Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. Karl On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:22 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
Karl Wright wrote: The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned. http://s.apache.org/ln -David David Crossley wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the Incubator rules. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 8:29 AM Karl Wright wrote: The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned. http://s.apache.org/ln -David David Crossley wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
The release is numbered 0.1-incubator right now. I could not find any rule that said what the actual format of the release number should be. Can you point me to the document that describes this? Thanks, Karl On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the Incubator rules. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 8:29 AM Karl Wright wrote: The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned. http://s.apache.org/ln -David David Crossley wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
Actually 0.1-incubating or 0.1.0-incubating if I'm not mistaken. Florent On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the Incubator rules. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 8:29 AM Karl Wright wrote: The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned. http://s.apache.org/ln -David David Crossley wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Florent Guillaume, Director of RD, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming Florent On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: The release is numbered 0.1-incubator right now. I could not find any rule that said what the actual format of the release number should be. Can you point me to the document that describes this? Thanks, Karl On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the Incubator rules. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 8:29 AM Karl Wright wrote: The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned. http://s.apache.org/ln -David David Crossley wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Florent Guillaume, Director of RD, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
I have uploaded a new artifact now. I could call this a release candidate except for the following: - This artifact has not been voted on by the ManifoldCF community. It is probably necessary to revote since what is included in the package has changed (e.g. no build artifacts except for docs). - I have made no changes to NOTICE and LICENSE, because the incubator and community advice seemed contradictory. I would like a general sense of how many people feel that the current NOTICE and LICENSE files are unacceptable before I make changes. - The two remaining RAT complaints, one of which comes from Forrest, and one from Lucene, need resolution. I posted about that earlier, but I have received no advice. I believe all other issues that have been raised have been addressed. I would very much like it if the incubator would review the modified artifact and see whether they agree. Thanks, Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Confusing naming of Manifold Connector Framework resources
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 January 2011 20:29, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: The official name of the project has changed repeatedly. The current official name is ManifoldCF. The community expects to change both the SVN root and the web-site root upon incubation in any case, which is why we have not changed either of these yet. OK, I see. Sorry, that should have been graduation, not incubation. A bigger area of concern is the prefix used for ManifoldCF tickets in Jira, which is CONNECTORS-xxx. This is apparently very difficult to change without losing a project's old tickets. I am hoping that change will not be needed. The Java package name hopefully won't need to be changed either ... We don't believe so. Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
oki that's fine then. Only did read 0.1 and didn't get the suffix. LieGrue, stru --- On Fri, 1/7/11, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 10:14 AM The release is numbered 0.1-incubator right now. I could not find any rule that said what the actual format of the release number should be. Can you point me to the document that describes this? Thanks, Karl On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the Incubator rules. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 To: general@incubator.apache.org Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 8:29 AM Karl Wright wrote: The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup. One consolation is that we do finally have a release of 0.9 planned. http://s.apache.org/ln -David David Crossley wrote: Karl Wright wrote: Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. One major problem will therefore be that we rely on Apache Forrest to build the documentation pages. Forrest requires Java 1.5. The availability of documentation in the release will therefore depend on the availability of Java 1.5 to the person building it. Is this acceptable? It is a tiny isolated problem. There are two simple workarounds. People do not need to stick with Java 1.5 http://forrest.apache.org/faq.html#oldjing -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
Hi Karl, Great job. +1 from me. SIGS check out: [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% gpg --verify apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 7 02:44:17 2011 PST using RSA key ID 03824582 gpg: Good signature from Karl David Wright (CODE SIGNING KEY) kwri...@apache.org gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: E74B 06A0 454F 6E92 400A 3450 FD1F F09C 0382 4582 [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% gpg --verify apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.zip.asc gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 7 02:44:10 2011 PST using RSA key ID 03824582 gpg: Good signature from Karl David Wright (CODE SIGNING KEY) kwri...@apache.org gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: E74B 06A0 454F 6E92 400A 3450 FD1F F09C 0382 4582 [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% MD5s check out: [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% cat *.md5 14F06B43AA87A615C7FD975452164664 *apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.gz F6D1D9AD7A5F7144B79C09B9E8A3BEE7 *apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.zip [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% md5sum apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.gz apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.zip 14f06b43aa87a615c7fd975452164664 apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.gz f6d1d9ad7a5f7144b79c09b9e8a3bee7 apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.zip Thanks for putting the KEYS file and CHANGES file with the RC. Minor notes: Rather than changing existing bits for the RC, why not just version them? Instead of: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/ You could do: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifold-cf-0.1-incubating/rcN/ So, for rc1, you'd have: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifold-cf-0.1-incubating/rc1/ BTW, it's fine to call this a release candidate. It's just not a release. Again, great job! Cheers, Chris On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:13 AM, Karl Wright wrote: I have uploaded a new artifact now. I could call this a release candidate except for the following: - This artifact has not been voted on by the ManifoldCF community. It is probably necessary to revote since what is included in the package has changed (e.g. no build artifacts except for docs). - I have made no changes to NOTICE and LICENSE, because the incubator and community advice seemed contradictory. I would like a general sense of how many people feel that the current NOTICE and LICENSE files are unacceptable before I make changes. - The two remaining RAT complaints, one of which comes from Forrest, and one from Lucene, need resolution. I posted about that earlier, but I have received no advice. I believe all other issues that have been raised have been addressed. I would very much like it if the incubator would review the modified artifact and see whether they agree. Thanks, Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
The community wanted to include both a source and a source+binary distribution. Accordingly, I spun up one of those, which is RC5. The RC4 candidate is still up there, so I guess you can vote on either one. Thanks! Karl On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Karl, Great job. +1 from me. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC2a)
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish the release. This release candidate has minimal changes compared to the previous release candidate and address the license/notice issues raised on this mailing list. Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M3-incubating-RC2a/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging repository. The release tag is available at : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M3-incubating-RC2a/ The podling vote thread is : http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg01108.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
Karl Wright wrote: The RAT report after these changes looks good except for two files, which come from the skins in the site: [rat:report] Unapproved licenses: [rat:report] [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/site/src/documentation/skins/common/xslt/html/split.xsl [rat:report] C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/site/src/documentation/skins/lucene/note.txt [rat:report] [rat:report] *** One of these looks like it comes from Forrest itself (the first), and has this header: !-- This stylesheet was taken from the XSLT FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/ Comments and adaption to be used without normalize-space() by forrest-...@xml.apache.org -- No idea what to do about that one. At Forrest we exclude it from our license header checking tools. The other is merely a todo list in the Lucene skin, which I believe could simply be removed. Or just exclude it too from your RAT processing. Thoughts? I don't understand why ManifoldCF needs this special skin processing that then needs to live in your svn. At Forrest, we advise not to create their own skin unless absolutely necessary. We prefer to address any needs in the default skin. With a quick flick through the ManifoldCF site i do not see anything that needs a special skin, just a couple of colour specifications. Of course this would be better discussed at the Forrest mail lists. At the dev@ list, seeing that you are using the development version. However, i reckon that you should not hold up your release because of this. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1
I don't understand why ManifoldCF needs this special skin processing that then needs to live in your svn. At Forrest, we advise not to create their own skin unless absolutely necessary. We prefer to address any needs in the default skin. With a quick flick through the ManifoldCF site i do not see anything that needs a special skin, just a couple of colour specifications. Of course this would be better discussed at the Forrest mail lists. At the dev@ list, seeing that you are using the development version. However, i reckon that you should not hold up your release because of this. -David Thanks for the advice. The current Forrest skin was originally put down by Grant so I will need to find out why he used it. But it is good to hear that these files can be excluded from the RAT report. Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
