[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
--- Comment #6 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 09:10 --- @r160568 (or earlier) this is no longer showing. -- iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
-- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-18 14:59:59 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
--- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 13:43 --- (In reply to comment #4) > In my powerpc-apple-darwin9 tree I have the patch in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html for a quite long time OK, might be worth double-checking - both parts are needed. > (and I guess it is not applied in the "native" tree of regress). nope. that's just trunk. With revision > 159371, I see the same failures as regress. These failures disappear if I > revert revision 159371 without any other change in my tree. I have clean libgomp results and only LTO FE fails, on powerpc-apple-darwin9 @159476 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html but... *without* changing varpool.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-17 09:08 --- > You had to revert 159371 in addition to the patch: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html > > or instead of that patch? Sorry for the confusion. In my powerpc-apple-darwin9 tree I have the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html for a quite long time (and I guess it is not applied in the "native" tree of regress). With revision 159371, I see the same failures as regress. These failures disappear if I revert revision 159371 without any other change in my tree. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
--- Comment #3 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 08:54 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Reverting revision 159371 fixes these failures. > > I had to revert revision 159371 at revision 159429 with the patch > inhttp://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00129.html . You had to revert 159371 in addition to the patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html or instead of that patch? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-17 08:45 --- > Reverting revision 159371 fixes these failures. I had to revert revision 159371 at revision 159429 with the patch inhttp://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00129.html . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
[Bug target/44163] [4.6 Regression] Multiple failures in the objc and libgomp test suites
--- Comment #1 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 07:43 --- @159462 on powerpc64 with: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01119.html (and needed for m32, but not to solve the tls problem) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg01125.html ObjC/C++ tls fails are limited to LTO-related === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes4980 # of unsupported tests 4 still working on better ways to solve the TLS issues (monitor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44132 for that) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44163
