[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2021-12-16 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

Patrick Palka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |12.0
 CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka  ---
Should be fully fixed for GCC 12 by r12-6022.

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2021-08-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski  ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Dup of PR 51577 ?

Well it does seem fixed on the trunk and that PR is fixed on the trunk (though
not closed).

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2020-06-23 Thread language.lawyer at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

Language Lawyer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||language.lawyer at gmail dot 
com

--- Comment #4 from Language Lawyer  ---
Dup of Bug 70099?

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2018-09-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2018-09-04
   See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
   ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Ah yes, I didn't look closely enough.

Confirmed. Every release I tested from 4.3 onwards has the same behaviour, so
it doesn't seem to be a regression.

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2018-09-04 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

--- Comment #2 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Dup of PR 51577 ?
Strictly speaking, it is not a dup, because PR 51577 and all the bugs marked as
dups of PR 51577 are about finding an operator with namespaced parameters in
the global namespace, but here the situation is the reverse. But the bugs could
be closely related.

[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

2018-09-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Dup of PR 51577 ?