Re: [brlug-general] network service segregation

2009-05-07 Thread Tim Fournet
from the machine it's running on, or an external host? It might be that iptraf 
is going by the driver, and since both nics have the same driver, it's not 
being accurate. If you can sniff the traffic on the receiving host and sort by 
mac address, that might tell you for sure



- Original Message -
From: "mat" 
To: general@brlug.net
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 2:04:19 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [brlug-general] network service segregation

Iptraf


--Original Message--
From: Tim Fournet
Sender: general-boun...@brlug.net
To: general@brlug.net
ReplyTo: general@brlug.net
Subject: Re: [brlug-general] network service segregation
Sent: May 7, 2009 12:48 PM

As long as your application is binding to an IP address and not creating 
reverse sessions, then I don't see how this could happen. What are you testing 
with that leads you to believe that you're getting traffic from another 
interface?

- Original Message -
From: "mat branyon" 
To: general@brlug.net
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 1:31:16 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [brlug-general] network service segregation


I am building a server that hosts multiple services, one of which is near real 
time (HD video on demand). The server is a dell 2950 with a dual port intel nic 
in it. I'd like to have one port set up for vod, and the other set up for all 
of the other services. both ports need to be set up to be on the same subnet. 
Is there a way to ensure that data sent to the ip on port one returns from the 
same port? 

currently, i am getting a lot of crossover, ie, i make a request for vod on 
eth3, and it gets returned through eth2... 

does this make any sense? any suggestions? 

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Re: [brlug-general] network service segregation

2009-05-07 Thread mat
Iptraf


--Original Message--
From: Tim Fournet
Sender: general-boun...@brlug.net
To: general@brlug.net
ReplyTo: general@brlug.net
Subject: Re: [brlug-general] network service segregation
Sent: May 7, 2009 12:48 PM

As long as your application is binding to an IP address and not creating 
reverse sessions, then I don't see how this could happen. What are you testing 
with that leads you to believe that you're getting traffic from another 
interface?

- Original Message -
From: "mat branyon" 
To: general@brlug.net
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 1:31:16 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [brlug-general] network service segregation


I am building a server that hosts multiple services, one of which is near real 
time (HD video on demand). The server is a dell 2950 with a dual port intel nic 
in it. I'd like to have one port set up for vod, and the other set up for all 
of the other services. both ports need to be set up to be on the same subnet. 
Is there a way to ensure that data sent to the ip on port one returns from the 
same port? 

currently, i am getting a lot of crossover, ie, i make a request for vod on 
eth3, and it gets returned through eth2... 

does this make any sense? any suggestions? 

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Re: [brlug-general] network service segregation

2009-05-07 Thread Tim Fournet
As long as your application is binding to an IP address and not creating 
reverse sessions, then I don't see how this could happen. What are you testing 
with that leads you to believe that you're getting traffic from another 
interface?

- Original Message -
From: "mat branyon" 
To: general@brlug.net
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2009 1:31:16 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [brlug-general] network service segregation


I am building a server that hosts multiple services, one of which is near real 
time (HD video on demand). The server is a dell 2950 with a dual port intel nic 
in it. I'd like to have one port set up for vod, and the other set up for all 
of the other services. both ports need to be set up to be on the same subnet. 
Is there a way to ensure that data sent to the ip on port one returns from the 
same port? 

currently, i am getting a lot of crossover, ie, i make a request for vod on 
eth3, and it gets returned through eth2... 

does this make any sense? any suggestions? 

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


[brlug-general] network service segregation

2009-05-07 Thread mat branyon
I am building a server that hosts multiple services, one of which is near
real time (HD video on demand).  The server is a dell 2950 with a dual port
intel nic in it.  I'd like to have one port set up for vod, and the other
set up for all of the other services.  both ports need to be set up to be on
the same subnet.  Is there a way to ensure that data sent to the ip on port
one returns from the same port?

currently, i am getting a lot of crossover, ie, i make a request for vod on
eth3, and it gets returned through eth2...

does this make any sense?  any suggestions?
___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Re: [brlug-general] Cox Optical Internet & Phones

2009-05-07 Thread Bret Esquivel
I have a client that has a 10 Mbps Metro-E from Cox. When it works, it works. 
However, within the first month of having the service, we encountered a fiber 
cut, and failed Cox hardware...


Bret Esquivel, MCSE, CCNA
President | Immense Networks
Office:    225.754.9005
Fax: 225.454.6485 
Mobile:  504.301.7413
9654 Brookline Avenue | Suite 200 
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809
http://www.immense.net/


-Original Message-
From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On Behalf Of 
Dustin Puryear
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:39 AM
To: general@brlug.net; General Discussion List; disc...@br-issa.org
Subject: Re: [brlug-general] Cox Optical Internet & Phones

Heck, I'd like to know too..

-Original Message-
From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On
Behalf Of Mark A. Lappin
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 10:36 AM
To: 'general@brlug.net'; 'General Discussion List';
'disc...@br-issa.org'
Subject: [brlug-general] Cox Optical Internet & Phones

Is anybody using Cox Optical Internet, Metro Ethernet and/or phones.
If you are I'd very much like to get your opinion of these services
offered by Cox or if you had these services and went back.

Mark

Mark A. Lappin, CCNA, MCSE:Security | Lee Michaels Fine Jewelry
Director of Information Technology
11314 Cloverland Ave  | Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Ph: 225.291.9094 ext 245 | Fax: 225-291-5778  | Mobile:  225-362-2770
www.lmfj.com



This communication is privileged and confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies of this communication .

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

--
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
Click here to report this message as spam. 
http://esva.puryear-it.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=





___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


Re: [brlug-general] Cox Optical Internet & Phones

2009-05-07 Thread Dustin Puryear
Heck, I'd like to know too..

-Original Message-
From: general-boun...@brlug.net [mailto:general-boun...@brlug.net] On
Behalf Of Mark A. Lappin
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 10:36 AM
To: 'general@brlug.net'; 'General Discussion List';
'disc...@br-issa.org'
Subject: [brlug-general] Cox Optical Internet & Phones

Is anybody using Cox Optical Internet, Metro Ethernet and/or phones.
If you are I'd very much like to get your opinion of these services
offered by Cox or if you had these services and went back.

Mark

Mark A. Lappin, CCNA, MCSE:Security | Lee Michaels Fine Jewelry
Director of Information Technology
11314 Cloverland Ave  | Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Ph: 225.291.9094 ext 245 | Fax: 225-291-5778  | Mobile:  225-362-2770
www.lmfj.com



This communication is privileged and confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies of this communication .

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

--
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
Click here to report this message as spam. 
http://esva.puryear-it.com/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=





___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net


[brlug-general] Cox Optical Internet & Phones

2009-05-07 Thread Mark A. Lappin
Is anybody using Cox Optical Internet, Metro Ethernet and/or phones.   If you 
are I'd very much like to get your opinion of these services offered by Cox or 
if you had these services and went back.

Mark

Mark A. Lappin, CCNA, MCSE:Security | Lee Michaels Fine Jewelry
Director of Information Technology
11314 Cloverland Ave  | Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Ph: 225.291.9094 ext 245 | Fax: 225-291-5778  | Mobile:  225-362-2770
www.lmfj.com



This communication is privileged and confidential.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
this communication .

___
General mailing list
General@brlug.net
http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net