Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and licenses. +1 from me. Paul On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes, including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The proposal can be seen at [1]. The six +1 votes were from: Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) Arthur Ryman Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) Oshani Seneviratne Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) John Kaputin We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ Thanks, John Kaputin -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
+1, indeed Deepal > I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and > licenses. > > +1 from me. > > Paul > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to >> release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 >> votes, >> including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The >> proposal can be seen at [1]. >> >> The six +1 votes were from: >> Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) >> Arthur Ryman >> Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) >> Oshani Seneviratne >> Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) >> John Kaputin >> >> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to >> publish >> the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. >> >> Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. >> >> [1] Proposal, >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL >> PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> [2] Download, >> http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ >> >> >> Thanks, >> John Kaputin >> >> > > -- Thanks, Deepal ~Future is Open~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
+1 (non binding) On 9/27/06, Deepal jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1, indeed Deepal > I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and > licenses. > > +1 from me. > > Paul > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to >> release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 >> votes, >> including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The >> proposal can be seen at [1]. >> >> The six +1 votes were from: >> Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) >> Arthur Ryman >> Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) >> Oshani Seneviratne >> Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) >> John Kaputin >> >> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to >> publish >> the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. >> >> Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. >> >> [1] Proposal, >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> [2] Download, >> http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ >> >> >> Thanks, >> John Kaputin >> >> > > -- Thanks, Deepal ~Future is Open~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
+1 from me (Binding) -- dims On 9/27/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and licenses. +1 from me. Paul On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes, > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > The six +1 votes were from: > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > Arthur Ryman > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > Oshani Seneviratne > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > John Kaputin > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. > > [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ > > > Thanks, > John Kaputin > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
On 9/26/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ Umm, maybe it's just me, but the fact that it's already in the dist directory implies that you're already distributing it. Or was that done sometime between this message showing up and me waking up and reading it? In all the releases I've ever been a part of you stick the files in someone's home directory on people, or some other place where it won't be mirrored, then vote, then move it into dist. -garrett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
In addition, I think the current policy is to not put incubating artifacts in official repositories ... Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 9/26/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to >> publish >> the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. >> >> Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. >> >> [1] Proposal, >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL >> PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> [2] Download, >> http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ > > Umm, maybe it's just me, but the fact that it's already in the dist > directory implies that you're already distributing it. Or was that > done sometime between this message showing up and me waking up and > reading it? > > In all the releases I've ever been a part of you stick the files in > someone's home directory on people, or some other place where it won't > be mirrored, then vote, then move it into dist. > > -garrett > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
Thanks for the advice Garrett and Guillaume. I read the policy stuff on incubator releases in [1] and [2] but didn't see anything about using private directories and not using official repositories. The way we have done the previous milestone releases is to upload the archives to this location, get the Woden and Incubator PMC votes passed, then publish a link to the location on the Downloads page of the Woden website. We can use a private repository next time during the voting phase, but I assume it's OK once the vote has passed to put milestone releases in /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/. If not, I'd like to be able to tell that it from [1] or [2]. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html regards, John Kaputin. On 9/27/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In addition, I think the current policy is to not put incubating artifacts in official repositories ... Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 9/26/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to >> publish >> the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. >> >> Please vote by 1pm EST, Friday September 29th 2006. >> >> [1] Proposal, >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> [2] Download, >> http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ > > Umm, maybe it's just me, but the fact that it's already in the dist > directory implies that you're already distributing it. Or was that > done sometime between this message showing up and me waking up and > reading it? > > In all the releases I've ever been a part of you stick the files in > someone's home directory on people, or some other place where it won't > be mirrored, then vote, then move it into dist. > > -garrett > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the advice Garrett and Guillaume. I read the policy stuff on incubator releases in [1] and [2] but didn't see anything about using private directories and not using official repositories. We can use a private repository next time during the voting phase, but I assume it's OK once the vote has passed to put milestone releases in /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/. If not, I'd like to be able to tell that it from [1] or [2]. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases [2] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html the last document is very much just an initial draft. there's still a ton of work to do on it and a lot of stuff's missing. i'll add something about this to it... - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes, including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The proposal can be seen at [1]. The six +1 votes were from: Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) Arthur Ryman Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) Oshani Seneviratne Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) John Kaputin We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is rerolled. a few notes: this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should definitely include a source distribution. the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you get into the habit now. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
Robert, Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the release later today, based on your comments. regards, John Kaputin., On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes, > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > The six +1 votes were from: > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > Arthur Ryman > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > Oshani Seneviratne > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > John Kaputin > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is rerolled. a few notes: this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should definitely include a source distribution. the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you get into the habit now. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback from the Incubator PMC. The jar files now have LICENSE and NOTICE files in their meta-inf directories. The release now includes a source code distribution as well as a binary distribution. The archive files names now begin with apache-woden-incubating-1.0.0M6* The archives now unpack to the top-level directory name woden-incubating-1.0.0M6 The files for this release are now located in a private directory at [3] and the previous M6 release files have been removed from /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. Please vote by 5pm EST, Wednesday October 4th 2006. [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ [3] Release files are in directory /home/jkaputin/wodenM6 at people.apache.org Thanks, John Kaputin On 9/29/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert, Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the release later today, based on your comments. regards, John Kaputin., On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to > > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 > votes, > > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The > > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > > > The six +1 votes were from: > > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > > Arthur Ryman > > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > > Oshani Seneviratne > > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > > John Kaputin > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > publish > > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE > files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are > distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden > plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to > have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is > rerolled. > > a few notes: > > this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should > definitely include a source distribution. > > the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command > is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the > release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. > > apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for > example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how > strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you > get into the habit now. > > - robert > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
I have not yet had any response to the second VOTE request after I re-rolled the Woden M6 release files. This is becoming urgent as the M6 release is required for upcoming the Axis2 1.1 release, so this is a gentle reminder for any Incubator PMC members from Apache WS. There were two binding +1 votes from the first VOTE request. Are these still valid for the re-rolled release candidate or do I need to start again and get three +1 binding votes for the re-rolled release. regards, John Kaputin. On 10/3/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback from the Incubator PMC. The jar files now have LICENSE and NOTICE files in their meta-inf directories. The release now includes a source code distribution as well as a binary distribution. The archive files names now begin with apache-woden-incubating-1.0.0M6* The archives now unpack to the top-level directory name woden-incubating-1.0.0M6 The files for this release are now located in a private directory at [3] and the previous M6 release files have been removed from /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. Please vote by 5pm EST, Wednesday October 4th 2006. [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ [3] Release files are in directory /home/jkaputin/wodenM6 at people.apache.org Thanks, John Kaputin On 9/29/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Robert, > Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the > release later today, based on your comments. > > regards, > John Kaputin., > > On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal > > to > > > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 > > votes, > > > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. > > The > > > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > > > > > The six +1 votes were from: > > > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > > > Arthur Ryman > > > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > > > Oshani Seneviratne > > > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > > > John Kaputin > > > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > publish > > > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > > > woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE > > files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are > > distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden > > plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to > > have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is > > rerolled. > > > > a few notes: > > > > this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should > > definitely include a source distribution. > > > > the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command > > is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the > > release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. > > > > apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for > > example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how > > strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you > > get into the habit now. > > > > - robert > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
Sorry guys .. +1 from me. Sanjiva. On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:52 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote: > I have not yet had any response to the second VOTE request after I re-rolled > the Woden M6 release files. This is becoming urgent as the M6 release is > required for upcoming the Axis2 1.1 release, so this is a gentle reminder > for any Incubator PMC members from Apache WS. > > There were two binding +1 votes from the first VOTE request. Are these > still valid for the re-rolled release candidate or do I need to start again > and get three +1 binding votes for the re-rolled release. > > regards, > John Kaputin. > > On 10/3/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback > > from the Incubator PMC. > > > > The jar files now have LICENSE and NOTICE files in their meta-inf > > directories. > > The release now includes a source code distribution as well as a binary > > distribution. > > The archive files names now begin with apache-woden-incubating-1.0.0M6* > > The archives now unpack to the top-level directory name > > woden-incubating-1.0.0M6 > > The files for this release are now located in a private directory at [3] > > and the previous M6 release files have been removed from > > /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden. > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. > > > > Please vote by 5pm EST, Wednesday October 4th 2006. > > > > [1] Proposal, > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL > > PROTECTED] > > > > > > [2] Download, > > http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ > > > > > > [3] Release files are in directory /home/jkaputin/wodenM6 at > > people.apache.org > > > > > > Thanks, > > John Kaputin > > > > > > On 9/29/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > Robert, > > > Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the > > > release later today, based on your comments. > > > > > > regards, > > > John Kaputin., > > > > > > On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal > > > > to > > > > > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 > > > > votes, > > > > > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. > > > > The > > > > > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > > > > > > > > > The six +1 votes were from: > > > > > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > > > > > Arthur Ryman > > > > > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > > > > > Oshani Seneviratne > > > > > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > > > > > John Kaputin > > > > > > > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > > > publish > > > > > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > > > > > > > woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE > > > > files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are > > > > distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden > > > > plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to > > > > have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is > > > > rerolled. > > > > > > > > a few notes: > > > > > > > > this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should > > > > definitely include a source distribution. > > > > > > > > the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command > > > > is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the > > > > release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. > > > > > > > > apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for > > > > example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how > > > > strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you > > > > get into the habit now. > > > > > > > > - robert > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
Thanks Sanjiva. Paul and Dims, are you still +1 on the re-rolled release? regards, John Kaputin On 10/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry guys .. +1 from me. Sanjiva. On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:52 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote: > I have not yet had any response to the second VOTE request after I re-rolled > the Woden M6 release files. This is becoming urgent as the M6 release is > required for upcoming the Axis2 1.1 release, so this is a gentle reminder > for any Incubator PMC members from Apache WS. > > There were two binding +1 votes from the first VOTE request. Are these > still valid for the re-rolled release candidate or do I need to start again > and get three +1 binding votes for the re-rolled release. > > regards, > John Kaputin. > > On 10/3/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback > > from the Incubator PMC. > > > > The jar files now have LICENSE and NOTICE files in their meta-inf > > directories. > > The release now includes a source code distribution as well as a binary > > distribution. > > The archive files names now begin with apache-woden-incubating-1.0.0M6* > > The archives now unpack to the top-level directory name > > woden-incubating-1.0.0M6 > > The files for this release are now located in a private directory at [3] > > and the previous M6 release files have been removed from > > /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden. > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. > > > > Please vote by 5pm EST, Wednesday October 4th 2006. > > > > [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ > > > > > > [3] Release files are in directory /home/jkaputin/wodenM6 at > > people.apache.org > > > > > > Thanks, > > John Kaputin > > > > > > On 9/29/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > Robert, > > > Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the > > > release later today, based on your comments. > > > > > > regards, > > > John Kaputin., > > > > > > On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal > > > > to > > > > > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 > > > > votes, > > > > > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. > > > > The > > > > > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > > > > > > > > > The six +1 votes were from: > > > > > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > > > > > Arthur Ryman > > > > > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > > > > > Oshani Seneviratne > > > > > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > > > > > John Kaputin > > > > > > > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > > > publish > > > > > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > > > > > > > woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE > > > > files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are > > > > distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden > > > > plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to > > > > have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is > > > > rerolled. > > > > > > > > a few notes: > > > > > > > > this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should > > > > definitely include a source distribution. > > > > > > > > the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command > > > > is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the > > > > release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. > > > > > > > > apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for > > > > example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how > > > > strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you > > > > get into the habit now. > > > > > > > > - robert > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
Yes, +1 from me. -- dims On 10/4/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Sanjiva. Paul and Dims, are you still +1 on the re-rolled release? regards, John Kaputin On 10/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Sorry guys .. +1 from me. > > Sanjiva. > > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:52 +0100, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote: > > I have not yet had any response to the second VOTE request after I re-rolled > > the Woden M6 release files. This is becoming urgent as the M6 release is > > required for upcoming the Axis2 1.1 release, so this is a gentle reminder > > for any Incubator PMC members from Apache WS. > > > > There were two binding +1 votes from the first VOTE request. Are these > > still valid for the re-rolled release candidate or do I need to start again > > and get three +1 binding votes for the re-rolled release. > > > > regards, > > John Kaputin. > > > > On 10/3/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback > > > from the Incubator PMC. > > > > > > The jar files now have LICENSE and NOTICE files in their meta-inf > > > directories. > > > The release now includes a source code distribution as well as a binary > > > distribution. > > > The archive files names now begin with apache-woden-incubating-1.0.0M6* > > > The archives now unpack to the top-level directory name > > > woden-incubating-1.0.0M6 > > > The files for this release are now located in a private directory at [3] > > > and the previous M6 release files have been removed from > > > /www/people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden. > > > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > > publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > > Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. > > > > > > Please vote by 5pm EST, Wednesday October 4th 2006. > > > > > > [1] Proposal, http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-woden-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > [2] Download, http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0.0M6-incubating/ > > > > > > > > > [3] Release files are in directory /home/jkaputin/wodenM6 at > > > people.apache.org > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > John Kaputin > > > > > > > > > On 9/29/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > Robert, > > > > Sorry for the delayed response - hardware problem. I'll rework the > > > > release later today, based on your comments. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > John Kaputin., > > > > > > > > On 9/27/06, robert burrell donkin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal > > > > > to > > > > > > release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 > > > > > votes, > > > > > > including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. > > > > > The > > > > > > proposal can be seen at [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > The six +1 votes were from: > > > > > > Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC) > > > > > > Arthur Ryman > > > > > > Jeremy Hughes (WS PMC) > > > > > > Oshani Seneviratne > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas (WS PMC) > > > > > > John Kaputin > > > > > > > > > > > > We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to > > > > > publish > > > > > > the Woden M6 archives on the Woden Download page at [2]. > > > > > > > > > > woden.jar, woden-api.jar and woden-ant.jar lack LICENSE and NOTICE > > > > > files in their META-INF directories. all release artifacts that are > > > > > distributed from apache must have LICENSE and NOTICE files. if woden > > > > > plays to issue these jars through the maven repository they need to > > > > > have these files included. i strongly suggest that this release is > > > > > rerolled. > > > > > > > > > > a few notes: > > > > > > > > > > this appears to be a binary only release. open source releases should > > > > > definitely include a source distribution. > > > > > > > > > > the tar.gz unpacks directly into the directory into which the command > > > > > is run. it's better to unpack into a subdirectory named after the > > > > > release type for example woden-incubating-1.0.0M6. > > > > > > > > > > apache releases should include the apache name in the artifact for > > > > > example apache-woden-1.0.0.tar.gz. there is some discussion about how > > > > > strongly applies to incubating releases but i would recommend that you > > > > > get into the habit now. > > > > > > > > > > - robert > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands,
Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden Milestone 6 release
On 10/3/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have re-rolled the Woden 1.0.0 Milestone 6 release based on the feedback from the Incubator PMC. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the Woden M6 release files on the Woden Download page at [2]. Pending this permission, the release files are stored at [3]. +1 notes: hosting the release candidate on your apache web space (http://people.apache.org/~jkaputin) is best the LICENSE and NOTICE files are in the jars but are in meta-inf not META-INF - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
