Re: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation
Please see my comments inline. Regards, Jason. --- On Mon, 9/1/08, mikaelkael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: mikaelkael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation > To: "Wil Sinclair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, fw-general@lists.zend.com > Date: Monday, September 1, 2008, 1:48 AM > "But translators should consider waiting a little while > before applying > these formatting changes" : it's what I think :-) ** How to schedule this kind of job? * > . > > For the consistency of the documentation, following the > example of the > code of the ZF, we can add a light script of tests to > check: line > length, presence of a \n at the good place, respect of > code conventions... > *** I agree that we need some tools to do the documents check for some purposes (like fixing formatting probelm)as we human are more likely to forget some of them or to make some typos on that. *** > Mickael. > > Wil Sinclair a écrit : > > I kept it right around 70 columns, mainly because the > code started moving off the printable page and it would have > been hard to read in a smaller font. But translators should > consider waiting a little while before applying these > formatting changes, unless you'd like to render your > docs in PDF now, that is. I will be looking through all the > docs and making them consistent style-wise very soon after > 1.6, and I will have to make changes to the code listings at > that time as well. > > I apologize for all the changes. As some of you may ** I am glad to see our documents has been greatly improved. Everybody should thank you for the changes.I did know some complaints on the examples within ZF documents long time ago. And also I think it should be a chance to let us to re think how to do the documents(and translating) more efficiently and accurately. I believe some similar changes will be happening somethings in the future. That's why I am thinking we provide Zend_Translate as a component of ZF to others to facilitate their development, why don't we make use of it? ** > have noticed, while the content is typically good and > consistently thorough, the writing styles, code conventions, > and formatting can differ widely from one section to the > next on the master English document. It has been livable up > to now, but really comes out when you render the ref guide > in a single document. The changes I have been making and > plan to make were chosen in part because they shouldn't > impact translations that much. I think we should talk about > methods by which we can start sharing examples and figures > as a partial solution to this problem if the translators > feel that they have to be consistent even with code > formatting in the translations. > > > > ,Wil
RE: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation
Yes, I meant that, but not only that, there are many formatting fixing before you. We have Zend_Translate module, why don't we take advantage of it to improve the translation system? What comes to my mind quickly is using the English version as the placeholders on the raw template files and using a tool to generate the final translated files. let me use an example to show my thought: 1) a snippet of a typical example of raw template file looks like: Introduction Zend_Acl provides a lightweight and flexible access control list (ACL) implementation for privileges management. In general, an application may utilize such ACL's to control access to certain protected objects by other requesting objects. 2) assume using POedit as a translating tool and translating zh doc,then in the Zend_Acl-zh.po file, it looks like: msgid "Introduction" msgstr "Chinese translation of 'Introduction'" msgid " Zend_Acl provides a lightweight and flexible access control list (ACL) implementation for privileges management. In general, an application may utilize such ACL's to control access to certain protected objects by other requesting objects." msgstr "Chinese translation of the content of this msgid" 3) Then using a tool (Zend_Translate should be one of them) to convert the Zend_Acl-zh.po to \documentation\manual\zh\module_specs\Zend_Acl.xml before generating the html file. Thus, we only need maintain the formatting part on the raw files. Regards, Jason. --- On Sat, 8/30/08, Wil Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Wil Sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fw-general@lists.zend.com > Date: Saturday, August 30, 2008, 1:59 AM > Do you mean the changes I'm making to the > sections? If > so, the formatting here is a bit more significant than the > formatting in > any other section. This is because no renderer (HTML, PDF, > etc.) wraps > this text- and they shouldn't either since that would > just make the code > unreadable. All the changes I'm making to the code are > specifically so > that it doesn't run off the page when rendered in a > printable format > like PDF. Going forward, if documentors were stricter about > applying the > '80 column' rule in the coding standards for docs, > this would be less of > an issue. > On solution that we could consider is having all > translations share code > examples. This is somewhat tricky, since there is > documentation in the > code comments that is usually translated, too. I think we > might be able > to refactor some of these examples to move the > documentation that is > current in code comments out to the normal text, but there > are certain > cases where this can be very unwieldy and make the docs > potentially more > confusing. I don't won't to make translators jobs > harder than they are > already. :) Does anyone have any other suggestions? Does > anyone think > there is enough value in sharing examples across > translations that we > should try this? If so, I'd still have to figure out > the means of doing > this, but docbook has a simple include mechanism that > should make it > pretty easy if we decided to go in this direction. > > ,Wil > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Qi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:21 PM > > To: fw-general@lists.zend.com > > Subject: [fw-general] About improving ZF doc > translation > > > > Hi All, > > > > Recently, we are experiencing a huge modification on > the document > > formatting. > > > > Can we separate the formatting stuff from the > documents(like what CSS > > does)? Thus, formatting stuffs are kept in one place > and can apply to > > all languages, let our translators only focus on the > translating job. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jason. > > > > > > > >
[fw-general] About improving ZF doc translation
Hi All, Recently, we are experiencing a huge modification on the document formatting. Can we separate the formatting stuff from the documents(like what CSS does)? Thus, formatting stuffs are kept in one place and can apply to all languages, let our translators only focus on the translating job. Thanks. Jason.
[fw-general] Does fisheye shutdown?
Hi All, Does anybody else notice that the fisheye has not been working for a couple days? http://framework.zend.com/code/browse/Zend_Framework/standard/trunk/documentation/manual/en/module_specs/Zend_Date-Additional.xml Thanks. Jason.
Re: [fw-general] Subdomains and Zend Framework
Yes, I agree with you. To computer, there are no different between "www" and " Chicago" or "Newyork", but the name itself. Jason. Jerry McG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I have a file system layout similar to the recommendation at http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.html#zend.controller.quickstart.go.directory I would like to work with subdomains such as http://chicago.example.com and http://newyork.example.com. I have added these subdomains in my Apache virtual hosts file as well as in the Windows hosts file. Now, how can I make subdomains work in Zend Framework. Should I create folders called Chicago and Newyork and repeat the recommended layout within these folders? Please guide me. Thanks! Jerry. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Subdomains-and-Zend-Framework-tp17125088p17125088.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Re: [fw-general] New Servers are Up!
One more thing: The translation status page did reflect the commits. http://framework.zend.com/manual/status I committed "sync with r9345" right after Matthew announced "server is up" , however, in status page, they are still not updated. Jason. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Re: [fw-general] New Servers are Up!
Great work! Just committed, faster than before Jason. Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After a long wait (thanks for the patience, all!), we're now up and running in the new data center! The new data center gives us several things immediately: * Failover for the PHP-based frontend * Dedicated server for the java tools (wiki, issue tracker, svn browser) and subversion * Redundant database servers In the long term, it will also provide us with a much more scalable infrastructure if demand dictates growth. Additionally, we now have Single Sign On (SSO) for our various java tools, meaning you can sign on to any of them, and have your authentication persist through the other tools. We are also now running the latest versions of Atlassian's tools, which will allow us to roll out other features in the coming weeks. DNS may take another day or so to propagate to some of you, but based on the server logs, we're getting steady traffic already. We're still tweaking a few things visually and performance wise, but everything is open for business; feel free to start adding and updating pages and issues, and committing those bug fixes! -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/ - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Re: [fw-general] Action Helper by name NotifyPreDispatch not found.
Thanks Matt,
ZF 1.5.1
Zend Studio 5.5.1
Bootstrap is:
set('config', $config);
// setup database
$db = Zend_Db::factory($config->db);
Zend_Db_Table::setDefaultAdapter($db);
// setup controller
$frontController = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance();
$frontController->throwExceptions(true);
$frontController->setControllerDirectory('../application/controllers');
Zend_Layout::startMvc(array('layoutPath'=>'../application/layouts'));
// setup action helper
$view = new Zend_View();
$view->addHelperPath('My/View/Helper/', 'My_View_Helper');
Zend_Controller_Action_HelperBroker::addPrefix('My_Helper');
// run!
$frontController->dispatch();
-
The problem is: when F10 run $frontController->dispatch(); no problem, but when
F11 first get in, then this error message occurred.
Thanks.
Jason.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- Jason Qi wrote
(on Wednesday, 30 April 2008, 09:36 PM -0700):
> I encountered the same situation as this:
>
> http://www.zfforums.com/zend-framework-general-discussions-1/
> general-q-zend-framework-2/
> action-helper-name-notifypredispatch-not-found-when-debugging-zend-debugger-526.html
>
> Does anyone know what happened ?
There's nowhere near enough information on that post for me to begin
speculating on it. What does the bootstrap look like, is there a
NotifyPreDispatch plugin that's supposed to be triggered, what version
of ZF, what version of Zend Studio...
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
-
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
[fw-general] Action Helper by name NotifyPreDispatch not found.
I encountered the same situation as this: http://www.zfforums.com/zend-framework-general-discussions-1/general-q-zend-framework-2/action-helper-name-notifypredispatch-not-found-when-debugging-zend-debugger-526.html Does anyone know what happened ? Thanks. Jason. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Re: [fw-general] Our new Zend Framework Architect
Wow, Matthew, Congratulation! I love your Form. Jason. - You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
[fw-general] How to separate the elements ? (Zend_Form)
Hi All, I just followed the example in (15.9. Advanced Zend_Form Usage) and the text and password elements seemed adhere together. See: http://dev.tmclubs.org/registration How can I separate them (let some space in between ) ? BTW, when I looked up the source code, I found html tags for the form are dd, dt, dl etc. How can I change them to table style tags? like tr, th, td etc . Thanks. Jason. - You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
Re: [fw-general] How to Debug
May not, see here: http://www.zend.com/products/studio/studio55 It says 5.5.1 new support for php 5.2.5 I think you have to upgrade your Zend Studio. Jason. P.S. if Zend can give all the ZF contributors some discount(or free -:)) on these debug products, that would be great. Jora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zend Studio 5.5.0 Is that OKï¼ qry wrote: > > What's your Zend Studio version? > > Zend Platform 3.5 + Zend Studio 5.5.1 can support PHP5.2.5 for sure. > > Jason. > > Jora wrote: > PHP5.2.5+MySQL, using Zend Framework. > It seems that Zend Studio doesn't support PHP5.2. > How can I ï½Âï½ ï½Âï½Âï½ ï½ ï½Âï½ > ï½Âï½Âï½ ï½ > ï½Âï½ ï½Âï½Âï½Âï½Âï½Âï½Âï½Âï¼ > > ï¼´ï½Âï½Âï½Âï½Âï½Âï¼ > Ｊï½Âï½Âï½ > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Debug-tp15674161s16154p15674161.html > Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > - > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! > Search. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Debug-tp15674161s16154p15674432.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Re: [fw-general] How to Debug
What's your Zend Studio version? Zend Platform 3.5 + Zend Studio 5.5.1 can support PHP5.2.5 for sure. Jason. Jora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PHP5.2.5+MySQL, using Zend Framework. It seems that Zend Studio doesn't support PHP5.2. How can I ï½ï½ ï½ï½ï½ ï½ ï½ï½ ï½ï½ï½ ï½ ï½ï½ ï½ï½ï½ï½ï½ï½ï½ï¼ ï¼´ï½ï½ï½ï½ï½ï¼ Ｊï½ï½ï½ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Debug-tp15674161s16154p15674161.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form - Problem with 'submit' button
It did show "Login" on the button(I used ZF1.5.0pr), but after I read
Matthiew's email(the one next to mine), I realized it is not good.
Jason.
Dennis Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That does not work, as Matthiew also said in his answer. The only way works
is to set not the decorators for all elements ats one (elementDecorators), you
have to add your own decorator for each element without the 'submit' button. So
the code expands a lot! For 5 Elements + 1 Sumbit form, you have to declare the
decorator 5 times instead of 1 time. The 'elementDecorators' overwrite the
spcific decorator of an element. Maybe you can change that Matthiew, like the
behaviour of CSS, the nearest decorator definition get's chosen?
Regards
Dennis
2008/2/19, Jason Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I used below two lines of code, and
the button shows "Login"
$this->view->form = new Zend_Form(...)
$this->view->form->submit->setValue('Login');
Do I answer your question ?
Jason.
Dennis Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But what if I don't want to use
'label' at the submit button? I only want to use 'value'.
2008/2/19, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-- Dennis Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 19 February 2008, 01:54 PM +0100):
> I have created a small form for testing the new Zend_Form component. Can
> anyone
> tell me, why I cannot set the "value" property for a 'submit' button? Instead,
> the 'submit' button uses the value for 'label' and I cannot deactive the label
> for 'submit'. For me it looks like a bug, but I'm not sure.
This is by design.
We use the label of the element, as this is what is *displayed* to the
end user. It also allows us to check the submitted value against the
label to determine (a) if the given submit button was used, and/or (b)
if somebody's potentially monkeying with the form. As an example,
Zend_Form_Element_Submit::isChecked() checks the submitted value
against the label, for instance; if they match, isChecked() returns
true.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
-
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form - Problem with 'submit' button
I used below two lines of code, and the button shows "Login"
$this->view->form = new Zend_Form(...)
$this->view->form->submit->setValue('Login');
Do I answer your question ?
Jason.
Dennis Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But what if I don't want to use
'label' at the submit button? I only want to use 'value'.
2008/2/19, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-- Dennis Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 19 February 2008, 01:54 PM +0100):
> I have created a small form for testing the new Zend_Form component. Can
> anyone
> tell me, why I cannot set the "value" property for a 'submit' button? Instead,
> the 'submit' button uses the value for 'label' and I cannot deactive the label
> for 'submit'. For me it looks like a bug, but I'm not sure.
This is by design.
We use the label of the element, as this is what is *displayed* to the
end user. It also allows us to check the submitted value against the
label to determine (a) if the given submit button was used, and/or (b)
if somebody's potentially monkeying with the form. As an example,
Zend_Form_Element_Submit::isChecked() checks the submitted value
against the label, for instance; if they match, isChecked() returns
true.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form now in core!
Great job Matthew and other people who involved in! I've already used Zend_form in my project with Zend_View and Zend_layout, it worked perfectly to fit what I needed. But sad to me, the coming documents are too big, I need more time to translate. -:) Jason. Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings all! I'm happy to report that Zend_Form is now in core! This means you will no longer need to use the incubator view helper path if you've been using SVN, and also that you can be fairly assured that the API will not change much between now and the final 1.5.0 release. If you have *not* tried Zend_Form yet, and wish to do so, you can get a snapshot on-demand via Fisheye. Navigate to: http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework/trunk/library and then, in the lower left sidebar, you'll see a box labelled, "Tarball;" select your favorite format (zip, tgz, tbz2), and wait for the download. Thanks, everyone, for the numerous issue reports and feature requests over the past weeks -- I think the result is a very strong component that will suit many people's form needs. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/ - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Re: [fw-general] Zend _Acl Adding resource question
go here http://www.zend.com/en/resources/webinars/framework to see Darby's Webinar Hope this helps Jason. Garri Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good Day, I have implemented a modular directory structure. modules/ admin/ controllers/ IndexController.php default/ controllers/ IndexController.php How do I add them as a resource to Zend_Acl? Cheers, Garri - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Re: [fw-general] Re: Documentation on framework site
Ok, thanks Thomas, I can fix these minor errors in both en and zh documents upon my user rights. >From you reply, there is no standards for the doc internal links, I'd like to >continue my way to fix them. Cheers! Jason. Thomas Weidner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As these ID's you are referring are just for internal linking and not displayed external generally it should be no problem. Also it's sometimes hard to name such internal links when the name is good for 2 examples showing the same in 2 ways... but feel free to rename them, as long as you also rename all other languages. Docu maintainers tend to forget renaming the links because they are not translated :-) Or create an jira issue with the links and the new naming... it will be fixed by me from time to time for all languages. But I don't think that we need a documentation standard just for internal links or headers. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com - Original Message - From: "Jason Qi" To: "Zend Mailing List" Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:15 AM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Re: Documentation on framework site > BTW, do we have the document standard, such as name convention, intent > other than DTD docbook ? > > i.g. > > sometime when I do "make check", there are some minor error message that > indicated duplicated ID names. I saw someone correct it by put a > number(and/or alphabet) suffix, like "samename-1" or "samename-1a" etc. I > used my way to correct it by according their contexts. > > I believe it is better we have such a document standard to accommodate the > increasing documents. > > Maybe there is a standard(like code standard) that I did not know ? > > Just my 2c. > > Jason. > > > Eric Coleman wrote: Why not use a version number in > the url? > > Or, what about putting some kind of "version" number information into > the docbook data? that way a component can specify what version it > was introduced, etc... would be nice :-d > > Regards, > Eric > > On Feb 5, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Simon Mundy wrote: > >> Heh, yeah I _would_ ... but I know nothing about how the manual gets >> from the repository to the website :) >> >> I'll wait to see if any of the existing maintainers put their hand >> up and if not then we'll put a prop up on the wiki post-1.5 >> >> Cheerio >> >>> To be honest, IMO the documentation situation is far from ideal right >>> now, and I can definitely see your point. On the other hand, 1.5. ;) >>> Have you considered putting together a proposal and reviewing what >>> changes would be required to our release process and build scripts? >>> As >>> I'm sure you've noticed, Simon, the best way to get something done in >>> framework is to do as much as you can yourself without blocking on >>> any >>> Zend involvement. :D Let me know what I can do to help you here, and >>> keep in mind that you might get more traction after 1.5 drops. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> ,Wil >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Simon Mundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 6:39 PM >>>> To: Wil Sinclair >>>> Cc: Zend Mailing List >>>> Subject: Documentation on framework site >>>> >>>> Hi Wil >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if this has been requested before, but would it be >>>> possible to make it slightly clearer on the documentation pages that >>>> the manual refers to the current trunk release of the framework? >>>> >>>> If not that then perhaps hold back updates on the website until a >>>> minor/major version has been released. I've seen a few cases where >>>> people are confused as the new documentation refers to functionality >>>> or changes that haven't yet been released to a stable version. >>>> >>>> Or perhaps a-la MySQL's site there could be a browseable-by-version >>>> page on the site? I'm not sure how automated the current process >>>> is so >>>> hope I'm not asking for a biggy here :) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Simon Mundy | Director | PEPTOLAB >>>> >>>> """ " "" """""" "" "" """"""" " "" """"" " """"" " """""" "" " >>>> >>>> 202/258 Flinders Lane | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 >>>> Voice +61 (0) 3 9654 4324 | Mobile 0438 046 061 | Fax +61 (0) 3 9654 >>>> 4124 >>>> http://www.peptolab.com >>> >> >> -- >> >> Simon Mundy | Director | PEPTOLAB >> >> """ " "" """""" "" "" """"""" " "" """"" " """"" " """""" "" " >> >> 202/258 Flinders Lane | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 >> Voice +61 (0) 3 9654 4324 | Mobile 0438 046 061 | Fax +61 (0) 3 9654 >> 4124 >> http://www.peptolab.com >> > > > > > - > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Re: [fw-general] Re: Documentation on framework site
BTW, do we have the document standard, such as name convention, intent other than DTD docbook ? i.g. sometime when I do "make check", there are some minor error message that indicated duplicated ID names. I saw someone correct it by put a number(and/or alphabet) suffix, like "samename-1" or "samename-1a" etc. I used my way to correct it by according their contexts. I believe it is better we have such a document standard to accommodate the increasing documents. Maybe there is a standard(like code standard) that I did not know ? Just my 2c. Jason. Eric Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why not use a version number in the url? Or, what about putting some kind of "version" number information into the docbook data? that way a component can specify what version it was introduced, etc... would be nice :-d Regards, Eric On Feb 5, 2008, at 10:03 PM, Simon Mundy wrote: > Heh, yeah I _would_ ... but I know nothing about how the manual gets > from the repository to the website :) > > I'll wait to see if any of the existing maintainers put their hand > up and if not then we'll put a prop up on the wiki post-1.5 > > Cheerio > >> To be honest, IMO the documentation situation is far from ideal right >> now, and I can definitely see your point. On the other hand, 1.5. ;) >> Have you considered putting together a proposal and reviewing what >> changes would be required to our release process and build scripts? >> As >> I'm sure you've noticed, Simon, the best way to get something done in >> framework is to do as much as you can yourself without blocking on >> any >> Zend involvement. :D Let me know what I can do to help you here, and >> keep in mind that you might get more traction after 1.5 drops. >> >> Thanks. >> ,Wil >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Simon Mundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 6:39 PM >>> To: Wil Sinclair >>> Cc: Zend Mailing List >>> Subject: Documentation on framework site >>> >>> Hi Wil >>> >>> I'm not sure if this has been requested before, but would it be >>> possible to make it slightly clearer on the documentation pages that >>> the manual refers to the current trunk release of the framework? >>> >>> If not that then perhaps hold back updates on the website until a >>> minor/major version has been released. I've seen a few cases where >>> people are confused as the new documentation refers to functionality >>> or changes that haven't yet been released to a stable version. >>> >>> Or perhaps a-la MySQL's site there could be a browseable-by-version >>> page on the site? I'm not sure how automated the current process >>> is so >>> hope I'm not asking for a biggy here :) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Simon Mundy | Director | PEPTOLAB >>> >>> """ " "" "" "" "" """ " "" " " " " "" "" " >>> >>> 202/258 Flinders Lane | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 >>> Voice +61 (0) 3 9654 4324 | Mobile 0438 046 061 | Fax +61 (0) 3 9654 >>> 4124 >>> http://www.peptolab.com >> > > -- > > Simon Mundy | Director | PEPTOLAB > > """ " "" "" "" "" """ " "" " " " " "" "" " > > 202/258 Flinders Lane | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia | 3000 > Voice +61 (0) 3 9654 4324 | Mobile 0438 046 061 | Fax +61 (0) 3 9654 > 4124 > http://www.peptolab.com > - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
[fw-general] Please check your docs before commit
Hi All, If you make English documents, please check if there any errors message by the command of "make check". Because the English documents are the source, if they are wrong, then all the translated documents will be following. Thanks. Jason. - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[fw-general] About docment compiling
Hi Darby, There is a problem for some documents. Here, I use one example: In file Zend_Currency-Useage.xml, line 11 to line 36 It is a tag and there is also a tag inside. When I issued command like: make XMLFILE=Zend_Currency-Useage.xml check1 I would get _temp_Zend_Currency-Useage.xml:54: element example: validity error : Element example content does not follow the DTD, expecting (blockinfo? , (title , titleabbrev?) , (calloutlist | glosslist | bibliolist | itemizedlist | orderedlist | segmentedlist | simplelist | variablelist | literallayout | programlisting | programlistingco | screen | screenco | screenshot | synopsis | cmdsynopsis | funcsynopsis | classsynopsis | fieldsynopsis | constructorsynopsis | destructorsynopsis | methodsynopsis | formalpara | para | simpara | address | blockquote | graphic | graphicco | mediaobject | mediaobjectco | informalequation | informalexample | informalfigure | informaltable | indexterm | beginpage | procedure)+), got (title para programlisting note ) -- This means that this document(Zend_Currency-Useage.xml) did not follow the DTD rule, When I moved tag out of the tag, this error message had gone. So, there will be two solutions 1) modify the DTD rule to allow tag reside in tag 2) move all tag out from tag in all the documents involved. I prefer 1), but I could not find where to modify the rule. Could you help me to find it? or you have another solution? Thanks. Jason. - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Re: [fw-general] SVN server has problem?
It is ok now. Don't know what happened Jason. Jason Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, It said this file E:\ZendFramework-trunk\incubator\tests\Zend\Service\Technorati\_files\TestBlogPostTagsError.xml was not under version control. Even I deleted all files under \_files\ and did update, did not work. Cleanup stopped and gave error message that "it was not under version control" If it is not under version control, where does it come from ? I am sure I deleted the whole folder of \_files. Anyone know what the problem is? Thanks and Happy Holiday! Jason. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
[fw-general] SVN server has problem?
Hi All, It said this file E:\ZendFramework-trunk\incubator\tests\Zend\Service\Technorati\_files\TestBlogPostTagsError.xml was not under version control. Even I deleted all files under \_files\ and did update, did not work. Cleanup stopped and gave error message that "it was not under version control" If it is not under version control, where does it come from ? I am sure I deleted the whole folder of \_files. Anyone know what the problem is? Thanks and Happy Holiday! Jason. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
[fw-general] Need help on document compiling
Hi All, Haohappy sent email and asked me about the compiling Simplified Chinese documents. I realized I had made a mistake on compiling the documents. I apologize to Darby, Mikespook, Developworker and others who saw my email.I gave you guys the wrong message. - Before the ZF1.03 issued, I only copied /manual/zh folder to my linux box, even there were some warning messages, the system did not stop, I thought I compiled them right and assumed the unfinished translation caused the warning messages. I did not realized the xi:fallback would use the corresponding English version to replace it. So the Simplified Chinese translation is not intact. But if I compile it with English version, it will stop and get the error message that Darby gave me before. My system is CentOS 4.5 or 5.0 - To narrow the problem, Haohappy suggested just check one file. When I issued the command of make XMLFILE=Zend_Controller-Router.xml check1 in /manual/zh I would get error message like: -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] zh]# make XMLFILE=Zend_Controller-Router.xml check1 Checking Zend_Controller-Router.xml with /usr/bin/xmllint... _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:19: element sect1: validity error : No declaration for attribute xmlns:xi of element sect1 " id="zend.controller.router" xml:base="module_specs/Zend_Controller-Router.xml" ^ _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:704: element xref: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "zend.controller.request.http.baseurl" ^ _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:19: element sect1: validity error : No declaration for attribute xmlns:xi of element sect1 _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:242: element xref: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "zend.controller.request.http.baseurl" Document _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml does not validate make: *** [check1] Error 3 -- I thought that maybe some special Chinese char caused the problem. However, when I issued the same command in /manual/en folder, I got the similar(almost same) error message, like: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] en]# make XMLFILE=Zend_Controller-Router.xml check1 Checking Zend_Controller-Router.xml with /usr/bin/xmllint... _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:19: element sect1: validity error : No declaration for attribute xmlns:xi of element sect1 " id="zend.controller.router" xml:base="module_specs/Zend_Controller-Router.xml" ^ _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:904: element xref: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "zend.controller.request.http.baseurl" ^ _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:19: element sect1: validity error : No declaration for attribute xmlns:xi of element sect1 _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml:311: element xref: validity error : IDREF attribute linkend references an unknown ID "zend.controller.request.http.baseurl" Document _temp_Zend_Controller-Router.xml does not validate make: *** [check1] Error 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] en]# -- The most weired thing is, even though, the link of "zend.controller.request.http.baseurl" works in both English and Chinese documents. Can anyone help me out? Thanks in advanced! Jason. - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
[fw-general] About the translation
Hi All, While I translating the documents, I found sometime I need add more notes or examples so that it will help people who speak my language grab the meaning better. But if I do so, it will be not exactly consistent with their English version. May I build a website and put 3 copies of the documents, one English, one my language, and one my language with extra notes and examples. Or anyone has better idea about this? Jason. - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Re: [fw-general] "make check" errors in English Documents
I found in these 4 files, in the first line, there is a extra stuff of "xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude"; so that it looks like http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude";> But others only have in the first line. I guess these cause the problem. Regards, Jason. --- Jason Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The message looks like > > element sect1: validity error: no declaration for > attribute xmlns:xi of element sect1 > "id="zend.controller.router" > xml:base="module_spaces/Zend_Controller-Router.xml" > > > And other 3 files have the same messages, they are: > > Zend_Controller-ActionHelper.xml > Zend_Controller-Plugins.xml > Zend_Validate-Set.xml > > I believe they could happen in the corresponding > translations. > > Regards, > > Jason > > > > > > > Ready > for the edge of your seat? > Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
[fw-general] "make check" errors in English Documents
Hi all, The message looks like element sect1: validity error: no declaration for attribute xmlns:xi of element sect1 "id="zend.controller.router" xml:base="module_spaces/Zend_Controller-Router.xml" And other 3 files have the same messages, they are: Zend_Controller-ActionHelper.xml Zend_Controller-Plugins.xml Zend_Validate-Set.xml I believe they could happen in the corresponding translations. Regards, Jason Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/
Re: [fw-general] Spam for Canadian Pharmacy
The best way to stop spam is not replying or sending any email to them, otherwise, they are very happy to know we are the right target. Most of time, they are mail scripts,if they get replied email, they will send more. The only thing we can do it ban the email by removing it from the mail list and put it in the block list( I believe you have already done that). I know there are some websites dedicated for antispam, but I can't remember the urls. Can anybody give some clues about it? Jason. --- Bill Karwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have sent an email to the Canadian Pharmacy to ask > them to stop > sending spam to all @lists.zend.com. I know it's > unlikely to stop the > spam, but it's worth an email. > > Bill > Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
[fw-general] Yahoo email problem
Hi All, Since yesterday, all emails from ZF mail list went to my Yahoo! bulk box. Does any of you encounter the same problem? Can we tell Yahoo! stop doing it? Jason. Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
Re: [fw-general] Password validation
Hi Markus, Do you think the Standard Validation Classes is useful for you? http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.validate.set.html Or you might write Validators yourself to fit your needs. see here: http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.validate.writing_validators.html Regards, Jason. --- Markus Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > quite often one has to make a form where a user can > create a user > account. It's customary to add two password fields, > and add a validation > rule so that when the entries in both fields do not > match, an error > message is presented to the user. > > I was searching for such a validation rule for use > with > Zend_Filter_Input, but couldn't find any. Am I > missing something? Or > would you guys do it entirely differently? > > CU > Markus > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
RE: [fw-general] Do we need Zend_Audit ?
Thanks Michael for your idea!
I have searched RFCs but did not find any "standard" definition of "Audit", but
there is one that discussed audit of Healthcare Applications(RFC 3881) as
follow:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3881.html
It looks like what you said, integrating Audit with ACL.So, if Zend_Audit is
needed, it should be focus on security aspect.
Jason.
Michael Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jason,
I can not say that it is really needed as I think most of us agree of the
Zend_Log capabilities should cover the needs.
However, I found that your idea interesting because of the previous apps that
I built required audit trails in order to pass the IT audit policy before
implementation. What I did was extending Zend_Log to this purpose and add them
to the framework I wrote for the app, and this things getting kinda repetitive
when developing more applications with different busines requirements.
Zend_Audit should simplify the effort of producing common audit trails.
Provide it with ability to be integrated with Zend_Acl, and extend it to a
class that works and produces some spesific trails to make the IT Audit folks
happy. I would be definately use it!
Maybe somethin default like
$trails = Zend_Audit::getInstance();
$trails->path('/path/to/trails/or/logs/dir');
$trails->logSystemActivity();
$trails->logCrudActivity();
$trails->logTransactions();
$trails->save();
Regards,
M
-
From: Jason Qi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:03 AM
To:fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: [fw-general] Do we needZend_Audit ?
Hi All,
I believe it will be intact if there is a Zend_Auditwork with
Zend_Auth/Acl. However, as many of you could see there is a Zend_logdoing
great job to track the system activities.
Do we really needZend_Audit just because the name? or It could do some
special job and takeadvantage of Zend_log to simplify the development?
Any thoughtsare very welcome!
Thanks.
Jason
-
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internetin your pocket: mail,
news, photos & more.
---
-
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car
Finder tool.
[fw-general] Do we need Zend_Audit ?
Hi All, I believe it will be intact if there is a Zend_Audit work with Zend_Auth/Acl. However, as many of you could see there is a Zend_log doing great job to track the system activities. Do we really need Zend_Audit just because the name? or It could do some special job and take advantage of Zend_log to simplify the development? Any thoughts are very welcome! Thanks. Jason - Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
[fw-general] Fisheye stopped ?
Thanks. Jason. - Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
Re: [fw-general] Thanks to Gavin Vess
My English may be not good enough to express my feeling this moment. But I have to say thank you a lot for contributing so much to this great framework. Best wish to you, Gavin! Jason. Nick Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aside from the big stuff, I'd like to say thanks to Gavin for the bits and pieces he helped me with. Nick > We would like to thank Gavin Vess for his enthusiasm and contributions > to the Zend Framework over the past months. Gavin has left Zend > Technologies, and we wish him well in all of his future endeavors. > > Gavin has served as the Zend point of contact for several key > components > of the Zend Framework. Starting now, the point of contact at Zend for > issues related to the I18N components (Zend_Date, Zend_Locale, > Zend_Translate, Zend_Measure, Zend_Currency) is Alexander > Veremyev. The > point of contact at Zend for issues related to Zend_Session is Darby > Felton. The point of contact for several utility classes > (Zend_Loader, > Zend_Registry, Zend_Version, Zend_Debug) is Bill Karwin. > > The current status of components of Zend Framework is tracked in a > Google spreadsheet here: > http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pMy3PL3bQqZqlteLWg43HDg > > Regards, > Bill Karwin > Product Engineering Manager > Zend Technologies - Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
Re: [fw-general] Doesn't php 5.2.0 support PDO for MySQL ?
BTW, is there any option for ZFW if there is no PDO support? Thanks. Jason. Jason Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Gavin, They told me that there is a security-hole on 5.2.1 and they have no choice but wait for 5.2.2. I think this is the common issue for every host. Moving to another host may not be a perfect solution. Regards, Jason. Gavin Vess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jason, There are some non-trivial bugs with 5.2.0. My personal recommendation would be to use a different version of PHP. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/zSM - requirements http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/rw0 - web hosts http://bugs.php.net/search.php?search_for=&boolean=1&limit=10&order_by=&direction=ASC&cmd=display&status=All&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Feature%2FChange+Request&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Documentation+problem&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Livedocs+problem&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Website+problem&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Systems+problem&php_os=&phpver=5.2.0&assign=&author_email=&bug_age=0 For example: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40036 Cheers, Gavin Jason Qi wrote: > Hi All, > > Below is the email I got from my host. I can't believe it is true. > > Does anybody have any idea about it? > > Thanks. > > Jason. > > Hello, > > Currently there is a problem with pdo_MySQL and php 5.2.0, and that is > the only version of php5 that we currently offer. We will be updating > to 5.2.2 if we find that it meets our standards. We are sorry for the > incompatability, but the versions of php that we have been able to get > pdo_mysql working on have major security holes that we cannot allow to be > on our servers. > > Please let us know if you have a work around you would like us to try, > or if you have any further questions. > > Thanks, > -Kai Meyer > Our online Help Center is available 24/7 at: > http://helpdesk.hostmonster.com/help > (866)573-4678 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. - Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
Re: [fw-general] Doesn't php 5.2.0 support PDO for MySQL ?
Thanks Gavin, They told me that there is a security-hole on 5.2.1 and they have no choice but wait for 5.2.2. I think this is the common issue for every host. Moving to another host may not be a perfect solution. Regards, Jason. Gavin Vess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jason, There are some non-trivial bugs with 5.2.0. My personal recommendation would be to use a different version of PHP. http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/zSM - requirements http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/rw0 - web hosts http://bugs.php.net/search.php?search_for=&boolean=1&limit=10&order_by=&direction=ASC&cmd=display&status=All&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Feature%2FChange+Request&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Documentation+problem&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Livedocs+problem&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Website+problem&bug_ntype%5B%5D=Systems+problem&php_os=&phpver=5.2.0&assign=&author_email=&bug_age=0 For example: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40036 Cheers, Gavin Jason Qi wrote: > Hi All, > > Below is the email I got from my host. I can't believe it is true. > > Does anybody have any idea about it? > > Thanks. > > Jason. > > Hello, > > Currently there is a problem with pdo_MySQL and php 5.2.0, and that is > the only version of php5 that we currently offer. We will be updating > to 5.2.2 if we find that it meets our standards. We are sorry for the > incompatability, but the versions of php that we have been able to get > pdo_mysql working on have major security holes that we cannot allow to be > on our servers. > > Please let us know if you have a work around you would like us to try, > or if you have any further questions. > > Thanks, > -Kai Meyer > Our online Help Center is available 24/7 at: > http://helpdesk.hostmonster.com/help > (866)573-4678 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
[fw-general] Doesn't php 5.2.0 support PDO for MySQL ?
Hi All, Below is the email I got from my host. I can't believe it is true. Does anybody have any idea about it? Thanks. Jason. Hello, Currently there is a problem with pdo_MySQL and php 5.2.0, and that is the only version of php5 that we currently offer. We will be updating to 5.2.2 if we find that it meets our standards. We are sorry for the incompatability, but the versions of php that we have been able to get pdo_mysql working on have major security holes that we cannot allow to be on our servers. Please let us know if you have a work around you would like us to try, or if you have any further questions. Thanks, -Kai Meyer Our online Help Center is available 24/7 at: http://helpdesk.hostmonster.com/help (866)573-4678 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_view or Smarty?
You just need implement Zend_View interface to start Smarty, it is very easy to change back to use Zend_View even without revise any other part of your code. Jason. José de Menezes Soares Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Which is the best? Which do you choose? Why? I am afraid to start using SMARTY and then ZEND_VIEW goes better... Could someone recommend one and say why? Best regards, José - Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input...
Bill once said that until 1.0, everything could be changed. If you use ZF for
your real product, it is better to do the final check after 1.0
Adam Balgach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so this functionality has gone away for
good ?
On 3/18/07, Jason Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please to see Rob's Goodbye
Zend.php
http://akrabat.com/
Hope it helps
Jason.
Adam Balgach <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: All,
How does the functionality change from .8 -> .9 for Zend_Filter_Input...
I was using something like:
Zend::register('post', new Zend_Filter_Input($_POST, false));
Zend::register('get', new Zend_Filter_Input($_GET, false));
but i see this class has gone away...
-
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
-
Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and
always stay connected to friends.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Filter_Input...
Please to see Rob's Goodbye Zend.php
http://akrabat.com/
Hope it helps
Jason.
Adam Balgach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All,
How does the functionality change from .8 -> .9 for Zend_Filter_Input...
I was using something like:
Zend::register('post', new Zend_Filter_Input($_POST, false));
Zend::register('get', new Zend_Filter_Input($_GET, false));
but i see this class has gone away...
-
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
Re: [fw-general] Hosting ??
Thanks Matthew, I will look into it. (Sorry to everybody that I did not read Zend_Json docs yet, I assumed that it need php JSON support and tried to solve it first.) Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- Jason Qi wrote (on Sunday, 04 March 2007, 10:42 AM -0800): > You have to make sure if it supports what you want. > > i.g. my web host(bluehost.com) neither supports php5.2, nor lets me manually > setup JSON. So, I can't use Zend_Json with my web host. Why not? It checks to see if ext/json is present, and if not, it uses the PHP version provided by Zend_Json_Encoder/Zend_Json_Decoder. The entire point of Zend_Json was to provide a PHP implementation of JSON encoding/decoding for when ext/json was not present. > Make a list to ask them before you go next step. > > Matthew Ratzloff wrote: > > Olivier, > > Take a look at the wiki: > http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFUSER/Zend+Framework+Web+Hosts > > -Matt > > - Original Message - > From: "Olivier Revollat" > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:47 AM > Subject: [fw-general] Hosting ?? > > > >I try to find a web hosting service who support Zend Framework (PHP5, > > mod_rewite, PDO ...) > > Do you have any idea ? > > Thanks > > > > âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ > Never miss an email again! > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/ - Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
Re: [fw-general] Hosting ??
You have to make sure if it supports what you want. i.g. my web host(bluehost.com) neither supports php5.2, nor lets me manually setup JSON. So, I can't use Zend_Json with my web host. Make a list to ask them before you go next step. Matthew Ratzloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Olivier, Take a look at the wiki: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFUSER/Zend+Framework+Web+Hosts -Matt - Original Message - From: "Olivier Revollat" To: Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 9:47 AM Subject: [fw-general] Hosting ?? >I try to find a web hosting service who support Zend Framework (PHP5, > mod_rewite, PDO ...) > Do you have any idea ? > Thanks - Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.
Re: [fw-general] Request for feedback: moving Zend.php to Zend/Zend.php
I like this idea. Shekar C Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bill, I guess this was discussed earlier and much desired. However, to work around the exception, could we look into renaming the Zend class to something like: Zend_Main or Zend_Public or Zend_Shared or Zend_Common or Zend_General or Zend_Base or Zend_Core or Zend_Standard... so the name of the file would be just: Main.php/Public.php/Shared.php/Common.php/ General.php/Base.php/Core.php/Standard.php/etc sitting in the Zend folder? What do others think? Main/Public/Shared/Common/General? Votes? Ideas for more names...? Regards, On 2/25/07, Bill Karwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please take a look at http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-958 We propose to move Zend.php to /library/Zend/Zend.php. The class name would continue to be 'Zend', and we're not suggesting changing any methods within the class. Therefore no usage of this class would change. The only change in your application would be that you need to change this: require_once 'Zend.php'; To this: require_once 'Zend/Zend.php'; Alternatively, you could add the 'Zend' directory to your include_path. The benefit of this change is to simplify integration of a Zend Framework tree in an application tree. You could use svn externals, for instance. The disadvantage is that it does not follow the ZF convention that class names always match the physical location of the class file. But this is the only class that needs to be an exception to this convention. I volunteer to make this change. I'll update other classes in the ZF tree. I'll write a note in the manual to tell users what they need to do. I'll write a docblock in Zend.php acknowledging that it is an exception to the class-to-location convention. If there are no strong objections, I'll make this change. Regards, Bill Karwin - Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
Re: [fw-general] Smarty integration
Hi,
I'd like to recommend you implement Zend_View interface instead of extend the
abstract class and the render method can be simply like this without any
problem:
public function render($name)
{
return $this->_smarty->fetch($name);
}
if you look into Smarty's source code, you will find the display() method calls
fetch()
and prints the output.
Just my two cents.
Jason.
highland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I created my own class extending Zend_View_Abstract and including smarty.
I wanted to be able to use smarty templates and zend render on the same
object.
Here is my code:
class MyView extends Zend_View_Abstract
{
private $_smarty = false;
public function __construct($data = array())
{
parent::__construct($data);
$config = Zend::registry('config');
$this->_smarty = new Smarty();
$main_path = $config->path->server.$config->path->homepage;
$this->_smarty->template_dir =
$main_path.$config->smarty->template_dir;
$this->_smarty->compile_dir =
$main_path.$config->smarty->compile_dir;
$this->_smarty->config_dir = $main_path.$config->smarty->config_dir;
$this->_smarty->cache_dir = $main_path.$config->smarty->cache_dir;
}
protected function _run($template=null)
{
print parent::render($template);
}
public function display($template)
{
$this->_smarty->display($template);
}
public function assign($var, $value=null)
{
if (is_string($var))
{
$value = @func_get_arg(1);
$this->_smarty->assign($var, $value);
}
elseif (is_array($var))
{
foreach ($var as $key => $value)
{
$this->_smarty->assign($key, $value);
}
}
else
{
throw new Zend_View_Exception('assign() expects a string or
array, got '.gettype($var));
}
}
public function escape($var)
{
if (is_string($var))
{
return parent::escape($var);
}
elseif (is_array($var))
{
foreach ($var as $key => $val)
{
$var[$key] = $this->escape($val);
}
return $var;
}
else
{
return $var;
}
}
public function output($name)
{
header("Expires: Mon, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT");
header("Cache-Control: no-cache");
header("Pragma: no-cache");
header("Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0", FALSE);
print parent::render($name);
}
public function render($name)
{
header("Expires: Mon, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT");
header("Cache-Control: no-cache");
header("Pragma: no-cache");
header("Cache-Control: post-check=0, pre-check=0", FALSE);
print parent::render($name);
}
public function isCached($template)
{
if ($this->_smarty->is_cached($template))
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
public function setCaching($caching)
{
$this->_smarty->caching = $caching;
}
}
?>
in Controller for drawing using smarty i use:
$view->display('smarty_template.tpl')
and it works fine. But i want also to be able to use on the same $view
object
Zend render (so i could process php code), so i tried:
$view->render('zend_template.tpl.php')
But Zend returned:
Zend_View_Exception: script './application/views/zend_template.tpl.php' not
found in path in /usr/share/php/Zend/View/Abstract.php on line 571
Why ? How can i correct it ?
Thanx
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Smarty-integration-tf3260325s16154.html#a9061125
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Auth cored!
Great! What time for code frozen? I am afraid I don't have enough time to translate the doc. Thanks. Jason. Philip Iezzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey Darby and everbody that is involved in the development of Zend_Auth (can't check on that due to the JIRA hickup (water might help)), I'd just like to clap hands. You have done great work! Zend_Auth is cored! Thanks, Philip - Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Re: [fw-general] About Zend_auth
Just a reminder, I saw Darby updated the Zend_Auth this afternoon. From now on,
it is singleton pattern. We have to use
Zend_Auth::getInstance() ;
instead of
new Zend_Auth();
Regards,
Jason.
mysticav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great. Thanks. Now it works. I hadn't tried it from the bootstrap
Well, Using the registry seems to be better because it's possible to access
the object from anywhere.
Using the controller, how can you access the object (when using setParam)
within a custom class method ? Is there any other way than passing the
object as an argument to that method/constructor from the controller?
Regarding the 1st Problem,
I was including the Classes after the session was started.
Thank you.
Regarding the First Problem.
John Reed-2 wrote:
>
> Instantiate the authentication object and/or token object in your
> bootstrap file, then make it available to your controller.
>
> I do it like so (note I',, using a customer save handler here, but it's
> not required.
>
> /*Instantiate session handler*/
> require_once 'Zend/Session.php';
> require_once 'ZendCustom/mySessionSaveHandler.php';
> Zend_Session::setSaveHandler(new falconSessionSaveHandler($db));
>
> /*Instantiate Auth Object. Note: Athentication data is stored is
> Zend_Auth session namespace by default*/
> require_once 'Zend/Auth.php';
> require_once 'ZendCustom/Auth/myToken.php';
> require_once 'ZendCustom/Auth/myAdapter.php';
> $auth = new Zend_Auth(new Zend_Auth_My_Adapter());
> $authToken = $auth->getToken();
>
> Then, after the controller instance has been instantiated, I use the
> setParam() method:
>
> $controller->setParam('auth', $auth);
> $controller->setParam('authToken', $authToken);
>
> Both the auth and authToken objects are now available to your controller
> script via getInvokeArg().
>
> Another alternative would be to store them with Zend::Register().
>
> I'm still new to this myself, so if anyone has a more elegant solution
> I'm all ears.
>
> John Reed
>
>
> mysticav wrote:
>> I want to know how exactly should I access to the auth object in a second
>> request page:
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> Page1.php (First Request/login controller)
>> // Security_MyAuthAdapter is a custom class implementation as
>> documentation
>> suggests.
>> $auth=new Zend_Auth(new Security_MyAuthAdapter());
>>
>> $options = array(
>> 'username' => 'sitar',
>> 'password' => 'parvez'
>> );
>>
>> // It returns a token instance as documentation suggests.
>> $auth->authenticate($options);
>>
>> if ($auth->isLoggedIn()) {
>> // print $auth->getToken()->isValid(); // Prints 1. Until here
>> everything works perfect.
>> }
>>
>> Page2.php (a second request/ any other page)
>>
>> // Until this point, I should have access to the following namespace:
>> $sess=new Zend_Sess('Zend_Auth');
>>
>> Documentation says that Zend_Auth Session contains a property token, wich
>> has a token instance.
>> So,
>>
>> print( $sess->token->getIdentity()); //Should print "sahid" (supposing
>> the
>> Indetity was set using the username).
>>
>> Problem 1:
>> I get the following errror:
>>
>> Fatal error: . function.testAction function.testAction ]: The script
>> tried to execute a method or access a property of an incomplete object.
>> Please ensure that the class definition "Security_MyAuthToken"
>> of
>> the object you are trying to operate on was loaded _before_ unserialize()
>> gets called or provide a __autoload() function to load the class
>> definition
>> in ..
>>
>> was loaded before unserialized ?
>> The thing is that the object was stored when executing Page1.php in
>> Zend_Auth Session namespace.
>> And everything runs perfect in Page1.php (the object token is perfectly
>> accessible).
>>
>> Problem 2:
>> Supost that finally a good guy tell me how to solve this problem, so I
>> can
>> get My token everywhere in my entire application.
>>
>> My question is:
>> How can I access the $auth object created in Page1.php ?
>> I f I want to log out in Page8.php, what do I need to do ?
>>
>> What I expect is to be able to access $auth anywhere so I can just:
>> $auth->logout();
>>
>> PLEASE HELP. THE ZEND_AUTH IMPLEMENTATION IS BEAUTIFUL. I JUST NEED TO
>> DEAL
>> WITH THIS PROBLEMATIC.
>>
>> THANKS.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/About-Zend_auth-tf3230529s16154.html#a8977407
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
