[CLOSED][VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
I'm open new vote with RC7. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
Added also bloom filter license in described Hadoop LICENSE file. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt Is this now complete, Franklin? On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues related with packaging web resources e.g., https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I mentioned earlier. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that you should look at. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t yp es On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt file contains the Apache license v2.0. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it again? Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to include its license. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not tested enough yet. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 license. If we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the overnext year. What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource s/ fi les/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx t LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t xt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that you should look at. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-typ es On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt file contains the Apache license v2.0. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it again? Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to include its license. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not tested enough yet. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 license. If we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the overnext year. What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/ fi les/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues related with packaging web resources e.g., https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I mentioned earlier. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that you should look at. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t yp es On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt file contains the Apache license v2.0. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it again? Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to include its license. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not tested enough yet. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 license. If we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the overnext year. What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource s/ fi les/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx t LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t xt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
I added W3C® SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE text additionally. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt Is this fix the LICENSE problem? If so, I'll re-create new one with this. Thanks. On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues related with packaging web resources e.g., https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494 If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. As I understand it the only requirement is that you have a source release; which your combined one does. As I said it isn't optimal. The blocker as I see it is that the LICENSE file is incomplete as I mentioned earlier. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that you should look at. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-t yp es On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt file contains the Apache license v2.0. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it again? Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to include its license. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not tested enough yet. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 license. If we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the overnext year. What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resource s/ fi les/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.tx t LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.t xt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
Vote please. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: This RC6 has passed, with three +1 votes from Hama PPMC members. And now we're waiting your votes. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Chia-Hung Lin cli...@googlemail.com wrote: +1 `mvn apache-rat:check` build success testing on 4 vms works md5sum passes the check sha1sum passes the check On 21 February 2012 18:06, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Signatures: - GPG signatures matches (asc) - md5 sums ok - sha1 sums ok Build: build is fine with maven, testcases pass (tar and zip) Examples: Tested all examples on local/pseudodistributed and distributed mode Whirr: started 3 EC2 instances with whirr and ran SSSP. The textToSeq utils also work as expected. Rat check also reveals that everything is ok. Sorry for the massive votes... Come on and vote :) +1 (binding). 2012/2/20 Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
-1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/fi les/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt file contains the Apache license v2.0. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it again? And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not tested enough yet. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 license. If we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the overnext year. What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from trunk to 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted below. On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/fi les/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? Also, you can stage your artifacts at http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public html folder, but this is not required. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses which I don't see in your LICENSE file. Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
This RC6 has passed, with three +1 votes from Hama PPMC members. And now we're waiting your votes. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Chia-Hung Lin cli...@googlemail.com wrote: +1 `mvn apache-rat:check` build success testing on 4 vms works md5sum passes the check sha1sum passes the check On 21 February 2012 18:06, Thomas Jungblut thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com wrote: Signatures: - GPG signatures matches (asc) - md5 sums ok - sha1 sums ok Build: build is fine with maven, testcases pass (tar and zip) Examples: Tested all examples on local/pseudodistributed and distributed mode Whirr: started 3 EC2 instances with whirr and ran SSSP. The textToSeq utils also work as expected. Rat check also reveals that everything is ok. Sorry for the massive votes... Come on and vote :) +1 (binding). 2012/2/20 Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin thomas.jungb...@gmail.com -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
On 20 February 2012 13:54, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ There are no hashes (MD5 or SHA1). AIUI these are required. No need to respin the release, but please create the hashes. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6
Thanks. I've created hash files. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:44 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 February 2012 13:54, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. Signing KEYS: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ There are no hashes (MD5 or SHA1). AIUI these are required. No need to respin the release, but please create the hashes. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ NOTICE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt LICENSE.txt: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ You can run the mvn apache-rat:check command to check for license headers. I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! I hope this will be a final, and +1. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
