Re: [DISCUSS] Linkis Proposal (a Computation Middleware project)

[Lidong Dai]

+1

Interesting!
Linkis builds a computation middleware layer to reduce the difficulty for
users to use multiple compute engines, and it seems that they have built a
community around Links
I'd like to see Links enter the Apache incubator for better development

Best Regards



---
Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair
David
lidong...@apache.org
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong
Twitter: @WorkflowEasy 
---


On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:07 AM Xun Liu  wrote:

> +1
>
> Linkis builds a layer of computing middleware between the upper application
> and the underlying engine.
> Solve the docking problems between various big data systems.
> Linkis helps users to use Apache's Hadoop, hive, spark, zeppelin and other
> systems more conveniently.
> I think that allowing Linkis to enter Apache for better development can
> also help other Apache Better use of the project.
> I think Linkis is a very valuable project.
> Good luck!
>
> Best regards,
> Xun Liu
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 3:32 PM ShaoFeng Shi 
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to second this proposal. Linkis builds an active open source
> > community and has been adopted by many companies. Bringing it to
> > Apache software foundation can accelerate its development, and add value
> to
> > Apache. Good luck!
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
> > Apache Kylin PMC
> > Email: shaofeng...@apache.org
> >
> > Apache Kylin FAQ: https://kylin.apache.org/docs/gettingstarted/faq.html
> > Join Kylin user mail group: user-subscr...@kylin.apache.org
> > Join Kylin dev mail group: dev-subscr...@kylin.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > 俊平堵  于2021年7月13日周二 上午9:32写道：
> >
> > > +1.
> > > Linkis is an interesting project that builds a unified layer to
> decouple
> > > the upper layer computation/application and under layer data engines,
> > such
> > > as Spark, Presto, Flink, etc. Also it looks already build a community
> > > around the project.
> > > Good luck!
> > >
> > >
> > > Shuai Di 于2021年7月12日 周一上午11:13写道：
> > >
> > > > Greetings!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We would like to start an open discussion on bringing Linkis (
> > > > https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/Linkis), a computation middleware
> > > > project, to the Apache Incubator.
> > > > The proposal can be found below and is also listed in the Incubator
> > wiki:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/LinkisProposal
> ,
> > > > thanks @Junping Du for creating the page!
> > > > We appreciate anyone who would give guidance or be willing to support
> > us
> > > a
> > > > an additional mentor.
> > > > ==
> > > > Linkis Proposal
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =Abstract=
> > > > Linkis builds a computation middleware layer to decouple the upper
> > > > applications and the underlying data engines, provides standardized
> > > > interfaces (REST, JDBC, WebSocket etc.) to easily connect to various
> > > > underlying engines (Spark, Presto, Flink, etc.), while enables cross
> > > engine
> > > > context sharing, unified job& engine governance and orchestration.
> > > > Linkis codebase: https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/Linkis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =Proposal=
> > > > Linkis is designed to solve computation governance problems in
> complex
> > > > distributed environments (typically in a big data platform), where
> you
> > > have
> > > > to deal with different types, versions, or clusters of underlying
> data
> > > > engines and hundreds of diversified engine clients at the upper
> > > application
> > > > layer as well.
> > > > Linkis acts as a proxy between the upper applications layer and
> > > underlying
> > > > engines layer. By abstracting and implementing the 3 common phases
> of a
> > > > job/request for submit, prepare and execute, Linkis is able to
> > facilitate
> > > > the connectivity, governance and orchestration capabilities of
> > different
> > > > kind of engines like OLAP, OLTP (developing), Streaming, and handle
> all
> > > > these "computation governance" affairs in a standardized reusable
> way.
> > > > We are actively operating the Linkis community and we are looking
> > forward
> > > > to increase community activity continuously.We propose to contribute
> > the
> > > > Linkis codebase to the Apache Software Foundation. We believe that
> > > bringing
> > > > Linkis into Apache Software Foundation and following the
> COMMUNITY-LED
> > > > DEVELOPMENT "APACHE WAY" could continuously improve project quality
> and
> > > > community vitality.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =Background=
> > > > In today's complex and distributed environment, the communication,
> > > > coordination and governance of application services have developed
> > mature
> > > > solutions from SOA to micro-services, and many practices from ESB to
> > > > Service Mesh to decouple different services.
> > > > However, things go different while an application service needs to
> > > > communicate with the underlying engines. Engines are isolated from
> each
> > > > other, 

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Assume we have enough information abut the provanance and they are from the 
same person/company I think one form is OK, but it may be easier to manage with 
two forms.

Thanks,
Justin 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

FW: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

[paul_a]

Hi,  me again,

To recap; We (the CloudStack Project) are bringing in some Terraform plugin 
code to pick up its ongoing development and maintenance.  It's split into two 
discrete repos in its external form, and will be keep in two discrete repos 
under the Apache repos.  There are different committers to the two repos (but 
with a large overlap).

Do these need separate IP Clearance forms ?



Kind regards

Paul Angus

-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus 
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 10:29 AM
To: mattsic...@apache.org
Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Got it.  Thanks Matt.

We'll continue on.


Kind regards

Paul Angus

-Original Message-
From: Matt Sicker 
Sent: 13 July 2021 20:39
To: Paul Angus 
Cc:  
Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Secretary only handles the books here; I don't make the call as to whether or 
not an IP donation is valid. That would be the job of the IPMC or the 
respective PMC if a top level project makes that call.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:42 AM Paul Angus  wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> The CloudStack project is in the process of getting IP clearance for a 
> Terraform plugin.
>
> WRT to signed Software Grants from contributors to the codebase that is being 
> taken over, we've had consent from 11 of the top 20 contributors [1] and an 
> acknowledged Software Grant from the major contributor and owner, Sander van 
> Harmelen.
>
> Is Sander's Grant sufficient for you as Secretary for us to proceed, or do 
> you require signed Grants from all who have responded.
>
> [1]  https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Angus
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 4:12 PM
> To: pau...@apache.org;  
> 
> Cc: Rohit Yadav ; Incubator General 
> ; Daniel Widdis 
> Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform
>
> Thanks Daniel for confirming. In that case I think we don't have any 
> outstanding concerns, all the guidance and advice we've received on this 
> thread has been attempted and resolved.
>
> Hi Paul - I think both Daniel and Justin have been answered and we can 
> continue. Kindly review and start a formal "[IP CLEARANCE]" thread on 
> general@incubator as per 
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#p
> rocess
> tracking the IP clearance at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159
>
> Regards.
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM Daniel Widdis  wrote:
> >
> > I have no concerns.  I am not a member of the IPMC, just an interested 
> > participant in the conversation.
> >
> > On 7/11/21, 11:25 PM, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel, Justin, IPMC,
> >
> > Are you happy with the answers to satisfaction? Do you have any other
> > questions/concerns, or can we continue with the IP clearance vote?
> > It has been three weeks since this thread, while the Apache CloudStack
> > PMC has passed the vote to accept donations in April 2021. If there
> > are any, can you advise by the end of tomorrow?
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:56 AM Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Justin,
> > >
> > > Yes that's right, there's no 3rd party code in the latest 
> > codebase/tags that is being donated. And yes, the large commits that 
> > brought the 3rd party code in vendor directory have been all removed too.
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 10 Jul, 2021, 6:26 am Justin Mclean, 
> >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> > However, if you compare the changes in above commits against the
> > >> > repositories being donated the "vendor" directory does not exist 
> > now
> > >> > in both the repositories being donated:
> > >> > https://github.com/xanzy/go-cloudstack
> > >> > https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack (for example
> > >> > vendor removed in this commit -
> > >> > 
> > https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commit/4db2f701592b5af74376f5b138624bff75763152)
> > >>
> > >> So what you are saying is that all of those large commits have been 
> > removed? What I would be concerned about happening is if a large amount of 
> > 3rd party code incorrectly gets an ASF header on it. There no issue with 
> > 3rd party code in the repo but it must be clearly marked, have the correct 
> > non ASF header and its license compatible with the Apache license. Looking 
> > at the repos all headers are ASF ones, is there any 3rd party code in the 
> > donated code?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Justin
> > >>
> >
> >



--
Matt Sicker
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
VP, Logging Services, ASF


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org