[VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.6.0-incubating

[Andrei Savu]

This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 0.6.0-incubating
and the last release as an incubator project.

It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1230&version=12316468

*** Please download, test and vote by August 26, 2011.

Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~asavu/whirr-0.6.0-incubating-candidate-0

Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewhirr-058

The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/tags/release-0.6.0-incubating

Whirr's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/dist/KEYS

Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Websites of retired podlings (was Re: Retired podlings with RW SVN access)

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:26:24AM +0200, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Another option which might be cleaner and less burdensome to administer 
> > would
> > be to create a boilerplate "Retired Podling" static html page which would
> > replace the website for any podling which does not graduate.  This page 
> > would
> > give a brief explanation of the project's history and status and point at 
> > any
> > remaining resources, such as read-only SVN if the podling completed a
> > successful code grant.
> >
> > If there is interest in that idea, I volunteer to help create the template 
> > for
> > the "Retired Podling" page.
> 
> I like that idea. But we should the folder i.a.o/retiredpodling
> not simply have a httpd redirect rule pointing to the incubator status page?
> The state of the podling is reflected there very well and there is
> even a chance to send a personal message

That also sounds like a decent way of handling things.

My preference is still to create dedicated pages, if such pages can be made to
look respectable and can be put into place with minimal effort by the person
performing the retirement.  If a template contribution does not materialize in
the next few days from me, though, redirecting to the status page seems like
an OK fallback.

Marvin Humphrey


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Websites of retired podlings (was Re: Retired podlings with RW SVN access)

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:32:10AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Btw, the work is a search and replace on the  tag. I
> generally find one that works on the site content but fails on javadoc
> (as inserting a header into a  system is painful).

I'm glad to hear that munging a TLP website doesn't typically require
extravagant effort.  Nevertheless, tidying up after retired podlings isn't
the most glamourous work, and I think we would do well to minimize the burden
on the valuable volunteers who are willing to step up. ;)

Performing a search and replace isn't a big deal for one page, but doing it
for a lot of pages is a pain, and then the real deal killer is that someone
has to assess whether the result is acceptable and troubleshoot it if it's
not.  What if the podling didn't have it's act together and it turns out that
the existing site had problems?  We wouldn't expect a TLP to be in that
situation under ordinary circumstances, but podlings have problems --
otherwise they'd be TLPs. :)

All in all, I think that it's best if the person doing the retirement doesn't
have to perform any inspection of existing website material.  It's less work
to wipe the site and swap in some sort of known-safe replacement.

Marvin Humphrey


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Andrew Bayer]

Hi -

The POM is actually just for site generation currently. In the next release,
we'll probably have Maven artifacts to release as well, though.

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:

> You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
> using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer 
> wrote:
> > Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >
> >> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
> >>
> >> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> >> details required for the new vote?
> >>
> >> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> >> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >> >
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >> >>
> >> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >> >>
> >> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >> >>
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer 
> wrote:
> >> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer 
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> >> .
> >> >> >> The
> >> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> >> packaging
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> >> been
> >> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> >> excluded
> >> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> >> been
> >> >> >> built
> >> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly.
> The
> >> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar
> on
> >> OS
> >> >> X -
> >> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to
> get
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> files
> >> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb 
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics
> )
> >> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >> >>>
> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> >> ).
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> >> please
> >> >> >> find
> >> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> >> excluded.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The
> .gitignore
> >> >> files -
> >> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball,
> but
> >> the
> >> >> >> ones
> >> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>  A.
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 P

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Francis De Brabandere]

You seem to have a pom.xml but if I understood correctly you're not
using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
>>
>> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
>> details required for the new vote?
>>
>> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>> >>
>> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> >> when the vote succeeds.
>> >>
>> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>> >>
>> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>> >>
>> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> >> > Tag replaced.
>> >> >
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer 
>> wrote:
>> >> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> >> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> >> .
>> >> >> The
>> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
>> packaging
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
>> been
>> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> >> excluded
>> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
>> been
>> >> >> built
>> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > A.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> >> tarball
>> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
>> OS
>> >> X -
>> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> >> the
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> A.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >> >>> list](
>> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
>> ).
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
>> please
>> >> >> find
>> >> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
>> excluded.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> >> files -
>> >> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
>> the
>> >> >> ones
>> >> >> >>> that
>> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>  A.
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >> >>>  Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> >> some
>> >> >> >>> files
>> >> >> >>>  without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> >> they're
>> >> >> >>>  expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
>> comments,
>> >> etc
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> >>> these
>> >> >> >>>  should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
>> missing
>> >> >> >>> something.
>> >> >> >>> 
>> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Roman Shaposhnik]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Bruno Mahé  wrote:
> imho this is a non issue for this release because:
> * A discussion has just started on bigtop-dev mailing list about that
> question.

For the benefit of those exclusively on general@incubator.apache.org: the thread
that Bruno mentioned has also established that to the best of our knowledge
there have NOT been any releases of community packaging artifacts for any
of the projects that Bigtop cares about(*). As of today,  the danger of overlap
with existing artifacts is non-existent.


Thanks,
Roman.

P.S. In fact, at the moment, it is not even clear where such artifacts would
go if they get released. To the best of our knowledge Apache does not
have infrastructure for supporting APT/YUM/ZYPPER repos, nor does
it have any plans to bring it up in the near future.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Roman Shaposhnik]

+1 Non-binding.  I appreciate Eric's concerns, but we are releasing
Bigtop project here,
not the artifacts it is capable of producing. That said, settling on
an appropriate (and
configurable!) naming convention for packages would be a really high priority
for us in coming weeks.

Thanks,
Roman.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
> from now)
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> (svn rev. 1160352)
>
> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A.
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r794749 - /infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template

[Craig L Russell]

I would view this as an experiment.

Granting all podling committers access to the entire incubator seems a  
bit overbroad.


Craig

On Aug 22, 2011, at 12:53 PM, danie...@apache.org wrote:


Author: danielsh
Date: Mon Aug 22 19:53:21 2011
New Revision: 794749

Log:
open /incubator to incubator committers

Modified:
   infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization- 
template


Modified: infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf- 
authorization-template
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
==
--- infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization- 
template (original)
+++ infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization- 
template Mon Aug 22 19:53:21 2011

@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ acrequser = r
* = r

[/incubator]
-@incubator-pmc = rw
+@incubator = rw
@member = rw

[/incubator/ace]



Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Andrew Bayer]

Given that we're not releasing binary convenience artifacts for this
release, would this be something that could be fixed in 0.2.0-incubating
rather than this release?

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Eric Yang  wrote:

> -1 non-binding, the package generation spec file are currently producing
> package name without reference to bigtop.  The resulting artifacts can
> potentially overlap with project produced artifacts.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working
> days
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/<
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/>
> >
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> > (svn rev. 1160352)
> >
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Eric Yang]

-1 non-binding, the package generation spec file are currently producing 
package name without reference to bigtop.  The resulting artifacts can 
potentially overlap with project produced artifacts.

regards,
Eric

On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:

> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
> 
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> 
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
> from now)
> 
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> 
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> 
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> (svn rev. 1160352)
> 
> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> 
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> A.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[JUICE] podling committers missing from incubator unix group

[sebb]

Entries in podling juice not in incubator group:
amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner

Could one of the PMC chairs please add them as follows:

$ modify_unix_group.pl incubator
-add=amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner

Thanks

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Andrew Bayer]

blergh, sorry about the date and the DISCLAIMER text. Fixing the DISCLAIMER
on trunk now. I've also done BIGTOP-26 on trunk. I'm honestly not sure about
the filter files - will check on that going forward.

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, sebb  wrote:

> On 22 August 2011 19:07, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >
> > It fixes the following issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >
> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working
> days
>
> s/August 24/,August 25/
>
> > from now)
> >
> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
> >
> > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/<
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/>
>
> sig and hashes OK.
>
> > The tag to be voted on:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> > (svn rev. 1160352)
>
> source archive agrees with tag (apart from .gitignore files)
>
> AL headers now appear on most files; the ones that don't have headers
> are mostly test files.
>
> There are a few filter files containing sed commands - do these
> support comments?
> If so, might be an idea to add some comments as to what they do (as
> well as an AL header).
> Not a blocker for this release.
>
> There are NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files in SVN and the archive,
> which is good.
>
> Unfortunately the DISCLAIMER file refers to Whirr:
>
> "For more information about the incubation status of the Whirr project you
> can go to the following page:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/bigtop/";
>
> I don't think this is a blocker, but should obviously be fixed for any
> future release candidates.
>
> Also, please fix the SVN properties for the next release (BIGTOP-26).
>
> Overall, content looks good to me (I cannot test)
>
> So no objections from me this time round.
>
> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a
> successful
> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > A.
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[sebb]

On 22 August 2011 19:07, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days

s/August 24/,August 25/

> from now)
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/

sig and hashes OK.

> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> (svn rev. 1160352)

source archive agrees with tag (apart from .gitignore files)

AL headers now appear on most files; the ones that don't have headers
are mostly test files.

There are a few filter files containing sed commands - do these
support comments?
If so, might be an idea to add some comments as to what they do (as
well as an AL header).
Not a blocker for this release.

There are NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files in SVN and the archive,
which is good.

Unfortunately the DISCLAIMER file refers to Whirr:

"For more information about the incubation status of the Whirr project you
can go to the following page:

http://incubator.apache.org/bigtop/";

I don't think this is a blocker, but should obviously be fixed for any
future release candidates.

Also, please fix the SVN properties for the next release (BIGTOP-26).

Overall, content looks good to me (I cannot test)

So no objections from me this time round.

> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A.
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[sebb]

On 22 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> ...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =)

AIUI that's only binding as far as the Bigtop PPMC (podling PMC) is concerned.

You don't seem to be on the Incubator PMC, which is what is required
for binding votes on a release.

> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> 0.1.0-incubating.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>>
>> *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
>> from now)
>>
>> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>>
>> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>>
>> The tag to be voted on:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>> (svn rev. 1160352)
>>
>> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
>> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> A.
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Andrew Bayer]

...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =)

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:

> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
> from now)
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>
> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>
> The tag to be voted on:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> (svn rev. 1160352)
>
> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>
> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
> Thanks!
>
> A.
>

[VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

[Andrew Bayer]

This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
0.1.0-incubating.

It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420

*** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days
from now)

Note that we are voting on the source (tag).

Source tarball, checksums, signature:
http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/

The tag to be voted on:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
(svn rev. 1160352)

Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS

Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

Thanks!

A.

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Andrew Bayer]

Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =)

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb  wrote:

> This thread has got rather long and complicated.
>
> May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
> details required for the new vote?
>
> Change the subject to include RC2 please.
>
> Thanks!
> On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >
> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
> >>
> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >>
> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >>
> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >>
> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >>
> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer 
> wrote:
> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> .
> >> >> The
> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> packaging
> >> >> files
> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> been
> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> excluded
> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> been
> >> >> built
> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >>
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
> OS
> >> X -
> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> >> the
> >> >> files
> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> ).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> please
> >> >> find
> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> excluded.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> >> files -
> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
> the
> >> >> ones
> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>  A.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>>  Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> >> some
> >> >> >>> files
> >> >> >>>  without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> >> they're
> >> >> >>>  expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow
> comments,
> >> etc
> >> >> -
> >> >> >>> these
> >> >> >>>  should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm
> missing
> >> >> >>> something.
> >> >> >>> 
> >> >> >>>  As to the package contents - as far as I can tell,
> everything
> >> is
> >> >> >>> under
> >> >> >>>  bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as
> in
> >> >> SVN,
> >> >> >>> same
> >> >> >>>  layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet
> being
> >> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >> >>>  and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If
> there
> >> >> are

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[sebb]

This thread has got rather long and complicated.

May I suggest creating a new thread (i.e. not a reply) with just the
details required for the new vote?

Change the subject to include RC2 please.

Thanks!
On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>
>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> when the vote succeeds.
>>
>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>
>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>
>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>
>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> > Tag replaced.
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> .
>> >> The
>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> >> files
>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> excluded
>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> >> built
>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >>
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> tarball
>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>> X -
>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> the
>> >> files
>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >>> list](
>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> >> find
>> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> files -
>> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> >> ones
>> >> >>> that
>> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>  A.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>>  Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> some
>> >> >>> files
>> >> >>>  without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> they're
>> >> >>>  expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
>> etc
>> >> -
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>>  should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >> >>> something.
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
>> is
>> >> >>> under
>> >> >>>  bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> >> SVN,
>> >> >>> same
>> >> >>>  layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >> >>> built/used,
>> >> >>>  and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> >> are
>> >> >>> any
>> >> >>>  inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
>> it
>> >> >>> out.
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  A.
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb 
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer > >
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > This is the first 

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[sebb]

On 22 August 2011 16:56, Benson Margulies  wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
>>
>>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> Two points here.
>
> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.

+1
> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
> typical procedure is:
>
> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
> 3) Start vote.
> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
>
> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
> tags.

It's still possible to have immutable tags for votes.

Tomcat creates tags of the form 7.0.n.
If the vote succeeds, good, then the code is released.
If not, then abandon the tag entirely, and restart with 7.0.n+1
Yes, it leaves occasional gaps in the release versions, but it is very
simple to operate.
[I think httpd do the same]

But if you don't want to do that, it's still possible to create a tag
with the -RCn suffix but the correct entries in the poms.

It may not be possible to do this using the Maven Release plugin, but
I don't use it so I don't know.

I create a clean workspace from trunk, edit poms to fix up version and
SVN URLs and then create the tag directly from the workspace.
The workspace is then ready to use to build the release candidate.

This leaves the trunk as a snapshot, as well being safer than working
from the local trunk workspace, which might contain spurious files.

If all else fails, make sure that the release vote includes the SVN
revision, because at least SVN revision + tag is immutable.

>>>
>>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>>> when the vote succeeds.
>>>
>>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>>
>>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>>
>>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>>
>>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>>> > Tag replaced.
>>> >
>>> > A.
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>>> >> > New candidate up at
>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>>> .
>>> >> The
>>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>>> >> files
>>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>>> excluded
>>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>>> >> built
>>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>>> >>
>>> >> > A.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>>> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>>> >> tarball
>>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>>> X -
>>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>>> the
>>> >> files
>>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> A.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>>> >> >>> list](
>>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
>>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>>> >> find
>>> >> >>> RC1
>>> >> >>> >> at
>>> >> >>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>>> >> >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Benson Margulies]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a
> technical reason to reuse the tag.
>
> And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors
> suggested we try releasing in order to find out what needed to be fixed for
> the release. =)

Ah, just what you were hoping for, contradictory direction. Sorry,
we're really good at that here at the incubator.

>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies 
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer 
>> wrote:
>> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>
>> Two points here.
>>
>> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
>> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
>> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.
>>
>> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
>> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
>> typical procedure is:
>>
>> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
>> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
>> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
>> 3) Start vote.
>> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
>>
>> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
>> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
>> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
>> tags.
>>
>> >>
>> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> >> when the vote succeeds.
>> >>
>> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>> >>
>> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>> >>
>> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> >> > Tag replaced.
>> >> >
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer 
>> wrote:
>> >> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> >> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> >> .
>> >> >> The
>> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
>> packaging
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
>> been
>> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> >> excluded
>> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
>> been
>> >> >> built
>> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > A.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> >> tarball
>> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
>> OS
>> >> X -
>> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> >> the
>> >> >> files
>> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> A.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >> >>> list](
>> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
>> ).
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
>> please
>> >> >> find
>> >> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
>> excluded.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> >> files -
>> >> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the 

[VOTE] Release Apache Wookie 0.9.0-incubating (General Incubation List)

[Paul Sharples]

This is the first incubator release for Apache Wookie, with the artifacts being 
versioned as 0.9.0-incubating.

We have already received 2 IPMC +1 votes (plus an additional 3 PPMC +1 votes) 
during the release voting on wookie-dev.

Vote thread:
http://incubator.markmail.org/search/?q=wookie-dev#query:wookie-dev%20date%3A201107%20+page:1+mid:64f4jbbr2ifunry2+state:results

Result:
http://incubator.markmail.org/search/?q=wookie-dev#query:wookie-dev%20date%3A201107%20+page:1+mid:2k34v5hddl4ihv4x+state:results

Svn source tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.0-incubating/

Release notes:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.0-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES

Release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~psharples/wookie/staging-area/0p9p0/rc3/

PGP release keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.0-incubating/KEYS

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Andrew Bayer]

fwiw, in this case, we weren't releasing via Maven, so there wasn't a
technical reason to reuse the tag.

And yeah, sorry, this is my first ever ASF release, and our mentors
suggested we try releasing in order to find out what needed to be fixed for
the release. =)

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer 
> wrote:
> > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >
> >> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> Two points here.
>
> 1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
> leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
> respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.
>
> 2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
> part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
> typical procedure is:
>
> 1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
> 2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
> proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
> 3) Start vote.
> 3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.
>
> The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
> you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
> wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
> tags.
>
> >>
> >> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> >> when the vote succeeds.
> >>
> >> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
> >>
> >> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
> >>
> >> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
> >>
> >> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> >> > Tag replaced.
> >> >
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer 
> wrote:
> >> >> > New candidate up at
> >> >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >> .
> >> >> The
> >> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian
> packaging
> >> >> files
> >> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has
> been
> >> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> >> excluded
> >> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has
> been
> >> >> built
> >> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >> >>
> >> >> > A.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> >> tarball
> >> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on
> OS
> >> X -
> >> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> >> the
> >> >> files
> >> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >> >>> list](
> >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics
> ).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
> >> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case,
> please
> >> >> find
> >> >> >>> RC1
> >> >> >>> >> at
> >> >> >>>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be
> excluded.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> >> files -
> >> >> >>> I'll
> >> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but
> the
> >> >> ones
> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>  A.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Benson Margulies]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.

Two points here.

1) It's a bad idea to do serious QA only as part of a release vote. It
leads to a lot of noise and duplicated effort. Some of what led to a
respin here could have been tested for before starting a vote.

2) Sebb, I'm sorry to point out that labels are frequently mutated as
part of the release process in various TLP's of which am a part. The
typical procedure is:

1) Try very hard to sort out any possible problems.
2) Run maven-release-plugin. This creates a tag named after the
proposed release (e.g. cxf-2.4).
3) Start vote.
3) If awful turns up, delete tag, goto 1.

The problem is that maven metadata captures the actual svn path, so if
you try to take the '-rcn and rename' you end up with poms with the
wrong svn tags in them. So we're all stuck with not-quite-immutable
tags.

>>
>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
>> when the vote succeeds.
>>
>> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>>
>> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>>
>> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>>
>> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> > Tag replaced.
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> >> > New candidate up at
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>> .
>> >> The
>> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> >> files
>> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
>> excluded
>> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> >> built
>> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>> >>
>> >> > A.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> >> tarball
>> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
>> X -
>> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
>> the
>> >> files
>> >> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> A.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >> >>> list](
>> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >> >>> or [developer list](
>> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
>> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> >> find
>> >> >>> RC1
>> >> >>> >> at
>> >> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> A.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
>> files -
>> >> >>> I'll
>> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> >> ones
>> >> >>> that
>> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>  A.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >> >>> >wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>>  Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
>> some
>> >> >>> files
>> >> >>>  without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> >> they're
>> >> >>>  expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
>> etc
>> >> -
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>>  should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >> >>> something.
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
>> is
>> >> >>> under
>> >> >>>  bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> >> SVN,
>> >> >>> same

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[Andrew Bayer]

Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2

A.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb  wrote:

> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>
> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
> when the vote succeeds.
>
> Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.
>
> Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.
>
> [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
>
> On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> > Tag replaced.
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
> >
> >> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> >> > New candidate up at
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> .
> >> The
> >> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
> >> files
> >> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
> >> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now,
> excluded
> >> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
> >> built
> >> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
> >> >
> >> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
> >>
> >> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
> >>
> >> > A.
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <
> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
> >> tarball
> >> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS
> X -
> >> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get
> the
> >> files
> >> >> missing headers today as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> A.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
> >> >>> list](
> >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
> >> >>> or [developer list](
> >> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
> >> find
> >> >>> RC1
> >> >>> >> at
> >> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
> >> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > No sign yet.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> A.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore
> files -
> >> >>> I'll
> >> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
> >> ones
> >> >>> that
> >> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>  A.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
> >> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
> >> >>> >wrote:
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>>  Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are
> some
> >> >>> files
> >> >>>  without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
> >> they're
> >> >>>  expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments,
> etc
> >> -
> >> >>> these
> >> >>>  should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
> >> >>> something.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything
> is
> >> >>> under
> >> >>>  bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
> >> SVN,
> >> >>> same
> >> >>>  layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
> >> >>> built/used,
> >> >>>  and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
> >> are
> >> >>> any
> >> >>>  inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check
> it
> >> >>> out.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  Adding DISCLAIMER now.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  A.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb 
> wrote:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> > On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer  >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,
> version
> >> >>> > > 0.1.0-incubating.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > It fixes the following issues:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24
> (3
> >> >>>

Re: Podlings needing copyright sign-off

[Kevan Miller]

On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:

> Etch and Tashi are signed off.
> 
> Droids (seems the easiest one to sign off on) and Olio (likely to be
> retired) left from 2008 inductees.
> 
> 2009 list remains unchanged from below.

Wink is on my ToDo list. Just need a bit of free time...

--kevan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

[sebb]

Tags are supposed to be immutable.

For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
when the vote succeeds.

Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag.

Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on.

[BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]

On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
> Tag replaced.
>
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb  wrote:
>
>> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer  wrote:
>> > New candidate up at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/.
>> The
>> > only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging
>> files
>> > that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been
>> > replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded
>> > from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been
>> built
>> > with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
>> >
>> > Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks!
>>
>> Can't find an SVN tag for the source.
>>
>> > A.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The
>> tarball
>> >> contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X -
>> >> I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the
>> files
>> >> missing headers today as well.
>> >>
>> >> A.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> You can get in touch with us on the [user
>> >>> list](
>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics)
>> >>> or [developer list](
>> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics).
>> >>>
>> >>> This also needs to be fixed before release.
>> >>>
>> >>> Why is this not a .txt file?
>> >>>
>> >>> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb  wrote:
>> >>> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer 
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please
>> find
>> >>> RC1
>> >>> >> at
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER.
>> >>> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Website should update shortly.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > No sign yet.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> A.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files -
>> >>> I'll
>> >>> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the
>> ones
>> >>> that
>> >>> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>  A.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <
>> andrew.ba...@gmail.com
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>>  Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some
>> >>> files
>> >>>  without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because
>> they're
>> >>>  expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc
>> -
>> >>> these
>> >>>  should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing
>> >>> something.
>> >>> 
>> >>>  As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is
>> >>> under
>> >>>  bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in
>> SVN,
>> >>> same
>> >>>  layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being
>> >>> built/used,
>> >>>  and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there
>> are
>> >>> any
>> >>>  inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it
>> >>> out.
>> >>> 
>> >>>  Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>> >>> 
>> >>>  A.
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>  On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb  wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> > On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> >>> > > 0.1.0-incubating.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > It fixes the following issues:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3
>> >>> working
>> >>> > days
>> >>> > > from now)
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Note that we are voting on the source (tag).
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/
>> >>> >
>> >>> > A lot of source files don't have any license headers.
>> >>> > There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to
>> SVN
>> >>> > alongside NOTICE and LICENSE.
>> >>> >
>> >>> 

Re: Podlings needing copyright sign-off

[Bertrand Delacretaz]

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to sign off
> their copyright item; namely:

>...
> 2009-12-15      clerezza
>...

Checked and we do have a grant at
documents/grants/trialox-clerezza.pdf,
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/clerezza.html should be updated
as soon as my change propagates to the live site.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org