Hi,
I've committed a fix (r19493) that will disable the use of the new
GDALCopyWords implementation. The old and new implementations are functionally
equivalent, but the new implementation is in some cases 5-10x faster than the
old implementation. However, there is no problem with disabling it and
affecting the functionality of GDAL.
For future reference, if you hit a bug in GDAL, one of the best ways to get
developer attention is to file a bug report on the GDAL Trac website
(http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/newticket), but this first requires creating an
OSGeo account at http://www.osgeo.org/osgeo_userid.
Cheers,
Philippe
On 2010-04-20, at 4:34 PM, jcurru wrote:
Thanks for your answer, Philippe.
I could make rasterio.cpp compile by making the following change (line 38):
// For now, work around MSVC++ 6.0's broken template support. If this value
// is not defined, the old GDALCopyWords implementation is used.
#define USE_NEW_COPYWORDS 1
#endif
#undef USE_NEW_COPYWORDS // changed
I guess gdal will use some kind of former strategie to copy bytes.
I hope this will generate valid code.
But you are telling me to file a ticket on GDAL's trac
(http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal) and assign it to me (pvachon). Due to my poor
english and lack of experience in this forum, I unfortunately don't know
what you mean. Would you be so kind to explain it to me?
Thanks again.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Compiling-in-Embarcadero-s-CBuilder-tp4930084p4933551.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
