Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

[Jari Arkko]

Thanks Dan & all… I have placed a no-obj for this document.

Jari

On Dec 28, 2013, at 11:55 AM, Adrian Farrel  wrote:

> Thanks,
> I added an RFC editor note.
> 
> Adrian
> 
>> From: Mike Shand
>> Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); gen-art@ietf.org
>> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic@tools.ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
>> 
>> I agree.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
>>> Dan -
>>> 
>>> Thanx for the review.
>>> I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done
>> by the RFC Editor.
>>> 
>>>Les
>>> 
>>> 
 -Original Message-
 From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
 To: gen-art@ietf.org
 Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic@tools.ietf.org
 Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
 
 
 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
>> ART,
 please see the FAQ at
 
 .
 
 Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
>> may
 receive.
 
 Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
 Review Date: 12/17/13
 IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
 IESG Telechat date:
 
 Summary: Ready
 
 Major issues:
 
 Minor issues:
 
 It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the
> IS-IS
 standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also
> be
 the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:
 
 OLD:
 
All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
 
 NEW:
 
All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
 
 Nits/editorial comments:
 
 
 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

[Adrian Farrel]

Thanks,
I added an RFC editor note.

Adrian

> From: Mike Shand
> Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> 
> I agree.
> 
>  Mike
> 
> On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> > Dan -
> >
> > Thanx for the review.
> > I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done
> by the RFC Editor.
> >
> > Les
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
> >> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> >> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic@tools.ietf.org
> >> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> >>
> >>
> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
> ART,
> >> please see the FAQ at
> >>
> >> .
> >>
> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
> may
> >> receive.
> >>
> >> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> >> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> >> Review Date: 12/17/13
> >> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
> >> IESG Telechat date:
> >>
> >> Summary: Ready
> >>
> >> Major issues:
> >>
> >> Minor issues:
> >>
> >> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the
IS-IS
> >> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also
be
> >> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:
> >>
> >> OLD:
> >>
> >> All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
> >> Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
> >>
> >> NEW:
> >>
> >> All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
> >> standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
> >> Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
> >>
> >> Nits/editorial comments:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

[Mike Shand]

I agree.

Mike

On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:

Dan -

Thanx for the review.
I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done by 
the RFC Editor.

Les



-Original Message-
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at

.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 12/17/13
IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Ready

Major issues:

Minor issues:

It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the IS-IS
standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also be
the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:

OLD:

All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.

NEW:

All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.

Nits/editorial comments:





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

[Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)]

Dan -

Thanx for the review.
I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done by 
the RFC Editor.

   Les


> -Original Message-
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> 
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
> please see the FAQ at
> 
> .
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
> receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 12/17/13
> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
> IESG Telechat date:
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the IS-IS
> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also be
> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:
> 
> OLD:
> 
>All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
>Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
> 
> NEW:
> 
>All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
>standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
>Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 
> 

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00

[Romascanu, Dan (Dan)]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at

.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 12/17/13
IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
IESG Telechat date: 

Summary: Ready

Major issues:

Minor issues:

It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the IS-IS 
standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also be 
the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1: 

OLD: 

   All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
   Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.

NEW: 

   All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
   standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
   Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.

Nits/editorial comments:




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art