[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Jake Farrell]

The Apache Stratos project was voted into the Incubator but the RESULT tag
was never added to the vote thread. Closing vote to clean up the Incubator
voting status page.

-Jake


http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201306.mbox/%3CCAKQbXgANiJ6Px%2BcBtW_oRc2wQbV9CEQeOHXFCQ8xQy9n8QDdxw%40mail.gmail.com%3E

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Afkham Azeez]

Thanks Ross for seeing this through.

Azeez

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
>
> Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
>
> There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1 votes.
> It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise it has become habitual
> to tally the votes formally, but when there are no -1s and enough binding
> +1s there is little need for this time consuming task.
>
> Of course, if the IPMC want to insist on a tally I will take it upon myself
> to count some beans whilst cursing under my breath about my volunteer time
> being squandered.
>
> Regardless the podling creation process can start - good luck all.
>
> Ross
>
> [1]
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
>



-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
*Member; Apache Software Foundation;
**http://www.apache.org/*
*
*
*email: **az...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 77 3320919
blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* *
twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
*
linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
*
*
*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
*
*

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Paul Fremantle]

Ross - huge thanks. Great champion-ing.

Paul


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:

> Resending with [RESULT] tag as  (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
>
>
> On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>
> > This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
> >
> > Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> > (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
> >
> > There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1
> votes.
> > It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise it has become
> habitual
> > to tally the votes formally, but when there are no -1s and enough binding
> > +1s there is little need for this time consuming task.
> >
> > Of course, if the IPMC want to insist on a tally I will take it upon
> > myself to count some beans whilst cursing under my breath about my
> > volunteer time being squandered.
> >
> > Regardless the podling creation process can start - good luck all.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling
> >
> >
> > On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >>
> >> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> >> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> >> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> >> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> >> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >>
> >> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >> [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >> because... (provide reason)
> >>
> >> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> >> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your votes.
> >> Ross
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
p...@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Sanjiva Weerawarana]

Very cool :-). Thanks Ross and everyone!

Sanjiva.


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> Resending with [RESULT] tag as  (reasonably) requested off list - sorry
>
>
> On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>
> > This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
> >
> > Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> > (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
> >
> > There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1
> votes.
> > It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise it has become
> habitual
> > to tally the votes formally, but when there are no -1s and enough binding
> > +1s there is little need for this time consuming task.
> >
> > Of course, if the IPMC want to insist on a tally I will take it upon
> > myself to count some beans whilst cursing under my breath about my
> > volunteer time being squandered.
> >
> > Regardless the podling creation process can start - good luck all.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling
> >
> >
> > On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >>
> >> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> >> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> >> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> >> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> >> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >>
> >> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >> [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >> because... (provide reason)
> >>
> >> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> >> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your votes.
> >> Ross
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1
650 265 8311
blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Ross Gardler]

Resending with [RESULT] tag as  (reasonably) requested off list - sorry


On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
>
> Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
>
> There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1 votes.
> It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise it has become habitual
> to tally the votes formally, but when there are no -1s and enough binding
> +1s there is little need for this time consuming task.
>
> Of course, if the IPMC want to insist on a tally I will take it upon
> myself to count some beans whilst cursing under my breath about my
> volunteer time being squandered.
>
> Regardless the podling creation process can start - good luck all.
>
> Ross
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>
>> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>>
>> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
>> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
>> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
>> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
>> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>>
>> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>> because... (provide reason)
>>
>> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
>> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>>
>> Thank you for your votes.
>> Ross
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Noah Slater]

Woot. Thanks Ross!


On 20 June 2013 12:26, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.
>
> Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
> (note some actions require the support of your mentors).
>
> There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1 votes.
> It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise it has become habitual
> to tally the votes formally, but when there are no -1s and enough binding
> +1s there is little need for this time consuming task.
>
> Of course, if the IPMC want to insist on a tally I will take it upon myself
> to count some beans whilst cursing under my breath about my volunteer time
> being squandered.
>
> Regardless the podling creation process can start - good luck all.
>
> Ross
>
> [1]
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
>



-- 
NS

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Ross Gardler]

This vote is now closed. The Vote passed.

Podling committers can start the process of setting up the project [1]
(note some actions require the support of your mentors).

There are no -1 votes and plenty of both binding and non-binding +1 votes.
It is not my intention to tally the votes. I realise it has become habitual
to tally the votes formally, but when there are no -1s and enough binding
+1s there is little need for this time consuming task.

Of course, if the IPMC want to insist on a tally I will take it upon myself
to count some beans whilst cursing under my breath about my volunteer time
being squandered.

Regardless the podling creation process can start - good luck all.

Ross

[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Setting+Up+a+New+Podling


On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Tammo van Lessen]

+1 (non-binding)

Best,
  Tammo


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Supun..
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Noah Slater  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> [1].
> > >
> > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > >
> > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > because... (provide reason)
> > >
> > > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your votes.
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Supun Kamburugamuva
> Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
> E-mail: supu...@gmail.com;  Mobile: +1 812 369 6762
> Blog: http://supunk.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Supun Kamburugamuva]

+1

Thanks,
Supun..


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Noah Slater  wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> NS
>



-- 
Supun Kamburugamuva
Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
E-mail: supu...@gmail.com;  Mobile: +1 812 369 6762
Blog: http://supunk.blogspot.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Noah Slater]

+1


On 14 June 2013 22:49, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
NS

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Daniel Kulp]

+1

Dan


On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> 
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> 
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
> 
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> 
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[ant elder]

+1

   ...ant

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Suresh Marru]

On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:19 AM, Greg Stein  wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey
>  wrote:
>> ...
>> It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
>> someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
>> Stratos, but to ensure that my positive assessment is communicated
>> unequivocally to one and all in the VOTE tally as it was during the PROPOSAL
>> thread, I hereby change the value of my vote from -0 to +0.9.
> 
> I never worried about the "vote impact", and your change was not requested.
> 
> My concern was that your pedantism caused two *highly* qualified (and
> IMO, unimpeachable) people to issue a mea culpa in response to your
> email. That was unjustified, and highly unnecessary when looking at
> the actual edit that was performed.
> 
> Sure, I could also say "Ross/Sanjiva: grow a pair. Don't apologize."
> But I like those guys, so I never said that ;-)
> 
> I dislike that the atmosphere puts them into a position where they
> feel a need to apologize. Personally speaking, it feels uncooperative
> and rules-based rather than "what can we do, to get our goals
> accomplished?"

With great respects to all of you, I only see the positive impact of this 
discussion. 

As many alternatives/mid course corrections to incubator/incubation are being 
discussed its even more important to tighten the loose screws to keep this 
vehicle moving smoothly. Changing proposal has been one of the nagging issues 
and Marvin's raised concern and people of the stature of Ross and Sanjiva's 
instant response only gets it strongly. Greg, Ross, Sanjiva make invaluable  
contributions to the foundation and you do it yet again. Thank you. 

I think Marvin did a head start at his "job". He might run sledge on small 
things or go soft on big issues, but we still should appreciate him 
volunteering during turbulence and let him go at it at liberal. 

When bringing proposals or release votes to this highly flammable list, its 
easier to predict weather than what gets ignited here. Thanks to generosity of 
Sanjiva and WSO2, the branding issue is resolved elegantly and now looking 
forward for this egg to incubate and hatch quickly. 

Suresh

> 
> It felt like the *goal* was lost, in favor of "oh, boo hoo, a small
> [favorable] edit was made".
> 
> IMO, the proper response would be "+1, great proposal. (as an aside,
> all: please do not edit once voting is underway)". ... And step back
> and consider the other end of the spectrum: say the proposal was
> edited several times during the voting process. The IPMC is
> highly-qualified to say "meh. nothing substantive. let's run with it."
> ... or they could "holy crap. everything changed. we need to run
> another vote."
> 
> I stand behind Sanjiva and what he/WSO2 are doing. I don't like seeing
> him put into a position where he does the Right Thing, then feels a
> need to apologize for it. I'd like to see us move past that.
> 
> -g
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Marlon Pierce]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

+1


Marlon


On 6/16/13 12:15 PM, Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Thanks Milinda
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan
>  wrote:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
 I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos
 proposal
>> [1].
 
 I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project
 to enter the incubator as a standard podling under the
 existing incubation policy. The acceptance or otherwise of
 the probationary TLP idea is a separate issue that will be
 explored during the first month of incubation, potentially
 resulting in a further IPMC vote.
 
 This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a
 podling.
 
 [X] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>>> 
>>> +1: (binding)
>>> 
>>> -
>>>
>>> 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- -- Lahiru Sandaruwan Software Engineer, Platform
>> Technologies, WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com 
>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>> 
>> email: lahi...@wso2.com cell: (+94) 773 325 954 blog:
>> http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/ twitter:
>> http://twitter.com/lahirus linked-in:
>> http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146
>> 
> 
> 
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvhzcAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5sToH/1L6gujjWO/Dgx1EqaQtha0g
xl9Kmhp2Rp3+BOPGJjIg4cKQk9zn++v4WPgxJJkfe0YWT3+sLy3MApqTk6nltMcZ
HbuTMWtuDT/wX61K2E3aED1XnlJsBSJrXMP/2wfQCskeSNjCJ9iTqx5VaayhuTe7
Bl2T9aXXMXlfrVq2JtQDqr4S09wd72aveYxzPT/P8giEQcrRDp1lo9ZG7PizOyps
ROAkiG0VH+zwLqYC1eQMm65Hg7KpHJVluPtmBziXhedtJOelX592vUJBxmezPaxh
hPGO21gkVbPhgcBXNn37+CbdvJeROWPlt59WX17e/mU7EG0Lup/3xMNTVax/ezg=
=E2Iv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Ruwan Linton]

+1

Ruwan


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Milinda Pathirage <
milinda.pathir...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> > [1].
> > > >
> > > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > > >
> > > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > > >
> > > > [X] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > >
> > > +1: (binding)
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Lahiru Sandaruwan
> > Software Engineer,
> > Platform Technologies,
> > WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
> > lean.enterprise.middleware
> >
> > email: lahi...@wso2.com cell: (+94) 773 325 954
> > blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus
> > linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Milinda Pathirage
> PhD Student Indiana University, Bloomington;
> E-mail: milinda.pathir...@gmail.com
> Web: http://mpathirage.com
> Blog: http://blog.mpathirage.com
>



-- 
Ruwan Linton
Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
Director of Engineering; http://adroitlogic.org

phone: +94 11 251 6899
email: ru...@adroitlogic.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097
blog: http://blog.ruwan.org
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ruwanlinton
google: http://www.google.com/profiles/ruwan.linton
tweet: http://twitter.com/ruwanlinton

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Greg Stein]

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Marvin Humphrey
 wrote:
>...
> It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
> someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
> Stratos, but to ensure that my positive assessment is communicated
> unequivocally to one and all in the VOTE tally as it was during the PROPOSAL
> thread, I hereby change the value of my vote from -0 to +0.9.

I never worried about the "vote impact", and your change was not requested.

My concern was that your pedantism caused two *highly* qualified (and
IMO, unimpeachable) people to issue a mea culpa in response to your
email. That was unjustified, and highly unnecessary when looking at
the actual edit that was performed.

Sure, I could also say "Ross/Sanjiva: grow a pair. Don't apologize."
But I like those guys, so I never said that ;-)

I dislike that the atmosphere puts them into a position where they
feel a need to apologize. Personally speaking, it feels uncooperative
and rules-based rather than "what can we do, to get our goals
accomplished?"

It felt like the *goal* was lost, in favor of "oh, boo hoo, a small
[favorable] edit was made".

IMO, the proper response would be "+1, great proposal. (as an aside,
all: please do not edit once voting is underway)". ... And step back
and consider the other end of the spectrum: say the proposal was
edited several times during the voting process. The IPMC is
highly-qualified to say "meh. nothing substantive. let's run with it."
... or they could "holy crap. everything changed. we need to run
another vote."

I stand behind Sanjiva and what he/WSO2 are doing. I don't like seeing
him put into a position where he does the Right Thing, then feels a
need to apologize for it. I'd like to see us move past that.

-g

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[David Crossley]

Good on you. Keep it up.

-David

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Samisa Abeysinghe]

+1 (non-binding)


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Milinda Pathirage <
milinda.pathir...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> Milinda
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> > [1].
> > > >
> > > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > > >
> > > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > > >
> > > > [X] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > >
> > > +1: (binding)
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Lahiru Sandaruwan
> > Software Engineer,
> > Platform Technologies,
> > WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
> > lean.enterprise.middleware
> >
> > email: lahi...@wso2.com cell: (+94) 773 325 954
> > blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus
> > linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Milinda Pathirage
> PhD Student Indiana University, Bloomington;
> E-mail: milinda.pathir...@gmail.com
> Web: http://mpathirage.com
> Blog: http://blog.mpathirage.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Greg Stein  wrote:
> Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
> when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
> benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
> generosity around the trademarks that it has worked to build.
>
> There should not be a need to apologize for Doing The Right Thing.
>
> I find it Wrong that others should make you feel like you've done
> something wrong. Grrr.
>
> Great first steps for Marvin before the Board votes him to be the new
> IPMC Chair. :-(

The Incubator has started to acquire a habit of altering proposals while VOTEs
are underway.  In my opinion, the principle that we VOTE on frozen proposals
with fixed language is worth an occasional protest vote.

Arguably, personnel VOTE threads which duplicate the +1s expressed in a
preceding DISCUSSION thread are wasteful, since the only meaningful action is
a subsequent Board ACK in response to a VP request.  Podling graduation votes
are similar in that they gauge consensus and yield a recommendation but the
only meaningful action is a subsequent Board resolution.  Podling *proposal*
votes, however, are different because they do not trigger an escalation to the
Board, but instead set a long chain of events in action supervised by the
Incubator alone.

The Incubator has previously experienced significant problems when
controversies have arisen over the legitimacy of podling proposals which were
not thoroughly vetted.  The IPMC can take weeks and hundreds of emails to hash
out the meaning of a disputed proposal.  I don't know about anybody else, but
I've started spending a little more time on proposal review in the hopes of
avoiding another such fiasco.

That said, I may have miscalibrated the numeric value of my protest vote.  I
deliberately did *not* vote -1 or request that the VOTE be cancelled because
that would have been stupid overkill.  My goal was to reach the membership of
the IPMC with a gentle reminder (the third this month) that ostensibly, we
VOTE on "final" proposals[1] rather than moving targets.  Reaching Sanjiva was
unintended; the error was neglecting to mark the wiki page as "final" before
the VOTE was kicked off -- not the subsequent edit.

It's inconceivable to me that this will have an ounce of impact on either
someone of Sanjiva's accomplishments or a future podling with the momentum of
Stratos, but to ensure that my positive assessment is communicated
unequivocally to one and all in the VOTE tally as it was during the PROPOSAL
thread, I hereby change the value of my vote from -0 to +0.9.

I suppose it remains to be seen whether this remedy will suffice to reassure
any Board members whose faith may have been shaken by this incident, though.

Marvin Humphrey

[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#vote

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Milinda Pathirage]

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks
Milinda


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> [1].
> > >
> > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > >
> > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > >
> > > [X] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >
> > +1: (binding)
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> Lahiru Sandaruwan
> Software Engineer,
> Platform Technologies,
> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> email: lahi...@wso2.com cell: (+94) 773 325 954
> blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/
> twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus
> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146
>



-- 
Milinda Pathirage
PhD Student Indiana University, Bloomington;
E-mail: milinda.pathir...@gmail.com
Web: http://mpathirage.com
Blog: http://blog.mpathirage.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Lahiru Sandaruwan]

+1 (non-binding)


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler 
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [X] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>
> +1: (binding)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
--
Lahiru Sandaruwan
Software Engineer,
Platform Technologies,
WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware

email: lahi...@wso2.com cell: (+94) 773 325 954
blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/lahirus
linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Jim Jagielski]

On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> 
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> 
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> 
> [X] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project

+1: (binding)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Olivier Lamy]

+1 (binding)

2013/6/15 Ross Gardler :
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Isuru Haththotuwa]

+1 (non-binding)


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Greg Stein  wrote:

> Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
> when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
> benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
> generosity around the trademarks that it has worked to build.
>
> There should not be a need to apologize for Doing The Right Thing.
>
> I find it Wrong that others should make you feel like you've done
> something wrong. Grrr.
>
> Great first steps for Marvin before the Board votes him to be the new
> IPMC Chair. :-(
>
> -g
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana 
> wrote:
> > Marvin my apologies - I didn't get a chance to do it immediately and then
> > because I don't have edit rights currently I asked Azeez to edit that
> > sentence in but that was a few days later ..
> >
> > As Ross said that's what I sent via email before and in any case its a
> > positive thing for the proposal.
> >
> > However, I understand the principle violation and accept your -0 vote.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey <
> mar...@rectangular.com>wrote:
> >
> >> -0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the
> VOTE
> >> started.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47
> >>
> >> Marvin Humphrey
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
> >>  wrote:
> >> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> [1].
> >> >
> >> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> >> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> >> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> >> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> >> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >> >
> >> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >> > [ ] +0
> >> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> >> > because... (provide reason)
> >> >
> >> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> >> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for your votes.
> >> > Ross
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >> >
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
> > email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880| +1
> > 650 265 8311
> > blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
> >
> > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Thanks and Regards,

Isuru H.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Greg Stein]

Please don't apologize for a change that is proper and Right. In fact,
when you look at the *actual* change, it is awesome. It is a clear
benefit for the podling and project, and a demonstration of WSO2's
generosity around the trademarks that it has worked to build.

There should not be a need to apologize for Doing The Right Thing.

I find it Wrong that others should make you feel like you've done
something wrong. Grrr.

Great first steps for Marvin before the Board votes him to be the new
IPMC Chair. :-(

-g


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana  wrote:
> Marvin my apologies - I didn't get a chance to do it immediately and then
> because I don't have edit rights currently I asked Azeez to edit that
> sentence in but that was a few days later ..
>
> As Ross said that's what I sent via email before and in any case its a
> positive thing for the proposal.
>
> However, I understand the principle violation and accept your -0 vote.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey 
> wrote:
>
>> -0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the VOTE
>> started.
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47
>>
>> Marvin Humphrey
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
>>  wrote:
>> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>> >
>> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
>> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
>> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
>> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
>> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>> >
>> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>> > because... (provide reason)
>> >
>> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
>> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>> >
>> > Thank you for your votes.
>> > Ross
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
> email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1
> 650 265 8311
> blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Greg Stein]

Not "your bad". An obvious change based on discussion.

IMO, I say "Marvin is being overly pedantic."

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Ross Gardler
 wrote:
> Marvin,
>
> That change was agreed in the discuss thread. I failed to look to see if it
> had been made before I called the vote. My bad.
>
> Ross
>
> Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
> On 15 Jun 2013 19:56, "Marvin Humphrey"  wrote:
>
>> -0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the VOTE
>> started.
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47
>>
>> Marvin Humphrey
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
>>  wrote:
>> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>> >
>> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
>> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
>> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
>> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
>> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>> >
>> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>> > because... (provide reason)
>> >
>> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
>> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>> >
>> > Thank you for your votes.
>> > Ross
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Sanjiva Weerawarana]

Marvin my apologies - I didn't get a chance to do it immediately and then
because I don't have edit rights currently I asked Azeez to edit that
sentence in but that was a few days later ..

As Ross said that's what I sent via email before and in any case its a
positive thing for the proposal.

However, I understand the principle violation and accept your -0 vote.

Cheers,

Sanjiva.


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

> -0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the VOTE
> started.
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
>  wrote:
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1
650 265 8311
blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Ross Gardler]

Marvin,

That change was agreed in the discuss thread. I failed to look to see if it
had been made before I called the vote. My bad.

Ross

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 15 Jun 2013 19:56, "Marvin Humphrey"  wrote:

> -0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the VOTE
> started.
>
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
>  wrote:
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Marvin Humphrey]

-0, because the proposal was not frozen and has been edited since the VOTE
started.

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47

Marvin Humphrey

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler
 wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Mattmann, Chris A (398J)]

+1 binding.

Cheers,
Chris

++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++






-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler 
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" 
Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 2:49 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" 
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

>I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
>I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
>the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
>policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
>separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
>incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
>This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
>[ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>[ ] +0
>[ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
>because... (provide reason)
>
>It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
>well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
>Thank you for your votes.
>Ross
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Lahiru Gunathilake]

+1 (non-binding)

Regards
Lahiru


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Alan Cabrera]

+1 binding


Regards,
Alan

On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> 
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> 
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
> 
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> 
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Chip Childers]

+1

On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Thilina Gunarathne]

+1 (non-binding)

thanks,
Thilina


On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -Sebastien
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
> nandana@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler 
> wrote:
> >> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >>
> >> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> >> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> >> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> >> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> >> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >>
> >> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Nandana
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
https://www.cs.indiana.edu/~tgunarat/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/thilina
http://thilina.gunarathne.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Sebastien Goasguen]

+1 (non-binding)

-Sebastien

On Jun 15, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya  
wrote:

> On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler  wrote:
>> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>> 
>> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
>> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
>> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
>> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
>> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>> 
>> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Best Regards,
> Nandana
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Nandana Mihindukulasooriya


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Nandana Mihindukulasooriya]

On Friday, June 14, 2013, Ross Gardler  wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.

+1 (binding)

Best Regards,
Nandana

-- 
Best Regards,
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Ate Douma]

On Jun 14, 2013 11:50 PM, "Ross Gardler"  wrote:
>
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>

+1 (binding)

Ate

> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Lakmal Warusawithana]

+1 (non-binding)

thanks

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Paul Fremantle  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Indika Kumara  >wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > ~ Indika
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> [1].
> > >
> > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > >
> > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > because... (provide reason)
> > >
> > > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your votes.
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> p...@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>



-- 
Lakmal Warusawithana
Software Architect; WSO2 Inc.
Mobile : +94714289692

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Paul Fremantle]

+1 (binding)

Paul


On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Indika Kumara wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> ~ Indika
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ross Gardler  >wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
p...@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Indika Kumara]

+1 (non-binding)

~ Indika


On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Sanjiva Weerawarana]

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>

+1 (non-binding).

Sanjiva.
-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1
650 265 8311
blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Suresh Marru]

+ 1 (binding)

Suresh

On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler  wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> 
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> 
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
> 
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> 
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Tim Williams]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler
 wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)

+1 (check-my-binding-status-and-dont-rely-on-the-"caller-asserts"-model)

Thanks,
--tim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[David Nalley]

On Jun 14, 2013 5:50 PM, "Ross Gardler"  wrote:
>
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

+1 (binding)

--David

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Isuru Perera]

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks!


On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Amila Jayasekara
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks
> AmilaJ
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Nirmal Fernando  >wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Afkham Azeez  wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Azeez
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler <
> > rgard...@opendirective.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> > [1].
> > > >
> > > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > > >
> > > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > > because... (provide reason)
> > > >
> > > > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > > > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your votes.
> > > > Ross
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Afkham Azeez*
> > > Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
> > > *Member; Apache Software Foundation;
> > > **http://www.apache.org/*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *email: **az...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 77 3320919
> > > blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* *
> > > twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<
> > > http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
> > > *
> > > linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
> > > *
> > > *
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Nirmal
> >
> > C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando
> > Senior Software Engineer,
> > WSO2 Inc.
> >
> > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
> >
>



-- 
Isuru Perera
Senior Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. | http://wso2.com/
Lean . Enterprise . Middleware

Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrishantha | LinkedIn:
http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chrishantha/

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Amila Jayasekara]

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks
AmilaJ


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Afkham Azeez  wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Azeez
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal
> [1].
> > >
> > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> > >
> > > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > > because... (provide reason)
> > >
> > > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your votes.
> > > Ross
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Afkham Azeez*
> > Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
> > *Member; Apache Software Foundation;
> > **http://www.apache.org/*
> > *
> > *
> > *email: **az...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 77 3320919
> > blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* *
> > twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<
> > http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
> > *
> > linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
> > *
> > *
> > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
> > *
> > *
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Nirmal
>
> C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2 Inc.
>
> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Nirmal Fernando]

+1 (non-binding)


On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Afkham Azeez  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Azeez
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler  >wrote:
>
> > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> >
> > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> > policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> > separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> > incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> >
> > This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> > because... (provide reason)
> >
> > It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> > well into next week to allow for the weekend.
> >
> > Thank you for your votes.
> > Ross
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Afkham Azeez*
> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
> *Member; Apache Software Foundation;
> **http://www.apache.org/*
> *
> *
> *email: **az...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 77 3320919
> blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* *
> twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<
> http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
> *
> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
> *
> *
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
> *
> *
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Nirmal

C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2 Inc.

Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Afkham Azeez]

+1 (binding)

Azeez

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
*Member; Apache Software Foundation;
**http://www.apache.org/*
*
*
*email: **az...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 77 3320919
blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* *
twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
*
linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
*
*
*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
*
*

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Deepal jayasinghe]

+1.

Deepal
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Henry Saputra]

+1 binding.

Good luck guys!

- Henry


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:

> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
>
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well into next week to allow for the weekend.
>
> Thank you for your votes.
> Ross
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Joe Brockmeier]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 04:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
> 
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
> separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
> incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.
> 
> This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)

+1 (binding)

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

[Ross Gardler]

I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].

I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
separate issue that will be explored during the first month of
incubation, potentially resulting in a further IPMC vote.

This vote is *only* for accepting the Stratos project as a podling.

[ ] +1 Accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
because... (provide reason)

It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
well into next week to allow for the weekend.

Thank you for your votes.
Ross

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org