[Bug bootstrap/40343] AIX PPC64 libgcc bootstrap miscompare

2009-06-04 Thread dje dot gcc at gmail dot com


--- Comment #3 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com  2009-06-04 19:41 ---
Subject: Re:  AIX PPC64 libgcc bootstrap miscompare

Only the rs6000 changes: r148138.  I am trying to narrow it down to
the rs6000.c change or the asm changes.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40343



[Bug rtl-optimization/36712] Inefficient loop unrolling

2009-05-20 Thread dje dot gcc at gmail dot com


--- Comment #5 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com  2009-05-20 17:51 ---
Subject: Re:  Inefficient loop unrolling

 I implemented a tree-level loop-unrolling pass in our private porting, which
 takes advantage of later tree ivopt pass. It produces much better code than
 rtl-level loop unrolling in such scenarios. Not sure whether should submit for
 4.5.

Why not sure?  The worst anyone can say is no.  Of course you
should submit it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36712



[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-04 Thread dje dot gcc at gmail dot com


--- Comment #25 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com  2008-11-04 18:11 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected

 This patch works on x86_64 GNU/Linux.

 Please HP/UX, AIX, and OSF users make sure it works for them as well.

I recompiled jc1 and libjava with the patch.  I still encounter failures with
execution tests.  I will be interested to learn Dave's results on HP-UX.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068



[Bug java/37068] [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI version detected

2008-11-04 Thread dje dot gcc at gmail dot com


--- Comment #26 from dje dot gcc at gmail dot com  2008-11-04 18:15 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression] libgcj linkage failure: Incorrect library ABI
version detected

The runtime failure has changed and no longer is complaining about ABI
versions on AIX.  As I mentioned, I will be interested to learn from Dave's
results this new runtime problem is AIX-specific or common to the other
platforms.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37068