Re: [PATCH 1/5 ver4] RS6000: Add 128-bit Integer Operations

2021-05-26 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi!

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:35:58AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> This patch fixes the order of the argument in the vec_rlmi and
> vec_rlnm builtins.  The patch also adds a new test cases to verify
> the fix.
> 
> The patch has been tested on
> powerpc64-linux instead (Power 8 BE)
> powerpc64-linux instead (Power 9 LE)
> powerpc64-linux instead (Power 10 LE)

Those last two are powerpc64le-linux, right?

> gcc/testsuite/
>   gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c:
>   New runnable test case.
>   gcc.target/powerpc/vec-rlmi-rlnm.c: Update scan assembler times
>   for xxlor instruction.

These need a leading *, as Will pointed out.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -save-temps" } */

It's a run test, so it needs p9vector_hw (no powerpc_ prefix on that
one).

> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-rlmi-rlnm.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-rlmi-rlnm.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,6 @@ rlnm_test_2 (vector unsigned long long x, vector unsigned 
> long long y,

> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xxlor" 3 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xxlor" 5 } } */

This was expected, right?

Okay for trunk, and backports after a while.  Thanks!


Segher


Re: [PATCH 1/5 ver4] RS6000: Add 128-bit Integer Operations

2021-04-28 Thread Carl Love via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 18:46 -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 09:35 -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > Will, Segher:
> > 
> > This patch fixes the order of the argument in the vec_rlmi and
> > vec_rlnm builtins.  The patch also adds a new test cases to verify
> > the fix.
> > 
> > The patch has been tested on
> >  powerpc64-linux instead (Power 8 BE)
> >  powerpc64-linux instead (Power 9 LE)
> >  powerpc64-linux instead (Power 10 LE)
> > 
> > Please let me know if the patch is acceptable for mainline.
> > 
> > Carl Love
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there an existing PR for this one? 

Will:

Not that I am aware of.  I found the issue as part of doing the
patches.  

 Carl 



Re: [PATCH 1/5 ver4] RS6000: Add 128-bit Integer Operations

2021-04-27 Thread will schmidt via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 09:35 -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> Will, Segher:
> 
> This patch fixes the order of the argument in the vec_rlmi and
> vec_rlnm builtins.  The patch also adds a new test cases to verify
> the fix.
> 
> The patch has been tested on
> powerpc64-linux instead (Power 8 BE)
> powerpc64-linux instead (Power 9 LE)
> powerpc64-linux instead (Power 10 LE)
> 
> Please let me know if the patch is acceptable for mainline.
> 
>Carl Love

Hi,

Is there an existing PR for this one? 

The subject line does not reflect this patch.
subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 ver4] RS6000: Add 128-bit Integer Operations


> 
> 
> 
> 2021-04-26  Carl Love  
> 
> gcc/
>   * config/rs6000/altivec.md (altivec_vrlmi): Fix
>   bug in argument generation.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
>   gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c:
>   New runnable test case.
>   gcc.target/powerpc/vec-rlmi-rlnm.c: Update scan assembler times
>   for xxlor instruction.

Need leading "*" on the file names above.


> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md  |   6 +-
>  .../powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c | 231 ++
>  .../gcc.target/powerpc/vec-rlmi-rlnm.c|   2 +-
>  3 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> index 1351dafbc41..97dc9d2bda9 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> @@ -1987,12 +1987,12 @@
> 
>  (define_insn "altivec_vrlmi"
>[(set (match_operand:VIlong 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> -(unspec:VIlong [(match_operand:VIlong 1 "register_operand" "0")
> - (match_operand:VIlong 2 "register_operand" "v")
> +(unspec:VIlong [(match_operand:VIlong 1 "register_operand" "v")
> + (match_operand:VIlong 2 "register_operand" "0")
>   (match_operand:VIlong 3 "register_operand" "v")]
>  UNSPEC_VRLMI))]
>"TARGET_P9_VECTOR"
> -  "vrlmi %0,%2,%3"
> +  "vrlmi %0,%1,%3"
>[(set_attr "type" "veclogical")])

ok

> 
>  (define_insn "altivec_vrlnm"
> diff --git 
> a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..be8f82d8a06
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/check-builtin-vec_rlnm-runnable.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -save-temps" } */
> +
> +/* Verify the vec_rlm and vec_rlmi builtins works correctly.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvrldmi\M} 1 } } */
> +
> +#include 
> +
> +#ifdef DEBUG
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#endif
> +
> +void abort (void);
> +
> +int main ()
> +{
> +  int i;
> +
> +  vector unsigned int vec_arg1_int, vec_arg2_int, vec_arg3_int;
> +  vector unsigned int vec_result_int, vec_expected_result_int;
> +  
> +  vector unsigned long long int vec_arg1_di, vec_arg2_di, vec_arg3_di;
> +  vector unsigned long long int vec_result_di, vec_expected_result_di;
> +
> +  unsigned int mask_begin, mask_end, shift;
> +  unsigned long long int mask;
> +
> +/* Check vec int version of vec_rlmi builtin */
> +  mask = 0;
> +  mask_begin = 0;
> +  mask_end   = 4;
> +  shift = 16;
> +
> +  for (i = 0; i < 31; i++)
> +if ((i >= mask_begin) && (i <= mask_end))
> +  mask |= 0x8000ULL >> i;
> +
> +  for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> +vec_arg1_int[i] = 0x12345678 + i*0x;
> +vec_arg2_int[i] = 0xA1B1CDEF;
> +vec_arg3_int[i] = mask_begin << 16 | mask_end << 8 | shift;
> +
> +/* do rotate */
> +vec_expected_result_int[i] =  ( vec_arg2_int[i] & ~mask) 
> +  | ((vec_arg1_int[i] << shift) | (vec_arg1_int[i] >> (32-shift))) & 
> mask;
> +  
> +  }
> +
> +  /* vec_rlmi(arg1, arg2, arg3)
> + result - rotate each element of arg2 left and inserting it into arg1 
> +   element based on the mask specified in arg3.  The shift, mask
> +   start and end is specified in arg3.  */
> +  vec_result_int = vec_rlmi (vec_arg1_int, vec_arg2_int, vec_arg3