Re: License for text content

2024-05-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

The CC BY 4.0 is not compatible with the Apache license, so I would avoid it if 
you can. While the Apache license is intended for code, it’s OK to use for 
documentation as well.

Kind Regards,
Justin

> On 2 May 2024, at 1:25 pm, tison  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
> that constructs the final software.
> 
> However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it
> appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms may
> not be applicable)? Or what licenses shall we use?
> 
> For example, a website repo can contain both code and docs. In my personal
> site, I wrote:
> 
>> Code is licensed under Apache-2.0, words and images are licensed under CC
> BY 4.0.
> 
> But I don't know if we can write the same to a site repo of an ASF project.
> 
> Best,
> tison.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



License for text content

2024-05-01 Thread tison
Hi,

IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
that constructs the final software.

However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it
appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms may
not be applicable)? Or what licenses shall we use?

For example, a website repo can contain both code and docs. In my personal
site, I wrote:

> Code is licensed under Apache-2.0, words and images are licensed under CC
BY 4.0.

But I don't know if we can write the same to a site repo of an ASF project.

Best,
tison.


Re: Verification of download pages and links

2024-05-01 Thread sebb
On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 18:14, tison  wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> I'm trying to make a reference in the next OpenDAL release, that staging
> the download pages and links.
>
> Here is a technical issue. Before the release is out, which link should be
> used? IIUC we can use the link at [1]. But it doesn't follow the INFRA
> policy for formal releases. However, before the release it out, no artifact
> of the specific version is available at [2] or [3].

I think the staging download page should show the intended final link values.
These will not point to an actual file (apart from KEYS), but it
should still be possible to check that the links have the correct
format.

> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opendal/
> [2] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/opendal/
> [3] https://downloads.apache.org/opendal/
>
> This is the ongoing patch [4] where I left a TODO inline.
>
> [4] https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4565
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> tison  于2024年4月29日周一 08:43写道:
>
> > > The link to the source download and keys and hashes is broken.
> >
> > Thank you! File [1] to fix it.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4547
> >
> > This shows the necessity of previewing the download page. At least since
> > we provide it, we should ensure its correctness.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Justin Mclean  于2024年4月29日周一 08:15写道:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > Here is a patch to cover a minimal download page [1], which is derived
> >> from
> >> > OpenDAL's download page [2]. Welcome to leave comments if you find any
> >> > issues or things we can improve on.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10271
> >> > [2] https://opendal.apache.org/download
> >>
> >> The link to the source download and keys and hashes is broken.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Justin
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Verification of download pages and links

2024-05-01 Thread tison
Hi Sebb,

I'm trying to make a reference in the next OpenDAL release, that staging
the download pages and links.

Here is a technical issue. Before the release is out, which link should be
used? IIUC we can use the link at [1]. But it doesn't follow the INFRA
policy for formal releases. However, before the release it out, no artifact
of the specific version is available at [2] or [3].

[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opendal/
[2] https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/opendal/
[3] https://downloads.apache.org/opendal/

This is the ongoing patch [4] where I left a TODO inline.

[4] https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4565

Best,
tison.


tison  于2024年4月29日周一 08:43写道:

> > The link to the source download and keys and hashes is broken.
>
> Thank you! File [1] to fix it.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4547
>
> This shows the necessity of previewing the download page. At least since
> we provide it, we should ensure its correctness.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Justin Mclean  于2024年4月29日周一 08:15写道:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Here is a patch to cover a minimal download page [1], which is derived
>> from
>> > OpenDAL's download page [2]. Welcome to leave comments if you find any
>> > issues or things we can improve on.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10271
>> > [2] https://opendal.apache.org/download
>>
>> The link to the source download and keys and hashes is broken.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Justin
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>