Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt

2014-02-20 Thread IJsbrand Wijnands
Hi Francis,

I'll resolve the editorial nits.

Regarding the co-author list, you say (soft) limit, what does (soft) mean here?

Does one co-author need to drop of, or will it pass?

Thx,

Ice.

On 17 Feb 2014, at 16:12, Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr wrote:

 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
 Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
 
 http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
 
 Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
 you may receive.
 
 Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt
 Reviewer: Francis Dupont
 Review Date: 20140211
 IETF LC End Date: 20140212
 IESG Telechat date: unknown
 
 Summary: Ready
 
 Major issues: None
 
 Minor issues: None
 
 Nits/editorial comments:
 - the number of authors is greater than the (soft) limit
 
 - 1 page 5: too many 'o' in 'co-oordination'
 
 - 1.2 pages 5  6: IMHO you should describe more terms in the Terminology
  section, e.g., UMH, RPA and even RD (as VRF is already in it)
 
 Regards 
 
 francis.dup...@fdupont.fr

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art


Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt

2014-02-19 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Francis.

Jari

On Feb 17, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr wrote:

 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
 Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
 
 http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
 
 Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
 you may receive.
 
 Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt
 Reviewer: Francis Dupont
 Review Date: 20140211
 IETF LC End Date: 20140212
 IESG Telechat date: unknown
 
 Summary: Ready
 
 Major issues: None
 
 Minor issues: None
 
 Nits/editorial comments:
 - the number of authors is greater than the (soft) limit
 
 - 1 page 5: too many 'o' in 'co-oordination'
 
 - 1.2 pages 5  6: IMHO you should describe more terms in the Terminology
  section, e.g., UMH, RPA and even RD (as VRF is already in it)
 
 Regards 
 
 francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
 
 ___
 Gen-art mailing list
 Gen-art@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art


[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt

2014-02-17 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20140211
IETF LC End Date: 20140212
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - the number of authors is greater than the (soft) limit

 - 1 page 5: too many 'o' in 'co-oordination'

 - 1.2 pages 5  6: IMHO you should describe more terms in the Terminology
  section, e.g., UMH, RPA and even RD (as VRF is already in it)

Regards 

francis.dup...@fdupont.fr

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art