[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-16 Thread lingling.kong7 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

kong lingling  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lingling.kong7 at gmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from kong lingling  ---
Just mention and tag commit 9dbff9c05520a74e6cd337578f27b56c941f64f3 also
causes another case FAIL.
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/apx-ndd-tls-1b.c scan-assembler-times addq[
\t]+%r[a-z0-9]+, a@gottpoff\\(%rip\\), %r[a-z0-9]+ 1

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener  ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #5)
> I suppose Richard should have known the issue.
> See: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2024-May/079828.html

Yep, this and others were the reason the change was reverted against the
authors wish for GCC 14 but I promised to re-instantiate in stage1.  That
means it's Segher who's intending to fix this and the rest of the fallout
in a more appropriate way that wasn't suitable for late stage4.

But confirmed, I also see this.

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-15 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

Haochen Jiang  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com

--- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang  ---
I suppose Richard should have known the issue.
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2024-May/079828.html

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-15 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

Rainer Orth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth  ---
A reghunt identified

commit 9dbff9c05520a74e6cd337578f27b56c941f64f3
Author: Richard Biener 
Date:   Tue May 7 10:14:19 2024 +0200

Revert "Revert "combine: Don't combine if I2 does not change""

as the culprit.

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||testsuite-fail
   Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

Rainer Orth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |i386-pc-solaris2.11,
   ||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth  ---
I'm seeing this on Linux/x86_64, too.

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth  ---
Created attachment 58171
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58171=edit
gcc-14 assembler input

[Bug target/115028] [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c FAILs

2024-05-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115028

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth  ---
Created attachment 58170
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58170=edit
trunk assembler input