Re: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

[Francis De Brabandere]

+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik  wrote:
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of 
> developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential 
> obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They 
> even went an extra mile and collected all ICLAs in adbvance.
>
> So now I am starting the vote to accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is also available at: 
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>
> Andrus
>
> ---
> Andrus Adamchik
> Apache Cayenne ORM: http://cayenne.apache.org/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/andrus_a
>
>
>
> ---
>
> == OpenMeetings Project Proposal ==
>
> == Abstract ==
> Openmeetings is a web conferencing solution.
>
> == Proposal ==
> Openmeetings provides video conferencing, instant messaging, white board, 
> collaborative document editing and other groupware tools using API functions 
> of the Red5 Streaming Server for Remoting and Streaming.
>
> == Background ==
> Openmeetings was developed since 2007 by Sebastian Wagner and willing 
> developers. The project ships a release approximately once per quarter. It 
> was developed using LGPL license, and developers are currently thinking of 
> re-licensing it under Apache License 2.0.
>
> The project started as module by Sebastian Wagner for an ELearning platform 
> (Dokeos) and was then split into a separated project. That is the reason why 
> there is a strong relation to educational institutions that are using 
> OpenMeetings and there are integrations for platforms like Moodle, ATutor, 
> Sakai, STudIP or ILias available 
> (http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/MoodlePlugins). The relation to 
> educational institutions also subsequently lead to some projects funded by 
> the EU where OpenMeetings was involved, for example by the Swedish/Finnish 
> Centre of Open-Source !OpenKarken (Case-Study about the EU project at 
> OSOR.eu: http://www.osor.eu/studies/finland-and-sweden-collaborate-using-oss )
>
> The integration and internationalization of the project was a primary focus 
> right from the start of the project. Since Version 0.5 there is a 
> Language-Editor (http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/LanguageEditor) 
> to edit labels, export and import them as XML and you can use those XML files 
> for future installations (or contribute it to the community). There are 
> currently around 30 languages available.  Since version 0.5.1 there is also a 
> SOAP API to integrate !OpenMeetings. We constantly improve this SOAP/REST API 
> (http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/SoapMethods) with new 
> functionality with a strong focus on security and usability. The 
> auth-mechnism is quite similar to OAuth, you create some token and then 
> assign rights to the token. (Documentation for Single Sign On: 
> http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/DirectLoginSoapGeneralFlow)
>
> The project name "!OpenMeetings" and logos are inspired by Ludovic Gasc who 
> has been the project manager at Dokeos at the time Sebastian split 
> !OpenMeetings as separated project.
>
> Red5 Server provides an "Edge-Orion-Clustering" 
> (http://trac.red5.org/wiki/Documentation/Tutorials/EdgeOriginClusteringConfiguration).
>   We hope to extend this clustering solution with support for rtmpt and  
> rtmps and integrate that into our application as native clustering  option.
>
> == Rationale ==
> Last year most major vendors started commercial web conferencing solutions. 
> This is an important part of software ecosystem, and there is an urge to 
> consolidate open source development efforts in this direction.
>
> According to several studies demand for synchronous Communication, in 
> opposite to asynchronous Communication like wiki's or email, will raise the 
> upcoming years. For example Gartner promises that 2011 the market will grow 
> 20% according to their "Magic Quadrant" report 2010 ( 
> http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=205941 ).
>
> Openmeetings is a unique solution in terms of patent purity and potentially 
> can grow into solution built on top of the fully open source stack. That is 
> why it is a good candidate for consolidating web conferencing community 
> efforts.
>
> == Initial Goals ==
> Each of project committers has their own set of goals, but we all share the 
> following.
>
>  * Move to Apache.
>  * Become popular.
>
> To become popular we plan to do the following.
>
>  * Improve ecosystem around the project.
>  * Improve release process.
>  * Improve project testing and stability.
>  * Apply modular architecture/SOA for better integration with other projects.
>
> == Current Status ==
> We have agreed on applying for the Apache Foundation and preparing our 
> proposal for the vote.
>
> 

Re: Establishing New Committers

[Ross Gardler]

On 7 November 2011 14:11, Tim Williams  wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler  
> wrote:

...

>> That being said, thank you for improving this template, I've added
>> your enhancements to the original template over at ComDev (along with
>> the modification suggested by Craig).
>
> These look familiar, where in svn can I look for these improved
> versions? and, are they accessible to all committers?

Sorry, links are always useful.

http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html

These pages are editable by any committer (via the CMS) but only
publisheable by ComDev PMC members

Ross

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator

[Andrus Adamchik]

Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of 
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential 
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They 
even went an extra mile and collected all ICLAs in adbvance.

So now I am starting the vote to accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator.

The proposal is also available at: 
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal

Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Accept Openmeetings for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:

The vote is open for 72 hours.

Andrus

---
Andrus Adamchik
Apache Cayenne ORM: http://cayenne.apache.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/andrus_a



---

== OpenMeetings Project Proposal ==

== Abstract ==
Openmeetings is a web conferencing solution.

== Proposal ==
Openmeetings provides video conferencing, instant messaging, white board, 
collaborative document editing and other groupware tools using API functions of 
the Red5 Streaming Server for Remoting and Streaming.

== Background ==
Openmeetings was developed since 2007 by Sebastian Wagner and willing 
developers. The project ships a release approximately once per quarter. It was 
developed using LGPL license, and developers are currently thinking of 
re-licensing it under Apache License 2.0.

The project started as module by Sebastian Wagner for an ELearning platform 
(Dokeos) and was then split into a separated project. That is the reason why 
there is a strong relation to educational institutions that are using 
OpenMeetings and there are integrations for platforms like Moodle, ATutor, 
Sakai, STudIP or ILias available 
(http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/MoodlePlugins). The relation to 
educational institutions also subsequently lead to some projects funded by the 
EU where OpenMeetings was involved, for example by the Swedish/Finnish Centre 
of Open-Source !OpenKarken (Case-Study about the EU project at OSOR.eu: 
http://www.osor.eu/studies/finland-and-sweden-collaborate-using-oss )

The integration and internationalization of the project was a primary focus 
right from the start of the project. Since Version 0.5 there is a 
Language-Editor (http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/LanguageEditor) to 
edit labels, export and import them as XML and you can use those XML files for 
future installations (or contribute it to the community). There are currently 
around 30 languages available.  Since version 0.5.1 there is also a SOAP API to 
integrate !OpenMeetings. We constantly improve this SOAP/REST API 
(http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/SoapMethods) with new functionality 
with a strong focus on security and usability. The auth-mechnism is quite 
similar to OAuth, you create some token and then assign rights to the token. 
(Documentation for Single Sign On: 
http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/wiki/DirectLoginSoapGeneralFlow)

The project name "!OpenMeetings" and logos are inspired by Ludovic Gasc who has 
been the project manager at Dokeos at the time Sebastian split !OpenMeetings as 
separated project.

Red5 Server provides an "Edge-Orion-Clustering" 
(http://trac.red5.org/wiki/Documentation/Tutorials/EdgeOriginClusteringConfiguration).
  We hope to extend this clustering solution with support for rtmpt and  rtmps 
and integrate that into our application as native clustering  option.

== Rationale ==
Last year most major vendors started commercial web conferencing solutions. 
This is an important part of software ecosystem, and there is an urge to 
consolidate open source development efforts in this direction.

According to several studies demand for synchronous Communication, in opposite 
to asynchronous Communication like wiki's or email, will raise the upcoming 
years. For example Gartner promises that 2011 the market will grow 20% 
according to their "Magic Quadrant" report 2010 ( 
http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=205941 ).

Openmeetings is a unique solution in terms of patent purity and potentially can 
grow into solution built on top of the fully open source stack. That is why it 
is a good candidate for consolidating web conferencing community efforts.

== Initial Goals ==
Each of project committers has their own set of goals, but we all share the 
following.

 * Move to Apache.
 * Become popular.

To become popular we plan to do the following.

 * Improve ecosystem around the project.
 * Improve release process.
 * Improve project testing and stability.
 * Apply modular architecture/SOA for better integration with other projects.

== Current Status ==
We have agreed on applying for the Apache Foundation and preparing our proposal 
for the vote.

Technical status of the project is: Current stable tree is 1.8.x, Trunk is 1.9.

=== Meritocracy ===
Developers community is successfully driven by consensus now. If there are more 
developers on board, consensus may turn into meritocracy.

=== Community ===
The developer c

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[Jörn Kottmann]

Hello everyone,

the vote is cancelled. We already addressed all the issues mentioned by Sebb
and will soon prepare the next release candidate. Thanks for the review.

Jörn

On 11/7/11 10:30 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:

Hi all,

please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.

OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of 
natural language text.
It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization, sentence 
segmentation,
part-of-speech tagging, named entity extraction, chunking, parsing, 
and coreference resolution.


The OpenNLP community approved the release of opennlp-1.5.2-rc4 in 
this vote thread
with 4 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes and we received no 0 or -1 
votes:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-opennlp-dev/20.mbox/%3C4EB79746.2010908%40gmail.com%3E 



The release artifacts and rat reports can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~joern/releases/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating/rc4/

Our release contains multiple sub-projects, the rat reports have been 
generated

for each of these sub-projects.

Many thanks for your support,
Jörn



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[sebb]

On 7 November 2011 18:15, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:
>
 Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.

 The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:

 "This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
 The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
 under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)."

 This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only;
 UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph.

>>> Our mentors told us that all references should be mentioned in the NOTICE
>>> file, OpenNLP does not even redistribute UIMA. So even if it would be an
>>> external library there would be no need to include it in the NOTICE file.
>>
>> Exactly. The NOTICE file is for included items only.
>>
>>> Is the new common way of doing things now the one suggested above?
>>
>> AIUI it was always - and still is - the case that the NOTICE file is
>> for required notices only.
>>
>> If there is a document that says otherwise, please provide details here.
>
> No, I don't know of a document which says otherwise. I personally also
> prefer
> just to include the things which are necessary. We will update to NOTICE
> file.
>
> Based on the other feedback we got from you I believe we should make one
> more release candidate. Or do you think that is not necessary?

I think it would be useful to redo the RC.

Thanks.

>>
>> Not quite sure why there are tar.gz and zip versions of the binary
>> archive, but only a zip version of the source archive.
>> I would expect there to be a tar.gz source archive as well.
>
> Well, I guess others also, lets add it.
>>
>> The source archive contains some files that are not in SVN:
>> pom.xml.releaseBackup (several, in different directories)
>> opennlp/release.properties
>>
>> Looks like there was some kind of packaging problem.
>
> Yes I noticed issue directly after doing the RC 4, but thought
> it might not be important enough to redo the RC since we had
> the same issue with our last release and no one ever noticed it,
> and it is not causing any issues.
>
> Anyway it is fixed already and will not happen again.
>
>> [SVN still contains a .cvsignore file under
>> opennlp-uima\src\main\java\opennlp\uima\namefind; this can probably be
>> removed]
>
> Good catch, we will remove it.
>
> Jörn
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Establishing New Committers

[Donald Whytock]

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
> "rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
> that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these
> privileges, it is one of the few blunt instruments available for
> solving community issues that have got out of hand.

Another way that "privileges" is better is that commits, as I
understand it, can be -1'ed away if necessary.  A "right" to commit
might imply more permanence than actually exists.

Don

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Establishing New Committers

[Tim Williams]

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at
> some point in the future.
>
> You use the phrase "committ rights" in this template. They are not
> "rights" they are "privileges". The reason this might be important is
> that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these
> privileges, it is one of the few blunt instruments available for
> solving community issues that have got out of hand.
>
> The wording of this template won't change this, but this is your first
> opportunity to communicate that this is a privilege and not a right.
> The PMC can choose to give and take this privilege as they see fit.
>
> That being said, thank you for improving this template, I've added
> your enhancements to the original template over at ComDev (along with
> the modification suggested by Craig).

Hi Ross,
These look familiar, where in svn can I look for these improved
versions? and, are they accessible to all committers?

Thanks,
--tim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 (ipmc binding)

verified the checks/sigs, rat looks good and was able to build the ZK
deb pkg successfully.

note: it would be nice if at the end of the "make zookeeper-deb"
(etc...) some indication of success/failure was indicated. Also some
information on what was built and where it was output would also be
useful.

Patrick

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Tom White  wrote:
> +1
>
> I verified checksums and signature. NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER
> files look good. I ran RAT and the files without licenses seem to be
> test data.
>
> Tom
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik  wrote:
>> This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by:
>>  $ mvn -Prelease install
>> at the top level of a project. This is THE only change between RC1 and RC2
>> and given how cosmetic it is I'd like to think that all the existing
>> +1 votes don't
>> need to be recast. Please let me know if that's not the case.
>>
>> =
>> This is the second incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
>> 0.2.0-incubating.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues:
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317591&projectId=12311420
>>
>> *** Please download, test, and vote by Saturday, November 5
>>
>> Note that we are voting on the source (tag): release-0.2.0-incubating-RC2
>>
>> Source tarball, checksums, signature:
>>    http://people.apache.org/~rvs/bigtop-0.2.0-incubating-RC2/
>>
>> The tag to be voted on:
>>   
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.2.0-incubating-RC2/
>>
>> Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS
>>
>> Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a successful
>> PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[Jörn Kottmann]

Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.

The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:

"This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)."

This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only;
UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph.


Our mentors told us that all references should be mentioned in the NOTICE
file, OpenNLP does not even redistribute UIMA. So even if it would be an
external library there would be no need to include it in the NOTICE file.

Exactly. The NOTICE file is for included items only.


Is the new common way of doing things now the one suggested above?

AIUI it was always - and still is - the case that the NOTICE file is
for required notices only.

If there is a document that says otherwise, please provide details here.


No, I don't know of a document which says otherwise. I personally also 
prefer

just to include the things which are necessary. We will update to NOTICE
file.

Based on the other feedback we got from you I believe we should make one
more release candidate. Or do you think that is not necessary?

Not quite sure why there are tar.gz and zip versions of the binary
archive, but only a zip version of the source archive.
I would expect there to be a tar.gz source archive as well.


Well, I guess others also, lets add it.

The source archive contains some files that are not in SVN:
pom.xml.releaseBackup (several, in different directories)
opennlp/release.properties

Looks like there was some kind of packaging problem.


Yes I noticed issue directly after doing the RC 4, but thought
it might not be important enough to redo the RC since we had
the same issue with our last release and no one ever noticed it,
and it is not causing any issues.

Anyway it is fixed already and will not happen again.


[SVN still contains a .cvsignore file under
opennlp-uima\src\main\java\opennlp\uima\namefind; this can probably be
removed]


Good catch, we will remove it.

Jörn

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[Benson Margulies]

I agree with sebb about UIMA and notices. Sorry not to have been
paying attention when this came up before.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:45 PM, sebb  wrote:
> On 7 November 2011 14:48, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:
>> On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Where is the SVN tag?
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/
>>
>>> The KEYS file?
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/KEYS
>>>
>>> Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:
>>>
>>> "This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
>>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
>>> under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)."
>>>
>>> This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only;
>>> UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph.
>>>
>>
>> Our mentors told us that all references should be mentioned in the NOTICE
>> file, OpenNLP does not even redistribute UIMA. So even if it would be an
>> external library there would be no need to include it in the NOTICE file.
>
> Exactly. The NOTICE file is for included items only.
>
>> Is the new common way of doing things now the one suggested above?
>
> AIUI it was always - and still is - the case that the NOTICE file is
> for required notices only.
>
> If there is a document that says otherwise, please provide details here.
>
> Not quite sure why there are tar.gz and zip versions of the binary
> archive, but only a zip version of the source archive.
> I would expect there to be a tar.gz source archive as well.
>
> The source archive contains some files that are not in SVN:
> pom.xml.releaseBackup (several, in different directories)
> opennlp/release.properties
>
> Looks like there was some kind of packaging problem.
>
> [SVN still contains a .cvsignore file under
> opennlp-uima\src\main\java\opennlp\uima\namefind; this can probably be
> removed]
>
>> Thanks for taking time to review it.
>>
>> Jörn
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[sebb]

On 7 November 2011 14:48, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:
> On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Where is the SVN tag?
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/
>
>> The KEYS file?
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/KEYS
>>
>> Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.
>>
>> The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:
>>
>> "This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
>> under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)."
>>
>> This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only;
>> UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph.
>>
>
> Our mentors told us that all references should be mentioned in the NOTICE
> file, OpenNLP does not even redistribute UIMA. So even if it would be an
> external library there would be no need to include it in the NOTICE file.

Exactly. The NOTICE file is for included items only.

> Is the new common way of doing things now the one suggested above?

AIUI it was always - and still is - the case that the NOTICE file is
for required notices only.

If there is a document that says otherwise, please provide details here.

Not quite sure why there are tar.gz and zip versions of the binary
archive, but only a zip version of the source archive.
I would expect there to be a tar.gz source archive as well.

The source archive contains some files that are not in SVN:
pom.xml.releaseBackup (several, in different directories)
opennlp/release.properties

Looks like there was some kind of packaging problem.

[SVN still contains a .cvsignore file under
opennlp-uima\src\main\java\opennlp\uima\namefind; this can probably be
removed]

> Thanks for taking time to review it.
>
> Jörn
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[Jörn Kottmann]

On 11/7/11 3:29 PM, sebb wrote:

On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:


Where is the SVN tag?

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/


The KEYS file?

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/opennlp/tags/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4/KEYS

Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.

The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:

"This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)."

This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only;
UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph.



Our mentors told us that all references should be mentioned in the NOTICE
file, OpenNLP does not even redistribute UIMA. So even if it would be an
external library there would be no need to include it in the NOTICE file.

Is the new common way of doing things now the one suggested above?

Thanks for taking time to review it.

Jörn



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[sebb]

On 7 November 2011 09:30, Jörn Kottmann  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
>
> OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural
> language text.
> It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization, sentence
> segmentation,
> part-of-speech tagging, named entity extraction, chunking, parsing, and
> coreference resolution.
>
> The OpenNLP community approved the release of opennlp-1.5.2-rc4 in this vote
> thread
> with 4 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes and we received no 0 or -1 votes:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-opennlp-dev/20.mbox/%3C4EB79746.2010908%40gmail.com%3E
>
> The release artifacts and rat reports can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~joern/releases/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating/rc4/

Where is the SVN tag?

The KEYS file?

Links to both should be provided in the VOTE e-mails please.

The NOTICE file in the binary zip contains the following paragraph:

"This product depends on Apache UIMA developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/), licensed
under the Apache License 2.0 (see LICENSE file)."

This should be removed; NOTICE files are for *required* notices only;
UIMA is covered under the earlier ASF paragraph.

> Our release contains multiple sub-projects, the rat reports have been
> generated
> for each of these sub-projects.
>
> Many thanks for your support,
> Jörn
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[Tommaso Teofili]

+1 (binding)
Tommaso

2011/11/7 Jörn Kottmann 

> Hi all,
>
> please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.
>
> OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural
> language text.
> It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization, sentence
> segmentation,
> part-of-speech tagging, named entity extraction, chunking, parsing, and
> coreference resolution.
>
> The OpenNLP community approved the release of opennlp-1.5.2-rc4 in this
> vote thread
> with 4 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes and we received no 0 or -1 votes:
> http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
> opennlp-dev/20.mbox/%**3C4EB79746.2010908%40gmail.**com%3E
>
> The release artifacts and rat reports can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~**joern/releases/opennlp-1.5.2-**incubating/rc4/
>
> Our release contains multiple sub-projects, the rat reports have been
> generated
> for each of these sub-projects.
>
> Many thanks for your support,
> Jörn
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> general-help@incubator.apache.**org
>
>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Wookie 0.9.1-incubating (General Incubation List)

[Paul Sharples]

This VOTE has failed due to incomplete LICENSE files.

On 04/11/2011 16:11, Paul Sharples wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Wookie, with the 
artifacts being versioned as 0.9.1-incubating.


We have already received 2 IPMC +1 votes (plus an additional 3 PPMC +1 
votes) during the release voting on wookie-dev. (We need one more IPMC 
vote)


Vote thread:
http://incubator.markmail.org/search/?q=wookie-dev#query:wookie-dev%20date%3A20%20+page:1+mid:5rm25ch2op32bnjt+state:results 



Result:
http://incubator.markmail.org/search/?q=wookie-dev#query:wookie-dev%20date%3A20%20+page:1+mid:xpzregppdevaipca+state:results 



Svn source tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.1-incubating/

Release notes:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/tags/0.9.1-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES 



Release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~psharples/wookie/staging-area/0p9p1/rc4/

PGP release keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wookie/KEYS

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache opennlp-1.5.2-incubating-rc4

[Jörn Kottmann]

Hi all,

please review and vote on approving the release of Apache OpenNLP.

OpenNLP is a machine learning based toolkit for the processing of 
natural language text.
It supports the most common NLP tasks, such as tokenization, sentence 
segmentation,
part-of-speech tagging, named entity extraction, chunking, parsing, and 
coreference resolution.


The OpenNLP community approved the release of opennlp-1.5.2-rc4 in this 
vote thread

with 4 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes and we received no 0 or -1 votes:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-opennlp-dev/20.mbox/%3C4EB79746.2010908%40gmail.com%3E

The release artifacts and rat reports can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~joern/releases/opennlp-1.5.2-incubating/rc4/

Our release contains multiple sub-projects, the rat reports have been 
generated

for each of these sub-projects.

Many thanks for your support,
Jörn

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org