Ah yes, sorry, totally missed your message. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi > > I guess you missed my message. I gonna deal with CarbonData. > > Regards > JB > > On Feb 13, 2017, 19:26, at 19:26, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >Thanks, John. I think CarbonData and SystemML may ready for graduation. > > > >Looks like Luciano will work with SystemML, then I will work with > >CarbonData. > > > >- Henry > > > >On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:28 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > >wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings. > >While > >> I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for the > >> community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we can > >do to > >> graduate podlings that seem to be doing well. > >> > >> Take a look at the last two reports: > >> > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017 > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 > >> > >> Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all > >> graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow, > >BatchEE, > >> Freemarker, Metron). I didn't include that in February, but if I had > >to > >> list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract, Guacamole, > >> PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my > >POV/opinion > >> unless others want to chime in). > >> > >> So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get past > >the > >> finish line? > >> > >> John > >> >
