Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 I feel the same with Willem that we have almost finished an incubator release :) Thanks. Willem Jiang 于2022年8月30日周二 11:00写道： > > +1 binding. > After reviewing the latest proposal and third party License issue. > I have a feeling we can do the first incubator release quickly. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM tison wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Hivemall from Incubator
+1 (binding) Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 2:57 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Hivemall has been incubating since 2016-09-13. > > From last year, activity has been low and the chances of attracting new > committers and building a vibrant community seem very slim at this point. > > The dev community vote was started by the PPMC for over a month and > can be found here[1],[2] > > I therefore propose to retire Hivemall from the Incubator. > > I want to start this official vote. > > Voting will start now and will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > Notice: Because the dev vote didn't get enough +1's, this vote is not > the same as usual, it's not a laze vote. > > [ ] +1 Retire the project > [ ] +0 No opinion. > [ ] -1 Do not retire the project because... > > [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/3s7bjgqm7864qbwnf1ny3lszklm65sgn > [2]https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv267tds166z7vtbzjt46nrz26xhzgvb > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 binding. After reviewing the latest proposal and third party License issue. I have a feeling we can do the first incubator release quickly. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
The voting thread looks fragmented in some mail clients (like Gmail). I'd like to make a summary of the current state so that we don't deadlock here: +1 bindings: Thomas Weise Ted Liu +1 non-bindings: Zhuoyu Chen Qingrong wang shaokang lv benjobs Sherlock Homles hulk Jiafeng.Zhang 郭宁 Kelu Tao -1 bindings: Justin Mclean -1 non-bindings: tksonjk tk Zur Aviem All concerns thrown by -1s are answered. I'd like to learn if there're still some blockers. Also, cc the nominated mentors to help with voting in this thread. Best, tison. tison 于2022年8月30日周二 10:37写道： > +1 (binding) > > Best, > tison. > > > Liu Ted 于2022年8月24日周三 23:08写道： > >> +1 (binding) >> Best regards,, >> >> Ted Liu >> >> 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Good Luck! >> > >> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to >> > call >> > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check >> out >> > the >> > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. >> > > >> > > Please cast your vote: >> > > >> > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way >> > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... >> > > >> > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the >> > Incubator >> > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > tison. >> > > >> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 >> > > [2] >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >> > > >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi, +1 (binding) - best of luck! Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Best, tison. Liu Ted 于2022年8月24日周三 23:08写道： > +1 (binding) > Best regards,, > > Ted Liu > > 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good Luck! > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > > call > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > the > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > [2] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept ICLA and Software Grant from UMD Into the Apache Flagon Podling
Hello General! Refreshing this 72 VOTE: I am looking for additional review and binding VOTEs from the Incubator regarding a recent SW grant (via CCLA) from UMD to the Flagon Podling. The Flagon community has VOTED to accept for reasons outlined below and Secretary has accepted the CCLA. We are seeking concurrence from the incubator. Details follow: > On Aug 19, 2022, at 9:32 PM, Joshua Poore wrote: > > Hello Incubator! > > I am continuing a 72 VOTE from the Flagon Community on Incubator General > regarding the acceptance of an ICLA and Software Grant into the Apache Flagon > (Incubating) Podling. > > The purpose of this VOTE is to establish consensus and transparency wrt to IP > Clearance. > > We conducted a Community Discussion @ Flagon and a VOTE. > > VOTE Thread on Flagon Private: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/t5gof3sj40xrv2ylrgntx6oz2vdcc37t > > VOTE Result on Flagon Private: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dvz7rtxl77pfqb3c3tgn36g1wbfgr54h > > [3] +1 (+2 Binding) > [0] 0 > [0] -1 > > Accepted Submission of ICLA to Secretary: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/fz6v7x9gjcllr5dvsf5ho9hbt7ogrwvw > > > > Respectfully, > > Josh (Flagon PPMC) > > > Details on the Software Grant Follow (copied from original Flagon VOTE) below: > > > The Software Grant encompasses a refactor of the Apache Flagon Distill > product, which has been deprecated for a few years now [1] > This Grant includes ~150 new commits and thousands of new insertions (and a > lot of deletions) At UMD my team and I re-thought Distill as a Python > Package (for distro through PyPI) [2] that allows users to: > - efficiently segment UserALE.js (or User Behavior Logs) data > - curate segments - transform segments with logical operations (intersection, > union, etc.) > - filter log data extracted from segments > - apply analytics (e.g., statistical, graphs) to data extracted from segments > - support graph-based visualization (funnel, sankey) > Additionally: > - code is well documented [3] > - excellent working examples [4] > Distill also provides examples for dashboards to visualize segments using > both Apache Superset and Plotly/Dash > The original Distill product was tethered to a front-end (Tap), relied on > rudimentary (and error-prone) processing of segments within the client. This > made Distill difficult to maintain and required users to adopt tap, limiting > their analytical use-cases with UserALE.js and Distill. Overall, I think > that Distill provides a far more scaleable product to engage (and expand) our > development community. I think this will add real value to Apache Flagon. > Overhead/Actions prior to release: > - Documentation builds will need be adjusted for a new repo/branch > - Additional documentation for a few analytical functions (i.e., click-rate) > - Minor tweaks to simply code in a few functions (i.e., click-rate) > - Some restructuring of Repo to consolidate and organize examples > - a few additional README’s should be added (i.e., examples /dir) > IP Clearance The Software Grant is signed by Felicia Metz, esq. who is an > Associate Director at the University of Maryland’s, UMD Ventures office, > which has authority to release UMD IP. That makes accepting this grant > significantly easier from an IP Clearance perspective. New Committers The > UMD executed CCLA includes 5 new committers and potentially new PPMC members > [see 5 for executed Software Grant from UMD] > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-flagon-distill > [2] > https://github.com/UMD-ARLIS/incubator-flagon-distill/tree/distill_toolkit_refactor > > [3] > https://incubator-flagon-distill.readthedocs.io/en/distill_toolkit_refactor > [4] > https://github.com/UMD-ARLIS/incubator-flagon-distill/blob/distill_toolkit_refactor/examples/Segments_Demo.ipynb > > [5] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fz6v7x9gjcllr5dvsf5ho9hbt7ogrwvw - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Hivemall from Incubator
+1 to retire (binding) On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 4:57 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Hivemall has been incubating since 2016-09-13. > > From last year, activity has been low and the chances of attracting new > committers and building a vibrant community seem very slim at this point. > > The dev community vote was started by the PPMC for over a month and > can be found here[1],[2] > > I therefore propose to retire Hivemall from the Incubator. > > I want to start this official vote. > > Voting will start now and will remain open for at least 72 hours. > > Notice: Because the dev vote didn't get enough +1's, this vote is not > the same as usual, it's not a laze vote. > > [ ] +1 Retire the project > [ ] +0 No opinion. > [ ] -1 Do not retire the project because... > > [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/3s7bjgqm7864qbwnf1ny3lszklm65sgn > [2]https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv267tds166z7vtbzjt46nrz26xhzgvb > > -- > Best wishes！ > CalvinKirs > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
A few additional comments here: 1. As Justin said, you can select which one you want to choose (and ALv2 is a good choice!). Some projects take extra measures to explicitly state which of the two options they elect. 2. The ALv2 + LGPL option is common, primarily to accommodate projects under GPLv2 which consider the additional patent terms of ALv2 incompatible. The LGPL alternative is generally offered as an alternative to permit GPLv2 projects to use the project as a dependency. For those of us who want to make our libraries accessible to anyone, we're stuck with either MIT or dual ALv2/LGPL licensing. Projects choosing to go ALv2 only are going to be incompatible to be used as a dependency with GPLv2 projects. On 8/29/22, 12:26 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, > hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found > that many of them are dual protocol, for example > > org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. > 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 > 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 Jackson looks to be dual licensed [1] so you can select which license of the two you want to use. (Hint you would select ALv2.). Not all code bases with multiple licenses work that way. In each case you'll need to look at them to see if they are dual licensed or if they contain code under both licenses. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/codehaus/jackson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi, > hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found > that many of them are dual protocol, for example > > org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. > 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 > 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 Jackson looks to be dual licensed [1] so you can select which license of the two you want to use. (Hint you would select ALv2.). Not all code bases with multiple licenses work that way. In each case you'll need to look at them to see if they are dual licensed or if they contain code under both licenses. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/codehaus/jackson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
@Justin Mclean hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found that many of them are dual protocol, for example org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 How is this finally classified, and does it comply with apache rules? Best, Zhuoyu Chen. Justin Mclean 于2022年8月29日周一 10:45写道： > Hi, > > There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as > another project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to > discuss overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each > other or even if possible reuse code. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
