Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Seems like your gump script is hosed.. I think dos2unix program can fix that, or copy & paste the contents of gump in a new file (using a terminal session), remove gump, rename the new file to gump, chmod +x the new file and run :) I hit this proble a couple of times when editing bash scripts on windows and copying it directly to a linux box, it would give these strange warnings.. Don't know if this is the case though, but it seems similar.. Mvgr, Martin Graham Leggett wrote: Hi all, I have been trying to play around with Gump, but there seems to be some components missing that gump requires, however the lack of a meaningful error message leaves me stumped: bash-2.03$ ./gump validate ./gump: function: not found Run the DTD validation tools on the metadata. Usage: ./gump validate ./gump: function: not found ./gump: validate Any ideas? Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Martin van den Bemt said: > Seems like your gump script is hosed.. I think dos2unix program can fix > that, or copy & paste the contents of gump in a new file (using a > terminal session), remove gump, rename the new file to gump, chmod +x > the new file and run :) > I hit this proble a couple of times when editing bash scripts on windows > and copying it directly to a linux box, it would give these strange > warnings.. > Don't know if this is the case though, but it seems similar.. The gump code is a fresh checkout from svn to MacOSX, then moved to Solaris, no Windows is involved anywhere. As far as I am aware, MacOSX follows the Unix line ending conventions, but I could be wrong. If I turn on python debugging, it does this, which seems to indicate line ending problems of some kind: bash-2.03$ python -d ./gump validate File "./gump", line 25 function usage ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
have a go at dos2unix (if you have installed that on solaris) Something probably happened moving across the files.. Mvgr, Martin Graham Leggett wrote: Martin van den Bemt said: Seems like your gump script is hosed.. I think dos2unix program can fix that, or copy & paste the contents of gump in a new file (using a terminal session), remove gump, rename the new file to gump, chmod +x the new file and run :) I hit this proble a couple of times when editing bash scripts on windows and copying it directly to a linux box, it would give these strange warnings.. Don't know if this is the case though, but it seems similar.. The gump code is a fresh checkout from svn to MacOSX, then moved to Solaris, no Windows is involved anywhere. As far as I am aware, MacOSX follows the Unix line ending conventions, but I could be wrong. If I turn on python debugging, it does this, which seems to indicate line ending problems of some kind: bash-2.03$ python -d ./gump validate File "./gump", line 25 function usage ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The gump code is a fresh checkout from svn to MacOSX, I'm not sure whether we have svn:eol-style native on all files - and whether I "corrected" all the Windows line-ends when I tried to clean up the files. Are you talking about the script named gump at the top of trunk? This one does not have CRs and svn:eol-style is native. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > have a go at dos2unix (if you have installed that on solaris) tr -d '\r' < file > outfile will do. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Stefan Bodewig said: > I'm not sure whether we have svn:eol-style native on all files - and > whether I "corrected" all the Windows line-ends when I tried to clean > up the files. > > Are you talking about the script named gump at the top of trunk? Yes. > This one does not have CRs and svn:eol-style is native. I just checked out the gump SVN repo from scratch on the Solaris box, and the problem remains. The problem does not happen on the MacOSX machine though - which has an older version of python on it (v2.3), while the Solaris machine has the most recent release of python on it (v2.4). Could it be that python has changed between v2.3 and v2.4 to cause a problem? Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could it be that python has changed between v2.3 and v2.4 to cause a > problem? No idea, sorry. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Martin van den Bemt said: > have a go at dos2unix (if you have installed that on solaris) > Something probably happened moving across the files.. As I said below, neither DOS nor Windows have been involved, so running it through dos2unix is not likely to achieve anything. I checked it out directly to the Solaris machine from SVN, and it still complains with the error - the problem seems to be related to python v2.4. dos2unix has no effect on the gump file: bash-2.03$ cat gump | wc -c 9794 bash-2.03$ cat gump | dos2unix | wc -c could not open /dev/kbd to get keyboard type US keyboard assumed could not get keyboard type US keyboard assumed 9794 Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Stefan Bodewig said: >> Could it be that python has changed between v2.3 and v2.4 to cause a >> problem? > > No idea, sorry. Has gump been tested at all using python v2.4? - it's new, having been released in November last year. Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig said: > >>> Could it be that python has changed between v2.3 and v2.4 to cause >>> a problem? >> >> No idea, sorry. > > Has gump been tested at all using python v2.4? - it's new, having > been released in November last year. I haven't, that's all I know. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Stefan Bodewig said: >> Has gump been tested at all using python v2.4? - it's new, having >> been released in November last year. > > I haven't, that's all I know. There is an irony in that the latest trunk of gump doesn't run under the latest release of python... :) Busy trying to install python v2.3 to see if that will make it work on Solaris. Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Graham Leggett said: > Busy trying to install python v2.3 to see if that will make it work on > Solaris. Just tried python v2.3.5, but the same problem is present. Seems gump won't work on Solaris at all :( Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
I assume you have installed the sun gnu package (although I saw the bash pointer, there could be something wrong..) Did you also try the tr thing that stefan suggested btw ? And the copy & paste to a new bash file ? And maybe check if the file starts with a #!/path/to/bash and also points to the correct path to bash for your solaris install. (sorry don't have solaris running anymore, or else I could have a go at it) Just some ideas, since I don't have a clue what else could be wrong.. Mvgr, Martin Graham Leggett wrote: Graham Leggett said: Busy trying to install python v2.3 to see if that will make it work on Solaris. Just tried python v2.3.5, but the same problem is present. Seems gump won't work on Solaris at all :( Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Martin van den Bemt wrote: And maybe check if the file starts with a #!/path/to/bash and also points to the correct path to bash for your solaris install. I suddenly realised that the "gump" script is not a python script, but a non portable shell script - if you change /bin/sh at the top of the script to point at bash directly, suddenly the script starts working. I have not yet been able to figure out exacyl what portability problems there are, but in the mean time it would probably save a lot of drama if /bin/sh was changed to /bin/bash, to show that bash is required. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Glad to hear it runs :) Anyone opposed to the change proposed by Graham ? On redhat / fedora it defaults to /bin/bash, don't if other linux variants are the same.. (eg on debian).. Mvgr, Martin Graham Leggett wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: And maybe check if the file starts with a #!/path/to/bash and also points to the correct path to bash for your solaris install. I suddenly realised that the "gump" script is not a python script, but a non portable shell script - if you change /bin/sh at the top of the script to point at bash directly, suddenly the script starts working. I have not yet been able to figure out exacyl what portability problems there are, but in the mean time it would probably save a lot of drama if /bin/sh was changed to /bin/bash, to show that bash is required. Regards, Graham -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone opposed to the change proposed by Graham ? No, although I'd prefer to find the reason it doesn't work on plain Bourne Shells as well. > On redhat / fedora it defaults to /bin/bash, don't if other linux > variants are the same.. (eg on debian).. At least on Brutus /bis/sh links to bash. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gump won't run: function: not found
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone opposed to the change proposed by Graham ? No, although I'd prefer to find the reason it doesn't work on plain Bourne Shells as well. I'll try to figure that out this week, with different kind of shells.. I am in desperate need anyway to switch to a more modern version of gump . I think my servers and workstations are stable enough to have a go at this (my hardware has been blacking out on me big time lately..) Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
