Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

2017-02-14 Thread John D. Ament 
-1 license file still needs a lot of work.

MIT licenses need to be explicitly included in the license, not just
linked.  In general, the license contents need to be in the LICENSE file,
not just links to the licenses.  In some cases, its done like this (full
license headers copied) and in others there's a path link to the license.

John

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:38 PM Dan Kirkwood  wrote:

> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
> proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating.  We now
> kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
>
> The VOTE RESULT is here:
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4aa7f70b34ba9d2e4190301ae7ea118aa86b297c81e60467aedaf3dc@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
>
> The draft release notes (along with links to artifacts,
> signatures/checksums, and updated documentation) can be found here:
>
> http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
>
> The git tag for the repository is "RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9":
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/releases/tag/RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9
>
> The source distribution (also linked in the release notes) is here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC9/
>
> Build instructions are included in the BUILD.md file which is
> included in the source artifact.
>
> Artifacts have been signed with the "dang...@apache.org" key listed in:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/KEYS
>
> Please review and vote:
>
> [  ] +1 Approve the release
> [  ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Dan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

2017-02-14 Thread Eric Covener 
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood  wrote:
> The git tag for the repository is "RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9":
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/releases/tag/RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9
>
> The source distribution (also linked in the release notes) is here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC9/
>
> Build instructions are included in the BUILD.md file which is
> included in the source artifact.
>
> Artifacts have been signed with the "dang...@apache.org" key listed in:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/KEYS
>
> Please review and vote:
>
> [  ] +1 Approve the release
> [  ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)


+1 (binding)

Validated Checksums, signatures, tarball contents matches git tag.
Spot-checked LICENSE/NOTICES vs issues raised in previous votes.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [discuss] Apache Gobblin Incubator Proposal

2017-02-14 Thread Olivier Lamy 
Hi
Well I don't see issues as no one discuss the proposal.
So I will start the official vote tomorrow.
Cheers
Olivier

On 6 February 2017 at 14:08, Olivier Lamy  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> I would like to submit to you a proposal to bring Gooblin to the Apache
> Software Foundation.
> The text of the proposal is included below and available as a draft here
> in the Wiki: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GobblinProposal
>
> We will appreciate any feedback and input.
>
> Olivier on behalf of the Gobblin community
>
>
> = Apache Gobblin Proposal =
> == Abstract ==
> Gobblin is a distributed data integration framework that simplifies common
> aspects of big data integration such as data ingestion, replication,
> organization and lifecycle management for both streaming and batch data
> ecosystems.
>
> == Proposal ==
>
> Gobblin is a universal data integration framework. The framework has been
> used to build a variety of big data applications such as ingestion,
> replication, and data retention. The fundamental constructs provided by the
> Gobblin framework are:
>
>  1. An expandable set of connectors that allow data to be integrated from
> a variety of sources and sinks. The range of connectors already available
> in Gobblin are quite diverse and are an ever expanding set. To highlight
> just a few examples, connectors exist for databases (e.g., MySQL, Oracle
> Teradata, Couchbase etc.), web based technologies (REST APIs, FTP/SFTP
> servers, Filers), scalable storage (HDFS, S3, Ambry etc,), streaming data
> (Kafka, EventHubs etc.), and a variety of proprietary data sources and
> sinks (e.g.Salesforce, Google Analytics, Google Webmaster etc.). Similarly,
> Gobblin has a rich library of converters that allow for conversion of data
> from one format to another as data moves across system boundaries (e.g.
> AVRO in HDFS to JSON in another system).
>
>
>  2. Gobblin has a well defined and customizable state management layer
> that allows writing stateful applications. These are particularly useful
> when solving problems like bulk incremental ingest and keeping several
> clusters replicated in sync. The ability to record work that has been
> completed and what remains in a scalable manner is critical to writing such
> diverse applications successfully.
>
>
>  3. Gobblin is agnostic to the underlying execution engine. It can be
> tailored to run ontop of a variety of execution frameworks ranging from
> multiple processes on a single node, to open source execution engines like
> MapReduce, Spark or Samza, natively on top of raw containers like Yarn or
> Mesos, and the public cloud like Amazon AWS or Microsoft Azure. We are
> extending Gobblin to run on top of a self managed cluster when security is
> vital.  This allows different applications that require different degrees
> of scalability, latency or security to be customized to for their specific
> needs. For example, highly latency sensitive applications can be executed
> in a streaming environment while batch based execution might benefit
> applications where the priority might be geared towards optimal container
> utilization.
>
>  4.Gobblin comes out of the box with several diagnosability features like
> Gobblin metrics and error handling. Collectively, these features allow
> Gobblin to operate at the scale of petabytes of data. To give just one
> example, the ability to quarantine a few bad records from an isolated Kafka
> topic without stopping the entire flow from continued execution is vital
> when the number of Kafka topics range in the thousands and the collective
> data handled is in the petabytes.
>
> Gobblin thus provides crisply defined software constructs that can be used
> to build a vast array of data integration applications customizable for
> varied user needs. It has become a preferred technology for data
> integration use-cases by many organizations worldwide (see a partial list
> here).
>
> == Background ==
>
> Over the last decade, data integration has evolved use case by use case in
> most companies. For example, at LinkedIn, when Kafka became a significant
> part of the data ecosystem, a system called Camus was built to ingest this
> data for analytics processing on Hadoop. Similarly, we had custom pipelines
> to ingest data from Salesforce, Oracle and myriad other sources. This
> pattern became the norm rather than the exception and one point, LinkedIn
> was running at least fifteen different types of ingestion pipelines. This
> fragmentation has several unfortunate implications. Operational costs scale
> with the number of pipelines even if the myriad pipelines share a vasty
> array of common features. Bug fixes and performance optimizations cannot be
> shared across the pipelines. A common set of practices around debugging and
> deployment does not emerge. Each pipeline operator will continue to invest
> in his little silo of the data integration world completely oblivious to
> the challenges of his fellow operator

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
No problem at all. Just to be sure we don't duplicate work ;)

Regards
JB

On Feb 14, 2017, 12:28, at 12:28, Henry Saputra  wrote:
>Ah yes, sorry, totally missed your message.
>
>On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I guess you missed my message. I gonna deal with CarbonData.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2017, 19:26, at 19:26, Henry Saputra
>
>> wrote:
>> >Thanks, John. I think CarbonData and SystemML may ready for
>graduation.
>> >
>> >Looks like Luciano will work with SystemML, then I will work with
>> >CarbonData.
>> >
>> >- Henry
>> >
>> >On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament
>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings.
>> >While
>> >> I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for
>the
>> >> community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we
>can
>> >do to
>> >> graduate podlings that seem to be doing well.
>> >>
>> >> Take a look at the last two reports:
>> >>
>> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
>> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>> >>
>> >> Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all
>> >> graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow,
>> >BatchEE,
>> >> Freemarker, Metron).  I didn't include that in February, but if I
>had
>> >to
>> >> list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract,
>Guacamole,
>> >> PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my
>> >POV/opinion
>> >> unless others want to chime in).
>> >>
>> >> So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get
>past
>> >the
>> >> finish line?
>> >>
>> >> John
>> >>
>>

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-14 Thread Henry Saputra 
Ah yes, sorry, totally missed your message.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I guess you missed my message. I gonna deal with CarbonData.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Feb 13, 2017, 19:26, at 19:26, Henry Saputra 
> wrote:
> >Thanks, John. I think CarbonData and SystemML may ready for graduation.
> >
> >Looks like Luciano will work with SystemML, then I will work with
> >CarbonData.
> >
> >- Henry
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament 
> >wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings.
> >While
> >> I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for the
> >> community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we can
> >do to
> >> graduate podlings that seem to be doing well.
> >>
> >> Take a look at the last two reports:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> >>
> >> Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all
> >> graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow,
> >BatchEE,
> >> Freemarker, Metron).  I didn't include that in February, but if I had
> >to
> >> list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract, Guacamole,
> >> PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my
> >POV/opinion
> >> unless others want to chime in).
> >>
> >> So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get past
> >the
> >> finish line?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
>

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-14 Thread Katherine Marsden 

On 2/13/17 4:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
 I didn't include that in February, but if I had to

list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent ...




So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get past the
finish line?



I started a discussion on the Edgent list and included my 
recommendations [1].  Thanks for starting the rally.  It is a great kick 
to do what we need to as you say get to the finish line.


Best

Kathey

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8f10fa966580b4cc1b6119f287c00906a75a526c14ecb507fdf3e7f4@%3Cdev.edgent.apache.org%3E







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Trafodion

2017-02-14 Thread Pierre Smits 
Hi John,

Thank you for bringing that page to my attention. And my apologies for not
including it.

Re: conversation who is on the list
That graduation discussion will certainly be addressing that aspect.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:15 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:07 AM Pierre Smits 
> wrote:
>
> > @John: Thanks. I will look into that.
> >
> > @Jean-Babtiste
> > I see discrepancies between following sources that need to be addressed:
> >
> >1. http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
> >2. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/trafodion
> >3. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Contributors
> >
> > Unless I will see evidence (process to evaluate) is underway to the
> > contrary, I will regard [3] as leading, which will need to spill over
> into
> > [1] and [2].
> >
>
>
> You should have the conversation about who is actually on Trafodion on the
> Trafodion list, not the incubator lists.  I'll point out that this page [4]
> is missing the expected details about this.
>
> [4]: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/trafodion.html
>
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > ORRTIZ.COM 
> > OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Phonebook is a bit convoluted.  You need to create the podling in
> > > asf-authorization-template.  Here's what we did for CommonsRDF [1]
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/
> > > deployment/modules/subversion_server/files/authorization/
> > > asf-authorization-template#L140
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Pierre
> > > >
> > > > The podling content XML is up to date and published on the CMS ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 14, 2017, 08:27, at 08:27, Pierre Smits <
> pierre.sm...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > >While looking at [1] I searched for the Trafodion podling [2]
> without
> > > > >success.
> > > > >
> > > > >What needs to be done to make the podling visible in the phonebook?
> > > > >
> > > > >[1] http://home.apache.org
> > > > >[2] http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
> > > > >
> > > > >Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >Pierre Smits
> > > > >
> > > > >ORRTIZ.COM 
> > > > >OFBiz based solutions & services
> > > > >
> > > > >OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > > >http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-14 Thread John D. Ament 
Upayavira,

I've pinged the podling in the past about graduation.  *I* think you're
ready.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:15 PM Upayavira  wrote:

> I would appreciate assistance in deciding whether Wave needs more than
> its current slow, but not stationary, development.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, at 06:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Awesome news, thanks everyone.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:17 PM Suneel Marthi 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Streams was also called as 'Ready to graduate' in the December report.
> > >
> > > Since Oct 2016, the podling has had 3 releases and another release is
> > > planned for this weekend.
> > >
> > > There have been discussions on the podIing mail lists about graduation
> > > following the next planned release. I can help push forward Streams
> > > graduation and the podling has satisfied most of the Apache Maturity
> > > Assessment -  see
> > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+Streams
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Pierre Smits 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I guess it should be
> > > brought
> > > > back regularly so that participants here stay on the ball.
> > > >
> > > > That being said, I believe Trafodion should also be considered to be
> > > ready.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > > ORRTIZ.COM 
> > > > OFBiz based solutions & services
> > > >
> > > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings.
> > > While
> > > > > I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for
> the
> > > > > community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we
> can do
> > > > to
> > > > > graduate podlings that seem to be doing well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Take a look at the last two reports:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
> > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> > > > >
> > > > > Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all
> > > > > graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow,
> BatchEE,
> > > > > Freemarker, Metron).  I didn't include that in February, but if I
> had
> > > to
> > > > > list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract,
> Guacamole,
> > > > > PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my
> > > POV/opinion
> > > > > unless others want to chime in).
> > > > >
> > > > > So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get
> past
> > > the
> > > > > finish line?
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Trafodion

2017-02-14 Thread John D. Ament 
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:07 AM Pierre Smits 
wrote:

> @John: Thanks. I will look into that.
>
> @Jean-Babtiste
> I see discrepancies between following sources that need to be addressed:
>
>1. http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
>2. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/trafodion
>3. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Contributors
>
> Unless I will see evidence (process to evaluate) is underway to the
> contrary, I will regard [3] as leading, which will need to spill over into
> [1] and [2].
>


You should have the conversation about who is actually on Trafodion on the
Trafodion list, not the incubator lists.  I'll point out that this page [4]
is missing the expected details about this.

[4]: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/trafodion.html


>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM 
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
> > Phonebook is a bit convoluted.  You need to create the podling in
> > asf-authorization-template.  Here's what we did for CommonsRDF [1]
> >
> > John
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/
> > deployment/modules/subversion_server/files/authorization/
> > asf-authorization-template#L140
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pierre
> > >
> > > The podling content XML is up to date and published on the CMS ?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Feb 14, 2017, 08:27, at 08:27, Pierre Smits  >
> > > wrote:
> > > >Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >While looking at [1] I searched for the Trafodion podling [2] without
> > > >success.
> > > >
> > > >What needs to be done to make the podling visible in the phonebook?
> > > >
> > > >[1] http://home.apache.org
> > > >[2] http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
> > > >
> > > >Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > >ORRTIZ.COM 
> > > >OFBiz based solutions & services
> > > >
> > > >OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > >http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > >
> >
>

Re: Trafodion

2017-02-14 Thread Pierre Smits 
@John: Thanks. I will look into that.

@Jean-Babtiste
I see discrepancies between following sources that need to be addressed:

   1. http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
   2. https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/trafodion
   3. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TRAFODION/Contributors

Unless I will see evidence (process to evaluate) is underway to the
contrary, I will regard [3] as leading, which will need to spill over into
[1] and [2].

Best regards,


Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament 
wrote:

> Phonebook is a bit convoluted.  You need to create the podling in
> asf-authorization-template.  Here's what we did for CommonsRDF [1]
>
> John
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/
> deployment/modules/subversion_server/files/authorization/
> asf-authorization-template#L140
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pierre
> >
> > The podling content XML is up to date and published on the CMS ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Feb 14, 2017, 08:27, at 08:27, Pierre Smits 
> > wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >While looking at [1] I searched for the Trafodion podling [2] without
> > >success.
> > >
> > >What needs to be done to make the podling visible in the phonebook?
> > >
> > >[1] http://home.apache.org
> > >[2] http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >
> > >Pierre Smits
> > >
> > >ORRTIZ.COM 
> > >OFBiz based solutions & services
> > >
> > >OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > >http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
>

Re: Trafodion

2017-02-14 Thread John D. Ament 
Phonebook is a bit convoluted.  You need to create the podling in
asf-authorization-template.  Here's what we did for CommonsRDF [1]

John

[1]:
https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/subversion_server/files/authorization/asf-authorization-template#L140

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:

> Hi Pierre
>
> The podling content XML is up to date and published on the CMS ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Feb 14, 2017, 08:27, at 08:27, Pierre Smits 
> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >While looking at [1] I searched for the Trafodion podling [2] without
> >success.
> >
> >What needs to be done to make the podling visible in the phonebook?
> >
> >[1] http://home.apache.org
> >[2] http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Pierre Smits
> >
> >ORRTIZ.COM 
> >OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> >OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> >http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>

Re: Trafodion

2017-02-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
Hi Pierre

The podling content XML is up to date and published on the CMS ?

Regards
JB

On Feb 14, 2017, 08:27, at 08:27, Pierre Smits  wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>While looking at [1] I searched for the Trafodion podling [2] without
>success.
>
>What needs to be done to make the podling visible in the phonebook?
>
>[1] http://home.apache.org
>[2] http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion
>
>Best regards,
>
>Pierre Smits
>
>ORRTIZ.COM 
>OFBiz based solutions & services
>
>OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

Trafodion

2017-02-14 Thread Pierre Smits 
Hi all,

While looking at [1] I searched for the Trafodion podling [2] without
success.

What needs to be done to make the podling visible in the phonebook?

[1] http://home.apache.org
[2] http://home.apache.org/phonebook.html?podling=trafodion

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-14 Thread Pierre Smits 
Hi Upayariva,

Maybe I am kicking an open door, but the mere 'whether Wave needs more than
its current slow, but not stationary, development' indicates that you
believe that it requires more than that to grow and graduate from our
incubator.

What is the focus of the PPMC? How is the project doing promotion-wise?

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM 
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Upayavira  wrote:

> I would appreciate assistance in deciding whether Wave needs more than
> its current slow, but not stationary, development.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, at 06:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Awesome news, thanks everyone.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:17 PM Suneel Marthi 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Streams was also called as 'Ready to graduate' in the December report.
> > >
> > > Since Oct 2016, the podling has had 3 releases and another release is
> > > planned for this weekend.
> > >
> > > There have been discussions on the podIing mail lists about graduation
> > > following the next planned release. I can help push forward Streams
> > > graduation and the podling has satisfied most of the Apache Maturity
> > > Assessment -  see
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/
> Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+Streams
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Pierre Smits 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I guess it should be
> > > brought
> > > > back regularly so that participants here stay on the ball.
> > > >
> > > > That being said, I believe Trafodion should also be considered to be
> > > ready.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > > ORRTIZ.COM 
> > > > OFBiz based solutions & services
> > > >
> > > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndam...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings.
> > > While
> > > > > I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for
> the
> > > > > community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we
> can do
> > > > to
> > > > > graduate podlings that seem to be doing well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Take a look at the last two reports:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
> > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
> > > > >
> > > > > Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all
> > > > > graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow,
> BatchEE,
> > > > > Freemarker, Metron).  I didn't include that in February, but if I
> had
> > > to
> > > > > list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract,
> Guacamole,
> > > > > PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my
> > > POV/opinion
> > > > > unless others want to chime in).
> > > > >
> > > > > So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get
> past
> > > the
> > > > > finish line?
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Podling Graduation Rally

2017-02-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
Hi

I guess you missed my message. I gonna deal with CarbonData.

Regards
JB

On Feb 13, 2017, 19:26, at 19:26, Henry Saputra  wrote:
>Thanks, John. I think CarbonData and SystemML may ready for graduation.
>
>Looks like Luciano will work with SystemML, then I will work with
>CarbonData.
>
>- Henry
>
>On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament 
>wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings.
>While
>> I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for the
>> community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we can
>do to
>> graduate podlings that seem to be doing well.
>>
>> Take a look at the last two reports:
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017
>>
>> Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all
>> graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow,
>BatchEE,
>> Freemarker, Metron).  I didn't include that in February, but if I had
>to
>> list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract, Guacamole,
>> PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my
>POV/opinion
>> unless others want to chime in).
>>
>> So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get past
>the
>> finish line?
>>
>> John
>>