Re: [VOTE] Graduate Cordova podling from Apache Incubator
On Oct 9, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate the Cordova podling from Apache Incubator. +1 (mentor) -- Gianugo Rabellino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote: Hey all, The Lucene.Net community feels ready to graudate. Our internal vote was a success (~40 +1's and a bit of a mess because we had a number of mailing lists which spread our vote out - sorry about that spam). We had some concerns regarding the size and activity of our community, however, with addition of two new committers just recently we feel that we are still growing as a community and that graduating will only help us build our community further. Dev Mailing List: http://s.apache.org/FQF User Mailing List: http://s.apache.org/P6f Our [Proposal] Resolution thread in general (http://s.apache.org/Qv6) didn't garner many comments, but we take silence as your proposal looks good Once again our resolution is located: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Resolution+Template I'll leave this vote open for at least 72 hours: [+1] We need some time apart to appreciate each other [-1] We'd like you to stay because... +1 -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Kato to the attic?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: Kato is not an ASF project (yet), so wouldn't it just be rm'd rather than moving to the Attic? Well, let's try to solve this once and for all. Sure, Kato is not a full-fledged ASF process Incubator-wise, but at the same time it may have passed the IP clearance stage so it may be argued that it is ASF's IP and ASF responsability, which in turn may justify keeping it shelved in the Attic. As an Attic PMC member, who is also very well aware of lack of volunteers over there, I couldn't be happier with a policy stating that failed incubating projects are just rm'd, but I don't think we never came up with a clear decision on that. And I would like to make sure it's the right thing to do in the first place. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) From: Kevin Kluge Sent: 4/9/2012 18:32 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please vote with: +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator +0: don't care -1: do not accept CloudStack into Incubator (please explain the objection) The vote is open for at least 72 hours from now (until at least 19:00 US-PST on April 12, 2012). Thanks for the consideration. -kevin [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CloudStackProposal Abstract CloudStack is an IaaS (Infrastracture as a Service) cloud orchestration platform. Proposal CloudStack provides control plane software that can be used to create an IaaS cloud. It includes an HTTP-based API for user and administrator functions and a web UI for user and administrator access. Administrators can provision physical infrastructure (e.g., servers, network elements, storage) into an instance of CloudStack, while end users can use the CloudStack self-service API and UI for the provisioning and management of virtual machines, virtual disks, and virtual networks. Citrix Systems, Inc. submits this proposal to donate the CloudStack source code, documentation, websites, and trademarks to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). Background Amazon and other cloud pioneers invented IaaS clouds. Typically these clouds provide virtual machines to end users. CloudStack additionally provides baremetal OS installation to end users via a self-service interface. The management of physical resources to provide the larger goal of cloud service delivery is known as orchestration. IaaS clouds are usually described as elastic -- an elastic service is one that allows its user to rapidly scale up or down their need for resources. A number of open source projects and companies have been created to implement IaaS clouds. Cloud.com started CloudStack in 2008 and released the source under GNU General Public License version 3 (GPL v3) in 2010. Citrix acquired Cloud.com, including CloudStack, in 2011. Citrix re-licensed the CloudStack source under Apache License v2 in April, 2012. Rationale IaaS clouds provide the ability to implement datacenter operations in a programmable fashion. This functionality is tremendously powerful and benefits the community by providing: - More efficient use of datacenter personnel - More efficient use of datacenter hardware - Better responsiveness to user requests - Better uptime/availability through automation While there are several open source IaaS efforts today, none are governed by an independent foundation such as ASF. Vendor influence and/or proprietary implementations may limit the community's ability to choose the hardware and software for use in the datacenter. The community at large will benefit from the ability to enhance the orchestration layer as needed for particular hardware or software support, and to implement algorithms and features that may reduce cost or increase user satisfaction for specific use cases. In this respect the independent nature of the ASF is key to the long term health and success of the project. Initial Goals The CloudStack project has two initial goals after the proposal is accepted and the incubation has begun. The Cloudstack Project's first goal is to ensure that the CloudStack source includes only third party code that is licensed under the Apache License or open source licenses that are approved by the ASF for use in ASF projects. The CloudStack Project has begun the process of removing third party code that is not licensed under an ASF approved license. This is an ongoing process that will continue into the incubation period. Third party code contributed to CloudStack under the CloudStack contribution agreement was assigned to Cloud.com in exchange for distributing CloudStack under GPLv3. The CloudStack project has begun the process of amending the previous CloudStack contribution agreements to obtain consent from existing contributors to change the CloudStack project's license. In the event that an existing contributor does not consent to this change, the project is prepared to remove that contributor's code. Additionally, there are binary dependencies on redistributed libraries that are not provided with an ASF-approved license. Finally, the CloudStack has source files incorporated from third parties that were not provided with an ASF-approved license. We have begun the process of re-writing this software. This is an ongoing process that will extend into the incubation period. These issues are discussed in more detail later in the proposal. Although CloudStack is open source, many design documents and discussions that should have been publicly available and accessible were not publicized. The Project's second goal will be to fix this lack of transparency by encouraging the initial committers to publicize technical
Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Callback for incubation
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, As discussed, the PhoneGap project would like to enter the Incubator under the Apache Callback name (potential alternative names to be discussed during incubation). The initial proposal has been well received and there are no major open issues, so it's time to vote! Thus I'm now calling a formal VOTE on the Apache Callback proposal as included below. The proposal is also available at http://wiki.phonegap.com/w/page/46311152/apache-callback-proposal on the PhoneGap wiki, and I'll place a copy for our archives on the Incubator wiki as soon as it stops giving me internal server errors. Please VOTE: [ ] +1 Accept Apache Callback for incubation [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Callback for incubation because... +1 (binding) -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] PhoneGap for Apache Incubator
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote: I would like to propose PhoneGap to be an Apache Incubator project. (Under the new, still proposed name, Apache Callback.) Here's a link to the proposal in the current PhoneGap wiki: http://wiki.phonegap.com/w/page/46311152/apache-callback-proposal Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we start the vote tomorrow. I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add another committer to the roster. Abu Obeida Bakhach abu.obe...@microsoft.com has been following the WP7 part of Phonegap and would be happy to continue helping out at least on that front. As he was a Stonehenge committer, he should already have a CLA on file and an Apache ID. Obeida works in my team and I already checked with him - he'd be eager to help. Can I just go ahead and edit the proposal? Thanks, -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] PhoneGap for Apache Incubator
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote: Hi everyone, I would like to propose PhoneGap to be an Apache Incubator project. (Under the new, still proposed name, Apache Callback.) Awesome, as a Phonegap enthusiast I'm really looking forward to it - and I'm happy to sign up as a mentor (gianugo at apache.org). -- Gianugo Rabellino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Stonehenge
+1, although I'd rather see it go in the dormant section. Also, I would have rather see this vote happen on stonehenge-dev first, but it's not that big of a deal. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: The Stonehenge project pretty much accomplished what it originally set out to do and then really didn't find a way to transition to something that is longer lasting and able to develop a community around it. Lately, there has been no interest in it as evidence by the last commit being almost a year ago. The only recent activity on the dev list is about retiring it and notices about missing board reports. Please vote for the retiring of the Stonehenge podling: [] +1 - please retire [] +/-0 [] -1 - please don't retire, because... -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote: [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 (binding) -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation
+1 From: Tommaso Teofili Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:10 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Lucene.Net for incubation +1 Tommaso 2011/1/27 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org On 2011-01-27, Troy Howard wrote: Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan 12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a vote to accept Lucene.Net into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is included below and can also be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal Please cast your votes: [X] +1 Accept Lucene.Net for incubation [ ] +0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene.Net return to the Incubator
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote: All, Please review our proposal for moving the Lucene.Net project back to the Incubator. I am happy to support this proposal and signed up as a mentor. -- Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it Blog: http://boldlyopen.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] ESME Graduation to TLP
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com wrote: Establish the Apache ESME Project +1! -- Gianugo Rabellino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report - Update 2
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: Missing reports: Droids, HISE, Stonehenge - Stonehenge appears to have been dead since July, when it made a milestone release, and is discussing being archived. There appears to be disappointment over the perceived disappearance of Microsoft and WSO2. Just for the sake of completeness, it's not really like Microsoft has disappeared as MS committers have been the ones suggesting the project folds down and, despite missing the board report deadline, are active in ensuring a smooth transition to whatever is next for the project. As discussed on the Stonehenge mailing list, it just seems the the project - as it has been scoped - has matured to a point where there is little value to add (also given the technology landscape wrt WS-I). It should also be noted that other key contributors (Sun and Spring) appear to have already left the building. Now that I am relocated in Redmond (and, incidentally, working next door to Kamaljit Bath who is one of the main MS contributors), I am willing to help streamlining this transition and support closing down the project unless someone in the community is interested in keeping it alive. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org wrote: I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a new Amber podling. The goal is to build a community around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and implementation +1 -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Amber proposal
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org wrote: So, we decided that it was worth to file a proposal for incubation, and we started writing one here : http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmberProposal . Simone, looks great - I signed up as a mentor, although I see you are already in great company! -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-1.0-RC1-incubating
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com wrote: The ESME community has voted on and approved the release of apache-esme-1.0-RC1-incubating. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Let me restate my +1 (IPMC hat) here. -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Resigning (again?) from River mentorship
Howdy, I seem to clearly recall that I sent a message a while ago stating that I didn't have quite enough time to follow River with the attention it deserves. It seems that one fell through some cracks (most likely sitting in one of my draft folders) and I was reminded that indeed I am still listed. It seems that the River project is doing just fine without me anyways :) so let's have some spring cleaning and consider this as my resignation as a mentor of River. Good luck folks! -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: ...I suggest you review the thread that was provided and then see if you want to reconsider your veto As this vote is not about a technical issue, I don't think there are vetos - we should have explicitely specified that this is a majority vote. Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just express your disagreement with the majority? Just a strong disagreement. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala santiago.g...@gmail.com wrote: Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just express your disagreement with the majority? I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't find it... I just replied to the wrong email which wasn't cc'd here, apologies. So let me restate here: it's a non-binding, non-vetoeing -1 based on the fact I think this solution is (a) incompatible with our own policy and (b) makes a special case for an individual which is both unfair (towards people and organizations who contributed significantly more) and a precedent for others to claim they should receive the same treatment. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Santiago Gala santiago.g...@gmail.com wrote: Robert and Gianugo, did you mean to veto this with your -1s, or just express your disagreement with the majority? I might be thick or gmail buggy, but where is Gianugo's -1 ? I can't find it... I just replied to the wrong email which wasn't cc'd here, apologies. So let me restate here: it's a non-binding, non-vetoeing -1 based on [...] I should add: this is not an attempt to rehash a discussion that has been going on forever, merely a due justification for a -1 as my arguments have been expressed on esme-dev and not here. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Incubate Lucene Connector Framework
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote. On behalf of the Lucene PMC, I'd like to propose incubation for a new Lucene subproject called the Lucene Connector Framework (LCF). I think we have all the necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LuceneConnectorFrameworkProposal [] +1. Accept LCF into the Incubator. [] 0. Don't care. [] -1. Do not accept (and why.) +1 -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)
Paul, thanks for your reply. Some quick comments: On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Goetz, Paul paul.go...@sap.com wrote: Hi Bertrand, hi Giuanugo, we discussed that with Florent Guillaume (from Chemistry) already. There are two aspects here, let me start with the technical one: As stated in the proposal: Chemistry aims to have a broader scope (including server implementations and mappings to JCR). OpenCMIS is about protocol handling (SOAP and AtomPub) only. From 10.000 feet, it seems like OpenCMIS might be used by Chemistry, then? At least to me (as a CMIS consumer), Chemistry is difficult to understand since both parts (SPI and API) are not clearly separated. With OpenCMIS, we aim for a clear separation between provider interfaces (SPI) and client interfaces (API). What's also missing from my perspective is a better mechanism for the client to control the write-through operations behind the objects. Let me see if I'm getting it straight - what you are saying is that it would be hard to decouple Chemistry from JCR so that you might use it for another server implementation? If that's the case, I (kinda, as JCR should be pretty OK to that extent) see your point - otherwise I'm a bit lost I'm afraid. The second aspect is organizational: It will be difficult to align the APIs right now. When discussing that with Florent we came to the conclusion that either we start a sandbox in Chemistry, or we start a project in parallel. After some further discussions (involving Justin Erenkrantz to get some guidance), we decided for a new project to avoid the confusion of having two API approaches in one project. Therefore we would suggest to start with a new podling, and decide on how to do a merge/combination of Chemistry and OpenCMIS later. I wish this discussion happened on chemistry-dev, and I would actually like to see what the community as a whole thinks about it. I'd actually prefer to see OpenCMIS possibly spinning off from Chemistry after an unsuccessful integration attempt rather than merging at a later time. And there are other Apache products co-existing in parallel (e.g. Axis and CXF, just to pick one example), and the ASF has never stated that this has to be avoided. So to me, it seemed that the idea of having two projects in parallel isn't that bad. Oh, there are plenty, and duplication isn't inherently bad. The difference here (and it's a big one in my book) is that we are talking about two different podlings, with all the related issues of incubating projects such as finite resources and whatnot. And the fact they both aim to implement an unfinished spec doesn't quite help. May I suggest we move this discussion to the Chemistry lists in order to seek consensus over there? That would allow you to return to the Incubator with a proposal properly addressing the duplication issue. If there is a thorough discussion over there, and a general agreement (including agreeing to disagree), I'll be happy to sign up as a mentor/champion for OpenCMIS. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)
Florian, On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Florian Müller fmuel...@opentext.com wrote: Hi, I can talk a bit about the OpenCMIS architecture. That might help to distinguish it from Chemistry. snip/ I hope that helps. It does, thanks for sharing. However, it would help a lot more as a foundation for a discussion with a more knowledgeable community such as the Chemistry one. Thanks, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement Interoperability Services (CMIS)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Goetz, Paul paul.go...@sap.com wrote: Hi, well, sorry that the discussion did not happen on the Chemistry mailing list. But for those being employees needing a legal clearance from their employer, before they can contribute or mail to a mailing list, it is difficult to do that in an early stage... I understand and sympathize, but if this is the kind of issues you are facing, I would suggest that you have much bigger problems to solve than an Open Source project. Actually, your statement is extremely worrisome, as you should be aware that in Apache you have to act as an individual: it's fine that you bring your company agenda to the table, but it's also important that you are able to decide based on pure technical merit and exercise your judgement as an individual. If you don't feel that's the case - and indeed I can smell some issues here - maybe the ASF is not the right place for you and you will find a more corporate-friendly environment somewhere else (Eclipse comes to mind). We have a working code base already - discussing the modus operandi and a potential merge with Chemistry seems to be time consuming to me (compared to doing a review once the entire OpenCMIS code is available and stabilized). Wouldn't it be worth to give it a try? I'm not going to formally stop you, but I would say that giving it a try just for the sake of it is not quite the right way to start. You have to realize that incubating a project requires time and dedication from the Incubator PMC as a whole, from your mentors and from the champion: it's no small feat by any stretch of imagination. Letting you start incubating without properly scrutinizing the issue of how you might relate with another podling just because your employer makes it difficult to have an open discussion to a mailing list doesn't sound a single bit right to me. -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote: Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with Bertrand as the Champion, and Gianugo, Niclas, Ross, Karl and Reinhard volunteering to be Mentors. Please cast your votes: +1 -- Gianugo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Clerezza
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote: ...The full proposal can be found on the wiki at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal ... And we are looking for mentors! You just got your first one. LMK how I can assist. -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: If you're not interested in Java and MySQL Cluster, you can stop reading now...
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote: I'm working (day job!) on a Java interface to the MySQL Cluster database (a.k.a. NDB). NDB is a high performance, high availability database used mostly in telecommunications applications. It can be the backing store for a MySQL server (accessed via any of the MySQL client APIs such as ODBC, JDBC) or can be used directly via primitive C++ or Java APIs. What I've been developing is a high performance, easy-to-use Java interface to NDB that bypasses the MySQL Server and instead goes directly to the native NDB API. I've used a Domain Object Model similar to Hibernate, JDO, and JPA. I'd like to work on this in Apache and would like to discuss the opportunities with folks at ApacheCon. If this looks interesting, please let me know. I'll post a proposal to the incubator wiki if there is positive feedback. Interesting! However, I assume the MySQL side is all GPL. How does it mix 'n match with the Apache License? Thanks, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Buildr as TLP
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alex Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote on approving the graduation of Buildr. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and only votes from Incubator PMC members are binding. [ ] +1 Approve graduation of Buildr as a Top-Level Project [ ] -1 Buildr is not ready to graduate +1 - have fun! -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] ESME - The Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Darren Hague [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator. Uber-cool. I signed up as a mentor as well. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Catacomb
On Sep 22, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: (Is Gianugo around? I haven't seen him on-list in a long time.) Sorta. Fighting with extensive travel and an overzealous GMail spam filter that insists in sweeping interesting stuff under the rug... Still, listening and lurking. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.8.1-incubating release
On Aug 13, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Hello, The community has approved a release of Apache CouchDB 0.8.1- incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to make the release. +1 -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation
On Feb 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can be found on the Apache Wiki, and reproduced below. I would like to proudly start this off with my +1. +1 -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project
On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: The original source for this proposal can be found at http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal I think this would be a fantastic addition to Apache. Would love to help, so let me know if you're interested in another mentor. Thanks, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation
On Nov 29, 2007 1:59 AM, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. [ X] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] accept Pig into Incubator
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed Pig project. +1 -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Proposal] Sling
On 8/17/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 8/8/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sling Proposal [...] Nominated Mentors * Jukka Zitting (jukka at apache dot org) Anyone interested in mentoring Sling? Count me in. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Wicket from the incubator
On 5/24/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator, The Wicket podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending the attached draft board resolution. The vote will end in 72 hours, 1900 hours CET sunday 27-May-2007. [X ] +1 Recommend to the board to establish Apache Wicket -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-beta1
On 4/27/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator PMC, The Apache Wicket project asks your permission to release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-beta1. +1 -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Incubate new podling, River (nee Braintree, nee..., nee Jini)
On 12/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below [ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please) +1 -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Proposal] Jini Project
On Jun 21, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Leo Simons wrote: * Mentor - Geir Magnusson Jr. Lately popular opinion seems to be that it'd be good if there were at least three mentors. Any others? Here, here! I' d be glad to be a mentor for this project, I've been following Jini closely and would love to see it coming to Apache, helping out where I can. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Jackrabbit to TLP status (pending board approval)
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Can you confirm the community diversity? That is one thing I could not tell straight off, although I do note the comment in July 2005 about crossing the threshold, and observe that there have been at least 4 committers added since then. So I'm assuming that it is fine, and therefore +1. Good point. Here is the current list of committers and their last known affiliation I'm counting 8 employees of Day who are not-Roy (I trust you particularly to know how to wear two different hats) and 6 non-employees constituting the initial PMC. As such, I'm afraid I must cast -1 at this time soley on the issue of diversity, to graduate this to a TLP. That vote would change as diversity continues to increase (which I trust it will.) I wouldn't have the same concern graduating this podling into a diverse TLP as a new subproject, so I cast +1 at graduating into an existing TLP. As a subproject of a larger existing PMC they would address the issue of diversity in that forum, instead of in incubator, and this would be fine. Another option is for some existing PPMC members unaffiliated with Day to stay on as mentors of a new TLP, rather than retiring just yet. Well, if that helps a very deserving project to be graduated, I'll be more than happy to keep on serving in its PMC. I asked to be turned into emeritus because all I did during these years was providing advocacy and oversight (given Roy was there, this basically turned out to a few +1, but hey), with no code contribution whatsoever. But I'm still here and willing to help. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - Making sense of Open Source - http://www.sourcesense.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Wicket] As erspective podling candidate
On Mar 3, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Hiya, I've been following the Wicket project (http:// wicket.sourceforge.net) for some time now and have noticed that besides having an awesome web framework they've got a solid community behind it all. These folks have great collaboration going on and the code is all ASL. I'm posting this email to guage the interest at the ASF for bringing wicket into the incubator. I've had a few conversations with Apache people and wicket folks about this. Any thoughts? Comments? Well, Wicket is a very nice project, and I would love to see it coming over here. Also, this might be a way for me to finally kick my lazy butt and start helping out in the incubator, so if you need a mentor or help of any kind, I'm here! Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] add Dominique Pfister to Jackrabbit committers
On Mar 4, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Stefan Guggisberg wrote: I hereby nominate Dominique Pfister (dominique.pfister at day.com) on the basis of his sustained interest, quality of work, and desire to contribute to the project on a long-term basis. Please vote with your +1 for yes, +0 for abstain, or -1 (not at this time). +1 -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: !AW: AW: AW: We want to donate a XML / Cocoon / EJB / WebStart- based CMS
Sascha-Matthias Kulawik wrote: It's pretty hard, however, to judge your software based on the resources we can see from here (a german web site and a webstart admin tool which requires a password). So Yes, you're right, the Website is german. Thats why I just want to start with the process and do the remaining stuff for that donation in that time. Unfortunately (well, for you, not for Apache :-)) it doesn't work like this with the ASF. If you carefully read all the project guidelines and incubation proposals you'll see that to get into Apache you have to follow a very strict set of requirements in terms of community first and code base next (but community is what really matters). While I understand that it might sound harsh to you (the typical reaction is like what the heck, I'm givin my cool stuff away and those guys are being picky?), this is one of the main reasons for Apache to continue serving just the best of breed in Open Source software. If you'll be patient enough, I'm sure you'll learn to appreciate the Apache Way. Because of ongoing server problems you can test the Application under: http://213.252.141.109/admin/ To get access to the Admin Tool try following: User: BT Passwd: test Hmmm... I'm getting an 'Error during logon: null' which doesn't seem much promising. :-/ Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com (Now blogging at: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/gianugo/) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
