[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-11 05:27 --- Created an attachment (id=13883) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13883&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-11 05:49 --- FYI, all three modules are needed to trigger the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-11 06:38 --- Working: 2007-07-09-r126478 Failing: 2007-07-10-r126510 I believe it is due to the patch r126509 | pault | 2007-07-10 07:11:00 +0200 (Di, 10 Jul 2007) | 28 lines PR 32634 [...] * module.c (write_generic): Write the local name of the interface. but I might be wrong and it is one of: r126486 | dfranke | 2007-07-09 16:56:49 +0200 (Mon, 09 Jul 2007) | 14 lines r126493 | kargl | 2007-07-09 21:41:37 +0200 (Mon, 09 Jul 2007) | 6 lines r126496 | fxcoudert | 2007-07-10 00:00:52 +0200 (Tue, 10 Jul 2007) | 6 lines The error message is: USE util,ONLY: sort 1 Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util' Reduced test case: MODULE kinds INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp = SELECTED_REAL_KIND ( 14, 200 ) END MODULE kinds MODULE util USE kinds, ONLY: dp INTERFACE sort MODULE PROCEDURE sort2 END INTERFACE CONTAINS SUBROUTINE sort2 ( ) END SUBROUTINE sort2 END MODULE util MODULE graphcon USE util,ONLY: sort END MODULE graphcon -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu dot org Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-11 08:33 --- No error up to and including r126496. That leaves only Paul's patch ... -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 04:58 --- (In reply to comment #4) > No error up to and including r126496. That leaves only Paul's patch ... > Daniel, Could you please revert r126496 and re-open the PR? - I can do nothing about it for 10 days or more. Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 06:22 --- (In reply to comment #5) Daniel, Hmmm! Cancel that - I'll have a slot this evening where I can either fix it or revert it myself. Just leave it to me but, I'll let you know if I am unable to do the business. Paul - who is run off his feet but wants to fix those bugs... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 06:31 --- Subject: Bug 32727 Author: dfranke Date: Thu Jul 12 06:31:12 2007 New Revision: 126572 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126572 Log: 2007-07-12 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/32634 PR fortran/32727 * module.c: Reverted Paul's patch from 2007-07-10. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/module.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 06:36 --- Sorry, too late :( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-12 06:57 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Sorry, too late :( Fine with me :-), I can give gfortran another round of testing today... thanks BTW, if you revert a patch, you should add the testcase that is the reason it. To avoid regressing again if the patch gets re-applied. Similarly, you should xfail the other testcase that now fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 07:27 --- > BTW, if you revert a patch, you should add the testcase that is the reason > it. To avoid regressing again if the patch gets re-applied. Similarly, you > should xfail the other testcase that now fails. Joost, good point. I thought about XFAIL, but then again, probably nobody will notice that there's something wrong since it's expected to fail. Hence I concluded that it would be preferable to have people asking about a testsuite failure twice a day then to hide the problem it in an xfail :) However, if Paul does find the time today, I'm positive that he will set it right -- otherwise I will implement your suggestion tomorrow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 17:39 --- *** Bug 32741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 20:05 --- Subject: Bug 32727 Author: pault Date: Thu Jul 12 20:04:59 2007 New Revision: 126600 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126600 Log: 2007-07-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/32634 PR fortran/32727 * module.c (write_generic): Restore patch of 2007-07-10 and use symbol name if there are no use names. 2007-07-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/32727 * gfortran.dg/interface_17.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_17.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/module.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 20:26 --- Thanks for the very prompt report. I would use your cp2k testcase but it does not compile on Cygwin - it runs out of memory during compilation. When I have a moment, I'll break itup. Fixed on trunk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
[Bug fortran/32727] [4.3 regression] bogus error: Error: Symbol 'sort' referenced at (1) not found in module 'util'
--- Comment #14 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-13 07:14 --- (In reply to comment #13) > I would use your cp2k testcase but it does not compile on Cygwin - it runs out > of memory during compilation. When I have a moment, I'll break itup. yes, it can be trivially split after every module, and compiled in that order. The other option is to check (a fixed version) out from cvs. See http://cp2k.berlios.de/download.html. That might initially be a few minutes more work to setup, but has the advantage that make -j X speeds up testing and that miscompilations can be more easily found. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32727
