Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.7-incubating (rc2)
+1 On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.0.7-incubating > release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the > release. *As we only have two mentors left we will need at least one > extra vote.* > > These are the major changes from our previous 2.0.6-incubating release: > > * Allow to set limit for maximum number of rows returned > * Update Empire-Struts-Extentions to Struts 2.2.1 and provide Portlet Support > > Changelog: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.0.7-incubating-rc2/CHANGELOG.txt?view=co > > Subversion tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.0.7-incubating-rc2 > > Maven staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheempire-db-003/ > > Distribution files are located here > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ > > Rat report for the tag is available here: > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Setting up the Jena podling
Hi, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave wrote: > ...I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone ahead and created JIRA > issues to request infrastructure setup for Apache Jena (incubating) Thanks - I did the svn setup, for the rest I'm quite busy with the new stanbol podling otherwise, so if you guys can get Jena going that's very cool. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Setting up the Jena podling
I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. Thanks for the help on the ASF side. Sent from my mobile device. On 3 Dec 2010, at 10:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave wrote: >> ...I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone ahead and created JIRA >> issues to request infrastructure setup for Apache Jena (incubating) > > Thanks - I did the svn setup, for the rest I'm quite busy with the new > stanbol podling otherwise, so if you guys can get Jena going that's > very cool. > > -Bertrand > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Setting up the Jena podling
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. > > Thanks for the help on the ASF side. Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences? (Perhaps we should move further discussion to the jena-dev list since it is now open) - Dave > Sent from my mobile device. > > On 3 Dec 2010, at 10:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave wrote: >>> ...I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone ahead and created JIRA >>> issues to request infrastructure setup for Apache Jena (incubating) >> >> Thanks - I did the svn setup, for the rest I'm quite busy with the new >> stanbol podling otherwise, so if you guys can get Jena going that's >> very cool. >> >> -Bertrand >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Setting up the Jena podling
On 3 Dec 2010, at 13:38, Dave wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. >> >> Thanks for the help on the ASF side. > > Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences? I have all the IDs waiting for ICLAs to be filed before making requests. I'll do them in batches as they get processed. > > (Perhaps we should move further discussion to the jena-dev list since > it is now open) Yes. I'll get Jena debs to join. Ross > > - Dave > > >> Sent from my mobile device. >> >> On 3 Dec 2010, at 10:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave wrote: ...I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone ahead and created JIRA issues to request infrastructure setup for Apache Jena (incubating) >>> >>> Thanks - I did the svn setup, for the rest I'm quite busy with the new >>> stanbol podling otherwise, so if you guys can get Jena going that's >>> very cool. >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Setting up the Jena podling
On 03/12/10 13:59, Ross Gardler wrote: On 3 Dec 2010, at 13:38, Dave wrote: (Perhaps we should move further discussion to the jena-dev list since it is now open) Yes. I'll get Jena debs to join. Ross Leo already invited us via jena-devel. I imagine most of us are subscribed now. Damian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Setting up the Jena podling
On 03/12/10 13:38, Dave wrote: On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. > > Thanks for the help on the ASF side. Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences? (Perhaps we should move further discussion to the jena-dev list since it is now open) 5 of 7 has indicated to me that ICLAs are filed. Waiting two people ... (name and shame?) Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)
Hi Luciano, Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I think... Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war First, note how there are redundant license files in WEB-INF/classes/LICENSE and WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/LICENSE (I've seen this same problem in another project. Can't remember how it was resolved). Also, I don't think the LICENSE information (in either file) is accurate. It needs to reflect the licensing information for the artifacts contained within the .war. However, I don't think it does... IMO, this merits a -1... --kevan On Nov 28, 2010, at 12:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone > release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval > to publish the release. > > Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release > artifacts of PhotArk. > > The artifacts are available for review at: > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M3-incubating-RC1/ > > This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, > and the Maven staging repository. > > The release tag is available at : > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M3-incubating-RC1/ > > The podling vote thread is : > http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01082.html > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Introduction for Stephen D. Williams (sdw)
For the purposes of supporting the about to be proposed EXI incubator project, I'll introduce myself here: I have a long background [3] in software development and related activities. In addition to IETF (presence/IM) and W3C (XBC,EXI) participation for many years, I have long (since the mid-80s) used, promoted, and contributed to open source projects. Recently, in addition to OpenEXI, I have been working on a fork of XBig for Java->C++ glue (overdue for release), creating a new Java PC simulator / visualizer as an applet (NSF grant with a professor at American University), and created a new very concise Java Dom/Sax parser (pending license release). I have also been finding and working around bugs, limitations, and Apache software versioning issues for Android development. At one point I was listed as a Linux kernel contributor (albeit for something minor). I have been a CTO at a few startups, including, briefly, Jabber.com, Inc. I'm currently an independent self-employed consultant (OptimaLogic, Inc.) doing deep Android Java/C++ and Qt/C++ development involving GUI interface and complex Oauth-like REST web APIs with crypto, XML, and related technologies. Other recent development involves computer vision, augmented reality, and semantic desktop related information visualization, management, and sharing. Thanks, sdw -- Stephen D. Williams s...@lig.net stephendwilli...@gmail.com LinkedIn: http://sdw.st/in V:650-450-UNIX (8649) V:866.SDW.UNIX V:703.371.9362 F:703.995.0407 AIM:sdw Skype:StephenDWilliams Yahoo:sdwlignet Resume: http://sdw.st/gres Personal: http://sdw.st facebook.com/sdwlig twitter.com/scienteer
Ready to propose EXI incubator candidate
This is a call for a champion and mentors for an incubator project we are about to propose formally for implementations of the W3C EXI specification and related technologies. The current proposal abstract, proposal, and background for EXI can be found at the end of this message for reference[4]. Some current and former members of the W3C EXI [1] / XBC [2] working groups are interested in submitting an Apache Incubator proposal for EXI. Open EXI is an existing open-source project with a partial EXI implementation under the Apache 2.0 license. Another more-complete commercially-developed implementation is being released soon, also under the Apache 2.0 license. Further contributions will be made soon. We have a proposal, to be released shortly, that seems complete with an initial set of five committers. We believe we now need a champion and nominated mentors. I have agreed to lead this effort and would be happy to act as a mentor if promoted to that status. [1] W3C Efficient XML Interchange http://www.w3.org/XML/EXI/ [2] XML Binary Characterization http://www.w3.org/XML/Binary/ [3] http://sdw.st/gres [4] Current Open-EXI Apache Incubator Proposal introduction to EXI: Abstract Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) is a forthcoming W3C Recommendation for compression and high performance decompression of XML. This standard has wide applicability to all forms of XML documents and consistently beats zip/gzip in terms of compactness. Multiple software implementations are beginning to emerge. This work will establish a high performance open source codebase in both Java and C++ that can immediately be used in bandwidth-limited environments and other software applications that are not currently well served by XML. It may later may integrated into http servers and clients. Proposal This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software Foundation to develop an implementation of the current EXI Candidate Recommendation, and to track changes to the Candidate Recommendation as is progresses to an approved W3C standard. The initial implementation will be in Java, and a subsequent C++ implementation will follow. Once implemented the EXI standard could be used in many other Apache projects, such as the web server, web services, etc. The EXI specification is available at the EXI Working Group Public Page. A Primer on EXI is available there, as are an evaluation of the likely impacts and best practices. An evaluation and measurement note are available; these notes are a product of the test framework results. Background Since the inception of XML, it has been noticed that a good number of data exchange application scenarios seemed to fit the use of XML very appealing, only to find XML inhibitive given its sometimes very costly inefficiency of inherent verbosity. Legacy applications involving data exchange, for example, typically use non-XML data formats (e.g. ASN.1 PER) that predate XML, are often far more efficient and in some cases hand-optimized to achieve the best performance result. When such applications attempt to harness the numerous benefits of XML, it is not unusual that they find XML helplessly bulky to adopt given the bandwidth constraints of the existing communication infrastructures that were designed with the currently used format in mind. Another example is a data-intensive mobile application for which bandwidth is at a premium and the use of XML is not very realistic due to its substantive disadvantage at bandwidth conservation. While there are some other use cases that address the bloated message size issue with general-purpose compression methods such as GZip, the application of such methods unfortunately more often than not compound the efficiency issue for those use cases aforementioned because GZip usually degrades the processing efficiency dramatically and has little or no impact on the message size when individual message is short. Over the years, there have been developed numerous file formats purported to serve as alternative, efficient representation of XML data. W3C's (World Wide Web Consortium) XBC WG (XML Binary Characterization Working Group) in 2005 found that most, if not all of those formats are not very general in the sense that they had been each designed to target a particular problem domain and do not serve well use cases of other domains. In 2006, W3C launched the EXI (Efficient XML Interchange) WG with the charter to conduct study and formulate a single alternative format that provides utmost efficiency better than the customarily used formats (e.g. ASN.1 and GZip) do and even competes with hand-optimized formats, with broadest coverage of use cases and platforms including those that had not been well served by XML, and yet is compatible with XML and integrates well with existing XML family of standards and applications without major disruption. As of this writing, EXI is a W3C Candidate Recommendation, and is
[RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
Hi everyone, I'm pleased to report that the vote to accept Wave into the ASF incubator was overwhelmingly positive. By my tally, there have been 88 votes over the past 3+ days, including 18 IPMC binding votes, 8 votes by members of the ASF, and no -1 votes. Of those 88 votes, due to a slight process confusion (and an issue of reply-to settings), 22 votes were only registered on the existing wave-protocol Google Group. The 18 binding votes: Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, Mark Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton The 68 non-binding votes: a2c, Adirondack, Alain Levesque, Albonobo, Alex North, Andreas Kuckartz, Andrian Kurniady, Anthony Watkins, Bart Thate, benediktus dwi hari prasetyo, Bertine van Hövell, Charles Goddard, Chris Harvey, Christopher Brind, Dan Peterson, Dave Woollard, David Wang, David Westbrook, Davide Carnovale, Edward J. Yoon, Eelco Hillenius, florent andré, Florian Rohrweck, Francis De Brabandere, Gamer-Z, Help Earth Foundation,Honza Rameš, Ian Boston, Ian Roughley,Isabel Drost, Jack Park, James R. Purser, Jeff Forsyth, Jeremy ngl, John Edstrom, JR Smith, Kevin Lau, Lahiru Gunathilake, Manfred Herrmann, Mark Kovacevich, Matias Molinas, Matt Richards, Matthew Cua1, Michael MacFadden, MiCHiLU/Takanao Endoh, Mohammad Nour, Nathanael Abbotts, Noriyo, Paul Lindner, Petru, Riu6, Sander W G van der Waal, Scott Wilson, shigech...@gmail.com, Sophia Parafina, Soren Lassen, STenyaK, Tad Glines, ThomasWrobel, Tish Shute, Vitality, and Yasushi Ando The primary voting thread (there were a few side threads that sprawled that aren't linked here): http://apache.markmail.org/message/v2c4cnewpczdxzny [ The following Google Group archives the other 22 unofficial, non-binding votes: http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/4fc26d16cde74380 ] The proposal that was approved: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal Looking forward to growing Wave in the Apache way, -Dan
Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > The 18 binding votes: > Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris > A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug > Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, Mark > Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira > > The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: > Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas > Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton > Wow! Did we set some sort of record? I didn't realize that so many ASF people had voted. -Tad
Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
Now that the Vote has been completed. What are the next steps? On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tad Glines wrote: > 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > > The 18 binding votes: >> Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris >> A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug >> Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, >> Mark >> Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira >> >> The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: >> Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas >> Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton >> > > Wow! Did we set some sort of record? I didn't realize that so many ASF > people had voted. > > -Tad > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- --Matt
Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
Would it be a good idea to translate this page to other languages? Or something is more urgent for translation than this? I can try to help. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > Hi everyone, > > I'm pleased to report that the vote to accept Wave into the ASF incubator > was overwhelmingly positive. > > By my tally, there have been 88 votes over the past 3+ days, including 18 > IPMC binding votes, 8 votes by members of the ASF, and no -1 votes. Of those > 88 votes, due to a slight process confusion (and an issue of reply-to > settings), 22 votes were only registered on the existing wave-protocol > Google Group. > > The 18 binding votes: > Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris > A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug > Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, Mark > Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira > > The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: > Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas > Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton > > The 68 non-binding votes: > a2c, Adirondack, Alain Levesque, Albonobo, Alex North, Andreas Kuckartz, > Andrian Kurniady, Anthony Watkins, Bart Thate, benediktus dwi hari prasetyo, > Bertine van Hövell, Charles Goddard, Chris Harvey, Christopher Brind, Dan > Peterson, Dave Woollard, David Wang, David Westbrook, Davide Carnovale, > Edward J. Yoon, Eelco Hillenius, florent andré, Florian Rohrweck, Francis De > Brabandere, Gamer-Z, Help Earth Foundation,Honza Rameš, Ian Boston, Ian > Roughley,Isabel Drost, Jack Park, James R. Purser, Jeff Forsyth, Jeremy ngl, > John Edstrom, JR Smith, Kevin Lau, Lahiru Gunathilake, Manfred Herrmann, > Mark Kovacevich, Matias Molinas, Matt Richards, Matthew Cua1, Michael > MacFadden, MiCHiLU/Takanao Endoh, Mohammad Nour, Nathanael Abbotts, Noriyo, > Paul Lindner, Petru, Riu6, Sander W G van der Waal, Scott Wilson, > shigech...@gmail.com, Sophia Parafina, Soren Lassen, STenyaK, Tad Glines, > ThomasWrobel, Tish Shute, Vitality, and Yasushi Ando > > The primary voting thread (there were a few side threads that sprawled that > aren't linked here): > http://apache.markmail.org/message/v2c4cnewpczdxzny > [ The following Google Group archives the other 22 unofficial, non-binding > votes: > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/4fc26d16cde74380 > ] > > The proposal that was approved: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal > > Looking forward to growing Wave in the Apache way, > -Dan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- Kevin ___ This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is prohibited. ___
Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
Michael MacFadden has written some ideas here: http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box/apache-incubator-roadmap FYI, several of us on the Google Wave team are away on vacations in parts of the December-January time period, so anything that depends on us may move a bit slow for the next month or so. Soren On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Matt Richards wrote: > Now that the Vote has been completed. > What are the next steps? > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tad Glines wrote: >> >> 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson >>> >>> The 18 binding votes: >>> Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris >>> A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug >>> Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, >>> Mark Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira >>> The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: >>> Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas >>> Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton >> >> Wow! Did we set some sort of record? I didn't realize that so many ASF >> people had voted. >> -Tad >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > > -- > --Matt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
Welcome, and best of luck. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator
All, I have volunteered to start the infrastructure set up in the absence of some of the Googlers on vacation as Soren mentions. Hopefully over the next few days we'll get some clarity on the actual logistics of becoming a podling in the incubator. I think we will likely start a new thread to figure that out. I would guess that one of the first things we would like to do is to get the mailing lists set up so that we can further discuss the organization of the project on a wave list. I am sure the Apache mentors can weigh in here to help us get started. ~Michael On Dec 3, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Soren Lassen wrote: > Michael MacFadden has written some ideas here: > > http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box/apache-incubator-roadmap > > FYI, several of us on the Google Wave team are away on vacations in > parts of the December-January time period, so anything that depends on > us may move a bit slow for the next month or so. > > Soren > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Matt Richards wrote: >> Now that the Vote has been completed. >> What are the next steps? >> >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tad Glines wrote: >>> >>> 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson The 18 binding votes: Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, Mark Struberg, Michael McCandless, Ralph Goers, Tim Williams, and Upayavira The 8 non-IMPC members who are ASF members: Ate Douma, Brett Porter, Leif Hedstrom, Marcel Offermans, Niklas Gustavsson, Richard Hall, Santiago Gala, and Vincent Siveton >>> >>> Wow! Did we set some sort of record? I didn't realize that so many ASF >>> people had voted. >>> -Tad >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Wave Protocol" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >> >> >> >> -- >> --Matt >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> wave-protocol+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Hi Luciano, > Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I > think... > > Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. > > I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war > > First, note how there are redundant license files in WEB-INF/classes/LICENSE > and WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/LICENSE (I've seen this same problem in another > project. Can't remember how it was resolved). Also, I don't think the LICENSE > information (in either file) is accurate. It needs to reflect the licensing > information for the artifacts contained within the .war. However, I don't > think it does... > > IMO, this merits a -1... > > --kevan PhotArk has a binary distribution and it has a LICENSE and NOTICE that incorporate all the 3rd party dependencies that is available on the photark war files. The actual war files are not ditributed by itself. In this case, isn't the LICENSE and NOTICE in the binary distribution enough ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
