[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform Provider project contribution

[paul_a]

 

There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy

consensus. Thank you!

 

 

 

Kind regards

 

Paul Angus

 

From: pau...@apache.org   mailto:pau...@apache.org> > 
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org  
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform Provider project contribution

 

Hi Incubator PMC,

 

The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Terraform Provider", which

is a Terraform provider for CloudStack [1].

 

Please vote to accept this contribution.

 

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],

open for at least 72 hours.

 

Apache CloudStack PMC

 

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.html

 

[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

 

 

Many Thanks

 

Paul Angus

 

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project contribution

[paul_a]

 

There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy

consensus. Thank you!

 

 

Kind regards

 

Paul Angus

 

From: pau...@apache.org   mailto:pau...@apache.org> > 
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org  
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project contribution

 

Hi Incubator PMC,

 

The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Go SDK", which

is a web based API for CloudStack [1].

 

Please vote to accept this contribution.

 

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],

open for at least 72 hours.

 

 

Apache CloudStack PMC

 

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-go-sdk.html

 

[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

 

 

 

Many Thanks

 

Paul Angus

 

RE: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform Provider project contribution

[paul_a]

There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy

consensus. Thank you!

 

 

 

Kind regards

 

Paul Angus

 

From: pau...@apache.org  
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav 
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform Provider project contribution

 

Hi Incubator PMC,

 

The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Terraform Provider", which

is a Terraform provider for CloudStack [1].

 

Please vote to accept this contribution.

 

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],

open for at least 72 hours.

 

Apache CloudStack PMC

 

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.html

 

[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

 

 

Many Thanks

 

Paul Angus

 

RE: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project contribution

[paul_a]

There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy

consensus. Thank you!

 

 

Kind regards

 

Paul Angus

 

From: pau...@apache.org  
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav 
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project contribution

 

Hi Incubator PMC,

 

The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Go SDK", which

is a web based API for CloudStack [1].

 

Please vote to accept this contribution.

 

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],

open for at least 72 hours.

 

 

Apache CloudStack PMC

 

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-go-sdk.html

 

[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

 

 

 

Many Thanks

 

Paul Angus

 

[IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project contribution

[paul_a]

Hi Incubator PMC,

 

The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Go SDK", which

is a web based API for CloudStack [1].

 

Please vote to accept this contribution.

 

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],

open for at least 72 hours.

 

 

Apache CloudStack PMC

 

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-go-sdk.html

 

[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

 

 

 

Many Thanks

 

Paul Angus

 

[IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform Provider project contribution

[paul_a]

Hi Incubator PMC,

 

The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Terraform Provider", which

is a Terraform provider for CloudStack [1].

 

Please vote to accept this contribution.

 

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],

open for at least 72 hours.

 

Apache CloudStack PMC

 

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-terraform.html

 

[2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

 

 

Many Thanks

 

Paul Angus

 

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

[paul_a]

Thanks Justin,

 

We believe that we have now.  They are mostly from the same person/company,
but as they're going to go into two distinct repos, and do different things
- one is a library which can facilitate a whole load of things including the
other the feature in the other repo. I'm leaning towards two forms to keep
the index.xml file in a consistent format.

 

 

Kind regards




Paul Angus

 

  _  

From: Justin Mclean 
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 9:21:43 AM
To: Paul Angus 
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav

Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform 

 

Hi,

Assume we have enough information abut the provanance and they are from the
same person/company I think one form is OK, but it may be easier to manage
with two forms.

Thanks,
Justin 

FW: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

[paul_a]

Hi,  me again,

To recap; We (the CloudStack Project) are bringing in some Terraform plugin 
code to pick up its ongoing development and maintenance.  It's split into two 
discrete repos in its external form, and will be keep in two discrete repos 
under the Apache repos.  There are different committers to the two repos (but 
with a large overlap).

Do these need separate IP Clearance forms ?



Kind regards

Paul Angus

-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus 
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 10:29 AM
To: mattsic...@apache.org
Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Got it.  Thanks Matt.

We'll continue on.


Kind regards

Paul Angus

-Original Message-
From: Matt Sicker 
Sent: 13 July 2021 20:39
To: Paul Angus 
Cc:  
Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Secretary only handles the books here; I don't make the call as to whether or 
not an IP donation is valid. That would be the job of the IPMC or the 
respective PMC if a top level project makes that call.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:42 AM Paul Angus  wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> The CloudStack project is in the process of getting IP clearance for a 
> Terraform plugin.
>
> WRT to signed Software Grants from contributors to the codebase that is being 
> taken over, we've had consent from 11 of the top 20 contributors [1] and an 
> acknowledged Software Grant from the major contributor and owner, Sander van 
> Harmelen.
>
> Is Sander's Grant sufficient for you as Secretary for us to proceed, or do 
> you require signed Grants from all who have responded.
>
> [1]  https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Paul Angus
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 4:12 PM
> To: pau...@apache.org;  
> 
> Cc: Rohit Yadav ; Incubator General 
> ; Daniel Widdis 
> Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform
>
> Thanks Daniel for confirming. In that case I think we don't have any 
> outstanding concerns, all the guidance and advice we've received on this 
> thread has been attempted and resolved.
>
> Hi Paul - I think both Daniel and Justin have been answered and we can 
> continue. Kindly review and start a formal "[IP CLEARANCE]" thread on 
> general@incubator as per 
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#p
> rocess
> tracking the IP clearance at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159
>
> Regards.
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM Daniel Widdis  wrote:
> >
> > I have no concerns.  I am not a member of the IPMC, just an interested 
> > participant in the conversation.
> >
> > On 7/11/21, 11:25 PM, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daniel, Justin, IPMC,
> >
> > Are you happy with the answers to satisfaction? Do you have any other
> > questions/concerns, or can we continue with the IP clearance vote?
> > It has been three weeks since this thread, while the Apache CloudStack
> > PMC has passed the vote to accept donations in April 2021. If there
> > are any, can you advise by the end of tomorrow?
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:56 AM Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Justin,
> > >
> > > Yes that's right, there's no 3rd party code in the latest 
> > codebase/tags that is being donated. And yes, the large commits that 
> > brought the 3rd party code in vendor directory have been all removed too.
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 10 Jul, 2021, 6:26 am Justin Mclean, 
> >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> > However, if you compare the changes in above commits against the
> > >> > repositories being donated the "vendor" directory does not exist 
> > now
> > >> > in both the repositories being donated:
> > >> > https://github.com/xanzy/go-cloudstack
> > >> > https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack (for example
> > >> > vendor removed in this commit -
> > >> > 
> > https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack/commit/4db2f701592b5af74376f5b138624bff75763152)
> > >>
> > >> So what you are saying is that all of those large commits have been 
> > removed? What I would be concerned about happening is if a large amount of 
> > 3rd party code incorrectly gets an ASF header on it. There no issue with 
> > 3rd party code in the repo but it must be clearly marked, have the correct 
> > non ASF header and its license compatible with the Apache license. Looking 
> > at the repos all headers are ASF ones, is there any 3rd party code in the 
> > donated code?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Justin
> > >>
> >
> >



--
Matt Sicker
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
VP, Logging Services, ASF


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

FW: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

[paul_a]

Sorry, me again.

 

As these two codebases are being brought over into two separate repos, and 
referred to as distinct entities, do they need separate Codebase IP Clearance 
XML files and then separate entries in index.xml ?

 

Kind regards

 

Paul Angus

 

From: Rohit Yadav  
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 11:14 AM
To: pau...@apache.org; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

 

There are two codebases referred in the new git repositories:

 

CloudStack Terraform Provider: 
https://github.com/xanzy/terraform-provider-cloudstack to be imported at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider

CloudStack Go SDK: https://github.com/xanzy/go-cloudstack to be imported at 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go (this one is required by the Terraform 
provider as a library)

 

Regards.


  

  

  _  

From: pau...@apache.org   mailto:pau...@apache.org> >
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 15:36
To: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org   
mailto:priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> >
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >
Subject: RE: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform 

 

Please could some one give me the exact way that the Terraform code is going to 
be referred to, I’ve seen a few different ones.

 

eg

- Terraform Provider and Go SDK

- CloudStack Terraform Provider

- CloudStack Terraform

- Terraform Provider CloudStack

 

 

 

Kind regards

 

Paul Angus

 

From: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> 
> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 10:23 AM
To: pau...@apache.org  ; 
priv...@cloudstack.apache.org  
Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

 

Hi Paul,

 

The IP clearance officer needs to do that after due diligence of the outline 
XML file, so I only committed the cloudstack-terraform.xml outline file but did 
not add it to the index.xml. Let me know if you need assistance in doing that 
(i.e. unable to svn commit?).

 

Regards.


  

  

  _  

From: pau...@apache.org   mailto:pau...@apache.org> >
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 14:12
To: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org   
mailto:priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> >
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >
Subject: RE: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform 

 

Hi All,

After committing the  cloudstack-terraform.xml  file, the next step is to 'add 
a row to the table at incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/index.xml'.
I couldn't find a row for ' cloudstack-terraform.xml'  in the index.xml file.  
Is it staring me I the face or has it not been done?

I've added it as another step in 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159 for tracking.

Kind regards

Paul Angus

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav mailto:ro...@apache.org> > 
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 4:12 PM
To: pau...@apache.org  ; 
mailto:priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> > 
mailto:priv...@cloudstack.apache.org> >
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:ro...@apache.org> >; Incubator 
General mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> >; 
Daniel Widdis mailto:wid...@gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Thanks Daniel for confirming. In that case I think we don't have any 
outstanding concerns, all the guidance and advice we've received on this thread 
has been attempted and resolved.

Hi Paul - I think both Daniel and Justin have been answered and we can 
continue. Kindly review and start a formal "[IP CLEARANCE]" thread on 
general@incubator as per 
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html#process
tracking the IP clearance at
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5159

Regards.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM Daniel Widdis mailto:wid...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> I have no concerns.  I am not a member of the IPMC, just an interested 
> participant in the conversation.
>
> On 7/11/21, 11:25 PM, "Rohit Yadav"   > wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel, Justin, IPMC,
>
> Are you happy with the answers to satisfaction? Do you have any other
> questions/concerns, or can we continue with the IP clearance vote?
> It has been three weeks since this thread, while the Apache CloudStack
> PMC has passed the vote to accept donations in April 2021. If there
> are any, can you advise by the end of tomorrow?
>
> Regards.
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 10:56 AM Rohit Yadav   > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > Yes that's right, there's no 3rd party code in the latest codebase/tags 
> that is being donated. And yes, the large commits that brought the 3rd party 
> code in vendor directory have been all removed too.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > On Sat, 10 Jul, 2021, 6:26 am Justin Mclean,   > w