Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Hello, You really do not want to get a correction for: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23631 before release? I checked again with 4.0.2 20050917, and nothing has changed since: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00251.html Etienne. ___ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
On 9/19/05, Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I applied the patch by hand (not working with CVS) and it
does _not_ solve the problem.
In this case, I am sorry but the probability of a fix before the release
is close to zero.
The problem with 4.0 is that it behaves completely different in this case
and the fix at expand time is too late. After gimplification we already have
sub (i)
{
static int C.0[100] = {0};
unsigned int i.1;
unsigned int D.1136;
int * D.1137;
int * D.1138;
int array[100];
array = C.0;
i.1 = (unsigned int) i;
D.1136 = i.1 * 4;
D.1137 = (int *) D.1136;
D.1138 = array + D.1137;
sub2 (D.1138);
}
While for 4.1 we get
sub (i)
{
unsigned int i.0;
unsigned int D.1282;
int * D.1283;
int * D.1284;
int array[100];
array = {};
i.0 = (unsigned int) i;
D.1282 = i.0 * 4;
D.1283 = (int *) D.1282;
D.1284 = array + D.1283;
sub2 (D.1284);
}
which is fine.
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Please test, post test results to gcc-testresults, and send me an email pointing at the results. Still OK for SPARC/Solaris: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00929.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00930.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00931.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00932.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00933.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00934.html -- Eric Botcazou
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
On Sep 18, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: In fact, as far as I can recall, 4.0.2 will be the first ever GCC release with zero testsuite FAILs across all languages on s390-ibm-linux ... [ rub eyes ] [ head explodes ] [ desperately trying to make sense of the world ] You didn't test --enable-languages=obj-c++
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
GCC 4.0.2 RC2 is now available here Sill ok on arm-none-elf: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00938.html Paul
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
You didn't test --enable-languages=obj-c++ Yeah, it's a plot, we positively refuse to test everything Apple has *not* contributed. ;-) -- Eric Botcazou
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
On Sep 19, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote: On Sep 18, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: In fact, as far as I can recall, 4.0.2 will be the first ever GCC release with zero testsuite FAILs across all languages on s390-ibm-linux ... [ rub eyes ] [ head explodes ] [ desperately trying to make sense of the world ] You didn't test --enable-languages=obj-c++ 4.0.2 or any 4.0.x does not have obj-c++. Anyways, all of the known failures with the obj-c++ with the GNU runtime have been filed and someone needs to look into them. Only one of the issues is really a library problem which I will be fixing once 4.1 is branched. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Anyways, all of the known failures with the obj-c++ with the GNU runtime have been filed and someone needs to look into them. Are you talking about these? === obj-c++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm (test for excess errors) FAIL: obj-c++.dg/bitfield-4.mm (test for excess errors) FAIL: obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm (test for excess errors) FAIL: obj-c++.dg/cxx-ivars-2.mm execution test FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-3.mm execution test FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-4.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/encode-4.mm compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-5.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/encode-5.mm compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-6.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/encode-6.mm compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-8.mm execution test FAIL: obj-c++.dg/isa-field-1.mm (test for excess errors) FAIL: obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm (test for excess errors) FAIL: obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: obj-c++.dg/method-19.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/method-19.mm compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-2.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-2.mm compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-9.mm (test for excess errors) WARNING: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-9.mm compilation failed to produce executab It's on x86-64/Linux. And I'm seeing roughly the same failures on SPARC/Solaris. -- Eric Botcazou
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
On Sep 19, 2005, at 4:21 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote: Anyways, all of the known failures with the obj-c++ with the GNU runtime have been filed and someone needs to look into them. Are you talking about these? I filed them as bugs, not fixed them. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Please test, post test results to gcc-testresults, and send me an email pointing at the results. OK for sh4-unknown-linux-gnu: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00902.html Regards, kaz
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:41:54AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: Please test, post test results to gcc-testresults, and send me an email pointing at the results. OK for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00942.html Janis
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Etienne Lorrain wrote: Hello, You really do not want to get a correction for: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23631 before release? I'd love to get a patch for this problem. -- but there's no readily available prospect, and this is not a regression from 4.0.x. The primary goal for 4.0.2 is to provide an upgrade path for anyone who is already using 4.0.1. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Mark Mitchell wrote: Please test, post test results to gcc-testresults, and send me an email pointing at the results. s390(x)-ibm-linux is still fine: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00883.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00884.html In fact, as far as I can recall, 4.0.2 will be the first ever GCC release with zero testsuite FAILs across all languages on s390-ibm-linux ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand Linux on zSeries Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
Mark Mitchell wrote: Please test, post test results to gcc-testresults, and send me an email pointing at the results. darwin ppc should be ok. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00898.html Andreas
