Re: June report prep
What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project in May's report but not on June Would like to know that and get ready for coming report. Thank you very much. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: The first action of the June report cycle is to send the timeline email to general@incubator. This should be done by the last Wednesday of the month, so that people see it a full week before podling reports are due. Here's a sample: Yay! With the correct version of python, this now works for me. We won't know what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much. Thanks, Ted -- looks good! And I'm glad that you sent it out, because it seems that the other Marvin flaked again and the per-podling reminder emails have not fired yet. That's not something that the Report Manager is responsible for, though -- it's something the Incubator relies on individual volunteers to monitor. If the automatic reminders haven't fired by tomorrow, I'll send out manual reminders again. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: [X ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because... As mentioned before I think the name is too close to Mesos, especially taking into account the ways those names are pronounced in various languages. This is not a veto of course as this is a majority vote, and I don't object to the podling creation anyway, it's just the name that's problematic IMO. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: June report prep
Incubator projects start with monthly reporting and then switch to quarterly after the first few reports. I think that it is very helpful to do a bit of the report each month even after switching to quarterly reporting because it is hard to remember everything that has happened after 3 months. Even just making a few notes each week is a good thing. This is also a good opportunity to build community if you spread around the writing of those few lines. Starting with super easy contributions like that often leads to much more significant contributions later. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote: What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project in May's report but not on June Would like to know that and get ready for coming report. Thank you very much. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: The first action of the June report cycle is to send the timeline email to general@incubator. This should be done by the last Wednesday of the month, so that people see it a full week before podling reports are due. Here's a sample: Yay! With the correct version of python, this now works for me. We won't know what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much. Thanks, Ted -- looks good! And I'm glad that you sent it out, because it seems that the other Marvin flaked again and the per-podling reminder emails have not fired yet. That's not something that the Report Manager is responsible for, though -- it's something the Incubator relies on individual volunteers to monitor. If the automatic reminders haven't fired by tomorrow, I'll send out manual reminders again. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: June report prep
Thanks Ted, this is more clear now. You are right, to have monthly summary is also very important to share such information in project community, and it's good start point for people learn more about that project when they joined a new community Thanks. Best Regards! - Luke Han 2015-05-29 16:23 GMT+08:00 Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com: Incubator projects start with monthly reporting and then switch to quarterly after the first few reports. I think that it is very helpful to do a bit of the report each month even after switching to quarterly reporting because it is hard to remember everything that has happened after 3 months. Even just making a few notes each week is a good thing. This is also a good opportunity to build community if you spread around the writing of those few lines. Starting with super easy contributions like that often leads to much more significant contributions later. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Luke Han luke...@gmail.com wrote: What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project in May's report but not on June Would like to know that and get ready for coming report. Thank you very much. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: The first action of the June report cycle is to send the timeline email to general@incubator. This should be done by the last Wednesday of the month, so that people see it a full week before podling reports are due. Here's a sample: Yay! With the correct version of python, this now works for me. We won't know what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much. Thanks, Ted -- looks good! And I'm glad that you sent it out, because it seems that the other Marvin flaked again and the per-podling reminder emails have not fired yet. That's not something that the Report Manager is responsible for, though -- it's something the Incubator relies on individual volunteers to monitor. If the automatic reminders haven't fired by tomorrow, I'll send out manual reminders again. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator
+1 2015-05-29 11:34 GMT+08:00 Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: Based on the earlier discussion in thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Mysos, an Apache Mesos framework for running MySQL instances, as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached below The VOTE is open for at least the next 72 hours: [ ] +1 Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because... +1. -- justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating
Hi all, The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Kylin 0.7.1 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin. Since this is first release after join Apache Incubating project, we would like to hear more feedback from incubator community and please help to verify and vote our release candidate. Proposal: http://s.apache.org/kylin-0.7.1-vote Vote result: 3 binding +1 votes 0 non-binding +1 votes No -1 votes http://s.apache.org/kylin-0.7.1-result The commit to be voted upon: https://github.com/apache/incubator-kylin/commit/76b5d37561879140e73c9179d95a4e5e96751444 Its hash is 76b5d37561879140e73c9179d95a4e5e96751444. The artifacts to be voted on are located here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kylin/apache-kylin-0.7.1-incubating-rc2/ The hashes of the artifacts are as follows: src.zip.md5 c8b0bb6744288f07ad625cc48521b088 src.zip.sha1 bafab62d5df6e77da0f236b9399a674abcc2b34a A staged Maven repository is available for review at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekylin-1004/ Release artifacts are signed with the following key: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lukehan.asc Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and with the endorsement of our mentors we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the release. The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes (3 +1) is reached. [ ] +1 Release this package [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Luke Han, on behalf of Apache Kylin PPMC
Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator
Bringing back comments from a separate thread on board@ Sorry to see your vote of a -1 on the proposal due to the name. This was raised during the discussion phase and as stated in the discussion we are not against a name change, but saw it as something that was not a blocker to entering incubation. We did an initial name search on our own and there are no collisions on Mysos externally and we have two Mesos PMC members on the project that did not see any problems with the name, Dave and Vinod are both on the Mesos PMC. A note has been sent to the Mesos PMC private@ list regarding the Mysos proposal and the project name and asked that comments be brought back to here. -Jake On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: [X ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because... As mentioned before I think the name is too close to Mesos, especially taking into account the ways those names are pronounced in various languages. This is not a veto of course as this is a majority vote, and I don't object to the podling creation anyway, it's just the name that's problematic IMO. -Bertrand
Re: Blog policy for poddlings
On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 09:43 PM, Dave Lester wrote: My understanding is that only TLPs can publish to blogs.a.o. I guess that depends on whether you mean the top-level Apache blog there or starting a new blog. CloudStack started its blog on blogs.apache.org while we were a podling with (IIRC) Sally's blessing. Example here: https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/tags/4.0.1-incubating Whether that was aggregated/carried on the main site, I don't recall. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Apache Sentry This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sentry-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAE=hR03kUTGF3s5QCpuUj=_eyry_gsR=w6kd-pvd_-cdcru...@mail.gmail.com%3E It would be perfectly understandable for an individual release manager to misunderstand the incubating release process, but it's troubling that not a single podling community member spoke up. What's going on? Apologies for just noticing this email, and for missing that. I'm looking into this, I think there may have been a misunderstanding about the need for IPMC votes vs. actually conducting a vote on general@. (IIRC all three binding +1s are IPMC members.) Thanks, Joe. To clarify and elaborate: The Apache Incubator is a top-level project at the Apache Software Foundation -- like Apache Tomcat, like Apache Lucene, like Apache HTTPD. The Incubator makes official Apache releases following a specific process, just like those other top-level projects do. Release candidates prepared by incubating podlings become official Apache releases when the Incubator releases them. This requires a vote by the Incubator PMC. It is not valid for a subset of any Apache PMC to approve a release candidate without giving the entire PMC sufficient opportunity for review. This prevents, for example, a handful of employees from ExampleCo making a release of Apache Foo that other members of the Foo PMC find objectionable. While the Sentry release glitch appears to have arisen from a misunderstanding, there have been multiple occasions in the ASF's history where failure to understand or uphold release protocols has resulted in distorted project governance and disenfranchised PMC members. From time to time, you will hear people argue that the incubation process should be reorganized and that the release votes on general@incubator should be streamlined away. Such arguments would be more persuasive, IMO, if it were not routine to catch problems during the general@incubator vote phase. In any case, that is not the situation that exists today. So we now have Sentry artifacts being distributed which have not been approved by the full Incubator PMC. A similar situation with another project was once resolved by having the full PMC vote on the already-distributed artifacts. In my view, the Sentry podling should initiate such a vote, and a passing vote would settle the issue. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Blog policy for poddlings
I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! can someone please remind me what's the policy for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a blogging platform? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: Blog policy for poddlings
It's not ComDev is press@ Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnikmailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org Sent: 5/29/2015 7:11 PM To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Blog policy for poddlings This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ? Thanks, Roman. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings wait until graduation to post in it. - Henry On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! can someone please remind me what's the policy for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a blogging platform? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Blog policy for poddlings
To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate messaging. That is why we have press@ :-) On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote: It's not ComDev is press@ Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnikmailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org Sent: 5/29/2015 7:11 PM To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Blog policy for poddlings This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ? Thanks, Roman. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings wait until graduation to post in it. - Henry On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! can someone please remind me what's the policy for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a blogging platform? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Blog policy for poddlings
This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ? Thanks, Roman. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings wait until graduation to post in it. - Henry On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! can someone please remind me what's the policy for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a blogging platform? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Blog policy for poddlings
When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings wait until graduation to post in it. - Henry On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! can someone please remind me what's the policy for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a blogging platform? Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
