Joining IPMC member

2013-03-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi,

I just noticed that Mentor must be members of the Incubator PMC[1].
Regarding MRQL podling, I'm not only Champion but also want to be a
Mentor for MRQL project.

Please add me to IPMC.

1. http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor

-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC1.

2013-03-14 Thread Mahadev Konar
Thanks to feedback from general@incubator we have updated the release
artifacts with the following fixes:

  1. Fixed NOTICE.txt
  2. Fixed KEYS file.
  3. Removed pyc files in my svn tree (unfortunately ran mvn test
before building last time).
  4. mvn apache-rat:check passes. The exclude files are files that
cannot have Apache Headers since it breaks the run time.
  5. Website has been updated (http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/ to
fix all the issues mentioned earlier - thanks to Yusaku).
  6. Release artifacts now use md5 and sha1.

The staging Staging site is:
http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc1/

with user docs at:
http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html
and dev docs at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development

 SVN source tag:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc1

 PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C)
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C

One can look into the issues fixed in this release at

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC

Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

thanks
mahadev

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Joining IPMC member

2013-03-14 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Edward, are you not familiar with our custom of handling personnel
matters on private lists? It has not always been that way, but do you
understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
now?

Marvin Humphrey

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi,

 I just noticed that Mentor must be members of the Incubator PMC[1].
 Regarding MRQL podling, I'm not only Champion but also want to be a
 Mentor for MRQL project.

 Please add me to IPMC.

 1. 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor

 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Joining IPMC member

2013-03-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Yes, I think I'm not familiar with handling issues like personnel, and
somewhat emotional person.

However, I want to helping people who want to contribute to ASF or
collaborate with ASF projects in the future.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
 Edward, are you not familiar with our custom of handling personnel
 matters on private lists? It has not always been that way, but do you
 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?

 Marvin Humphrey

 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 Hi,

 I just noticed that Mentor must be members of the Incubator PMC[1].
 Regarding MRQL podling, I'm not only Champion but also want to be a
 Mentor for MRQL project.

 Please add me to IPMC.

 1. 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor

 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Joining IPMC member

2013-03-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?

P.S., It's been 6 years since I uploaded my first patch on HBase. I
still don't know many things but I'm continuously learning from you
guys ;-)

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
 Yes, I think I'm not familiar with handling issues like personnel, and
 somewhat emotional person.

 However, I want to helping people who want to contribute to ASF or
 collaborate with ASF projects in the future.

 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com 
 wrote:
 Edward, are you not familiar with our custom of handling personnel
 matters on private lists? It has not always been that way, but do you
 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?

 Marvin Humphrey

 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 Hi,

 I just noticed that Mentor must be members of the Incubator PMC[1].
 Regarding MRQL podling, I'm not only Champion but also want to be a
 Mentor for MRQL project.

 Please add me to IPMC.

 1. 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor

 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Missing Report

2013-03-14 Thread Matt Franklin
As a new podling, Tez is scheduled to report this month; but, there is
no report completed in the wiki.  If possible, please add your report
to the wiki [1] before the end of Friday.

[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2013

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Wave - Missing Report

2013-03-14 Thread Matt Franklin
Wave is scheduled to report this month; but, there is no report
completed in the wiki.  If possible, please add your report to the
wiki [1] before the end of Friday.

[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2013

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report

2013-03-14 Thread Matt Franklin
I have added a draft commentary to the report in the wiki.  Since we
had no shepherd self-organization, I am asking for an immediate set of
volunteers who can review the podlings and provide shepherd comments
before Friday evening, when I will send the report to the board on
Benson's behalf.  If you have time and are willing, reply to this
thread with which podlings you would like to review and add your name
to the wiki.  Additionally, there are quite a few reports that need
mentor sign-off.  All mentors, please review your podling reports and
add your X.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
 Working on it now.  Will have it ready in the morning for review 
 comment and will submit it to the board on Friday.

 -Matt

 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Thanks!


 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin 
 m.ben.frank...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:

  If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
  Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it
 contains
  at that moment.


 I can do it.


 
 
  On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
 javascript:;
  wrote:
 
   Folks,
  
   I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain
   networking and state of jet lag.
  
   Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to
 the
   board's doorstep?
  
   --benson
  
  
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report

2013-03-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
I can give some Shepherd notes for Wave.
I am sorry to ask, but is there any docs what specifically i have to
do as a Shepherd or is it just an giving an impression on how life
goes?

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have added a draft commentary to the report in the wiki.  Since we
 had no shepherd self-organization, I am asking for an immediate set of
 volunteers who can review the podlings and provide shepherd comments
 before Friday evening, when I will send the report to the board on
 Benson's behalf.  If you have time and are willing, reply to this
 thread with which podlings you would like to review and add your name
 to the wiki.  Additionally, there are quite a few reports that need
 mentor sign-off.  All mentors, please review your podling reports and
 add your X.

 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Working on it now.  Will have it ready in the morning for review 
 comment and will submit it to the board on Friday.

 -Matt

 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Thanks!


 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin 
 m.ben.frank...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:

  If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
  Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it
 contains
  at that moment.


 I can do it.


 
 
  On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
 javascript:;
  wrote:
 
   Folks,
  
   I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain
   networking and state of jet lag.
  
   Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to
 the
   board's doorstep?
  
   --benson
  
  
 


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Joining IPMC member

2013-03-14 Thread Suresh Marru
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:26 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:

 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?
 
 P.S., It's been 6 years since I uploaded my first patch on HBase. I
 still don't know many things but I'm continuously learning from you
 guys ;-)

Hi Edward,

I do not think any one is questioning your credibility as a committer, or pmc 
member. I think Marvin hit it right and straight forward way. At ASF one of the 
few things (and primarily the only thing) like adding to a PMC is handled on 
private lists. Given that you have been contributing since 6 years you are 
certainly expected to know it. It is not healthy to side track the issue with 
your contributions or citing emotional reasons. 

Suresh


 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
 Yes, I think I'm not familiar with handling issues like personnel, and
 somewhat emotional person.
 
 However, I want to helping people who want to contribute to ASF or
 collaborate with ASF projects in the future.
 
 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com 
 wrote:
 Edward, are you not familiar with our custom of handling personnel
 matters on private lists? It has not always been that way, but do you
 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?
 
 Marvin Humphrey
 
 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I just noticed that Mentor must be members of the Incubator PMC[1].
 Regarding MRQL podling, I'm not only Champion but also want to be a
 Mentor for MRQL project.
 
 Please add me to IPMC.
 
 1. 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor
 
 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report

2013-03-14 Thread Matt Franklin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
 I can give some Shepherd notes for Wave.
 I am sorry to ask, but is there any docs what specifically i have to
 do as a Shepherd or is it just an giving an impression on how life
 goes?

Thanks! There are no docs ATM.  What we have been doing is looking at
the podling (mail lists, etc) to get a feel for how the community is
progressing toward graduation and providing feedback.  You can see
prior shepherd feedback in previous reports and e-mails to general@


 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I have added a draft commentary to the report in the wiki.  Since we
 had no shepherd self-organization, I am asking for an immediate set of
 volunteers who can review the podlings and provide shepherd comments
 before Friday evening, when I will send the report to the board on
 Benson's behalf.  If you have time and are willing, reply to this
 thread with which podlings you would like to review and add your name
 to the wiki.  Additionally, there are quite a few reports that need
 mentor sign-off.  All mentors, please review your podling reports and
 add your X.

 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Working on it now.  Will have it ready in the morning for review 
 comment and will submit it to the board on Friday.

 -Matt

 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Thanks!


 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin 
 m.ben.frank...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:

  If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
  Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it
 contains
  at that moment.


 I can do it.


 
 
  On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
 javascript:;
  wrote:
 
   Folks,
  
   I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain
   networking and state of jet lag.
  
   Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to
 the
   board's doorstep?
  
   --benson
  
  
 


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 --
 http://www.grobmeier.de
 https://www.timeandbill.de

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Looking for a volunteer to finalize the March report

2013-03-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
 grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
 I can give some Shepherd notes for Wave.
 I am sorry to ask, but is there any docs what specifically i have to
 do as a Shepherd or is it just an giving an impression on how life
 goes?

 Thanks! There are no docs ATM.  What we have been doing is looking at
 the podling (mail lists, etc) to get a feel for how the community is
 progressing toward graduation and providing feedback.  You can see
 prior shepherd feedback in previous reports and e-mails to general@

Thank you, that is enough information. I will provide some feedback on
Wave soon.

Cheers



 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I have added a draft commentary to the report in the wiki.  Since we
 had no shepherd self-organization, I am asking for an immediate set of
 volunteers who can review the podlings and provide shepherd comments
 before Friday evening, when I will send the report to the board on
 Benson's behalf.  If you have time and are willing, reply to this
 thread with which podlings you would like to review and add your name
 to the wiki.  Additionally, there are quite a few reports that need
 mentor sign-off.  All mentors, please review your podling reports and
 add your X.

 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Working on it now.  Will have it ready in the morning for review 
 comment and will submit it to the board on Friday.

 -Matt

 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Thanks!


 On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin 
 m.ben.frank...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:

  If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report 
  on
  Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it
 contains
  at that moment.


 I can do it.


 
 
  On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
 javascript:;
  wrote:
 
   Folks,
  
   I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncertain
   networking and state of jet lag.
  
   Would someone else be willing to tie off the report and deliver it to
 the
   board's doorstep?
  
   --benson
  
  
 


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 --
 http://www.grobmeier.de
 https://www.timeandbill.de

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Chip Childers
Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache. 

We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1], 
not including the 8 mentors that helped guide our community through incubation. 
 
16 of the committers and 7 of the PPMC members were added after the podling was
formed. One mentor joined the project after the podling started.  3 of the 
initial
committers that were not in the initial PPMC have now joined the PPMC. 7 of our 
mentors will be remaining with the project as it transitions into a TLP.

We have verified that Apache CloudStack is a suitable name [2], and the
CloudStack marks are being donated from Citrix to the ASF.

We completed two releases (Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating and Apache 
CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating) and are currently preparing for two more (4.0.2 
and 4.1.0).

Our community has created a set of bylaws for the project [3].

The community of Apache CloudStack is active, healthy, and growing and has
demonstrated the ability to self-govern using accepted Apache practices.

After holding a discussion [4][5], the Apache CloudStack community subsequently 
voted overwhelmingly to graduate [6], collecting 55 +1 votes (including 
4 from IPMC members), and no +0 or -1 votes.

IPMC members voting +1 in the project-level thread are:
 * Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor) [7]
 * Noah Slater (IPMC/mentor) [8]
 * Alex Karasulu (IPMC/mentor) [9]
 * Brett Porter (IPMC/mentor) [10]

Please cast your votes:

[ ] +1 Graduate Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Apache CloudStack
[ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator because...

-chip


[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
[3] https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/apache-cloudstack-project-bylaws.html
[4] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3C20130213145014.GE800%40USLT-205755.sungardas.corp%3E
[5] http://markmail.org/message/3nluchj5q5waguws
[6] http://markmail.org/message/ntf777ctbhdytijp
[7] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAOvkMoa4yK-L7T7OjER2pfWAAtkrOnZOe-icMPkoesWgAUDPbg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[8] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAPaJBx6f4a58xky0jmVjn=xcyvxuu4dxduetqsr9ovwj80n...@mail.gmail.com%3E
[9] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccadwpi+gfnodtuydyuy8vzm3rttzbsbq1krzzukwe4-t_qnn...@mail.gmail.com%3E
[10] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3c6f99d33d-641a-4b7d-8387-a420f8a88...@apache.org%3E


Proposed Resolution:

X. Establish the Apache CloudStack Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to providing and supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
cloud computing platforms.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the Apache CloudStack Project, be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache CloudStack Project be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing and 
supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing platforms.

RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache CloudStack be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction
of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache CloudStack Project, and to
have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope
of responsibility of the Apache CloudStack Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache CloudStack Project:

* Joe Brockmeier j...@apache.org
* Will Chan willc...@apache.org
* Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
* Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
* Sebastien Goasguen seb...@apache.org
* Matt Richard Hogstrom hogst...@apache.org
* Wido den Hollander wid...@apache.org
* Alex Huang ahu...@apache.org
* Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
* Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
* John Kinsella j...@apache.org
* Kevin Kluge kl...@apache.org
* Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
* David Nalley ke4...@apache.org
* Brett Porter br...@apache.org
* Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org
* Marcus Sorensen mlsoren...@apache.org
* Edison Su edi...@apache.org
* Hugo Trippaers h...@apache.org
* Chiradeep Vittal chirad...@apache.org

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Chip Childers be appointed to the
office of 

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Noah Slater
+1

(I figure a second vote from me can't hurt...)


On 14 March 2013 16:47, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:

 Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
 significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.

 We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
 not including the 8 mentors that helped guide our community through
 incubation.
 16 of the committers and 7 of the PPMC members were added after the
 podling was
 formed. One mentor joined the project after the podling started.  3 of the
 initial
 committers that were not in the initial PPMC have now joined the PPMC. 7
 of our
 mentors will be remaining with the project as it transitions into a TLP.

 We have verified that Apache CloudStack is a suitable name [2], and the
 CloudStack marks are being donated from Citrix to the ASF.

 We completed two releases (Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating and Apache
 CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating) and are currently preparing for two more
 (4.0.2
 and 4.1.0).

 Our community has created a set of bylaws for the project [3].

 The community of Apache CloudStack is active, healthy, and growing and has
 demonstrated the ability to self-govern using accepted Apache practices.

 After holding a discussion [4][5], the Apache CloudStack community
 subsequently
 voted overwhelmingly to graduate [6], collecting 55 +1 votes (including
 4 from IPMC members), and no +0 or -1 votes.

 IPMC members voting +1 in the project-level thread are:
  * Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor) [7]
  * Noah Slater (IPMC/mentor) [8]
  * Alex Karasulu (IPMC/mentor) [9]
  * Brett Porter (IPMC/mentor) [10]

 Please cast your votes:

 [ ] +1 Graduate Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
 [ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Apache CloudStack
 [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
 because...

 -chip


 [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
 [3]
 https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/apache-cloudstack-project-bylaws.html
 [4]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3C20130213145014.GE800%40USLT-205755.sungardas.corp%3E
 [5] http://markmail.org/message/3nluchj5q5waguws
 [6] http://markmail.org/message/ntf777ctbhdytijp
 [7]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAOvkMoa4yK-L7T7OjER2pfWAAtkrOnZOe-icMPkoesWgAUDPbg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
 [8]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAPaJBx6f4a58xky0jmVjn=xcyvxuu4dxduetqsr9ovwj80n...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [9]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccadwpi+gfnodtuydyuy8vzm3rttzbsbq1krzzukwe4-t_qnn...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [10]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3c6f99d33d-641a-4b7d-8387-a420f8a88...@apache.org%3E


 Proposed Resolution:

 X. Establish the Apache CloudStack Project

 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
 the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
 a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
 of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
 related to providing and supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
 cloud computing platforms.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
 (PMC), to be known as the Apache CloudStack Project, be and hereby is
 established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache CloudStack Project be and hereby is responsible
 for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing and
 supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing platforms.

 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache CloudStack be and
 hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction
 of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache CloudStack Project,
 and to
 have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope
 of responsibility of the Apache CloudStack Project; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
 are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache CloudStack
 Project:

 * Joe Brockmeier j...@apache.org
 * Will Chan willc...@apache.org
 * Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
 * Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
 * Sebastien Goasguen seb...@apache.org
 * Matt Richard Hogstrom hogst...@apache.org
 * Wido den Hollander wid...@apache.org
 * Alex Huang ahu...@apache.org
 * Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
 * Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
 * John Kinsella j...@apache.org
 * Kevin Kluge kl...@apache.org
 * Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
 * David Nalley ke4...@apache.org
 * Brett Porter br...@apache.org
 * Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org
 * Marcus Sorensen 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

2013-03-14 Thread Arun C Murthy
+1, this is a great addition!

On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:

 = Ivory Proposal =
 
 == Abstract ==
 Ivory is a data processing and management solution for Hadoop designed for
 data motion, coordination of data pipelines, lifecycle management, and
 data discovery. Ivory enables end consumers to quickly onboard their data
 and its associated processing and management tasks on Hadoop clusters.
 
 == Proposal ==
 Ivory will enable easy data management via declarative mechanism for
 Hadoop. Users of Ivory platform simply define infrastructure endpoints,
 data sets and processing rules declaratively. These configurations
 are expressed in such a way that the dependencies between
 these entities are explicitly described. This information about
 inter-dependencies between various entities allows Ivory to orchestrate and
 manage various data management functions.
 
 The key use cases that Ivory addresses are:
 * Data Motion
 * Process orchestration and scheduling
 * Policy-based Lifecycle Management
 * Data Discovery
 * Operability/Usability
 
 With these features it is possible for users to onboard their data sets
 with
 a comprehensive and holistic understanding of how, when and where their
 data
 is managed across its lifecycle. Complex functions such as retrying
 failures,
 identifying possible SLA breaches or automated handling of input data
 changes
 are now simple directives. All the administrative functions and user level
 functions are available via RESTful APIs. CLI is simply a wrapper over the
 RESTful APIs.
 
 == Background ==
 Hadoop and its ecosystem of products have made storing and processing
 massive
 amounts of data commonplace. This has enabled numerous organizations to
 gain
 valuable insights that they never could have achieved in the past. While it
 is easy to leverage Hadoop for crunching large volumes of data, organizing
 data, managing life cycle of data and processing data is fairly involved.
 This is solved adequately well in a classic data platform involving data
 warehouses and standard ETL (extract-transform-load) tools, but remains
 largely
 unsolved today. In addition to data processing complexities, Hadoop
 presents
 new sets of challenges and opportunities relating to management of data.
 
 Data Management on Hadoop encompasses data motion, process orchestration,
 lifecycle management, data discovery, etc. among other concerns that are
 beyond
 ETL. Ivory is a new data processing and management platform for Hadoop that
 solves this problem and creates additional opportunities by building on
 existing
 components within the Hadoop ecosystem (ex. Apache Oozie, Apache Hadoop
 DistCp
 etc.) without reinventing the wheel. Ivory has been in production at
 InMobi,
 going on its second year and has been managing hundreds of feeds and
 processes.
 
 Ivory is being developed by engineers employed with InMobi, Hortonworks and
 Yahoo!. This platform addition will increase the adoption of Apache Hadoop
 by
 driving data management tractable for end users. We are therefore proposing
 to
 make Ivory an Apache open source project.
 
 == Rationale ==
 The Ivory project aims to improve the usability of Apache Hadoop. As a
 result
 Apache Hadoop will grow its community of users by increasing the places
 Hadoop
 can be utilized and the use cases it will solve. By developing Ivory in
 Apache
 we hope to gather a diverse community of contributors, helping to ensure
 that
 Ivory is deployable for a broad range of scenarios. Members of the Hadoop
 development community will be able to influence Ivory’s roadmap, and
 contribute
 to it. We believe having Ivory as part of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem will
 be
 a great benefit to all of Hadoop's users.
 
 == Current Status ==
 Ivory is widely deployed in production within InMobi and moving on to its
 second year. A version with a valuable set of features is developed by the
 list of initial committers and is hosted on github.
 
 === Meritocracy ===
 Our intent with this incubator proposal is to start building a diverse
 developer
 community around Ivory following the Apache meritocracy model. We have
 wanted to
 make the project open source and encourage contributors from multiple
 organizations from the start. We plan to provide plenty of support to new
 developers and to quickly recruit those who make solid contributions to
 committer status.
 
 === Community ===
 We are happy to report that the initial team already represents multiple
 organizations. We hope to extend the user and developer base further in the
 future and build a solid open source community around Ivory.
 
 === Core Developers ===
 Ivory is currently being developed by three engineers from InMobi –
 Srikanth Sundarrajan, Shwetha G S, and Shaik Idris, two Hortonworks
 employees –
 Sanjay Radia and Venkatesh Seetharam. In addition, two Yahoo! employees,
 Rohini Palaniswamy and Thiruvel Thirumoolan, are also involved. Srikanth,
 Shwetha and Shaik are the original 

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Daniel Gruno
Top-posting since this is a long letter and you just need to see whether
it's +1 or -1 ;)

So here: +1 (non-binding).

I've seen your work flow from an infra perspective, and it seems vibrant
and well oiled, and I'm pleased to see this vote. You're an easy team to
work with (that is my opinion at least), always give feedback, and
aren't afraid of using bleeding edge tools (even those written by me),
which speaks warmly of your ability to adjust to new surroundings.

With regards,
Daniel.

On 03/14/2013 05:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
 Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
 significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache. 
 
 We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1], 
 not including the 8 mentors that helped guide our community through 
 incubation.  
 16 of the committers and 7 of the PPMC members were added after the podling 
 was
 formed. One mentor joined the project after the podling started.  3 of the 
 initial
 committers that were not in the initial PPMC have now joined the PPMC. 7 of 
 our 
 mentors will be remaining with the project as it transitions into a TLP.
 
 We have verified that Apache CloudStack is a suitable name [2], and the
 CloudStack marks are being donated from Citrix to the ASF.
 
 We completed two releases (Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating and Apache 
 CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating) and are currently preparing for two more (4.0.2 
 and 4.1.0).
 
 Our community has created a set of bylaws for the project [3].
 
 The community of Apache CloudStack is active, healthy, and growing and has
 demonstrated the ability to self-govern using accepted Apache practices.
 
 After holding a discussion [4][5], the Apache CloudStack community 
 subsequently 
 voted overwhelmingly to graduate [6], collecting 55 +1 votes (including 
 4 from IPMC members), and no +0 or -1 votes.
 
 IPMC members voting +1 in the project-level thread are:
  * Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor) [7]
  * Noah Slater (IPMC/mentor) [8]
  * Alex Karasulu (IPMC/mentor) [9]
  * Brett Porter (IPMC/mentor) [10]
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [ ] +1 Graduate Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
 [ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Apache CloudStack
 [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator because...
 
 -chip
 
 
 [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
 [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/apache-cloudstack-project-bylaws.html
 [4] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3C20130213145014.GE800%40USLT-205755.sungardas.corp%3E
 [5] http://markmail.org/message/3nluchj5q5waguws
 [6] http://markmail.org/message/ntf777ctbhdytijp
 [7] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAOvkMoa4yK-L7T7OjER2pfWAAtkrOnZOe-icMPkoesWgAUDPbg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
 [8] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAPaJBx6f4a58xky0jmVjn=xcyvxuu4dxduetqsr9ovwj80n...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [9] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccadwpi+gfnodtuydyuy8vzm3rttzbsbq1krzzukwe4-t_qnn...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [10] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3c6f99d33d-641a-4b7d-8387-a420f8a88...@apache.org%3E
 
 
 Proposed Resolution:
 
 X. Establish the Apache CloudStack Project
 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
 the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
 a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
 of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
 related to providing and supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
 cloud computing platforms.
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
 (PMC), to be known as the Apache CloudStack Project, be and hereby is
 established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the Apache CloudStack Project be and hereby is responsible
 for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing and 
 supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing platforms.
 
 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache CloudStack be and
 hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction
 of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache CloudStack Project, and 
 to
 have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope
 of responsibility of the Apache CloudStack Project; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
 are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache CloudStack 
 Project:
 
 * Joe Brockmeier j...@apache.org
 * Will Chan willc...@apache.org
 * Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
 * Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
 * 

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation of Apache Onami

2013-03-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello,

maybe my e-mail has not been seen. Any comments from the IPMC? If not,
I will discuss the next steps with the Onami devs.

Cheers
Christian

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then
 the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy.

 A look on the status page shows that a few releases have been made:
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/onami.html

 Two minor ones (parent pom), two component releases. Another minor
 release is currently being voted on.

 Three new committers were added in the past weeks.

 SVNSearch shows, there is clearly one guy who is outstanding in his
 motivation, but others do commit as well:
 http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fincubator%2Fonami

 Mailinglist Archives show the Community is discussing in public:
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-onami-dev/

 There is only one item left on the status page, which is the podling
 name search. Since we have had some efforts in that area already, we
 do not expect any surprises. Here is the issue we created recently and
 expect to be closed soon:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-27

 That said, the community consists of new Apache-people and some more
 experienced Apache-people. I do not see any problem regarding
 developing the Apache-way.

 With all that in mind, I do not see a reason this podling needs to
 stay any longer in the Incubator (given the podling name search is
 resolved).

 Are there any objections from the rest of the incubator to start with
 the graduation preparations and finally vote?

 Cheers,
 Christian


 --
 http://www.grobmeier.de
 https://www.timeandbill.de



--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1

Dan



On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:

 Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
 significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache. 
 
 We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1], 
 not including the 8 mentors that helped guide our community through 
 incubation.  
 16 of the committers and 7 of the PPMC members were added after the podling 
 was
 formed. One mentor joined the project after the podling started.  3 of the 
 initial
 committers that were not in the initial PPMC have now joined the PPMC. 7 of 
 our 
 mentors will be remaining with the project as it transitions into a TLP.
 
 We have verified that Apache CloudStack is a suitable name [2], and the
 CloudStack marks are being donated from Citrix to the ASF.
 
 We completed two releases (Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating and Apache 
 CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating) and are currently preparing for two more (4.0.2 
 and 4.1.0).
 
 Our community has created a set of bylaws for the project [3].
 
 The community of Apache CloudStack is active, healthy, and growing and has
 demonstrated the ability to self-govern using accepted Apache practices.
 
 After holding a discussion [4][5], the Apache CloudStack community 
 subsequently 
 voted overwhelmingly to graduate [6], collecting 55 +1 votes (including 
 4 from IPMC members), and no +0 or -1 votes.
 
 IPMC members voting +1 in the project-level thread are:
 * Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor) [7]
 * Noah Slater (IPMC/mentor) [8]
 * Alex Karasulu (IPMC/mentor) [9]
 * Brett Porter (IPMC/mentor) [10]
 
 Please cast your votes:
 
 [ ] +1 Graduate Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
 [ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Apache CloudStack
 [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator because...
 
 -chip
 
 
 [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
 [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/apache-cloudstack-project-bylaws.html
 [4] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3C20130213145014.GE800%40USLT-205755.sungardas.corp%3E
 [5] http://markmail.org/message/3nluchj5q5waguws
 [6] http://markmail.org/message/ntf777ctbhdytijp
 [7] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAOvkMoa4yK-L7T7OjER2pfWAAtkrOnZOe-icMPkoesWgAUDPbg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
 [8] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAPaJBx6f4a58xky0jmVjn=xcyvxuu4dxduetqsr9ovwj80n...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [9] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccadwpi+gfnodtuydyuy8vzm3rttzbsbq1krzzukwe4-t_qnn...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [10] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3c6f99d33d-641a-4b7d-8387-a420f8a88...@apache.org%3E
 
 
 Proposed Resolution:
 
 X. Establish the Apache CloudStack Project
 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
 the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
 a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
 of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
 related to providing and supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
 cloud computing platforms.
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
 (PMC), to be known as the Apache CloudStack Project, be and hereby is
 established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the Apache CloudStack Project be and hereby is responsible
 for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing and 
 supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing platforms.
 
 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache CloudStack be and
 hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction
 of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache CloudStack Project, and 
 to
 have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope
 of responsibility of the Apache CloudStack Project; and be it further
 
 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
 are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache CloudStack 
 Project:
 
 * Joe Brockmeier j...@apache.org
 * Will Chan willc...@apache.org
 * Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
 * Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
 * Sebastien Goasguen seb...@apache.org
 * Matt Richard Hogstrom hogst...@apache.org
 * Wido den Hollander wid...@apache.org
 * Alex Huang ahu...@apache.org
 * Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
 * Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
 * John Kinsella j...@apache.org
 * Kevin Kluge kl...@apache.org
 * Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
 * David Nalley ke4...@apache.org
 * Brett Porter br...@apache.org
 * Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org
 * Marcus Sorensen 

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Dave Fisher
I think that this vote should be invalidated.

Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?

It is not 5.

Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?

If two members of the IPMC step forward to Mentor MRQL I might change my mind.

Regards,
Dave

On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:12 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:

 The VOTE has passed with 5 binding +1's and no -1s.
 
 I'll start the work to get the podling started.
 
 Thank you.
 
 On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
 chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 +1 from me (binding).
 
 Good luck!
 
 Cheers,
 Chris
 
 
 On 3/6/13 9:04 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
 
 Dear ASF members,
 I would like to call for a VOTE for acceptance of MRQL into the
 Incubator.
 The vote will close on Monday March 11, 2013.
 
 [ ] +1 Accept MRQL into the Apache incubator
 [ ] +0 Don't care.
 [ ] -1 Don't accept MRQL into the incubator because...
 
 Full proposal is pasted below and the corresponding wiki is
 
 http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRQLProposal
 
 Only VOTEs from Incubator PMC members are binding,
 but all are welcome to express their thoughts.
 Sincerely,
 Leonidas Fegaras
 
 
 = Abstract =
 
 MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for large-scale,
 distributed data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop and Hama.
 
 = Proposal =
 
 MRQL (pronounced ''miracle'') is a query processing and optimization
 system for large-scale, distributed data analysis. MRQL (the MapReduce
 Query Language) is an SQL-like query language for large-scale data
 analysis on a cluster of computers. The MRQL query processing system
 can evaluate MRQL queries in two modes: in MapReduce mode on top of
 Apache Hadoop or in Bulk Synchronous Parallel (BSP) mode on top of
 Apache Hama. The MRQL query language is powerful enough to express
 most common data analysis tasks over many forms of raw ''in-situ''
 data, such as XML and JSON documents, binary files, and CSV
 documents. MRQL is more powerful than other current high-level
 MapReduce languages, such as Hive and PigLatin, since it can operate
 on more complex data and supports more powerful query constructs, thus
 eliminating the need for using explicit MapReduce code. With MRQL,
 users will be able to express complex data analysis tasks, such as
 PageRank, k-means clustering, matrix factorization, etc, using
 SQL-like queries exclusively, while the MRQL query processing system
 will be able to compile these queries to efficient Java code.
 
 = Background =
 
 The initial code was developed at the University of Texas of Arlington
 (UTA) by a research team, led by Leonidas Fegaras. The software was
 first released in May 2011. The original goal of this project was to
 build a query processing system that translates SQL-like data analysis
 queries to efficient workflows of MapReduce jobs. A design goal was to
 use HDFS as the physical storage layer, without any indexing, data
 partitioning, or data normalization, and to use Hadoop (without
 extensions) as the run-time engine. The motivation behind this work
 was to build a platform to test new ideas on query processing and
 optimization techniques applicable to the MapReduce framework.
 
 A year ago, MRQL was extended to run on Hama. The motivation for this
 extension was that Hadoop MapReduce jobs were required to read their
 input and write their output on HDFS. This simplifies reliability and
 fault tolerance but it imposes a high overhead to complex MapReduce
 workflows and graph algorithms, such as PageRank, which require
 repetitive jobs. In addition, Hadoop does not preserve data in memory
 across consecutive MapReduce jobs. This restriction requires to read
 data at every step, even when the data is constant. BSP, on the other
 hand, does not suffer from this restriction, and, under certain
 circumstances, allows complex repetitive algorithms to run entirely in
 the collective memory of a cluster. Thus, the goal was to be able to
 run the same MRQL queries in both modes, MapReduce and BSP, without
 modifying the queries: If there are enough resources available, and
 low latency and speed are more important than resilience, queries may
 run in BSP mode; otherwise, the same queries may run in MapReduce
 mode. BSP evaluation was found to be a good choice when fault
 tolerance is not critical, data (both input and intermediate) can fit
 in the cluster memory, and data processing requires complex/repetitive
 steps.
 
 The research results of this ongoing work have already been published
 in conferences (WebDB'11, EDBT'12, and DataCloud'12) and the authors
 have already received positive feedback from researchers in academia
 and industry who were attending these conferences.
 
 = Rationale =
 
 * MRQL will be the first general-purpose, SQL-like query language for
 data analysis based on BSP.
 Currently, many programmers prefer to code their MapReduce
 applications in a higher-level query language, rather than an
 algorithmic language. For 

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
+1 (binding)

I've been keeping a bit of an eye on that community and FWIW
I think they are in a reasonable shape.

Thanks,
Roman.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
 Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
 significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.

 We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
 not including the 8 mentors that helped guide our community through 
 incubation.
 16 of the committers and 7 of the PPMC members were added after the podling 
 was
 formed. One mentor joined the project after the podling started.  3 of the 
 initial
 committers that were not in the initial PPMC have now joined the PPMC. 7 of 
 our
 mentors will be remaining with the project as it transitions into a TLP.

 We have verified that Apache CloudStack is a suitable name [2], and the
 CloudStack marks are being donated from Citrix to the ASF.

 We completed two releases (Apache CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating and Apache
 CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating) and are currently preparing for two more (4.0.2
 and 4.1.0).

 Our community has created a set of bylaws for the project [3].

 The community of Apache CloudStack is active, healthy, and growing and has
 demonstrated the ability to self-govern using accepted Apache practices.

 After holding a discussion [4][5], the Apache CloudStack community 
 subsequently
 voted overwhelmingly to graduate [6], collecting 55 +1 votes (including
 4 from IPMC members), and no +0 or -1 votes.

 IPMC members voting +1 in the project-level thread are:
  * Mohammad Nour El-Din (IPMC/mentor) [7]
  * Noah Slater (IPMC/mentor) [8]
  * Alex Karasulu (IPMC/mentor) [9]
  * Brett Porter (IPMC/mentor) [10]

 Please cast your votes:

 [ ] +1 Graduate Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator
 [ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Apache CloudStack
 [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache CloudStack from Apache Incubator because...

 -chip


 [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html
 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
 [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/apache-cloudstack-project-bylaws.html
 [4] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3C20130213145014.GE800%40USLT-205755.sungardas.corp%3E
 [5] http://markmail.org/message/3nluchj5q5waguws
 [6] http://markmail.org/message/ntf777ctbhdytijp
 [7] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAOvkMoa4yK-L7T7OjER2pfWAAtkrOnZOe-icMPkoesWgAUDPbg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
 [8] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAPaJBx6f4a58xky0jmVjn=xcyvxuu4dxduetqsr9ovwj80n...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [9] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3ccadwpi+gfnodtuydyuy8vzm3rttzbsbq1krzzukwe4-t_qnn...@mail.gmail.com%3E
 [10] 
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201303.mbox/%3c6f99d33d-641a-4b7d-8387-a420f8a88...@apache.org%3E


 Proposed Resolution:

 X. Establish the Apache CloudStack Project

 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
 the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
 a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
 of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
 related to providing and supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
 cloud computing platforms.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
 (PMC), to be known as the Apache CloudStack Project, be and hereby is
 established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the Apache CloudStack Project be and hereby is responsible
 for the creation and maintenance of software related to providing and
 supporting Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing platforms.

 RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, Apache CloudStack be and
 hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction
 of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache CloudStack Project, and 
 to
 have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope
 of responsibility of the Apache CloudStack Project; and be it further

 RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby
 are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache CloudStack 
 Project:

 * Joe Brockmeier j...@apache.org
 * Will Chan willc...@apache.org
 * Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
 * Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
 * Sebastien Goasguen seb...@apache.org
 * Matt Richard Hogstrom hogst...@apache.org
 * Wido den Hollander wid...@apache.org
 * Alex Huang ahu...@apache.org
 * Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
 * Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
 * John Kinsella j...@apache.org
 * Kevin Kluge kl...@apache.org
 * Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
 * David Nalley ke4...@apache.org
 * 

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?

 It is not 5.

For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.

  Mohammed Nour El-Din
  Alex Karasulu
  Tommaso Teofili
  Chris Mattmann

 Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?

In addition to Alex Karasulu, Mohammed Nour El-Din had volunteered,
but seems to have been left off the version of the proposal which was
VOTEd on. So unless Mohammed has withdrawn, MRQL has 2 Mentors.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Maybe 3 including myself? or If we need to recruit one more Mentor and
re-open the vote with properly updated proposal, Please let us know.

I apologize that I made a mistake here. I was confused with this comment[1].

1. http://markmail.org/message/k6s56f5wlxgqhq3k

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?

 It is not 5.

 For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.

   Mohammed Nour El-Din
   Alex Karasulu
   Tommaso Teofili
   Chris Mattmann

 Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?

 In addition to Alex Karasulu, Mohammed Nour El-Din had volunteered,
 but seems to have been left off the version of the proposal which was
 VOTEd on. So unless Mohammed has withdrawn, MRQL has 2 Mentors.

 Marvin Humphrey

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Ivory name

2013-03-14 Thread Srikanth Sundarrajan
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Will evaluate possible options.

Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@gmail.com wrote:

 Folks,  there is already a project in the general hadoop space called
 Ivory, and it shows up as the top result for ivory hadoop on Google.

 http://lintool.github.com/Ivory/
 A Hadoop toolkit for web-scale information retrieval research

 (Disclaimer: I don't work on this project, but I do work with one of the
 primary authors, Jimmy Lin).


-- 
_
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others 
authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance 
on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your 
system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission 
of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its 
receipt.


Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

2013-03-14 Thread Srikanth Sundarrajan
Thanks. Yes, Git seems an attractive option for version control.

Regards
Srikanth Sundarrajan

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:


 +1, this will be a great addition to the Hadoop eco-system!

 The proposal looks fine overall. I quickly searched around for the name
 ivory, it looks to be a safe one, but someone needs to do due diligence?

 And I think you can chose to have git as the version control if you feel
 like it.

 Thanks,
 +Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli

 On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:

  = Ivory Proposal =
 
  == Abstract ==
  Ivory is a data processing and management solution for Hadoop designed
 for
  data motion, coordination of data pipelines, lifecycle management, and
  data discovery. Ivory enables end consumers to quickly onboard their data
  and its associated processing and management tasks on Hadoop clusters.
 
  == Proposal ==
  Ivory will enable easy data management via declarative mechanism for
  Hadoop. Users of Ivory platform simply define infrastructure endpoints,
  data sets and processing rules declaratively. These configurations
  are expressed in such a way that the dependencies between
  these entities are explicitly described. This information about
  inter-dependencies between various entities allows Ivory to orchestrate
 and
  manage various data management functions.
 
  The key use cases that Ivory addresses are:
  * Data Motion
  * Process orchestration and scheduling
  * Policy-based Lifecycle Management
  * Data Discovery
  * Operability/Usability
 
  With these features it is possible for users to onboard their data sets
  with
  a comprehensive and holistic understanding of how, when and where their
  data
  is managed across its lifecycle. Complex functions such as retrying
  failures,
  identifying possible SLA breaches or automated handling of input data
  changes
  are now simple directives. All the administrative functions and user
 level
  functions are available via RESTful APIs. CLI is simply a wrapper over
 the
  RESTful APIs.
 
  == Background ==
  Hadoop and its ecosystem of products have made storing and processing
  massive
  amounts of data commonplace. This has enabled numerous organizations to
  gain
  valuable insights that they never could have achieved in the past. While
 it
  is easy to leverage Hadoop for crunching large volumes of data,
 organizing
  data, managing life cycle of data and processing data is fairly involved.
  This is solved adequately well in a classic data platform involving data
  warehouses and standard ETL (extract-transform-load) tools, but remains
  largely
  unsolved today. In addition to data processing complexities, Hadoop
  presents
  new sets of challenges and opportunities relating to management of data.
 
  Data Management on Hadoop encompasses data motion, process orchestration,
  lifecycle management, data discovery, etc. among other concerns that are
  beyond
  ETL. Ivory is a new data processing and management platform for Hadoop
 that
  solves this problem and creates additional opportunities by building on
  existing
  components within the Hadoop ecosystem (ex. Apache Oozie, Apache Hadoop
  DistCp
  etc.) without reinventing the wheel. Ivory has been in production at
  InMobi,
  going on its second year and has been managing hundreds of feeds and
  processes.
 
  Ivory is being developed by engineers employed with InMobi, Hortonworks
 and
  Yahoo!. This platform addition will increase the adoption of Apache
 Hadoop
  by
  driving data management tractable for end users. We are therefore
 proposing
  to
  make Ivory an Apache open source project.
 
  == Rationale ==
  The Ivory project aims to improve the usability of Apache Hadoop. As a
  result
  Apache Hadoop will grow its community of users by increasing the places
  Hadoop
  can be utilized and the use cases it will solve. By developing Ivory in
  Apache
  we hope to gather a diverse community of contributors, helping to ensure
  that
  Ivory is deployable for a broad range of scenarios. Members of the Hadoop
  development community will be able to influence Ivory’s roadmap, and
  contribute
  to it. We believe having Ivory as part of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem
 will
  be
  a great benefit to all of Hadoop's users.
 
  == Current Status ==
  Ivory is widely deployed in production within InMobi and moving on to its
  second year. A version with a valuable set of features is developed by
 the
  list of initial committers and is hosted on github.
 
  === Meritocracy ===
  Our intent with this incubator proposal is to start building a diverse
  developer
  community around Ivory following the Apache meritocracy model. We have
  wanted to
  make the project open source and encourage contributors from multiple
  organizations from the start. We plan to provide plenty of support to new
  developers and to quickly recruit those who make solid contributions to
  committer status.
 
  

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC1.

2013-03-14 Thread Mahadev Konar
+1 for the RC.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@apache.org wrote:
 Thanks to feedback from general@incubator we have updated the release
 artifacts with the following fixes:

   1. Fixed NOTICE.txt
   2. Fixed KEYS file.
   3. Removed pyc files in my svn tree (unfortunately ran mvn test
 before building last time).
   4. mvn apache-rat:check passes. The exclude files are files that
 cannot have Apache Headers since it breaks the run time.
   5. Website has been updated (http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/ to
 fix all the issues mentioned earlier - thanks to Yusaku).
   6. Release artifacts now use md5 and sha1.

 The staging Staging site is:
 http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc1/

 with user docs at:
 http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html
 and dev docs at:
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development

  SVN source tag:
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc1

  PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C)
  http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C

 One can look into the issues fixed in this release at

 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.
  [ ] +1 approve
  [ ] +0 no opinion
  [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 thanks
 mahadev

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Suresh Marru
On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:

 Maybe 3 including myself?

Hi Edward,

As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be IPMC 
members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion for MRQL. 

Since you have asked to be added to IPMC [3], I assume you realize you are not 
part of IPMC. Casting a binding vote on EasyAnt graduation [3] is not right.  
Please avoid creating such confusions. 

Suresh

[1] - 
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor
[2] - 
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
[3] - http://markmail.org/message/ldoyqm3o5eifyzrl
[4] - http://markmail.org/message/dxqqa2cf6cpvoeyp

 or If we need to recruit one more Mentor and
 re-open the vote with properly updated proposal, Please let us know.
 
 I apologize that I made a mistake here. I was confused with this comment[1].
 
 1. http://markmail.org/message/k6s56f5wlxgqhq3k
 
 On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey
 mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?
 
 It is not 5.
 
 For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.
 
  Mohammed Nour El-Din
  Alex Karasulu
  Tommaso Teofili
  Chris Mattmann
 
 Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?
 
 In addition to Alex Karasulu, Mohammed Nour El-Din had volunteered,
 but seems to have been left off the version of the proposal which was
 VOTEd on. So unless Mohammed has withdrawn, MRQL has 2 Mentors.
 
 Marvin Humphrey
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

2013-03-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
OKay I see.

 As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be 
 IPMC members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion 
 for MRQL.

Regarding Champion, Am I not a Officer of ASF? - A candidate project
shall be sponsored by an Officer or Member of the Foundation.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
 On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:

 Maybe 3 including myself?

 Hi Edward,

 As you have previously pointed out Champion and Mentors are required to be 
 IPMC members [1], [2]. So sorry you cannot be counted as a mentor/champion 
 for MRQL.

 Since you have asked to be added to IPMC [3], I assume you realize you are 
 not part of IPMC. Casting a binding vote on EasyAnt graduation [3] is not 
 right.  Please avoid creating such confusions.

 Suresh

 [1] - 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor
 [2] - 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Champion
 [3] - http://markmail.org/message/ldoyqm3o5eifyzrl
 [4] - http://markmail.org/message/dxqqa2cf6cpvoeyp

 or If we need to recruit one more Mentor and
 re-open the vote with properly updated proposal, Please let us know.

 I apologize that I made a mistake here. I was confused with this comment[1].

 1. http://markmail.org/message/k6s56f5wlxgqhq3k

 On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey
 mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
 Are the five binding votes from IPMC members?

 It is not 5.

 For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor.

  Mohammed Nour El-Din
  Alex Karasulu
  Tommaso Teofili
  Chris Mattmann

 Also, should proposals with only 1 valid Mentor be acceptable?

 In addition to Alex Karasulu, Mohammed Nour El-Din had volunteered,
 but seems to have been left off the version of the proposal which was
 VOTEd on. So unless Mohammed has withdrawn, MRQL has 2 Mentors.

 Marvin Humphrey

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Joining IPMC member

2013-03-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
The reason of opening here is that I see mails like Request to join
IPMC[1]. Moreover I already sent a mail to private@ at Feb 27.

1. 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201202.mbox/%3c87945f79-c905-4cdf-af5b-d7a9b54f3...@gmail.com%3E

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
 On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:26 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:

 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?

 P.S., It's been 6 years since I uploaded my first patch on HBase. I
 still don't know many things but I'm continuously learning from you
 guys ;-)

 Hi Edward,

 I do not think any one is questioning your credibility as a committer, or pmc 
 member. I think Marvin hit it right and straight forward way. At ASF one of 
 the few things (and primarily the only thing) like adding to a PMC is handled 
 on private lists. Given that you have been contributing since 6 years you are 
 certainly expected to know it. It is not healthy to side track the issue with 
 your contributions or citing emotional reasons.

 Suresh


 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 Yes, I think I'm not familiar with handling issues like personnel, and
 somewhat emotional person.

 However, I want to helping people who want to contribute to ASF or
 collaborate with ASF projects in the future.

 On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com 
 wrote:
 Edward, are you not familiar with our custom of handling personnel
 matters on private lists? It has not always been that way, but do you
 understand why virtually all ASF projects adhere to that convention
 now?

 Marvin Humphrey

 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 Hi,

 I just noticed that Mentor must be members of the Incubator PMC[1].
 Regarding MRQL podling, I'm not only Champion but also want to be a
 Mentor for MRQL project.

 Please add me to IPMC.

 1. 
 http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor

 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon



 --
 Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
 @eddieyoon

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org