Re: [VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier 


-1 (binding)

I have not seen a successful resolution of this process:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

I have seen some effort have been made in 2010:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/chukwa.html
The process has changed meanwhile and needs to be documented. The 
process has been discussed at general@incubator and should be known.


Maybe I missed the issue (Jira being slow today for me).
Please send me a successfully resolved issue number and I will turn into 
+1.


Thanks!



On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Eric Yang  wrote:

The Apache Chukwa project entered incubator in July of 2010. Since 
then

it has grown the community in users, committers and PPMC members,
made significant improvements to the project codebase and completed
many releases following ASF policies and guidelines.

The Apache Chukwa community has voted to proceed with graduation [1]
and the result can be found at [2]. Discussion about the proposed
resolution
is also available at [3].

Please cast your votes:

[  ] +1 Graduate Chukwa podling from Incubator
[  ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Chukwa
[  ] -1 Reject graduation of Chukwa podling from Incubator because 
...


Please find the proposed board resolution below.

[1] http://s.apache.org/chukwa-graduation-vote
[2] http://s.apache.org/chukwa-graduation-result
[3] http://s.apache.org/chukwa-graduation-Resolution


Resolution:

X.Establish the Apache Chukwa Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for
distribution
at no charge to the public, related to data streaming and
visualization for Hadoop services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Chukwa Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to data streaming, monitoring and visualization
for Hadoop services; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Chukwa" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache
Chukwa Project, and to have primary responsibility for
management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of
the Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Chukwa Project:

* Ahmed Fathalla (afathalla)
* Alan D. Cabrera (adc)
* Ant Elder (antelder)
* Ariel Rabkin (asrabkin)
* Bill Graham (billgraham)
* Eric Yang (eyang)
* Grace Huang (grace.huang)
* Ivy Tang (ivytang)
* Jerome Boulon (jboulon)
* Jiaqi Tan (tanjiaqi)
* Shreyas Subramanya (shreyas)
* Sourygna Luangsay (sluangsay)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Eric Yang,
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Chukwa,
to serve in accordance with and subject to
the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa Project PMC be hereby is
tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator Chukwa podling; and be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache
Incubator Chukwa podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
PMC are hereafter discharged.


Regards
Eric



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier 

-1 (binding).

As per this document:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
the trademark process has not been resolved.

It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

Thanks!



On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:


This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
1.2.0-incubating.

It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

Tag to be voted on (rc0):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the 
source

(tag).

A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and 
Arvind

Prabhakar).

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Shreepadma

[1] -
http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier 

Hi,

Could you please explain why the projects thinks a trademark process is 
not required?

http://incubator.apache.org/projects/drill.html

For me it is required to clear the name before a product is published:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
I don't see why Drill is an exception, but maybe I have missed 
something.


Until I know more, I need to -1 this.

Thanks!



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:29:46PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote:
We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone 
release.


The vote thread can be found here:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.mbox/%3ccaka9qdkmxjp-r8v+zwabm5e4b5osrypjyp+dupvq2lr-d70...@mail.gmail.com%3E

The vote passed with

4 x +1 binding votes
7 x +1 non-binding votes

An additional non-binding +1 vote was received after the vote closed.

A summary email can be found here:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201309.mbox/%3CCAKa9qDn1+TnKVP=p_=Lh==mOS=azctuz6_qvsm4u3z4gdhh...@mail.gmail.com%3E

The source only release artifactscan be found together with 
signatures here:


http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4/
Please vote on this release


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: [VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

2013-09-22 Thread Huang, Jie 
+1 

Thank you && Best Regards,
Grace （Huang Jie)

-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:ant.el...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 1:02 PM
To: 
Cc: Incubator
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

+1

   ...ant


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Eric Yang  wrote:

> The Apache Chukwa project entered incubator in July of 2010. Since 
> then it has grown the community in users, committers and PPMC members, 
> made significant improvements to the project codebase and completed 
> many releases following ASF policies and guidelines.
>
> The Apache Chukwa community has voted to proceed with graduation [1] 
> and the result can be found at [2]. Discussion about the proposed 
> resolution is also available at [3].
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [  ] +1 Graduate Chukwa podling from Incubator [  ] +0 Indifferent to 
> graduation status of Chukwa [  ] -1 Reject graduation of Chukwa 
> podling from Incubator because ...
>
> Please find the proposed board resolution below.
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/chukwa-graduation-vote
> [2] http://s.apache.org/chukwa-graduation-result
> [3] http://s.apache.org/chukwa-graduation-Resolution
>
>
> Resolution:
>
> X.Establish the Apache Chukwa Project
>
>   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>   interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
>   purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
>   the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for 
> distribution
>   at no charge to the public, related to data streaming and
>   visualization for Hadoop services.
>
>   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>   Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Chukwa Project",
>   be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>   Foundation; and be it further
>
>   RESOLVED, that the Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby is
>   responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
>   project related to data streaming, monitoring and visualization
>   for Hadoop services; and be it further
>
>   RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Chukwa" be and
>   hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
>   direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache
>   Chukwa Project, and to have primary responsibility for
>   management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of
>   the Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further
>
>   RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>   hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>   Apache Chukwa Project:
>
> * Ahmed Fathalla (afathalla)
> * Alan D. Cabrera (adc)
> * Ant Elder (antelder)
> * Ariel Rabkin (asrabkin)
> * Bill Graham (billgraham)
> * Eric Yang (eyang)
> * Grace Huang (grace.huang)
> * Ivy Tang (ivytang)
> * Jerome Boulon (jboulon)
> * Jiaqi Tan (tanjiaqi)
> * Shreyas Subramanya (shreyas)
> * Sourygna Luangsay (sluangsay)
>
>   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Eric Yang,
>   be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Chukwa,
>   to serve in accordance with and subject to
>   the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
>   Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
>   disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
>   further
>
>   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa Project PMC be hereby is
>   tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>   encourage open development and increased participation in the
>   Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further
>
>   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby
>   is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>   Incubator Chukwa podling; and be it further
>
>   RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache
>   Incubator Chukwa podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
>   PMC are hereafter discharged.
>
>
> Regards
> Eric
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-22 Thread Jim Jagielski 
Certainly that is a decision to be made by the Usergrid community
itself and not something to be "encouraged" by the ASF.

On Sep 21, 2013, at 12:41 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana  wrote:

> One other aspect- with my Stratos hat on I'd like to see these services
> (optionally) running on the Stratos PaaS framework .. that way the services
> inherit an elastic execution platform and more. So I see this as a win-win
> relationship.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> 
>> +1 - there's a lot of overlap / commonality of objective between BaaS and
>> the set of services provided by Apache Stratos (incubating) to developers
>> of apps. I'm very happy to see this come to ASF and will be happy to mentor
>> if you guys need another one.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Sanjiva.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>>> I would like to propose Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
>>> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
>>> Incubator podling.
>>> 
>>> Here is a link to the proposal:
>>>   https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/UsergridProposal
>>> 
>>> It is also pasted below:
>>> 
>>> = Usergrid Proposal =
>>> 
>>> == Abstract ==
>>> 
>>> Usergrid is a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile
>>> applications, based on RESTful APIs.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> == Proposal ==
>>> 
>>> Usergrid is an open-source Backend-as-a-Service (“BaaS” or “mBaaS”)
>>> composed
>>> of an integrated distributed NoSQL database, application layer and client
>>> tier with SDKs for developers looking to rapidly build web and/or mobile
>>> applications. It provides elementary services (user registration &
>>> management, data storage, file storage, queues) and retrieval features
>>> (full
>>> text search, geolocation search, joins) to power common app features.
>>> 
>>> It is a multi-tenant system designed for deployment to public cloud
>>> environments (such as Amazon Web Services, Rackspace, etc.) or to run on
>>> traditional server infrastructures so that anyone can run their own
>>> private
>>> BaaS deployment.
>>> 
>>> For architects and back-end teams, it aims to provide a distributed,
>>> easily
>>> extendable, operationally predictable and highly scalable solution. For
>>> front-end developers, it aims to simplify the development process by
>>> enabling them to rapidly build and operate mobile and web applications
>>> without requiring backend expertise.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> == Background ==
>>> 
>>> Developing web or mobile applications obviously necessitates writing and
>>> maintaining more than just front-end code. Even simple applications can
>>> implicitly rely on server code being run to store users, perform database
>>> queries, serve images and video files, etc. Developing and maintaining
>>> such
>>> backend services requires skills not always available or expected of app
>>> development teams. Beyond that, the proliferation of apps inside of
>>> companies leads to the creation of many different, ad-hoc, unequally
>>> maintained backend solutions created by employees and contractors alike
>>> and
>>> hosted on a wide variety of environments. This is causing poor resource
>>> usage, operational issues, as well as security, privacy & compliance
>>> concerns.
>>> 
>>> In response to this problem, companies have long tried to standardize
>>> their
>>> server-side stack or unify them behind an ESB or API strategy.
>>> Backends-as-a-Service follow a similar approach but their unique
>>> characteristic is strongly tying  1) a persistence tier (typically a
>>> database), 2) a server-side application tier delivering a set of common
>>> services and 3) a set of client-side application interface mechanisms. For
>>> example, a BaaS could package 1) MongoDB with 2) a node.js application
>>> that
>>> offers access through 3) WebSockets. In the case of Usergrid, the trifecta
>>> is 1) Cassandra, 2) Java + Jersey and 3) a RESTful API.
>>> 
>>> The Backend-as-a-Service approach has steadily gained popularity in the
>>> last
>>> few years with cloud providers such Parse.com, Stackmob.com and
>>> Kinvey.com,
>>> each operating tens of thousands of apps for tens of thousands of
>>> developers. The trend has already reached large organizations as well,
>>> with
>>> global companies such as Korea Telecom internally building a privately-run
>>> BaaS platform. But so far, there have been limited options for developers
>>> that want a non-proprietary, open option for hosting and providing these
>>> services themselves, or for enterprise and government users who want to
>>> provide these capabilities from their own data centers, especially on a
>>> very
>>> large scale.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> == Rationale ==
>>> 
>>> The issue this proposal deals with is implicit in the name.
>>> Backend-as-a-Service platforms are usually offered solely as proprietary
>>> cloud services. They are typically closed sourced, hosted on public
>>> clouds,
>>> and require subscripti

Re: [PROPOSAL] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-22 Thread Luciano Resende 
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> Certainly that is a decision to be made by the Usergrid community
> itself and not something to be "encouraged" by the ASF.
>
>
+1


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan 
Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html, its
required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.

We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38

The project status page
(http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html)
has
also been updated to reflect it. I think the voting can continue on this RC.

Thanks.
Shreepadma


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

> -1 (binding).
>
> As per this document:
> http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html
> the trademark process has not been resolved.
>
> It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:
>
>  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
>> 1.2.0-incubating.
>>
>> It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
>>
>> Source files : 
>> http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
>>
>> Tag to be voted on (rc0):
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
>> repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0
>>
>> Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
>> https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc
>>
>> Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
>> (tag).
>>
>> A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
>> PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and Arvind
>> Prabhakar).
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Shreepadma
>>
>> [1] -
>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
>> sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**results
>>
>
> --**--**-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> general-help@incubator.apache.**org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier 


Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
> Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html, its
> required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
> It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.

OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the name must be 
cleared before any package is released?


> We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
> name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38

OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.

> The project status page
> (http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html)
> has
> also been updated to reflect it. 

I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?

>I think the voting can continue on this RC.

I disagree. First clear the name, then release.

Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the intention 
more clear.

Cheers


>
> Thanks.
> Shreepadma
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier 
> wrote:
>
>> -1 (binding).
>>
>> As per this document:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html
>> the trademark process has not been resolved.
>>
>> It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
>> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:
>>
>>  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
>>> 1.2.0-incubating.
>>>
>>> It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
>>>
>>> Source files : 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
>>>
>>> Tag to be voted on (rc0):
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
>>> repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0
>>>
>>> Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
>>> https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc
>>>
>>> Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
>>> (tag).
>>>
>>> A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
>>> PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and Arvind
>>> Prabhakar).
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Shreepadma
>>>
>>> [1] -
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
>>> sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**results
>>>
>> --**--**-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> general-help@incubator.apache.**org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1525390 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/sentry.xml

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier 
-1, please roll this back.

THe VP must agree to this first, then you can mark this as done.

See: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

"The V.P. Branding will finally approve your request.

Important: you must wait until your trademark has been approved. There
is no lazy consensus.

Once the name is approved, you can resolve the JIRA issue and work with
your new trademark. Incubator Podlings: please don't forget to update
your Incubator status page."

Thanks

shreepa...@apache.org schrieb:
> Author: shreepadma
> Date: Sun Sep 22 17:03:45 2013
> New Revision: 1525390
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1525390
> Log:
> CMS commit to incubator by shreepadma
> 
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/sentry.xml
> 
> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/sentry.xml
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/sentry.xml?rev=1525390&r1=1525389&r2=1525390&view=diff
> ==
> --- incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/sentry.xml [utf-8] (original)
> +++ incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/sentry.xml [utf-8] Sun Sep 22 
> 17:03:45 2013
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
>item
>  
>  
> -  -..-..
> +  2013-09-19
>Make sure that the requested project name does not already 
> exist. http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html";>Please 
> follow
>  the guide to ensure a suitable project/product name.
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cvs-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: cvs-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan 
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:

>
>
> Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
> > Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html,
> its
> > required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
> > It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.
>
> OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the name
> must be cleared before any package is released?
>

Well, the way the rule reads today is the search process has to start
before a release can happen. If the name has to be cleared before a
release, it needs to be explicitly stated that way.


>
> > We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
> > name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38
>
> OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.
>
> > The project status page
> > (http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html<
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html>)
> > has
> > also been updated to reflect it.
>
> I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?
>
> >I think the voting can continue on this RC.
>
> I disagree. First clear the name, then release.
>
> Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the
> intention more clear.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Cheers.
Shreepadma


> >
> > Thanks.
> > Shreepadma
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier <
> grobme...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> -1 (binding).
> >>
> >> As per this document:
> >> http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html<
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html>
> >> the trademark process has not been resolved.
> >>
> >> It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
> >> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html<
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:
> >>
> >>  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
> >>> 1.2.0-incubating.
> >>>
> >>> It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
> >>>
> >>> Source files : http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/<
> http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/>
> >>>
> >>> Tag to be voted on (rc0):
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
> >>> repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0<
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0
> >
> >>>
> >>> Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
> >>> https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc<
> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc>
> >>>
> >>> Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
> >>> (tag).
> >>>
> >>> A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
> >>> PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and
> Arvind
> >>> Prabhakar).
> >>>
> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> Shreepadma
> >>>
> >>> [1] -
> >>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
> >>> sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**results<
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results
> >
> >>>
> >>
> --**--**-
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org<
> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org<
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier 


Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
>>> Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html,
>> its
>>> required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
>>> It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.
>> OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the name
>> must be cleared before any package is released?
>>
> 
> Well, the way the rule reads today is the search process has to start
> before a release can happen. If the name has to be cleared before a
> release, it needs to be explicitly stated that way.

On the end of the document one can read:

"The V.P. Branding will finally approve your request.

Important: you must wait until your trademark has been approved. There
is no lazy consensus.

Once the name is approved, you can resolve the JIRA issue and work with
your new trademark. Incubator Podlings: please don't forget to update
your Incubator status page.
"

It says, you can only work with your trademark when VP has approved the
mark. For me this includes a release.

You maybe can guess that it can cause trouble when you work with a brand
with has not checked. Only recently we had to rename a subproject of
project because the brand was not checked accordingly.

We can either discuss about grammar or spelling issues, which this
document surely has (they are mostly my fault). Or we can simply try to
understand what problems it solves and act like that.

For me trademarks clearance are as important as a clean IP. If I were
you, I would keep this vote running, but make the outcome pending to the
response.

Now, as Jira is available to me again I can see there a couple of
(software) projects using the name Sentry already. Like for example:
getsentry.com

Given the high number of other which use the name (346 search results on
github) I have concerns we will run into a trademark conflict here and
insist you wait until trademarks@ has approved your mark.

+ cc Trademarks

Cheers
Christain






> 
>>> We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
>>> name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38
>> OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.
>>
>>> The project status page
>>> (http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html<
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html>)
>>> has
>>> also been updated to reflect it.
>> I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?
>>
>>> I think the voting can continue on this RC.
>> I disagree. First clear the name, then release.
>>
>> Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the
>> intention more clear.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> Cheers.
> Shreepadma
> 
> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> Shreepadma
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier <
>> grobme...@gmail.com>wrote:
 -1 (binding).

 As per this document:
 http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html<
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html>
 the trademark process has not been resolved.

 It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
 http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html<
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html>
 Thanks!




 On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:

  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
> 1.2.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
>
> Source files : http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/<
>> http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/>
> Tag to be voted on (rc0):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
> repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0<
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0
> Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
> https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc<
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc>
> Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
> (tag).
>
> A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
> PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and
>> Arvind
> Prabhakar).
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Shreepadma
>
> [1] -
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
> sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**results<
>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results
>> --**---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Chukwa graduation

2013-09-22 Thread Eric Yang 
We did the name search in 2009, 2010, and 2012 via different Apache
processes while we were a sub-project of Hadoop, and repeat the name search
process for incubator.  The podling name search has been updated in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-19.  I think
trademark should not be an issue, Apache Chukwa (TM) has been listed on
hadoop.apache.org for years.
Hope this addresses the concerns.

regards,
Eric


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

>
> -1 (binding)
>
> I have not seen a successful resolution of this process:
> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html
>
> I have seen some effort have been made in 2010:
> http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/chukwa.html
> The process has changed meanwhile and needs to be documented. The process
> has been discussed at general@incubator and should be known.
>
> Maybe I missed the issue (Jira being slow today for me).
> Please send me a successfully resolved issue number and I will turn into
> +1.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>  On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Eric Yang  wrote:
>>
>>  The Apache Chukwa project entered incubator in July of 2010. Since then
>>> it has grown the community in users, committers and PPMC members,
>>> made significant improvements to the project codebase and completed
>>> many releases following ASF policies and guidelines.
>>>
>>> The Apache Chukwa community has voted to proceed with graduation [1]
>>> and the result can be found at [2]. Discussion about the proposed
>>> resolution
>>> is also available at [3].
>>>
>>> Please cast your votes:
>>>
>>> [  ] +1 Graduate Chukwa podling from Incubator
>>> [  ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Chukwa
>>> [  ] -1 Reject graduation of Chukwa podling from Incubator because ...
>>>
>>> Please find the proposed board resolution below.
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> http://s.apache.org/chukwa-**graduation-vote
>>> [2] 
>>> http://s.apache.org/chukwa-**graduation-result
>>> [3] 
>>> http://s.apache.org/chukwa-**graduation-Resolution
>>>
>>>
>>> Resolution:
>>>
>>> X.Establish the Apache Chukwa Project
>>>
>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>>> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
>>> purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
>>> the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for
>>> distribution
>>> at no charge to the public, related to data streaming and
>>> visualization for Hadoop services.
>>>
>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>>> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Chukwa Project",
>>> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
>>> Foundation; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby is
>>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
>>> project related to data streaming, monitoring and visualization
>>> for Hadoop services; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Chukwa" be and
>>> hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
>>> direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache
>>> Chukwa Project, and to have primary responsibility for
>>> management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of
>>> the Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>>> Apache Chukwa Project:
>>>
>>> * Ahmed Fathalla (afathalla)
>>> * Alan D. Cabrera (adc)
>>> * Ant Elder (antelder)
>>> * Ariel Rabkin (asrabkin)
>>> * Bill Graham (billgraham)
>>> * Eric Yang (eyang)
>>> * Grace Huang (grace.huang)
>>> * Ivy Tang (ivytang)
>>> * Jerome Boulon (jboulon)
>>> * Jiaqi Tan (tanjiaqi)
>>> * Shreyas Subramanya (shreyas)
>>> * Sourygna Luangsay (sluangsay)
>>>
>>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Eric Yang,
>>> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Chukwa,
>>> to serve in accordance with and subject to
>>> the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
>>> Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
>>> disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
>>> further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa Project PMC be hereby is
>>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>>> encourage open development and increased participation in the
>>> Apache Chukwa Project; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Chukwa Project be and hereby
>>> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
>>> Incubator Chukwa podling; and be it further
>>>
>>> RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache
>>> Incubator Chukwa podling e

Re: [VOTE] first milestone release of Apache Drill (incubating)

2013-09-22 Thread Ted Dunning 
Christian,

You reported DRILL-12 some
time ago.

In response, I did the search and documented my results here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-16

Can you explain what is missing?





On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Could you please explain why the projects thinks a trademark process is
> not required?
> http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/drill.html
>
> For me it is required to clear the name before a product is published:
> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html
> I don't see why Drill is an exception, but maybe I have missed something.
>
> Until I know more, I need to -1 this.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:29:46PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>>> We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release.
>>>
>>> The vote thread can be found here:
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-**
>>> dev/201309.mbox/%**3CCAKa9qDkMxJp-r8v+**ZwabM5E4b5osrypJyp+DuPvq2LR-**
>>> d70...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>> The vote passed with
>>>
>>> 4 x +1 binding votes
>>> 7 x +1 non-binding votes
>>>
>>> An additional non-binding +1 vote was received after the vote closed.
>>>
>>> A summary email can be found here:
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-**
>>> dev/201309.mbox/%3CCAKa9qDn1+**TnKVP=p_=Lh==mOS=azctUz6_**
>>> Qvsm4U3Z4gdhHHgQ@mail.gmail.**com%3E
>>>
>>> The source only release artifactscan be found together with signatures
>>> here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.**rc4/
>>> Please vote on this release
>>>
>>
>> --**--**-
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>> general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> general-help@incubator.apache.**org
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (RC6)

2013-09-22 Thread Patrick Wendell 
I'm +1 as well. It would be great if more people from the IPMC could
vote, since we are really trying to get this release out.

I'm also attaching below the output from our own auditing tool, which
verifies various aspects of the signatures, license files, and maven
publishing.

- Patrick


Starting tests, log output in spark_audit_Sep_09_2013_06_33_21. Test
results printed below:
[PASSED] sbt build against 'spark-core_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] sbt build against 'spark-bagel_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] sbt build against 'spark-mllib_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] sbt build against 'spark-streaming_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] sbt build against 'spark-repl_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] maven build against 'spark-core_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] maven build against 'spark-bagel_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] maven build against 'spark-mllib_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] maven build against 'spark-streaming_2.9.3' module
[PASSED] maven build against 'spark-repl_2.9.3' module
 Verifying download integrity for artifact:
spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-cdh4-rc6.tgz 
[PASSED] Artifact signature verified.
Running command: gpg --print-md MD5 spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-cdh4-rc6.tgz
[PASSED] Artifact MD5 verified.
Running command: gpg --print-md SHA512 spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-cdh4-rc6.tgz
[PASSED] Artifact SHA verified.
[PASSED] Tarball contains CHANGES.txt file
[PASSED] Tarball contains NOTICE file
[PASSED] Tarball contains LICENSE file
[PASSED] README file contains disclaimer
 Verifying download integrity for artifact:
spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-hadoop1-rc6.tgz 
[PASSED] Artifact signature verified.
Running command: gpg --print-md MD5 spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-hadoop1-rc6.tgz
[PASSED] Artifact MD5 verified.
Running command: gpg --print-md SHA512
spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-hadoop1-rc6.tgz
[PASSED] Artifact SHA verified.
[PASSED] Tarball contains CHANGES.txt file
[PASSED] Tarball contains NOTICE file
[PASSED] Tarball contains LICENSE file
[PASSED] README file contains disclaimer
 Verifying download integrity for artifact:
spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6.tgz 
[PASSED] Artifact signature verified.
Running command: gpg --print-md MD5 spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6.tgz
[PASSED] Artifact MD5 verified.
Running command: gpg --print-md SHA512 spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6.tgz
[PASSED] Artifact SHA verified.
[PASSED] Tarball contains CHANGES.txt file
[PASSED] Tarball contains NOTICE file
[PASSED] Tarball contains LICENSE file
[PASSED] README file contains disclaimer
 Verifying build and tests for artifact:
spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-cdh4-rc6.tgz 
==> Running build
[PASSED] sbt build successful
[PASSED] Maven build successful
==> Performing unit tests
[PASSED] Tests successful
 Verifying build and tests for artifact:
spark-0.8.0-incubating-bin-hadoop1-rc6.tgz 
==> Running build
[PASSED] sbt build successful
[PASSED] Maven build successful
==> Performing unit tests
[PASSED] Tests successful
 Verifying build and tests for artifact: spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6.tgz 
==> Running build
[PASSED] sbt build successful
[PASSED] Maven build successful
==> Performing unit tests
[PASSED] Tests successful

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Wendell  wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> (incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator release for
> Spark in Apache.
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.8.0-incubating (commit 3b85a85):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-spark.git;a=commit;h=3b85a8558da2c87873c85f227a189e45bf16b65d
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6/files/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-059/
>
> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6/docs/
>
> A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC [1] including
> +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Chris Mattman and Henry Saputra).
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating!
>
> The vote is open until Monday, September 23rd at 21:00 UTC and passes if
> a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
> http://spark.incubator.apache.org/
>
>
> [1] 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-spark-dev/201309.mbox/%3CCABPQxsvS14wfiABj32b_%2BgtLafmDog%3DcbWjn7v4FoqG5g-a7mQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> - Patrick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

2013-09-22 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana 
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> > Certainly that is a decision to be made by the Usergrid community
> > itself and not something to be "encouraged" by the ASF.
> >
> >
> +1
>

Nothing in my mail suggested otherwise.

OTOH, as an ASF Member, it always pleases me when ASF projects collaborate
with each other. Certainly the ASF *should* encourage that. Jim isn't that
any longer the case?

Sanjiva.
-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1
650 265 8311
blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (RC6)

2013-09-22 Thread Roman Shaposhnik 
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Wendell  wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> (incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator release for
> Spark in Apache.
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.8.0-incubating (commit 3b85a85):
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-spark.git;a=commit;h=3b85a8558da2c87873c85f227a189e45bf16b65d
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6/files/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-059/
>
> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6/docs/
>
> A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC [1] including
> +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Chris Mattman and Henry Saputra).
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating!
>
> The vote is open until Monday, September 23rd at 21:00 UTC and passes if
> a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Roman.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org