Re: [brutus] webapp - why?

2004-07-08 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
...
Since we'd rather spend the resources on building than presentation, perhaps
we ought just move to the XHTML option (in CleanUp branch).
+1
Forrest should be an option, not a strictly necessary dependency.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [brutus] webapp - why?

2004-07-08 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> could someone explain to me exactly *why* we're running forrest as a
> webapp? It's a relatively big resource hog...

Recall when we ran forrest as a batch command? It would generate thousands
of pages (costing lots of resources) even if those pages were never viewed.
Basically, from what you say, both ways of using Forrest are expensive.

Since we'd rather spend the resources on building than presentation, perhaps
we ought just move to the XHTML option (in CleanUp branch).

regards,

Adam


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [brutus] webapp - why?

2004-07-08 Thread Leo Simons
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in other words, that's a lot of tomcat processes with a lot of
resident memory.
Sure its not only a lot of Java threads in a single process with a lot
of resident memory?  Linux process watching tools are unusable WRT
threads - some people say Linux threads are unusable.
reasonably sure. Other tasks running concurrently are noticably faster 
when tomcat is off. Restarting tomcat also helps tremendously. I just 
tried that and then we're indeed down to just having many dupped threads.

I'm guessing the forrest webapp has a memory leak or two.
- LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [brutus] webapp - why?

2004-07-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> in other words, that's a lot of tomcat processes with a lot of
> resident memory.

Sure its not only a lot of Java threads in a single process with a lot
of resident memory?  Linux process watching tools are unusable WRT
threads - some people say Linux threads are unusable.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]