On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:28 AM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> This looks like an oversight of handling DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE.
> DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE only has the u.s_number.number set while
> the code expected newc.u.s_binary.left would be valid.
> So this treats DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE like we treat function
> paramaters
> (DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_FUNCTION_PARAM) and template paramaters
> (DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM).
>
> Note the code in the demangler does this when it sets
> DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE:
> ret->type = DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE;
> ret->u.s_number.number = num;
>
> Committed as obvious after bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu
> Will commit to other branches in a few days.
Now committed (with the testcase fix backported too) to the GCC 12 branch.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
> PR tree-optimization/109804
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (new_delete_mismatch_p): Handle
> DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski
> ---
> gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc | 1 +
> .../g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C| 42 +++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
> index cd083ab2237..dedaae27b31 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
> @@ -1701,6 +1701,7 @@ new_delete_mismatch_p (const demangle_component ,
>
> case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_FUNCTION_PARAM:
> case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_TEMPLATE_PARAM:
> +case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE:
>return newc.u.s_number.number != delc.u.s_number.number;
>
> case DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_CHARACTER:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..0ddc056c6df
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-new-delete-8.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/109804 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-Wall" } */
> +
> +/* Here we used to ICE in new_delete_mismatch_p because
> + we didn't handle unnamed types from the demangler
> (DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_TYPE). */
> +
> +template
> +static inline T * construct_at(void *at, ARGS && args)
> +{
> + struct Placeable : T
> + {
> + Placeable(ARGS && args) : T(args) { }
> + void * operator new (long unsigned int, void *ptr) { return ptr; }
> + void operator delete (void *, void *) { }
> + };
> + return new (at) Placeable(static_cast(args));
> +}
> +template
> +struct Reconstructible
> +{
> + char _space[sizeof(MT)];
> + Reconstructible() { }
> +};
> +template
> +struct Constructible : Reconstructible
> +{
> + Constructible(){}
> +};
> +struct A { };
> +struct B
> +{
> + Constructible a { };
> + B(int) { }
> +};
> +Constructible b { };
> +void f()
> +{
> + enum { ENUM_A = 1 };
> + enum { ENUM_B = 1 };
> + construct_at(b._space, ENUM_B);
> +}
> --
> 2.43.0
>
