 2830 Vellerat - Switzerland Tél : ++41 32 435 7171 Fax : ++41 32 435 7172 gsm : ++41 78 802 6760 www.ioda-net.ch Centre de Formation et de Coaching En Ligne www.cfcel.com
Re: [fw-general] HowTo Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase + Zend_Session
Bruno -- I sent an email yesterday, but I don't see it in the archives, so I'll ask again: Can you send both the bootstrap you use, the controller being tested, and the test case? It's really hard to debug when I don't have the information needed to reproduce the issue. I know that Zend_Test works fine with sessions, as the example I developed for the documentation -- the login form example -- utilizes Zend_Session, and works. The issue here is likely something to do with either (a) whitespace appearing before or after a class definition, or (b) the environment you setup for your application. Both are correctible. -- Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Thursday, 11 September 2008, 06:53 PM +0200): Bruno Friedmann wrote: I'm facing a problem how to do this. I've a application bootstrap which relies on Zend_Session. And I want to test controllers with the new (not so) Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase. It's the first time I've to do this so excuse me for the newb questions. I've follow the documentation and also the Mathew post blog and wiki. On a simple Hello world example tests are working nicely. (not too difficult, but just here to prove the env is correctly setup) So when I launch my test on the complicate bootstrap I've received this error : PHPUnit 3.2.21 by Sebastian Bergmann. IndexControllerTest E Time: 0 seconds There were 1 errors: 1) testIndexAction(IndexControllerTest) Zend_Session_Exception: Session must be started before any output has been sent to the browser; output started in /usr/share/php5/PEAR/PHPUnit/Util/Printer.php/139 /ioda/data/web-include/ZF/library.160/Zend/Session/Namespace.php:116 /home/bruno/workspace/socketfinder/sf/ZfApplication.php:155 /home/bruno/workspace/socketfinder/sf/ZfApplication.php:118 /home/bruno/workspace/socketfinder/sf/ZfApplication.php:98 /home/bruno/workspace/socketfinder/sf/tests/Sf/controllers/IndexControllerTest.php:22 I'm pretty sure I would have to do some sort of ouput_buffering but google was not my friend today. It only give me what phpunit session conference I've missed. Any path to a solution or any advice are welcome. Ok a little step futher I've found that we can change this. Zend_Session::$_unitTestEnabled = true; but I've always a error ... testIndexAction(IndexControllerTest) Undefined variable: _SESSION /ioda/data/web-include/ZF/library.160/Zend/Session.php:522 /ioda/data/web-include/ZF/library.160/Zend/Session.php:448 /ioda/data/web-include/ZF/library.160/Zend/Session/Namespace.php:116 /home/bruno/workspace/socketfinder/sf/ZfApplication.php:156 -- Bruno Friedmann -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] HowTo Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase + Zend_Session
-- Giorgio Sironi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Friday, 12 September 2008, 12:21 PM +0200): 2008/9/11 Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've a application bootstrap which relies on Zend_Session. And I want to test controllers with the new (not so) Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase. The problem is that Zend_Session is static: We are well aware of Zend_Session's shortcomings, and have plans to rewrite it for 2.0. It's basically impossible to test in its current state, and over-engineered. (No, I did _not_ write it.) I had to place some really ugly hacks in it to get it to work for testing with Zend_Test. I also have opened a topic in the fw-mvc list blaming the presence of so many static classes in the framework components. Obviously you can reset some of them, like Zend_Test_* does with the front controller and the helper broker, but to me it feels like a workaround; This is something we also hope to address in 2.0. However, there are definitely some good reasons to have the front controller a singleton, and I haven't heard any truly compelling arguments for it not to be. Same goes for the helper broker. If you or others can suggest a design that meets the requirements of these components, I'm all ears, and welcome your input -- but just saying it's hackish and/or stinks doesn't really further the dialog. also it means Zend_Session and other classes has to be aware of testing, while a class should have only one resposibility. See above. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Dojo_Form errors
-- valugi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Friday, 12 September 2008, 03:50 AM -0700):
1. Request object error
If you have errors in the request object when trying to make your forms to
use dojo, here is some clue. Dojo dijits uses some html templates and
.htaccess usually is not prepared for this.
.htaccess code:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule !\.(js|ico|gif|jpg|png|css|html)$ index.php
I posted a message to this list a couple days ago regarding this. Use
the following rewrite rule instead:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -s [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -l [OR]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d
RewriteRule ^.*$ - [NC,L]
RewriteRule ^.*$ /index.php [NC,L]
2. There is some error in the distribution that I have from zf. 1.6
I jave requests to this path:
http://zf.mysite.com/js/dojo/dijit/form/nls/en/validate.js
But then english version of this script is not there, is in the parent
folder.. just the english one.
http://zf.mysite.com/js/dojo/dijit/form/nls/validate.js
Can someone point how to make a good compilation of the dojo library so we
wont have this problems?
First off, can you send an HTML document that displayes this error for
me? I cannot reproduce it currently. Just save the HTML source of the
page that shows the issue.
Second, there are two ways you can get a Dojo release build:
* go into the util/buildscripts/ subdirectory of the Dojo
installation, and run './build_release.sh'. This will create a Dojo
release build in the release/ subdirectory. Use that build for your
application
* download a build from the Dojo website
3. I want to validate a text field for emails. The below sintax is correct
as Zend_Dojo_Form_Element inherits from regular Zend_Form_Element to which I
can add validators for email. This means that dojo should make use of this
validator on user side or I have to add a special validator plugin of Dojo
itself in order to do the validation?
First off, ZF validators are server-side only; we have not implemented
any functionality to translate them to Dojo client-side validations.
This is for many reasons: no 1:1 correspondence between most ZF
validators and Dojo validation constraints; users can write custom ZF
validators, and we have no mechanisms for hinting to Dojo how to
interpret those.
So, this brings me to the second point: you'll have to use a dijit that
*can* perform validations. TextBox does not. I'd use ValidationTextBox,
and then provide it with a regExp property with a minimal regex for
vlaidating an email address:
$email = new Zend_Dojo_Form_Element_TextBox( 'email' );
becomes:
$email = new Zend_Dojo_Form_Element_ValidationTextBox( 'email'
);
$email
-setLowercase( true )
-setMaxLength(40)
add this:
-setRegExp('[EMAIL PROTECTED],4}\b')
-setFilters(
array(
new Zend_Filter_StringToLower(),
new Zend_Filter_StringTrim()
)
)
-setLabel('Email')
-addValidator( new Zend_Validate_EmailAddress())
-setRequired( true )
;
and done.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Problem with Zend_View initialisation...
-- Apsy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Friday, 12 September 2008, 01:04 PM +0200):
I have a problem with my custom class of Zend_View.
In my bootstrap, i have instanciate a plugin wich initialize the
application like the Pastebin app of Matthew.
But i have a problem :
in my initView method of my plugin :
public function initView()
{
/*
* View
/
$view = new App_View_Page();
snip: view configuration
/*
* ViewRenderer
/
$viewRenderer = new
Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_ViewRenderer($view);
$viewRenderer
-setViewBasePathSpec(BASE_PATH . '/application/design/views')
-setViewScriptPathSpec(':module/:controller/:action.:suffix')
-setViewSuffix('phtml');
Zend_Debug::dump(get_class($viewRenderer-view));
$viewRenderer-init();
Here's the problem, right there. init() will initialize a DIFFERENT view
object. What you want to do is add your already initialized view object
to the view renderer:
$viewRenderer-setView($view);
and then things should work as expected
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
[fw-general] Singletons.
I want to make an application (like a library) embedded in another application both using ZendFramework. My problem is that in the embedded application I can't use the functionality of the singleton classes of ZendFramework because I don't know how or who is using them. There is a way to solve this ? Thanks in advance [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Singletons.-tp19457005p19457005.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] [Paginator] several paginators per page + other issues
Hi, the paginators if set up as per the manual use partials, I may be wrong as I've never used partials except for the paginator, the idea is that the paginator lives within it's own space. Therefore it doesn't in heirt your view variables just the variables you tell it to. If you look at the paginator code it allows you to pass parameters to the partial in the calling display method (I believe it's the last parameter). These will then be accessible in your partial as their own variable. Like I say though I may be wrong as I've never gone any more advanced than just passing a string to the paginator. Olivier Ricordeau wrote: I have a strange behaviour with the view variables. In my controller's init() method I declare a few view variables (ex: $this-view-trans = new Translator()) and I can't manage to access them in the paginator control script. I've tried to make a var_dump($this) and $this has the type MyView (which is fine, MyView is a custom class that inherits from Zend_View). But I get an error if I write $this-trans-some_method(), telling me Call to a member function some_method() on a non-object NB: Yes, I do a $paginator-setView($this-view) in my controller. Cheers, Olivier - Simon http://www.ajb007.co.uk/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Paginator--several-paginators-per-page-%2B-other-issues-tp19453883p19457129.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] HowTo Zend_Test_PHPUnit_ControllerTestCase + Zend_Session
2008/9/12 Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-- Giorgio Sironi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Friday, 12 September 2008, 12:21 PM +0200):
I also have opened a topic in the fw-mvc list blaming the presence of
so many static classes in the framework components. Obviously you can
reset some of them, like Zend_Test_* does with the front controller
and the helper broker, but to me it feels like a workaround;
This is something we also hope to address in 2.0. However, there are
definitely some good reasons to have the front controller a singleton,
and I haven't heard any truly compelling arguments for it not to be.
Same goes for the helper broker. If you or others can suggest a design
that meets the requirements of these components, I'm all ears, and
welcome your input -- but just saying it's hackish and/or stinks doesn't
really further the dialog.
Singletons are enemy of unit testing because they carry state around
the application. This state is bad because every test should be
independent of the others. That's the reason why the front controller
is reset in every setUp().
I think Zend_Controller_Front is currently a singleton because it has
to be globally accessible.
A rapid `grep -r Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance library/Zend/`
gives interesting results, for instance some helpers:
library/Zend/Controller/Action/Helper/Redirector.php
library/Zend/View/Helper/Url.php
This is a circular reference: how the helpers are supposed to be Unit
tested if they depends on the entire object graph of the application?
I think the request, response, router etc. objects can be injected by
a factory owned by the front controller (or passed in the dispatcher).
The helper broker is registered as the $_helper property of every
controller dispatched, so putting a HelperList object as a public
property of the front controller can help the dispatcher to produce a
new broker to put in the controller choosed.
The main flow of the application will be something like:
class Application
{
$front = new Zend_Controller_Front();
$front-helpers-add(...) //$front-getHelperList() if you want
$front-getRequest()-add(array($_GET, $_POST, $_FILES, ...)); //
exagerating,
// but superglobals are
also a global point of access
$front-dispatch();
}
..
class AUnitTestCase
{
$request = new Zend_Controller_Request(..);
$helper = new Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_ActionStack($request, ...);
}
..
class AIntegrationTestCase
{
$app = new Application();
$app-getFront()-getRequest()-add(// .. whatever you want
$app-dispatch('/');
$this-assertQuery($app-getResponse(), );
}
(These are only examples of what I think can improve the unit
testability of components and applications).
More discussion forthcoming..
--
Giorgio Sironi
Piccolo Principe Ossigeno Scripter
http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/ossigeno
RE: [fw-general] Models and folder grouping
I followed you up to a point.
1) I didn't have modules in my layout. But given the size of this project
it makes sense so I reorganized my folder structure to use models (this
alone may make organization much easier the more I think about it)
2) I had to add a $paths[] = $moduleDir; so that I could access forms
3) $row =
Project::getModel('Acl/Users')-fetchRow($user-select()-where('user_name =
?', $form-getValue('username')));
Returns an error: Fatal error: Call to a member function fetchRow() on a
non-object in
C:\wamp\www\el-cel\application\modules\User\controllers\IndexController.php
on line 126
My layout was (in part)
- application
- - modules
- - - user
- - - - models
- - - - - acl
- - - - - - users.php
RE: [fw-general] Models and folder grouping
See, I think I was a bit unclear with my approach. It's a bit different.
Here's how I organized it:
The actual layout turns out as follows during the forloop:
/app
/app/modules
/app/modules/core
/app/modules/core/models -- Added to inclusion path during the forloop
/app/modules/core/models/Core
/app/modules/core/models/Core/User.php
/app/modules/payment
/app/modules/payment/models -- Added to inclusion path during the forloop
/app/modules/payment/models/Payment
/app/modules/payment/models/Payment/Securepay.php
However, now I have the ability to create a new object of
Payment_Securepay().
= Payment_Securepay === Payment/Securepay.php
I did this for a couple reasons:
1.) Now I have the ability to reflect the table payment_securepay accurately
( without having to make modifications ).
The php_inclusion path has already been set during the forloop of my
directory:
Project::register('original_include_path', get_include_path());
\$paths[] = BP . DS . 'app' . DS . 'modules';
\$paths[] = BP . DS . 'lib';
\$dir = new DirectoryIterator(Project::getRoot().DS.'modules');
foreach(\$dir as \$file){
if (\$file-isDot() || !\$file-isDir()) {
continue;
}
--- ( HERE)\$paths[] = \$file-getPathname().DS.'models';
}
set_include_path( implode(PS, \$paths) . PS .
Project::registry('original_include_path'));
2. ) I also now can separate my models into various modules. ( obviously )
3.) My little trick was nothing more than a simple way to utilize the models
a different way
For example,
Project::getModel('core/session', array('name'='something'))-start();
This will do...
1.) require_once 'Core/Session.php';
2.) pass array('name'='something')
3.) calls start method on the returning object.
For you:
The Acl/Users call should request:
/app
/app/modules
/app/modules/acl
/app/modules/acl/models -- Added to inclusion path during the forloop
/app/modules/acl/models/Acl
/app/modules/acl/models/Acl/Users.php
which will be...
class Acl_Users extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract
which then ofcourse,
table acl_users...
Let me know if you still are having issues.
-jk
Ghrae wrote:
I followed you up to a point.
1) I didn't have modules in my layout. But given the size of this project
it makes sense so I reorganized my folder structure to use models (this
alone may make organization much easier the more I think about it)
2) I had to add a $paths[] = $moduleDir; so that I could access forms
3) $row =
Project::getModel('Acl/Users')-fetchRow($user-select()-where('user_name
=
?', $form-getValue('username')));
Returns an error: Fatal error: Call to a member function fetchRow() on a
non-object in
C:\wamp\www\el-cel\application\modules\User\controllers\IndexController.php
on line 126
My layout was (in part)
- application
- - modules
- - - user
- - - - models
- - - - - acl
- - - - - - users.php
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Models-and-folder-grouping-tp19412763p19458055.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] Models and folder grouping
Also, i would do...
admin/models/admin/acl/user.php
which represents the table admin_acl_user. Making a module out of the ACL
Player should be grouped into an administration module. ( atleast thats how
i see it ).
-jk
jkush1121 wrote:
See, I think I was a bit unclear with my approach. It's a bit different.
Here's how I organized it:
The actual layout turns out as follows during the forloop:
/app
/app/modules
/app/modules/core
/app/modules/core/models -- Added to inclusion path during the forloop
/app/modules/core/models/Core
/app/modules/core/models/Core/User.php
/app/modules/payment
/app/modules/payment/models -- Added to inclusion path during the forloop
/app/modules/payment/models/Payment
/app/modules/payment/models/Payment/Securepay.php
However, now I have the ability to create a new object of
Payment_Securepay().
= Payment_Securepay === Payment/Securepay.php
I did this for a couple reasons:
1.) Now I have the ability to reflect the table payment_securepay
accurately ( without having to make modifications ).
The php_inclusion path has already been set during the forloop of my
directory:
Project::register('original_include_path',get_include_path());
\$paths[] = BP . DS . 'app' . DS . 'modules';
\$paths[] = BP . DS . 'lib';
\$dir = new DirectoryIterator(Project::getRoot().DS.'modules');
foreach(\$dir as \$file){
if (\$file-isDot() || !\$file-isDir()) {
continue;
}
--- ( HERE) \$paths[] = \$file-getPathname().DS.'models';
}
set_include_path( implode(PS, \$paths) . PS .
Project::registry('original_include_path'));
2. ) I also now can separate my models into various modules. ( obviously )
3.) My little trick was nothing more than a simple way to utilize the
models a different way
For example,
Project::getModel('core/session', array('name'='something'))-start();
This will do...
1.) require_once 'Core/Session.php';
2.) pass array('name'='something')
3.) calls start method on the returning object.
For you:
The Acl/Users call should request:
/app
/app/modules
/app/modules/acl
/app/modules/acl/models -- Added to inclusion path during the forloop
/app/modules/acl/models/Acl
/app/modules/acl/models/Acl/Users.php
which will be...
class Acl_Users extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract
which then ofcourse,
table acl_users...
Let me know if you still are having issues.
-jk
Ghrae wrote:
I followed you up to a point.
1) I didn't have modules in my layout. But given the size of this
project
it makes sense so I reorganized my folder structure to use models (this
alone may make organization much easier the more I think about it)
2) I had to add a $paths[] = $moduleDir; so that I could access forms
3) $row =
Project::getModel('Acl/Users')-fetchRow($user-select()-where('user_name
=
?', $form-getValue('username')));
Returns an error: Fatal error: Call to a member function fetchRow() on a
non-object in
C:\wamp\www\el-cel\application\modules\User\controllers\IndexController.php
on line 126
My layout was (in part)
- application
- - modules
- - - user
- - - - models
- - - - - acl
- - - - - - users.php
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Models-and-folder-grouping-tp19412763p19458155.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Models and folder grouping
I think the most elegant way is to create your Loader
// in the bootstrap
require_once 'Zend/Loader.php';
Zend_Loader::registerAutoload( 'My_Loader' );
//Your class in library
class My_Loader
{
public static function loadClass( $class)
{
// autodiscover the path from the class name
}
}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Models-and-folder-grouping-tp19412763p19458193.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] [Paginator] several paginators per page + other issues
Hi Olivier, I can confirm what Bruno and Simon have already said. You may have multiple pagination controls per page. Note that the $this referenced in the view partial is not the Zend_View instance, but a separate object containing values for previous, next, etc. Thus you would not be able to access any variables from the view instance. As noted by Simon, the final parameter of the PaginationControl helper is reserved for user parameters. A variety of documentation updates are forthcoming. -Matt On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Olivier Ricordeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi list, First, I'm wondering if it's possible to have several paginators in the same page (I want to display them in the same page, but in different tabs). I'm asking this question because the example paginator control scripts use $this-previous (for instance), so I was thinking that several paginators per page could lead to conflicts. If the answer is no, is there a known workaround? Second question: I have a strange behaviour with the view variables. In my controller's init() method I declare a few view variables (ex: $this-view-trans = new Translator()) and I can't manage to access them in the paginator control script. I've tried to make a var_dump($this) and $this has the type MyView (which is fine, MyView is a custom class that inherits from Zend_View). But I get an error if I write $this-trans-some_method(), telling me Call to a member function some_method() on a non-object NB: Yes, I do a $paginator-setView($this-view) in my controller. Cheers, Olivier -- - *Olivier RICORDEAU* - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fw-general] One simple problem tooks me 2 hour- hope it will help someone..
Now i have similar(or not) issue.
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Loader_PluginLoader_Exception' with
message 'Plugin by name LoggedInUser was not found in the registry.
I have in application/views/helpers/ file LoggedInUser.php
?php
class Zend_View_Helper_LoggedInUser
{
protected $_view;
function setView($view)
{
$this-_view = $view;
}
function loggedInUser()
{
$auth = Zend_Auth::getInstance();
if($auth-hasIdentity())
{
$logoutUrl = $this-_view-linkTo('login/logout');
$user = $auth-getIdentity();
$username = $this-_view-escape(ucfirst($user));
$string = 'Welcome ' . $username . ' | ' .
$logoutUrl . ' Log out ';
} else {
//$loginUrl = $this-_view-linkTo('auth/identify'); #4
//$string = ' '. $loginUrl . ' Log in '; #5
}if (isset($user)) {
return $string;}
}
}
In my layout i am trying to do next:
?php if (!$this-loggedInUser()):?
div id=header.
In bootstrap file i have:
$base = realpath(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../');
$paths = array(
'.',
$base . '/library',
$base . '/application',
$base . '/application/forms',
$base . '/application/models',
);
ini_set('include_path', implode(PATH_SEPARATOR, $paths));
I would like to say that i already read similar topic here, but didnt helped
me.
Thank you very much,
Vladimir
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/One-simple-problem-tooks-me-2-hour--hope-it-will-help-someone..-tp19445706p19460458.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Status of Default Project Structure Component Proposal
Hi, I am highly interested in the current status of the Default Project Structure Component Proposal. In June the proposal was approved for incubator development. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/6KM Is there any news? Thanks and best regards, Ralf
RE: [fw-general] One simple problem tooks me 2 hour- hope it will help someone..
I don't see a reference to a helper path for the view to use.
Something like : $this-_view-addHelperPath('path-to-helpers-dir');
Hope it helps
Terre
-Original Message-
From: vladimirn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:19 PM
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: Re: [fw-general] One simple problem tooks me 2 hour- hope it will
help someone..
Now i have similar(or not) issue.
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Loader_PluginLoader_Exception' with
message 'Plugin by name LoggedInUser was not found in the registry.
I have in application/views/helpers/ file LoggedInUser.php
?php
class Zend_View_Helper_LoggedInUser
{
protected $_view;
function setView($view)
{
$this-_view = $view;
}
function loggedInUser()
{
$auth = Zend_Auth::getInstance();
if($auth-hasIdentity())
{
$logoutUrl = $this-_view-linkTo('login/logout');
$user = $auth-getIdentity();
$username = $this-_view-escape(ucfirst($user));
$string = 'Welcome ' . $username . ' | ' .
$logoutUrl . ' Log out ';
} else {
//$loginUrl = $this-_view-linkTo('auth/identify'); #4 //$string = ' '.
$loginUrl . ' Log in '; #5 }if (isset($user)) { return $string;} } }
In my layout i am trying to do next:
?php if (!$this-loggedInUser()):?
div id=header.
In bootstrap file i have:
$base = realpath(dirname(__FILE__) . '/../'); $paths = array(
'.',
$base . '/library',
$base . '/application',
$base . '/application/forms',
$base . '/application/models',
);
ini_set('include_path', implode(PATH_SEPARATOR, $paths));
I would like to say that i already read similar topic here, but didnt helped
me.
Thank you very much,
Vladimir
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/One-simple-problem-tooks-me-2-hour--hope-it-will-help-
someone..-tp19445706p19460458.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Status of Default Project Structure Component Proposal
-- Ralf Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Friday, 12 September 2008, 07:25 PM +0200): I am highly interested in the current status of the Default Project Structure Component Proposal. In June the proposal was approved for incubator development. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/6KM Is there any news? The version currently posted is the version we've accepted and which Ralph is using as his target for Zend_Tool. I saw your comment come through. We'd prefer not to have two separate directory layouts. The reason is that a site may grow organically, and at first need simply a single controller directory. As the sites needs grow, the developer should not need to refactor; adding a modules directory to application/ is a simple step and already supported by the front controller and dispatcher. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
[fw-general] Benchmarks
In case anyone is curious, Rasmus Lerdorf posted some benchmarks of the different frameworks. Solar and Zend Framework come out ahead. http://talks.php.net/show/drupal08/24 -Matt
RE: [fw-general] One simple problem tooks me 2 hour- hope it will help someone..
vRandom wrote:
I don't see a reference to a helper path for the view to use.
Something like : $this-_view-addHelperPath('path-to-helpers-dir');
Hope it helps
Terre
Thanks Terre :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/One-simple-problem-tooks-me-2-hour--hope-it-will-help-someone..-tp19445706p19462333.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Dojo Email validation, checkbox and Submit dojo form question- please?
Dear Matthew,
thanks for your help.
I managed to prevent submiting form before all required fields are properly
filled.
Email:
-addElement ( 'validationTextBox', 'email', array ('required' = true,
'label' = 'Email address', 'regExp' =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED],4}\b', 'invalidMessage' =
'Please provide valid Email address.', 'filters' = array ('StringTrim',
'StringToLower' ), 'validators' = array ('NotEmpty', array ('StringLength',
true, array (6, 20 ) ), array ('Regex', true, array ('/\w+/i' ) ) ) ) )
(maybe someone will find this usefull)
BUT! :))
my checkboxes wont work :)
$agreements
-addElement ( 'checkbox', 'ages', array ('required' = true, 'label' =
'I\'m Over 18 years old', 'invalidMessage' = 'You must validate that you
are over 18' ) )
-addElement ( 'checkbox', 'promotions', array ('required' = true, 'label'
= 'I agree NOT to send any email promotions promoting this web site',
'invalidMessage' = 'You must validate that you are over 18' ) )
-addElement ( 'checkbox', 'terms', array ('required' = true, 'label' = 'I
agree to the Terms Conditions', 'invalidMessage' = 'You must validate
that you are over 18' ) );
$form = new Zend_Dojo_Form ( );
$form-setMethod ( 'post' )-setAction ( /signup/process )-setName (
'signup' );
Alert you suggested me to make wont work as well :(
phtml:
? $this-dojo()-javascriptCaptureStart() ?
function validateForm() {
var form = dijit.byId(signup);
if (!form.validate()) {
alert(Invalid form);
return false;
}
return true;
}
? $this-dojo()-javascriptCaptureEnd() ?
? $this-dojo()-onLoadCaptureStart() ?
function () {
dojo.connect(dijit.byId(signup), onSubmit, validateForm);
}
? $this-dojo()-onLoadCaptureEnd() ?
div class=signupForm
?= $this-form ?
/div
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Dojo-Email-validation%2C-checkbox-and-Submit-dojo-form-question--please--tp19441003p19462822.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Status of Default Project Structure Component Proposal
Hi Matthew, thanks for your reply I saw your comment come through. We'd prefer not to have two separate directory layouts. The reason is that a site may grow organically, and at first need simply a single controller directory. As the sites needs grow, the developer should not need to refactor; adding a modules directory to application/ is a simple step and already supported by the front controller and dispatcher. Ok, thanks for the clarification. That makes sense to me! Best regards, Ralf
[fw-general] Loosing translations: ja_JP
Hi,
I am facing a strange problem. I have two servers (both same Linux
distro/version) and in one I can use the ja_JP translation with ZF and in
the other the loaded locale simply show empty strings for all japanese
characters.
I have a locale/ja_JP (CSV) with
something;字だけ入力してください
smeothing2:something2
in my code I use the $tr-_('something') and $tr-_('something2');
In one server both work and in the other only the something2 (added just to
test the application was loading the right locale file).
I've var_dump the $tr and it shows the [_translate:protected] with all
the locales and the key = value correct for the something2 but in blank for
the something (ex.
[ja_JP]=
array(29) {
[Name]=
string(0)
...
Any ideas?
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Dojo_Form and Checkbox Element
I've just tried trunk, and have the same behaviour. Having looked again at the HTML being generated, it seems quite odd: dd input name=courseList[CEAudio] value=0 type=hidden input options=enroll notenroll id=courseList[CEAudio] name=courseList[CEAudio] value=notenroll type=checkbox /dd You can't be using trunk. IDs on dijit CheckBoxes were fixed three days ago. Please update your svn checkout and re-verify. You were right; I wasn't using the latest trunk and have now fixed this. The HTML is much better: input name=courseList[CBAudio] value=0 type=hiddeninput id=courseList-CBAudio name=courseList[CBAudio] value=notenroll type=checkbox but the code still seems to be doing slightly the wrong thing; instead of putting the unchecked value into the hidden element, it puts it into the checkbox element, and the hidden element continues to show a value of 0. For the elements that are checked by the $form-populate() method, the checkbox's value is enroll (the correct checked value). I quickly verified this if I don't set the checked/unchecked values when I create the form elements - both the checkbox and hidden element show a value of '0', so I'm guessing at this point it is a bug? Most Dojo widgits have their id's generated as (for example) courseList-CEAudio ([] replaced by -), and I'm still confused as to how the hidden/checkbox of the same name are supposed to function (although they seem to, so I can't complain). Basically, when a checkbox is unchecked, either no value is submitted or an empty string is submitted for it (depending on the browser). This causes issues on the server-side, particularly if the value is required. The hidden element ensures a value is returned when the checkbox is unchecked. Within Zend_Form/Zend_Dojo, we allow you to set both the checked and unchecked values; the unchecked value is placed in the hidden element, the checked value in the checkbox itself. This way you get the appropriate value back based on the status of the checkbox at submission. This makes great sense :-) Thanks, Andrew -- Andrew Yager, Managing Director (MACS BCompSc MCP) Real World Technology Solutions Pty Ltd ph: 1300 798 718 or (02) 9037 0500 fax: (02) 9037 0591 mob: 0405 152 568 http://www.rwts.com.au/ or http://www.stonebridgecomputing.com.au/
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Dojo_Form and Checkbox Element
-- Andrew Yager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Saturday, 13 September 2008, 10:17 AM +1000): I've just tried trunk, and have the same behaviour. Having looked again at the HTML being generated, it seems quite odd: dd input name=courseList[CEAudio] value=0 type=hidden input options=enroll notenroll id=courseList[CEAudio] name=courseList[CEAudio] value=notenroll type=checkbox /dd You can't be using trunk. IDs on dijit CheckBoxes were fixed three days ago. Please update your svn checkout and re-verify. You were right; I wasn't using the latest trunk and have now fixed this. The HTML is much better: input name=courseList[CBAudio] value=0 type=hiddeninput id=courseList-CBAudio name=courseList[CBAudio] value=notenroll type=checkbox but the code still seems to be doing slightly the wrong thing; instead of putting the unchecked value into the hidden element, it puts it into the checkbox element, and the hidden element continues to show a value of 0. For the elements that are checked by the $form-populate() method, the checkbox's value is enroll (the correct checked value). I quickly verified this if I don't set the checked/unchecked values when I create the form elements - both the checkbox and hidden element show a value of '0', so I'm guessing at this point it is a bug? Yes. Please create an issue in the tracker. Be sure to include: * Minimum code necessary to reproduce * Expected result (in this case, the expected HTML) * Actual result (actual HTML generated) Thanks! Most Dojo widgits have their id's generated as (for example) courseList-CEAudio ([] replaced by -), and I'm still confused as to how the hidden/checkbox of the same name are supposed to function (although they seem to, so I can't complain). Basically, when a checkbox is unchecked, either no value is submitted or an empty string is submitted for it (depending on the browser). This causes issues on the server-side, particularly if the value is required. The hidden element ensures a value is returned when the checkbox is unchecked. Within Zend_Form/Zend_Dojo, we allow you to set both the checked and unchecked values; the unchecked value is placed in the hidden element, the checked value in the checkbox itself. This way you get the appropriate value back based on the status of the checkbox at submission. This makes great sense :-) Thanks, Andrew -- Andrew Yager, Managing Director (MACS BCompSc MCP) Real World Technology Solutions Pty Ltd ph: 1300 798 718 or (02) 9037 0500 fax: (02) 9037 0591 mob: 0405 152 568 http://www.rwts.com.au/ or http://www.stonebridgecomputing.com.au/ -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
