Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 4, Issue 17

2011-05-23 Thread Karen Sue Rolph

Dear Colleagues,

1) Clarification: I am teaching students how to edit and author in 
Wikipedia.  Topical suggestions for a methodology are welcome.
2) On motherhood: it depends on whether referring to the global situation, or 
U.S.  This argument is extensive, and in most responses, symptomatic of the 
problem.  Mothers, especially single mothers and children, are vulnerable 
populations under numerous social criteria.  Mothers who don't hold a job and 
have nannies are relatively few; they may still suffer from lack of 'voice'.  
Again, concrete data are the most useful for understanding gaps and constraints 
mothers face.

ksrolph

 From: gendergap-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
 Subject: Gendergap Digest, Vol 4, Issue 17
 To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 05:40:25 +
 
 Send Gendergap mailing list submissions to
   gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   gendergap-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
   gendergap-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Gendergap digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
1. Re: [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on,   Wikimedia Commons
   (The Richardsons)
2. Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons (Bob Sponge)
3. Women's College Video Project on Commons Media of the   Day (Pharos)
4. Re: Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons (Sarah)
5. Re: Gendergap Digest, Vol 4, Issue 16 (Karen Sue Rolph)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 21:26:53 -0400
 From: The Richardsons dons...@optonline.net
 Subject: Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on,
   Wikimedia Commons
 To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 Message-ID: 4dd714dd.2000...@optonline.net
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 Message: 7
 Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:37:41 -0600 (MDT)
 From: Fred Bauderfredb...@fairpoint.net
 Subject: Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on
   Wikimedia Commons
 To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
   gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 Message-ID:
   44058.66.243.192.69.1305736661.squir...@webmail.fairpoint.net
 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
 
 
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:16, Fred Bauderfredb...@fairpoint.net
wrote:
  
  
  My point is this: a significant number of women (current and
potential
  editors) don't want to work in a I like the big tits atmosphere,
  whatever
  was meant by it. Others don't mind. Point is that some*do*  mind.
  
  
  
So, was it an inane remark or a symptom of an atmosphere? I'm pretty
sure
you don't want to see an authoritarian crackdown either. We come down
heavy on Wikipedia sometimes, but for much more egregious behavior.
  
The problem is that such moves don't change culture, in fact, may
sometimes facilitate it, if traction can be gained by aggrieved users
who
feel they are being treated unfairly.
  
  
I see it as an inane remark that's symptomatic of the culture, in the
sense
that the poster thought it appropriate to post it.
  
Moving away from discussing this image now, to the broader issue, we do
see
a fair number of comments like that on Wikipedia, and letting them pass
without comment simply means they'll never stop.
  
We had a situation recently where we were discussing a BLP, and part of
the
content was that the woman had experienced a serious sexual assault. In
the
course of discussing how to approach it, a couple of remarks were made
that
tended to downplay what had happened to her, and one person -- in a
different section on the talk page -- commented on how attractive she
was,
and how he wanted to have her babies.
  
I was so disgusted by this that I felt (and to some extent still feel)
that
I didn't want to be involved in the project anymore, because why am I
wasting my time in that kind of atmosphere? I felt that it said something
about me, rather than about them.
  
I also had to decide whether to say something, or let it lie, and if I
did
say something, I had to make sure I was polite and circumspect, rather
than
screaming it from the rooftops, which is what I wanted to do. And it
suddenly felt like nothing had changed in the last 40 years, that these
remarks still appear, and that women are still made to feel bad if they
challenge them. And if we do challenge them, must be extra polite about
it.
Not make a fuss.
  
So that felt kind of depressing.
  
Sarah
 Now we're getting down to a serious discussion. The actual horns of the
 dilemma a 

Re: [Gendergap] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons

2011-05-23 Thread Nicole Willson
Comments like that don't make me run out of commons, but they do get an eye
roll from me at the very least. I don't see why that kind of comment is
necessary.

The images or comments are not what keep me from participating in commons,
it's not having a clear sense of whether or not comments like that are the
norm on commons or considered acceptable, as well as not knowing the best
way to respond. I spend most of my time on a smaller wiki, where I have a
better sense of what the rules are and who to contact within that community
for advice on how to handle that kind of thing. Since I don't have as good a
sense of the issues on Commons, I usually don't comment.

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:

 Sarah

 Speak for yourself. I'm also a woman and i don't see that you're not
 welcome in his comment, and also can't see why that particular comment
 would in some way made girls run out commons.
 _
 *Béria Lima*
 Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt
 (351) 963 953 042

 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
 livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
 estamos a fazer.*


 2011/5/23 Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com

 On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 16:32, Bob Sponge
 metzgerhandwerk.hat.tradit...@googlemail.com wrote:
  dear sarah
 
  i want to give you a small feedback about your entries here about a
  comment i did. (i found this list with a notice on my userpage in the
  german wikipedia)
 
  Pro i like her big tits :-) Bunnyfrosch (Diskussion) 22:59, 2 January
  2011 (UTC)
 
  there were 2 contra votes before, one argued not educational and
  questioned: Why manga woman rhymes with big tits? the other replies
  the not educational accusation. both arguments are bullshit in my
  opinion. because all is educational or nothing, but i am to obliging
  to told a another users his/her meaning is bullshit. for example if i
  want to know how a piece of shit looks like, a picture of a piece of
  shit ist educational, and if i want to know something about the
  frontieres of texas, a picture of a map coult very
  helpfully/educational. if people naming something not educational,
  they want to say somthing diffrent. ( note this is my personal pov!)
  but they vote this way, but really really often simply mean: i hate
  this pic or i hate this user or i hate every kind of nudity in the
  commons
 
  in german i often give persons a longer feedback, in english i spare
  the longer feedback. (you can read why^^) so i choose a short pro
  vote, applying to the first contra. and by the way, i am not addicted
  to big or small boobs - i couldn't care less!
  if i had choose a longer explanation for my vote, it would like:
  wikipedia needs well draught anime pictures, with common licences,
  this one is a great animation of a girl or transsexual in a beautyfull
  landscape.  so, thats the reason i vote with pro.
 
  but there was no need for a argumentaion, when the contra-side argues
  with not educational
 
  i hope this will help you, to understand my diction in the comment.
 
  best regards
  le frog du rabbit
 
 Bob, thanks for your explanation. It's appreciated.

 The thing is this: some of us would like to attract more women editors
 to Wikipedia, so that women have more of a voice, and perhaps also to
 change the culture of Wikipedia a little.

 It's arguably not in a woman's interests to hang around on a talk page
 where people are posting about big tits. It may be in the project's
 interests to have more women there, but it's hard to see how it could
 be in the interests of the individual women.

 It doesn't really matter what the intention is behind the words,
 because all we see are the words themselves. For some women (not all,
 but some), these words effectively mean, The way you see the world is
 not represented here, or Go away.

 That's one of the reasons it's a problem.

 Sarah

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




-- 
Only the shallow know themselves. - Oscar Wilde
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap