[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Richard Downer]

This is the result thread for the IP Clearance vote started in this thread:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201602.mbox/%3CCABQFKi1-VxhduAnn0BKewsDihWJP0kcBZ5KerWi%3DVXVjs-%2B5bQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E

No explicit binding votes were cast. As this is a lazy consensus vote,
this means that the Apache Brooklyn CLI has passed IP Clearance.

Some comments were raised on the vote thread. These comments have been
noted and clarifying notes added to the record. The comments made did
not affect the outcome of the vote.

Thank you to those who participated in this IP clearance vote.

Richard.


-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Downer <rich...@apache.org>
Date: 29 February 2016 at 21:19
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI
To: general@incubator.apache.org


Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for a new CLI tool.

See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html

Please vote to approve this contribution.

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours.

Thanks
Richard

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Alex Harui]

Thanks Craig.  Richard, I would take Craig's answer as authorization to
proceed.

-Alex

On 3/7/16, 9:43 AM, "Craig Russell"  wrote:

>A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor.
>
>If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant,
>no big deal IMHO.
>
>Clearly, bundled dependencies cannot be included in a grant since the
>grantor has no rights to them. The fact that they were included in a file
>referenced by the grant has no relevance. Including them was just a
>mistake.
>
>No action needed IMHO since the intent is clear.
>
>Craig
>
>> On Mar 7, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/16, 6:05 AM, "Richard Downer"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Alex, Justin, all,
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make
>>> this statement for the record:
>>> 
>>> Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link:
>>> 
>>>https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12
>>>f4
>>> 828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip
>>> SHA1: 5b5ef46c56adfff8ca86cca04694d5abc10ec447
>>> SHA256: 
>>>0cfaac11df7075c723bfb982ed5852d790fa195dcfe67c9bbbd545f34df71770
>>> 
>>> The folder 
>>>brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps
>>> is *excluded* from the code grant; this folder contains bundled
>>> dependencies licensed by 3rd parties using the MIT and BSD licenses.
>>> 
>>> With this folder removed from the ZIP file using the command zip -d
>>> FILENAME.zip 
>>> brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps\*,
>>> the hashes become:
>>> SHA1: 91fda2ca20c4b171985e1f5bb545ed8a236123dd
>>> SHA256: 
>>>4de28b308ad09f0e5642b4cefdd54b1c91b255fecd00184763a7d260bf8ec12d
>>> 
>>> I am updating the IP Clearance record with this same statement.
>>> 
>>> Is this sufficient notice for the record to address your comments?
>> 
>> I would hope it is sufficient, but I am not the person who can make the
>> call.  Other more senior folks may be able to make the call, but if you
>> want to be more sure, I would ask on legal-discuss if this is a
>>sufficient
>> way to update an SGA.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>Craig L Russell
>Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Craig Russell]

A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor.

If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant, no big 
deal IMHO.

Clearly, bundled dependencies cannot be included in a grant since the grantor 
has no rights to them. The fact that they were included in a file referenced by 
the grant has no relevance. Including them was just a mistake.

No action needed IMHO since the intent is clear. 

Craig

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/7/16, 6:05 AM, "Richard Downer"  wrote:
> 
>> Alex, Justin, all,
>> 
>> Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make
>> this statement for the record:
>> 
>> Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link:
>> https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4
>> 828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip
>> SHA1: 5b5ef46c56adfff8ca86cca04694d5abc10ec447
>> SHA256: 0cfaac11df7075c723bfb982ed5852d790fa195dcfe67c9bbbd545f34df71770
>> 
>> The folder brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps
>> is *excluded* from the code grant; this folder contains bundled
>> dependencies licensed by 3rd parties using the MIT and BSD licenses.
>> 
>> With this folder removed from the ZIP file using the command zip -d
>> FILENAME.zip 
>> brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps\*,
>> the hashes become:
>> SHA1: 91fda2ca20c4b171985e1f5bb545ed8a236123dd
>> SHA256: 4de28b308ad09f0e5642b4cefdd54b1c91b255fecd00184763a7d260bf8ec12d
>> 
>> I am updating the IP Clearance record with this same statement.
>> 
>> Is this sufficient notice for the record to address your comments?
> 
> I would hope it is sufficient, but I am not the person who can make the
> call.  Other more senior folks may be able to make the call, but if you
> want to be more sure, I would ask on legal-discuss if this is a sufficient
> way to update an SGA.
> 
> -Alex
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Alex Harui]

On 3/7/16, 6:05 AM, "Richard Downer"  wrote:

>Alex, Justin, all,
>
>Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make
>this statement for the record:
>
>Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link:
>https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4
>828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip
>SHA1: 5b5ef46c56adfff8ca86cca04694d5abc10ec447
>SHA256: 0cfaac11df7075c723bfb982ed5852d790fa195dcfe67c9bbbd545f34df71770
>
>The folder brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps
>is *excluded* from the code grant; this folder contains bundled
>dependencies licensed by 3rd parties using the MIT and BSD licenses.
>
>With this folder removed from the ZIP file using the command zip -d
>FILENAME.zip 
>brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps\*,
>the hashes become:
>SHA1: 91fda2ca20c4b171985e1f5bb545ed8a236123dd
>SHA256: 4de28b308ad09f0e5642b4cefdd54b1c91b255fecd00184763a7d260bf8ec12d
>
>I am updating the IP Clearance record with this same statement.
>
>Is this sufficient notice for the record to address your comments?

I would hope it is sufficient, but I am not the person who can make the
call.  Other more senior folks may be able to make the call, but if you
want to be more sure, I would ask on legal-discuss if this is a sufficient
way to update an SGA.

-Alex

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Richard Downer]

Alex, Justin, all,

Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make
this statement for the record:

Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link:
https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip
SHA1: 5b5ef46c56adfff8ca86cca04694d5abc10ec447
SHA256: 0cfaac11df7075c723bfb982ed5852d790fa195dcfe67c9bbbd545f34df71770

The folder brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps
is *excluded* from the code grant; this folder contains bundled
dependencies licensed by 3rd parties using the MIT and BSD licenses.

With this folder removed from the ZIP file using the command zip -d
FILENAME.zip brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps\*,
the hashes become:
SHA1: 91fda2ca20c4b171985e1f5bb545ed8a236123dd
SHA256: 4de28b308ad09f0e5642b4cefdd54b1c91b255fecd00184763a7d260bf8ec12d

I am updating the IP Clearance record with this same statement.

Is this sufficient notice for the record to address your comments?

Thanks!
Richard.

[Sorry for the delay in replying, due to illness]


On 1 March 2016 at 21:42, Alex Harui  wrote:
>
>
> On 3/1/16, 12:18 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>> Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these
>>> files in the zip referenced by the Grant.
>>
>>The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright
>>owner is IMO (but I could be wrong) I don’t think the grant needs to be
>>redone as it’s clear what would be under the ASF license. It would also
>>be relatively easy to remove the files from the zip and resubmit.
>
> I don't know if there is an official protocol for a scenario like this.
> All I think is needed is an email trail that indicates that the Grant
> needed some modifications and what the modifications were.  The grant
> document contains a SHA hash for the zip so if you change the zip the
> grant may need the SHA hash updated.  But hopefully it will be ok for
> folks to find an updated SHA hash in an email in the archives or maybe in
> the IP Clearance record itself.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Alex Harui]

On 3/1/16, 12:18 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these
>> files in the zip referenced by the Grant.
>
>The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright
>owner is IMO (but I could be wrong) I don’t think the grant needs to be
>redone as it’s clear what would be under the ASF license. It would also
>be relatively easy to remove the files from the zip and resubmit.

I don't know if there is an official protocol for a scenario like this.
All I think is needed is an email trail that indicates that the Grant
needed some modifications and what the modifications were.  The grant
document contains a SHA hash for the zip so if you change the zip the
grant may need the SHA hash updated.  But hopefully it will be ok for
folks to find an updated SHA hash in an email in the archives or maybe in
the IP Clearance record itself.

Thanks,
-Alex


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these
> files in the zip referenced by the Grant.

The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright owner is 
IMO (but I could be wrong) I don’t think the grant needs to be redone as it’s 
clear what would be under the ASF license. It would also be relatively easy to 
remove the files from the zip and resubmit.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Alex Harui]

On 3/1/16, 1:36 AM, "Richard Downer"  wrote:

>Justin,
>
>On 29 February 2016 at 22:36, Justin Mclean 
>wrote:
>>> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html
>>>
>> I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code and crypto code.
>>[1] Was this intended?
>
>MIT/BSD: yes this is intended - they are embedded dependencies, in a
>similar way that jquery might be embedded in a web app. (Bundling
>dependencies like this, I'm told, is normal for Go 1.5 - Go 1.6 makes
>it possible to link to dependencies without bundling and this is
>something that the community would like to look into.)

Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these
files in the zip referenced by the Grant.  If these files are dependencies
(not owned by the signers of the grant, no other paperwork authorizing the
grant signers to donate on behalf of the owners, and no intention for the
"home" for future development of these files to be at the ASF), then these
files should not be in the grant.  For sure, Jquery files should never be
in an grant to the ASF (unless the Jquery project decided to donate Jquery
to the ASF).

If there is a lot, you might want to re-do the Exhibit A (new zip and MD5
and update the grant document).  If it is a few, you might want to check
with legal-discuss or get advice from more senior people on this list, but
I would just explicitly list those few files in an email on this list
and/or your dev list so there is permanent record that you are making an
unofficial addendum to the grant and keep on going.

Of course, I could be wrong...
-Alex

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> MIT/BSD: yes this is intended

Thanks all good.

> It does appear that the LICENSE file is insufficient in this case so I
> will push to get that fixed.

Yes part of why I asked, but IMO that can be fixed up after the grant.

> Crypto: the name of the folder is a red herring in this case 

No problem.

Thanks,
Justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Richard Downer]

Justin,

On 29 February 2016 at 22:36, Justin Mclean  wrote:
>> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html 
>> 
> I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code and crypto code. [1] Was 
> this intended?

MIT/BSD: yes this is intended - they are embedded dependencies, in a
similar way that jquery might be embedded in a web app. (Bundling
dependencies like this, I'm told, is normal for Go 1.5 - Go 1.6 makes
it possible to link to dependencies without bundling and this is
something that the community would like to look into.)

It does appear that the LICENSE file is insufficient in this case so I
will push to get that fixed.

Crypto: the name of the folder is a red herring in this case - it is
SSH related and it contains terminal management code, but does not
actually contain any crypto code.

Thanks for your review.

Richard.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for a new CLI tool.
> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html 
> 
I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code and crypto code. [1] Was 
this intended?

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./br/Godeps/_workspace/src/golang.org/x/crypto

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

[Richard Downer]

Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for a new CLI tool.

See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html

Please vote to approve this contribution.

This is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours.

Thanks
Richard

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org