Hi, me again, To recap; We (the CloudStack Project) are bringing in some Terraform plugin code to pick up its ongoing development and maintenance. It's split into two discrete repos in its external form, and will be keep in two discrete repos under the Apache repos. There are different committers to the two repos (but with a large overlap).
Do these need separate IP Clearance forms ? Kind regards Paul Angus -----Original Message----- From: Paul Angus Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 10:29 AM To: mattsic...@apache.org Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform Got it. Thanks Matt. We'll continue on. Kind regards Paul Angus -----Original Message----- From: Matt Sicker <mattsic...@apache.org> Sent: 13 July 2021 20:39 To: Paul Angus <p...@angus.uk.com> Cc: <priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> <priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform Secretary only handles the books here; I don't make the call as to whether or not an IP donation is valid. That would be the job of the IPMC or the respective PMC if a top level project makes that call. On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:42 AM Paul Angus <p...@angus.uk.com> wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > The CloudStack project is in the process of getting IP clearance for a > Terraform plugin. > > WRT to signed Software Grants from contributors to the codebase that is being > taken over, we've had consent from 11 of the top 20 contributors [1] and an > acknowledged Software Grant from the major contributor and owner, Sander van > Harmelen. > > Is Sander's Grant sufficient for you as Secretary for us to proceed, or do > you require signed Grants from all who have responded. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159 > > > > Kind regards > > Paul Angus > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 4:12 PM > To: pau...@apache.org; <priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> > <priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org>; Incubator General > <general@incubator.apache.org>; Daniel Widdis <wid...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform > > Thanks Daniel for confirming. In that case I think we don't have any > outstanding concerns, all the guidance and advice we've received on this > thread has been attempted and resolved. > > Hi Paul - I think both Daniel and Justin have been answered and we can > continue. Kindly review and start a formal "[IP CLEARANCE]" thread on > general@incubator as per > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#p > rocess > tracking the IP clearance at > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159 > > Regards. > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM Daniel Widdis <wid...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have no concerns. I am not a member of the IPMC, just an interested > > participant in the conversation. > > > > On 7/11/21, 11:25 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Daniel, Justin, IPMC, > > > > Are you happy with the answers to satisfaction? Do you have any other > > questions/concerns, or can we continue with the IP clearance vote? > > It has been three weeks since this thread, while the Apache CloudStack > > PMC has passed the vote to accept donations in April 2021. If there > > are any, can you advise by the end of tomorrow? > > > > Regards. > > > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:56 AM Rohit Yadav <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Justin, > > > > > > Yes that's right, there's no 3rd party code in the latest > > codebase/tags that is being donated. And yes, the large commits that > > brought the 3rd party code in vendor directory have been all removed too. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > On Sat, 10 Jul, 2021, 6:26 am Justin Mclean, > > <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> > However, if you compare the changes in above commits against the > > >> > repositories being donated the "vendor" directory does not exist > > now > > >> > in both the repositories being donated: > > >> > https://github.com/xanzy/go-cloudstack > > >> > https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack (for example > > >> > vendor removed in this commit - > > >> > > > https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commit/4db2f701592b5af74376f5b138624bff75763152) > > >> > > >> So what you are saying is that all of those large commits have been > > removed? What I would be concerned about happening is if a large amount of > > 3rd party code incorrectly gets an ASF header on it. There no issue with > > 3rd party code in the repo but it must be clearly marked, have the correct > > non ASF header and its license compatible with the Apache license. Looking > > at the repos all headers are ASF ones, is there any 3rd party code in the > > donated code? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Justin > > >> > > > > -- Matt Sicker Secretary, Apache Software Foundation VP, Logging Services, ASF --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
