[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 11:20 --- Hi Dale, pr32417.f90 doesn't ICE any more, closing this PR. Please reopen if you have more information. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #10 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-09-28 20:34 --- I have tried twice, but I cannot get the testsuite to work. After I added --enable-checking, The make -k check-fortran does a little and fails with - ERROR:runtest.exe does not exit. I not sure what is happening - it was working. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 09:35 --- PR 33140 disappeared from mainline around 2007-09-08. Dale, can you still see the ICE you reported? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-29 20:42 --- That ICE is most likely PR 33140. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.2.0 |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-27 10:10 --- So everything (target == host) is cygwin. I'm sorry for the confusion, but as you talked about MSYS in your original report, I thought it would be some kind of cygwin-hosted mingw compiler... About the failures themselves: * it is currently expected that gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_integer.f90 fails, because of a bug in the cygwin math library; I'm surprised that it doesn't fail for you * could you try to compile pr32417.f90 yourself, and produce a backtrace of the ICE? Use gfortran -v pr32417.f90, from the output of that command, look at the command-line for the f951 command, run it under gdb (gdb -args /path/to/f951 .), set a breakpoint on fancy_abort (break fancy_abort) and when the breakpoint (or a segfault) is hit, ask for backtrace (backtrace). Copy-paste the result here. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #7 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-08-27 13:12 --- My programs fail in the save way on MSYS and GYGWIN, but on none of the other versions of gfortran. I tried intrinsic_integer.f90 by hand and it does not fail on my gfortran version. Here is the traceback for pr32417.f90 - (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/local/gfortran/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.0/f951.exe pr32417.f90 -quiet -dumpbase pr32417.f90 -mtune=generic -auxbase pr32417 -O -version -fintrinsic-modules-path /usr/local/gfortran/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.0/finclude Loaded symbols for /cygdrive/d/WINDOWS/system32/ntdll.dll Loaded symbols for /cygdrive/d/WINDOWS/system32/kernel32.dll Loaded symbols for /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll Loaded symbols for /cygdrive/d/WINDOWS/system32/advapi32.dll Loaded symbols for /cygdrive/d/WINDOWS/system32/rpcrt4.dll Loaded symbols for /usr/bin/cygiconv-2.dll Loaded symbols for /usr/bin/cygintl-8.dll GNU F95 version 4.3.0 20070723 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin) compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125), GMP version 4.1.4, MPFR version 2.2.0. GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 Breakpoint 1, fancy_abort (file=0xbc554b ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c, line=3077, function=0xbc5f2f build2_stat) at ../../gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:656 656 internal_error (in %s, at %s:%d, function, trim_filename (file), line); (gdb) traceback Undefined command: traceback. Try help. (gdb) backtrace #0 fancy_abort (file=0xbc554b ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c, line=3077, function=0xbc5f2f build2_stat) at ../../gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:656 #1 0x004bb42e in build2_stat (code=MINUS_EXPR, tt=0x7ff90cb0, arg0=0x7fcbef60, arg1=0x7fcbef40) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:3101 #2 0x0056a7a7 in fold_build2_stat (code=MINUS_EXPR, type=0x7ff90cb0, op0=0x7fcbef60, op1=0x7fcbef40) at ../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:13097 #3 0x00561937 in fold_binary (code=PLUS_EXPR, type=0x7ff90cb0, op0=0x7fcbeea0, op1=0x7fcbef20) at ../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:9278 #4 0x0056a77f in fold_build2_stat (code=PLUS_EXPR, type=0x7ff90cb0, op0=0x7fcbeea0, op1=0x7fcbef20) at ../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:13095 #5 0x005fdd3a in add_to_parts (parts=0x7fcbeea0, elt=0x7ff90cb0) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-address.c:426 #6 0x005fe0ab in create_mem_ref (bsi=0x22c810, type=0x7ff90b60, addr=0x22c790) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-address.c:546 #7 0x0097c8da in rewrite_use (data=0x22ca10, use=0x1ef97a0, cand=0x1f0db90) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:5091 #8 0x0097edf3 in tree_ssa_iv_optimize_loop (data=0x22ca10, loop=incomplete type) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:5179 #9 0x009801ce in tree_ssa_iv_optimize () at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:5382 #10 0x00a55b8b in tree_ssa_loop_ivopts () at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop.c:514 #11 0x006dc1e8 in execute_one_pass (pass=0xb8e6e0) at ../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1125 #12 0x006dc38e in execute_pass_list (pass=0xb8ea20) at ../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1178 #13 0x006dc3a1 in execute_pass_list (pass=0xb8dc30) at ../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1179 #14 0x006dc3a1 in execute_pass_list (pass=0xb8b350) at ../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1179 #15 0x00714298 in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x7fc9b900) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c:406 #16 0x006dd380 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x7fc9ba80) at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1073 #17 0x006def9f in cgraph_optimize () at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1142 #18 0x0046ca1f in gfc_be_parse_file (set_yydebug=0) at ../../gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:305 #19 0x00523800 in toplev_main (argc=12, argv=0x1eb2d58) at ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:1044 #20 0x004b131a in main (argc=12, argv=0x1eb2d58) at ../../gcc/gcc/main.c:35 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #1 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-08-24 12:46 --- Created an attachment (id=14101) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14101action=view) testsuite output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 15:05 --- *** Bug 33175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 16:24 --- cygwin or msys? What is the host, what is the target? As far as I see, there is only one gfortran failure: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/pr32417.f90, -O (internal compiler error) I don't see it on a fresh mingw native compiler (rev 127394M). -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #4 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-08-24 18:40 --- The Host and the Target was cygwin. There 60 unexpected failures in the gcc testsuite and one in the fortran testsuite. I have the latest version of gcc (3.4.4) that the cygwin site gives out. Is that the fresh mingw native compiler ? The gcc and gfortran are version 4.3.0 20070723 from svn, built on the cygwin system. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
[Bug fortran/33174] Testsuite: unexpected failures
--- Comment #5 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-08-24 19:27 --- gfortran --v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-cygwin Configured with: ../gcc/configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-multilib --prefix=/usr/local/gfortran --enable-languages=c,fortran --with-gmp=/usr/local/lib --with-mpfr=/usr/local/lib Thread model: single gcc version 4.3.0 20070723 (experimental) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33174
