Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.0.0 (RC2)

[Thejas Nair]

+1
Checked signatures and checksums, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE files


On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Alan Gates  wrote:

> +1.  Checked signatures, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE files, and
> assured there were no binary files in the distribution.
>
> Alan.
>
> > On Sep 3, 2016, at 02:33, WANG Sheng  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache
> > SINGA 1.0.0 (incubating).
> >
> > The vote thread is at:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201609.mbox/%
> 3CCAELsgRf0T371qTSVo20HjTGiXYgW-br7YgnffUHgAxTooqW9qQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > and the result is at:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201609.
> mbox/%3CCAELsgRcyMcB%3DF5XgtOv1P9zuNPbU7-qWmnCNbDpRrJu4ReP9ug%40mail.
> gmail.com%3E
> >
> > We ask the IPMC to vote on this release.
> >
> > The artifacts to be voted on are located at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.0.0/
> >
> > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > MD5: AE 01 1F 67 D7 F0 F6 23  FF 26 F9 A9 F0 00 1C C3
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/dinhtta.asc
> >
> > and the signature file is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.0.
> 0/apache-singa-incubating-1.0.0-RC2.tar.gz.asc
> >
> > The Github tag is at:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-singa/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc2
> >
> > with commit ID: 0416a0fdfa63cb1b4f54e438ff5b33d7eb4d8df0
> >
> > To check the license, you can use the Apache Rat tool as follows:
> > 1. download & decompress apache rat from
> > http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi
> > 2. run the following command under singa folder:
> >java -jar /PATH/TO/RAT/apache-rat-0.11.jar -E rat-excludes -d . >
> > rat_check
> > 3. check the results in file named "rat_check"
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours, or until the necessary number of
> > votes (3 +1) is reached.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SINGA 1.0.0-incubating
> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sheng
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Incubator wiki permission request for submitting report

[Khurrum Nasim]

Thank you so much.

KN

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey 
wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Khurrum Nasim 
> wrote:
>
> > I have created my new account on the incubator wiki. My username is
> > 'KhurrumNasim'. Can you please help granting the edit permission for
> > submitting the podling report?
>
> Done.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

[Mike Jumper]

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Mike Jumper  wrote:
>
>> Is the project-specific organization option not really an option at all
>> then? Frowned upon for a TLP, and not to be considered by a podling?
>
> My chief concern so far has been assuring that our nascent Infra-supported
> offerings do not conflict with policy.  Now that this has been achieved (in
> planning, if not yet in implementation), it's easier to speak to your issue.
>
> The main Docker Hub at hub.docker.com is a public-facing downstream
> distribution channel -- similar to Maven Central, PyPI, Debian package
> management, etc.
>
> It is appropriate to distribute official releases through downstream channels,
> but inappropriate to distribute unreleased materials through them.  (That's
> why having `latest` on hub.docker.com point to git `master` is problematic.)
> See Apache's formal Release Policy and Release Distribution Policy documents:
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy#policy
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#policy
>
> There are an unbounded number of such downstream channels, and there is no way
> we are going to formulate specific policies for all of them.  Instead, we
> primarily rely on people respecting our trademarks: that "Apache Foo", when
> obtained from one of these channels, is what the consumer expects.
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks
>
> One implication is that if you're using the project name for that Docker
> Hub account, we'd expect the entire PMC to have access.
>
> Incubating podlings operate under additional constraints, in that the "Apache"
> brand needs to be tempered with "incubating" and appropriate disclaimers.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
>
> But within those guidelines, the answer is: yes, go ahead.  If Infra's
> offering is not to your taste, that is.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>

Excellent. Thanks, Marvin.

This addresses absolutely all my questions quite nicely.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Mike Jumper  wrote:

> Is the project-specific organization option not really an option at all
> then? Frowned upon for a TLP, and not to be considered by a podling?

My chief concern so far has been assuring that our nascent Infra-supported
offerings do not conflict with policy.  Now that this has been achieved (in
planning, if not yet in implementation), it's easier to speak to your issue.

The main Docker Hub at hub.docker.com is a public-facing downstream
distribution channel -- similar to Maven Central, PyPI, Debian package
management, etc.

It is appropriate to distribute official releases through downstream channels,
but inappropriate to distribute unreleased materials through them.  (That's
why having `latest` on hub.docker.com point to git `master` is problematic.)
See Apache's formal Release Policy and Release Distribution Policy documents:

http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy#policy
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#policy

There are an unbounded number of such downstream channels, and there is no way
we are going to formulate specific policies for all of them.  Instead, we
primarily rely on people respecting our trademarks: that "Apache Foo", when
obtained from one of these channels, is what the consumer expects.

http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks

One implication is that if you're using the project name for that Docker
Hub account, we'd expect the entire PMC to have access.

Incubating podlings operate under additional constraints, in that the "Apache"
brand needs to be tempered with "incubating" and appropriate disclaimers.

http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html

But within those guidelines, the answer is: yes, go ahead.  If Infra's
offering is not to your taste, that is.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[Orhan Kislal]

John,

I know of this commit and I cannot see any distinction between the
src/utils folder and many other excluded folders. Here is the phrase from
the LICENSE file:

The rest of the source code, unless explicitly marked with an Apache License
header, should be assumed to be coming from previous life of MADlib as a
BSD licensed project and is available under the following license:
...

Thanks,

Orhan

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:

> Frank pointed me to this commit - which changes a bunch of things to Apache
> License:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 PM Orhan Kislal  wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it
> indicates
> > that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to the
> > commit tag that you mentioned?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Orhan
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Frank,
> > >
> > > Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in the
> > > explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
> > > headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
> > > license they're falling under?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought
> > the
> > > > files into ASF:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > > a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> > > 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> > > > and they have not been changed since that time.
> > > >
> > > > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
> > > >
> > > > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> > > > src/utils
> > > >
> > > > Frank
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan <
> > fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator
> > > release
> > > > > for
> > > > > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to
> > proceed
> > > > with
> > > > > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a
> > > 2-clause
> > > > > BSD
> > > > > > license.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > > > >
> > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > > > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd
> > release
> > > > we
> > > > > > did the same.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for
> src/utils.
> > > > Why
> > > > > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating
> > > NOTICE/LICENSE?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Frank
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >  Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > > > > > 
> > and
> > > > > > didn't
> > > > > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > > > > > keyservers.net
> > > > > > > and should be available now after you update your local cache.
> Is
> > > > this
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndam...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and
> > tell
> > > > me
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA
> key
> > ID
> > > > > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > > > > gpg: no valid 

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[John D. Ament]

Frank pointed me to this commit - which changes a bunch of things to Apache
License:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036

John

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 PM Orhan Kislal  wrote:

> John,
>
> I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it indicates
> that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to the
> commit tag that you mentioned?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orhan
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > Frank,
> >
> > Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in the
> > explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
> > headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
> > license they're falling under?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought
> the
> > > files into ASF:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> > 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> > > and they have not been changed since that time.
> > >
> > > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
> > >
> > > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> > > src/utils
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan <
> fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator
> > release
> > > > for
> > > > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to
> proceed
> > > with
> > > > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a
> > 2-clause
> > > > BSD
> > > > > license.
> > > > >
> > > > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > > >
> 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd
> release
> > > we
> > > > > did the same.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.
> > > Why
> > > > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating
> > NOTICE/LICENSE?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >  Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > > > > 
> and
> > > > > didn't
> > > > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > > > > keyservers.net
> > > > > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is
> > > this
> > > > > the
> > > > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and
> tell
> > > me
> > > > if
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key
> ID
> > > > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a
> > > > public
> > > > > > > server?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> > > > fmcquil...@pivotal.io
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and
> > > approved
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > 

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[Orhan Kislal]

John,

I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it indicates
that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to the
commit tag that you mentioned?

Thanks,

Orhan

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:

> Frank,
>
> Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in the
> explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
> headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
> license they're falling under?
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan 
> wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought the
> > files into ASF:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> > and they have not been changed since that time.
> >
> > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
> >
> > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> > src/utils
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator
> release
> > > for
> > > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to proceed
> > with
> > > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a
> 2-clause
> > > BSD
> > > > license.
> > > >
> > > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd release
> > we
> > > > did the same.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.
> > Why
> > > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating
> NOTICE/LICENSE?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > > >
> > > > Frank
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >  Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > > >  and
> > > > didn't
> > > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > > > keyservers.net
> > > > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is
> > this
> > > > the
> > > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Rahul
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell
> > me
> > > if
> > > > > you
> > > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
> > > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a
> > > public
> > > > > > server?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> > > fmcquil...@pivotal.io
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and
> > approved
> > > > the
> > > > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction
> > > metrics,
> > > > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > > > * improvements to existing modules 

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[John D. Ament]

Frank,

Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in the
explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
license they're falling under?

John

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan 
wrote:

> John,
>
> src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought the
> files into ASF:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> and they have not been changed since that time.
>
> tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
>
> So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> src/utils
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > >
> > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator release
> > for
> > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to proceed
> with
> > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a 2-clause
> > BSD
> > > license.
> > >
> > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd release
> we
> > > did the same.
> > >
> >
> > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.
> Why
> > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating NOTICE/LICENSE?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >  Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > >  and
> > > didn't
> > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > >
> > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > > keyservers.net
> > > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is
> this
> > > the
> > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > >
> > > > - Rahul
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell
> me
> > if
> > > > you
> > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > >
> > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
> > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > > >
> > > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a
> > public
> > > > > server?
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> > fmcquil...@pivotal.io
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and
> approved
> > > the
> > > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction
> > metrics,
> > > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM,
> > overlapping
> > > > > > patterns in path)
> > > > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > > > * bug fixes
> > > > > > * doc improvements
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $mvn verify
> > > > > >
> > > > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to
> see
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[Frank McQuillan]

John,

src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought the
files into ASF:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
and they have not been changed since that time.

tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460

So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for src/utils

Frank



On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> >
> > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator release
> for
> > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to proceed with
> > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a 2-clause
> BSD
> > license.
> >
> > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd release we
> > did the same.
> >
>
> Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.  Why
> are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating NOTICE/LICENSE?
>
>
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer  wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi John,
> > >
> > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > >  and
> > didn't
> > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > >
> > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > keyservers.net
> > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is this
> > the
> > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > >
> > > - Rahul
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me
> if
> > > you
> > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > >
> > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
> > > 6C725F40
> > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > >
> > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a
> public
> > > > server?
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> fmcquil...@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > >
> > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved
> > the
> > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > >
> > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > >
> > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction
> metrics,
> > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM,
> overlapping
> > > > > patterns in path)
> > > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > > * bug fixes
> > > > > * doc improvements
> > > > >
> > > > > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
> > > > >
> > > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > > >
> > > > > $mvn verify
> > > > >
> > > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see
> > the
> > > > > classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
> > > > >
> > > > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > > > >
> > > > > Source Files:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > > > 1-incubating-rc2
> > > > >
> > > > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.
> > > > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > > > >
> > > > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > > 

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[John D. Ament]

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan 
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the release.
>
> Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator release for
> MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to proceed with
> headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a 2-clause BSD
> license.
>
> The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd release we
> did the same.
>

Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.  Why
are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating NOTICE/LICENSE?


>
> Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
>
> Frank
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer  wrote:
>
> >  Hi John,
> >
> > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> >  and
> didn't
> > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> >
> > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> keyservers.net
> > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is this
> the
> > Apache recommended server to use?
> >
> > - Rahul
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me if
> > you
> > > think the issue's on my end?
> > >
> > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
> > 6C725F40
> > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > >
> > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a public
> > > server?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > >
> > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved
> the
> > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > >
> > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > >
> > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > >
> > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction metrics,
> > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM, overlapping
> > > > patterns in path)
> > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > * bug fixes
> > > > * doc improvements
> > > >
> > > > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
> > > >
> > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > >
> > > > $mvn verify
> > > >
> > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see
> the
> > > > classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
> > > >
> > > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > > >
> > > > Source Files:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > > 1-incubating-rc2
> > > >
> > > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.
> > > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific time.
> ***
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "September2016" by smarthi

[John D. Ament]

Suneel,

Can you fix the conflicts?

John

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM Apache Wiki  wrote:

> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki"
> for change notification.
>
> The "September2016" page has been changed by smarthi:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2016?action=diff=11=12
>
> Comment:
> Report for AriaTosca
>
>
>   Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> -   1.
> -   2.
> -   3.
> +   1. Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
> dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
> development process.
> +   2. Grow the community around the project.
> +   3. Migrate existing users to apache mailing lists, redirect the
> present external project links to Apache.
>
>   Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>   aware of?
>
> +   None
>
> -
> - How has the community developed since the last report?
> -
> -
> -
> - How has the project developed since the last report?
> + How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> +   The project is still being setup in Apache Incubator and is presently.
>
> +   Received Software Grant Agreement (SGA) from Gigaspaces.
>
> - Date of last release:
> +   The mailing lists, Jira, Github Repo, Incubator podling have been
> setup for the project.
>
> -   -XX-XX
> + How has the project developed since the last report?
>
> - When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> +   This would be the first report for AriaTosca.
> +   The project is presently being setup in Incubator.
>
> + Date of last release:
>
> +   None
>
> - Signed-off-by:
> + When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
> +   Project is being established in incubator with the proposed initial
> set of committers.
> +
> + Signed-off-by:
> +
> -   [ ](ariatosca) Suneel Marthi
> +   [X](ariatosca) Suneel Marthi
> [ ](ariatosca) John D. Ament
> [ ](ariatosca) Jakob Homan
>
> @@ -1355, +1360 @@
>
>   Taverna
>
>
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
>   Taverna is a domain-independent suite of tools used to design and execute
>   data-driven workflows.
>
> @@ -1366, +1377 @@
>
> 2. Complete IP/license review of unreleased repositories
> 3. Further engaging user/devops community
>
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> - Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> - aware of?
>
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +   3.
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
> +
> + Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> + aware of?
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> Preparing to graduate.
>
> - How has the community developed since the last report?
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
>
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
> +
> + Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> + aware of?
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> The community is moving towards graduation, by preparing a
> Graduation Maturity Assessment
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAVERNADEV/2016-03+Taverna+Graduation+Maturity+Assessment
> @@ -1414, +1441 @@
>
>
>   How has the project developed since the last report?
>
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +
> +
> + How has the community developed since the last report?
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
> +
> +
> +
> + How has the project developed since the last report?
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> The release of the Command Line and Engine was a major milestone
> for the project after joining Apache.
>
> @@ -1423, +1463 @@
>
> a plugin for OGC/GIS geographical web services.
>
>
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
>   Date of last release:
>
> 2016-07-01 taverna-engine-3.1.0-incubating
> @@ -1430, +1476 @@
>
> 2016-07-01 taverna-commandline-3.1.0-incubating
>
>
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +
> + How has the project developed since the last report?
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
>   When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
> 2015-12-04
>
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +
> + Date of last release:
> +
> +
> +  /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' 
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' 
> +
> +  /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' 
> +   -XX-XX
> +
> + When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> +

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[Frank McQuillan]

Hi John,

Thanks for reviewing the release.

Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator release for
MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to proceed with
headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a 2-clause BSD
license.

The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd release we
did the same.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this.

Frank

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer  wrote:

>  Hi John,
>
> We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
>  and didn't
> use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
>
> I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to keyservers.net
> and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is this the
> Apache recommended server to use?
>
> - Rahul
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me if
> you
> > think the issue's on my end?
> >
> > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
> 6C725F40
> > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> >
> > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a public
> > server?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > >
> > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the
> > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > >
> > > The voting result is available at:
> > >
> > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > >
> > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction metrics,
> > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM, overlapping
> > > patterns in path)
> > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > * bug fixes
> > > * doc improvements
> > >
> > > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
> > >
> > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > >
> > > $mvn verify
> > >
> > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see the
> > > classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
> > >
> > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > >
> > > Source Files:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > 1-incubating-rc2
> > >
> > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.
> > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > >
> > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific time. ***
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[Rahul Iyer]

 Hi John,

We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
 and didn't
use any public server for the previous 2 releases.

I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to keyservers.net
and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is this the
Apache recommended server to use?

- Rahul

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:

> I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me if you
> think the issue's on my end?
>
> Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> incubating-source.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID 6C725F40
> gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a public
> server?
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Incubator PMC,
> >
> > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the
> > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> >
> > The voting result is available at:
> >
> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> >
> > The main goals of this release are:
> > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction metrics,
> > sessionization, pivoting)
> > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM, overlapping
> > patterns in path)
> > * performance improvements (path)
> > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > * bug fixes
> > * doc improvements
> >
> > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
> >
> > To run check RAT, please do:
> >
> > $mvn verify
> >
> > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see the
> > classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
> >
> > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> >
> > Source Files:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> 1-incubating-rc2
> >
> > Commit to be voted upon:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.
> git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> >
> > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific time. ***
> >
>

Re: finding a Champion

[John D. Ament]

HI Roberto & Welcome!

It might be a good thing to post some information about your project, what
it does, if theres any existing source or community point links to it.
Seeing something vibrant and functioning will definitely draw out a
champion.

John

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:05 PM Roberto Attias
 wrote:

> Hello,this is my first email on this mailing list. I'm looking for a
> champion to incubate a project. I wrote to a couple of people from projects
> which have some relation, but neither replied, so I suspect I'm doing
> something wrong. At this stage I'm looking for feedback on whether there
> might be interest, and if so whether the project should be incubated right
> now, or at a later stage.
>
> Any feedback on how to find somebody to discuss this with is welcome.
> Thanks,
>Roberto
>
>

finding a Champion

[Roberto Attias]

Hello,this is my first email on this mailing list. I'm looking for a champion 
to incubate a project. I wrote to a couple of people from projects which have 
some relation, but neither replied, so I suspect I'm doing something wrong. At 
this stage I'm looking for feedback on whether there might be interest, and if 
so whether the project should be incubated right now, or at a later stage. 

Any feedback on how to find somebody to discuss this with is welcome.
Thanks,
   Roberto

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[John D. Ament]

In addition, your exclusion list is not valid for RAT (or maybe there was a
discussion that MADlib can exclude extra files?).  I don't see a reason
that src/utils is excluded, for instance.  There are files
(src/utils/Math.hpp for instance, but probably most of the files) that seem
to be madlib specific, so why are they not using proper license headers?

John

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:53 PM John D. Ament  wrote:

> I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me if
> you think the issue's on my end?
>
> Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID 6C725F40
> gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a public
> server?
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>
>> The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the
>> proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
>>
>> The voting result is available at:
>>
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
>>
>> The main goals of this release are:
>> * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction metrics,
>> sessionization, pivoting)
>> * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM, overlapping
>> patterns in path)
>> * performance improvements (path)
>> * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
>> * bug fixes
>> * doc improvements
>>
>> For more information including release notes, please see:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
>>
>> To run check RAT, please do:
>>
>> $mvn verify
>>
>> first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see the
>> classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
>>
>> We're voting on the source (tag):
>> rc/1.9.1-rc2
>>
>> Source Files:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.1-incubating-rc2
>>
>> Commit to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
>>
>> KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific time. ***
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

[John D. Ament]

I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me if you
think the issue's on my end?

Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID 6C725F40
gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a public
server?

John

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan 
wrote:

> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the
> proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
>
> The voting result is available at:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
>
> The main goals of this release are:
> * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction metrics,
> sessionization, pivoting)
> * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM, overlapping
> patterns in path)
> * performance improvements (path)
> * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> * bug fixes
> * doc improvements
>
> For more information including release notes, please see:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
>
> To run check RAT, please do:
>
> $mvn verify
>
> first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see the
> classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
>
> We're voting on the source (tag):
> rc/1.9.1-rc2
>
> Source Files:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.1-incubating-rc2
>
> Commit to be voted upon:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
>
> KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific time. ***
>

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

[Mike Jumper]

On Sep 6, 2016 5:38 PM, "Marvin Humphrey"  wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Or, matching up with our (post-graduation) Git repo naming
> convention again:
>
> apache/guacamole
> apache/guacamole-guacd
>
> apache/guacamole:0.9.10-incubating
> apache/guacamole-guacd:0.9.10-incubating
>
> I think this is best.  However, it bugs me that users are not provided
with
> adequate disclaimers for the common case that fetches `latest` as the
default
> tag:
>
> docker pull apache/guacamole
>

A necessary evil, perhaps. Even with Maven (at least older versions of
Maven), omitting the version while keeping only the groupId and artifactId
were legal coordinates.

Is the project-specific organization option not really an option at all
then? Frowned upon for a TLP, and not to be considered by a podling?

Thanks,

- Mike

Re: Incubator wiki permission request for submitting report

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Khurrum Nasim  wrote:

> I have created my new account on the incubator wiki. My username is
> 'KhurrumNasim'. Can you please help granting the edit permission for
> submitting the podling report?

Done.

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Incubator wiki permission request for submitting report

[Khurrum Nasim]

Hi,

I have created my new account on the incubator wiki. My username is
'KhurrumNasim'. Can you please help granting the edit permission for
submitting the podling report?

Thanks,
KN