[Bug fortran/31257] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-07 08:50 --- (In reply to comment #2) This looks related to 31218, so I'm adding a dependency even though I'm not certain it's the same. Also confirming, because it's definitely a bug even if it's a duplicate one. It might be - the problem is specifically due to achar not producing a character length. If you separate the expression for the first argument of the outer transfer into a character*(1) :: tmp(20), the code works because the character size of tmp is used. Hanging a diagnostic just before the gcc_assert, confirms that this expression does not have a ts.cl. Strangely, there is no gfc_resolve_achar function to do this. I can feel a fix coming on...:) Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-04-06 23:12:54 |2007-04-07 08:50:19 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257
[Bug fortran/31257] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-07 15:45 --- Subject: Bug number PR31257 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00321.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257
[Bug fortran/31257] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-07 21:29 --- Subject: Bug 31257 Author: pault Date: Sat Apr 7 21:29:13 2007 New Revision: 123646 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123646 Log: 2007-04-07 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/31257 * intrinsic.c (add_functions): Add ref. to gfc_resolve_achar. * intrinsic.h : Add prototype for gfc_resolve_achar. * iresolve.c (gfc_resolve_achar): New function. 2007-04-07 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/31257 * gfortran.dg/achar_4.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/achar_4.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.h trunk/gcc/fortran/iresolve.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257
[Bug fortran/31257] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-07 21:34 --- Fixed on trumk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257
[Bug fortran/31257] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor
--- Comment #2 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-06 23:12 --- This looks related to 31218, so I'm adding a dependency even though I'm not certain it's the same. Also confirming, because it's definitely a bug even if it's a duplicate one. -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||31218 nThis|| Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-06 23:12:54 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257
[Bug fortran/31257] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 20:27 --- Adding this to TRANSFER meta-bug, as frame 3 in the backtrace indicates a relation. No confirmation as I can not tell whether it is a dupe or not. (gdb) bt #0 fancy_abort (file=0x86e4fec ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c, line=4472, function=0x86e54c7 gfc_conv_expr_descriptor) at ../../../gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:656 #1 0x080baf5c in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor (se=0xbfa27ad4, expr=0x8894850, ss=0x8895b80) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:4472 #2 0x080bc19f in gfc_conv_array_parameter (se=0xbfa27ad4, expr=0x8894850, ss=0x8895b80, g77=1) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:4786 #3 0x080d68fa in gfc_conv_intrinsic_transfer (se=0xbfa281ec, expr=0x8894770) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:3111 #4 0x080cc3c2 in gfc_conv_function_expr (se=0xbfa281ec, expr=0x8894850) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:2689 #5 0x080cc8e9 in gfc_conv_expr (se=0xbfa281ec, expr=0x8894770) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3129 #6 0x080ce928 in gfc_trans_assignment (expr1=0x8894270, expr2=0x8894770, init_flag=0 '\0') at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3823 #7 0x080cf131 in gfc_trans_assign (code=0x8895af8) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:3985 #8 0x080b07dd in gfc_trans_code (code=0x8895af8) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans.c:473 #9 0x080c7d06 in gfc_generate_function_code (ns=0x885a1e8) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:3217 #10 0x0808c2b4 in gfc_parse_file () at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.c:3261 #11 0x080ab660 in gfc_be_parse_file (set_yydebug=0) at ../../../gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:305 #12 0x0830042d in toplev_main (argc=4, argv=0xbfa284c4) at ../../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:1050 #13 0x080ed162 in main (argc=2, argv=0x6) at ../../../gcc/gcc/main.c:35 -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||31237 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31257