Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Don't let me stop the vote but I'm getting java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space when I run the tests, mvn clean install. My MAVEN_OPTS is: -Xms2G -Xmx2G -XX:PermSize=1G -XX:MaxPermSize=1G Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Alan On May 7, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > Hi all, > > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki > 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. > > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the > developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding > votes (from jspwiki developers). > > I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release > candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue > Tracker [#2]. > > Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the > vote. > > thanks in advance, > juan pablo > > > [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD > [#2] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 > === > > Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed > artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. > > The tag to be voted upon: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 > > Source and binary files, with RAT report: > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ > > Checksums: > > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip > MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d > SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b > SHA512: > 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 > > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip > MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 > SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c > SHA512: > 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0 > > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC
Welcome aboard! Regards, Alan On May 13, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Dear community, > > I am pleased to announce that Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC. > > Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Joe! > > On behalf of the Incubator PMC, > > -- > NS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Looks good. +1 Craig On May 13, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > Hi all, > > the current tally, right now, is: > > +1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC) > +1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor) > +5 non binding from PPMC > > (all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding > vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take > a look at it. > > thx in advance! > > > br, > juan pablo > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ant, >> >> thanks for the vote :-) >> >> Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 >> entries, being the reasons behind each one: >> - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in >> NOTICE >> >> - "Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation." entry: legal's >> advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE >> >> - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 >> License, which in section 4.b states "If you distribute, publicly display, >> publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative >> Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...]" >> >> - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed >> in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative >> work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL "You may add Your own >> attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside >> or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such >> additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the >> License." >> >> Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are >> there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a >> handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in >> NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific >> dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects >> using it) >> >> Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. >> It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to >> start graduation discuss soon thereafter. >> >> @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at >> jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote >> >> >> br, >> juan pablo >> >> [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs >> [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >> [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution >> [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index >> >> >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >>> Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. >>> >>> I give it a +1. >>> >>> There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation >>> DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the >>> source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these >>> missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, >>> or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next >>> time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't >>> needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. >>> Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think >>> that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the >>> next release. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez >>> wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on >>> the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 >>> non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira >>> Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on >>> the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-inc
[ANNOUNCE] Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC
Dear community, I am pleased to announce that Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC. Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Joe! On behalf of the Incubator PMC, -- NS
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Hi all, the current tally, right now, is: +1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC) +1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor) +5 non binding from PPMC (all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take a look at it. thx in advance! br, juan pablo On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ant, > > thanks for the vote :-) > > Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 > entries, being the reasons behind each one: > - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in > NOTICE > > - "Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation." entry: legal's > advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE > > - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 > License, which in section 4.b states "If you distribute, publicly display, > publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative > Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...]" > > - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed > in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative > work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL "You may add Your own > attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside > or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such > additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the > License." > > Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are > there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a > handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in > NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific > dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects > using it) > > Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. > It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to > start graduation discuss soon thereafter. > > @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at > jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote > > > br, > juan pablo > > [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs > [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution > [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. >> >> I give it a +1. >> >> There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation >> DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the >> source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these >> missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, >> or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next >> time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't >> needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. >> Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think >> that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the >> next release. >> >>...ant >> >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki >> > 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. >> > >> > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on >> the >> > developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 >> non-binding >> > votes (from jspwiki developers). >> > >> > I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release >> > candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira >> Issue >> > Tracker [#2]. >> > >> > Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on >> the >> > vote. >> > >> > thanks in advance, >> > juan pablo >> > >> > >> > [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD >> > [#2] >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 >> > === >> > >> > Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed >> > artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. >> > >> > The tag to be voted upon: >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 >> > >> > Source and binary files, with RAT report: >> > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ >> > >> > Checksums: >> > >> > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip >> > MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d >> > SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b >> > SHA512: >> > >> 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0e
Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 5
sigs and checksum ok. Not trouble reported by rat So +1 (binding) 2013/5/10 Daniel Gómez Ferro : > +1 (non-binding) > > * verified signature and checksums > * only changes from previous RC are documentation related > * ran tests > > On Thu May 9 22:56:47 2013, kishore g wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> verified sigs >> built code, tools and ran tests >> rat check passed >> >> Thanks, >> Kishore G >> >> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0 >>> >>> We fixed 2 blocking issues wrt RC1, related to s4 tools, 1 blocking issue >>> in RC2, related to metrics logging configuration, issues related to the >>> package contents and license headers in RC3, and removed included javadoc >>> files in RC4. >>> >>> >>> >>> This release fixes the following issues: >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312322&version=12321702 >>> >>> >>> *** Please download, test and vote by Thursday, May 9th 2013, 13:00:00 >>> GMT >>> *** >>> >>> >>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). >>> >>> >>> Source package in zip format: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mmorel/s4-0.6.0-incubating-release-candidate-5/ >>> >>> >>> >>> The (git) tag to be voted upon: 0.6.0-RC5: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s4.git;a=tree;h=8b43b317104cfc9ebc42f6e8ec9c9557867155aa;hb=2f474503e2da111601bb92ca7186c136ba28e5b0 >>> >>> >>> >>> S4 KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s4/dist/KEYS >>> >>> >>> The README.md file contains instructions for installing the gradle >>> wrapper >>> (which is not shipped with the source release). >>> >>> >>> We include a RAT check task. (Can be used by fetching rat from /lib dir >>> in >>> the git repo and using the .rat-excludes file at the root of the git >>> repo) >>> >>> It can be run with : >>> gradlew rat > output >>> >>> >>> Please cast your vote, thanks! >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> >>> >>> NOTES: >>> >>> - All releases by podlings must be approved by the Incubator PMC. The >>> conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual Apache >>> process >>> and then call for a Incubator PMC VOTE on the general incubator list. >>> For RC5 however, following recommendations from our mentors, we are >>> proceeding to a parallel vote on both general@incubator and s4-dev >>> >>> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] helix 0.6.1-incubating
+1 thanks mahadev On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Shi Lu wrote: > Hi, > > This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Helix 0.6.1-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our second > release at Apache. > > Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy > to build partitioned and replicated, fault tolerant and scalable > distributed systems. > > Release notes: > > http://helix.incubator.apache.org/releasenotes/release-0.6.1-incubating.html > > Our vote thread on helix-dev: > > http://markmail.org/message/xymuvmcjxobmhjd3?q=+list:org%2Eapache%2Ehelix%2Edev > > The following IPMC members have voted +1 > Patrick Hunt > Olivier Lamy > > > Release artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehelix-121 > > Distribution: > * binaries: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/helix/0.6.1-incubating/binaries/ > * sources: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/helix/0.6.1-incubating/src/ > > > The 0.6.1-incubating release tag > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=commit;h=355d1692a9036fa8741ef828db45446515ff018f > > KEYS file available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/helix/KEYS > > Please vote on the release. The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > Thanks, > Apache Helix team. >
Re: Creating announce@ lists by default
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > If I was the press/analyst folks or security/sysadmin folks, I'd > probably prefer to receive all these announcements over one list, then > having to figure out every announcement list for each apache project > in use in my infrastructure or that I'm interested in. /me puts on my former press hat It depends a lot on whether I cover all open source or a specific project. If I care only about one or two Apache projects, I probably don't want to get all Apache announcements. Folks who care/write about OpenOffice, for instance, aren't going to necessarily want announcements about Whirr or Hadoop. AFAIC, having project-specific announce lists is good practice. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Need some help for releasing S4 0.6.0
Hi all, we currently have the following +1 votes: 1 IPMC / PPMC vote (phunt) 2 PPMC votes (kishoreg, mmorel) 1 non binding committer vote (dferro) So we haven't reached the quorum yet. Can we get some help (votes) to finalize this release? (The vote thread has the following subject: "[VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 5") Thanks! Matthieu > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0 >> >> We fixed 2 blocking issues wrt RC1, related to s4 tools, 1 blocking issue in >> RC2, related to metrics logging configuration, issues related to the package >> contents and license headers in RC3, and removed included javadoc files in >> RC4. >> >> >> >> This release fixes the following issues: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312322&version=12321702 >> >> >> *** Please download, test and vote by Thursday, May 9th 2013, 13:00:00 GMT >> *** >> >> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). >> >> >> Source package in zip format: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mmorel/s4-0.6.0-incubating-release-candidate-5/ >> >> >> >> The (git) tag to be voted upon: 0.6.0-RC5: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s4.git;a=tree;h=8b43b317104cfc9ebc42f6e8ec9c9557867155aa;hb=2f474503e2da111601bb92ca7186c136ba28e5b0 >> >> >> >> S4 KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s4/dist/KEYS >> >> >> The README.md file contains instructions for installing the gradle wrapper >> (which is not shipped with the source release). >> >> >> We include a RAT check task. (Can be used by fetching rat from /lib dir in >> the git repo and using the .rat-excludes file at the root of the git repo) >> >> It can be run with : >> gradlew rat > output >> >> >> Please cast your vote, thanks! >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> >> NOTES: >> >> - All releases by podlings must be approved by the Incubator PMC. The >> conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual Apache process >> and then call for a Incubator PMC VOTE on the general incubator list. >> For RC5 however, following recommendations from our mentors, we are >> proceeding to a parallel vote on both general@incubator and s4-dev >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
YAMP to fix the Incubator (*)
(Yet Another Meta Proposal ;-) Dunno if it's just me but I have totally lost track of what the current proposals are, who's supporting which options etc. To try to make sense of all this, I have created http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013 and suggest that whoever thinks the Incubator needs improvements lists their issues there, as concisely as possible, with suggestions for fixing. People can then comment there (with their names in brackets so we see who says what) - having all that on one page should help. -Bertrand (*) I actually don't think the Incubator is broken BTW...but fleshing out that page should allow us to find out - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released
Fair enough ;) -JZ On May 12, 2013, at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12 May 2013 20:59, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: >> Respectfully I disagree :) "The Sony TV is black" is correct because the >> noun/object is "tv". "Curator", is the noun in this case. "Curator" is not a >> brand of "zookeeper libraries". Curator is the thing itself. > > Sorry, but that is not the case for trademarks. > See for example: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#adjective > > >> -JZ >> >> On May 12, 2013, at 5:13 AM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 11 May 2013 20:20, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: I've added a description line to the ANNOUNCE sample email: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CURATOR/Example+Emails >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Note that the first mention of Curator should use it as an adjective, >>> not a noun. >>> Compare: "The Sony TV is black" - correct; "The Sony is black" - incorrect. >>> >>> Rather than: >>> "Curator is a set of Java libraries that make using >>> Apache ZooKeeper much easier and more reliable." >>> >>> perhaps put: >>> >>> "The Apache Curator Java libraries make using >>> Apache ZooKeeper much easier and more reliable." >>> >>> >>> -Jordan On May 11, 2013, at 1:00 AM, sebb wrote: Congrats. However, what is Curator? The mail does not say anything about it. Please ensure that any announcement e-mails about Curator include a brief description of what it is. >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released
Respectfully I disagree :) "The Sony TV is black" is correct because the noun/object is "tv". "Curator", is the noun in this case. "Curator" is not a brand of "zookeeper libraries". Curator is the thing itself. -JZ On May 12, 2013, at 5:13 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 May 2013 20:20, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: >> I've added a description line to the ANNOUNCE sample email: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CURATOR/Example+Emails > > Thanks. > > Note that the first mention of Curator should use it as an adjective, > not a noun. > Compare: "The Sony TV is black" - correct; "The Sony is black" - incorrect. > > Rather than: > "Curator is a set of Java libraries that make using > Apache ZooKeeper much easier and more reliable." > > perhaps put: > > "The Apache Curator Java libraries make using > Apache ZooKeeper much easier and more reliable." > > > >> -Jordan >> >> On May 11, 2013, at 1:00 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> Congrats. >> >> However, what is Curator? >> >> The mail does not say anything about it. >> >> Please ensure that any announcement e-mails about Curator include a >> brief description of what it is. >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: A lot of reports missing these period
David Crossley wrote: > Marvin sends a summary to IPMC private@ list. It did include both > MRQL and Ambari. > > They are listed in this summary (generated from content/podlings.xml): > http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt > and in this month's data list: > http://incubator.apache.org/report_due_2.txt I looked at each mailing list archive of those due to report. The reminder was delivered to all projects except: jclouds : the mailing list was not ready at that time ambari, mrql, tajo For the latter three, was the message stuck in your email moderation queue? Also remember that it is clear when your project is due to report. See the above references. -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
