hm, reading the threads in the list archive
is an option that I often use, too, and it is independent of any mail program
;-)
example, by thread, this month:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2012-June/thread.html
:-) cheers
Claudia
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:50:17 +0100, Andreas Kolbe wrote
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Karen Sue Rolph
> wrote:
>
> > Dear esteemed colleagues,
> >
>
>
>
> > I recently referred to Anita S. I don't know her, don't know how she
> > would be contacted, Andreas. I don't know if she contributes to Wikipedia,
> > even. Anyone who might have weighed in without first exploring the nature
> > of her work missed it's essence. Evidence is useful to this forum and its
> > mission.
> >
> > KSRolph
> >
>
> Dear Karen,
>
> I have contacted Anita, and hope she will have time to look in.
>
> (As for the threading of topics, I suspect that gmail handles the thread
> structure better than hotmail. In gmail, all the posts that belong to a
> given topic always appear together, in one long list, so it's easier to see
> what preceded any given post.)
>
> Best,
> Andreas
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
