Re: [gdal-dev] more commands, less utilities

2009-04-24 Thread Brent Fraser

How about gdaldem2image for a name?  A little long, but less confusion over 
what it actually does...

Matt Wilkie wrote:

Upon reflection, I think we should congregate these utilities into a
single utility -- gdaldem (I'm totally flexible on the name -- and
have each be a separate operation within that rather than
proliferating five more GDAL utilities.

 -- http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2640


___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


Re: [gdal-dev] more commands, less utilities

2009-04-24 Thread Frank Warmerdam

Matt Wilkie wrote:

Upon reflection, I think we should congregate these utilities into a
single utility -- gdaldem (I'm totally flexible on the name -- and
have each be a separate operation within that rather than
proliferating five more GDAL utilities.

 -- http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2640

I like the idea of gdaldem with commands rather than seperate utilities.

For some time I've considered proprosing that we do the same with gdal
so that `merge`, `warp`, `translate`, etc. become commands to a single
gdal utility. Ditto for ogr. I've hesitated because there is so much 
inertia (and I'd be asking others to do work that I can't!).


Matt, etc,

I would say that before folks become too dependent on the existing
utility interface is the time to do a change like this.

I did introduce gdal_manage so that small operations would not need
to each be a distinct utility.

Best regards,
--
---+--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Programmer for Rent

___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev