[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- Should be fully fixed for GCC 12 by r12-6022.
[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Dup of PR 51577 ? Well it does seem fixed on the trunk and that PR is fixed on the trunk (though not closed).
[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Language Lawyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||language.lawyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Language Lawyer --- Dup of Bug 70099?
[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-09-04 See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=51577 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah yes, I didn't look closely enough. Confirmed. Every release I tested from 4.3 onwards has the same behaviour, so it doesn't seem to be a regression.
[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #2 from SztfG at yandex dot ru --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Dup of PR 51577 ? Strictly speaking, it is not a dup, because PR 51577 and all the bugs marked as dups of PR 51577 are about finding an operator with namespaced parameters in the global namespace, but here the situation is the reverse. But the bugs could be closely related.
[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Dup of PR 51577 ?