[Bug translation/79997] simple-ssa-sprintf i18n: wrong plural form in maybe_warn

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
  Known to work||8.1.0
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
  Known to fail||7.3.0

--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor  ---
I believe these issues were fixed in r258154.

[Bug translation/79997] simple-ssa-sprintf i18n: wrong plural form in maybe_warn

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||diagnostic
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-08-17
 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  Component|tree-optimization   |translation
 Depends on||77810
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager  ---
Redoing https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01634.html

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||diagnostic
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-08-14
 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  Component|tree-optimization   |translation
 Depends on||77810
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor  ---
Confirmed.  There are a few instances of this idiom in the file and elsewhere
in GCC.  The pass makes use of the format_warning_at_substring() function to do
the formatting and that function only comes in one form, and doesn't provide an
"overload" similar to warning_n or warning_at_rich_loc_n to format plural forms
of diagnostics (this enhancement request is being tracked in pr77810).


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
[Bug 77810] provide format_inform_at_substring to go with
format_warning_at_substring


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
[Bug 77810] provide format_inform_at_substring to go with
format_warning_at_substring

[Bug translation/79997] simple-ssa-sprintf i18n: wrong plural form in maybe_warn

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79997

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||diagnostic
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-08-14
 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  Component|tree-optimization   |translation
 Depends on||77810
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor  ---
Confirmed.  There are a few instances of this idiom in the file and elsewhere
in GCC.  The pass makes use of the format_warning_at_substring() function to do
the formatting and that function only comes in one form, and doesn't provide an
"overload" similar to warning_n or warning_at_rich_loc_n to format plural forms
of diagnostics (this enhancement request is being tracked in pr77810).


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
[Bug 77810] provide format_inform_at_substring to go with
format_warning_at_substring