Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Don't let me stop the vote but I'm getting java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space when I run the tests, mvn clean install. My MAVEN_OPTS is: -Xms2G -Xmx2G -XX:PermSize=1G -XX:MaxPermSize=1G Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Alan On May 7, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > Hi all, > > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki > 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. > > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the > developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding > votes (from jspwiki developers). > > I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release > candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira Issue > Tracker [#2]. > > Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the > vote. > > thanks in advance, > juan pablo > > > [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD > [#2] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 > === > > Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed > artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. > > The tag to be voted upon: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 > > Source and binary files, with RAT report: > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ > > Checksums: > > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip > MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d > SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b > SHA512: > 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 > > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip > MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 > SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c > SHA512: > 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0 > > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Looks good. +1 Craig On May 13, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > Hi all, > > the current tally, right now, is: > > +1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC) > +1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor) > +5 non binding from PPMC > > (all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding > vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take > a look at it. > > thx in advance! > > > br, > juan pablo > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < > juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ant, >> >> thanks for the vote :-) >> >> Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 >> entries, being the reasons behind each one: >> - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in >> NOTICE >> >> - "Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation." entry: legal's >> advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE >> >> - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 >> License, which in section 4.b states "If you distribute, publicly display, >> publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative >> Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...]" >> >> - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed >> in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative >> work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL "You may add Your own >> attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside >> or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such >> additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the >> License." >> >> Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are >> there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a >> handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in >> NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific >> dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects >> using it) >> >> Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. >> It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to >> start graduation discuss soon thereafter. >> >> @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at >> jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote >> >> >> br, >> juan pablo >> >> [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs >> [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps >> [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution >> [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index >> >> >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >>> Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. >>> >>> I give it a +1. >>> >>> There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation >>> DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the >>> source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these >>> missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, >>> or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next >>> time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't >>> needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. >>> Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think >>> that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the >>> next release. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez >>> wrote: Hi all, We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on >>> the developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 >>> non-binding votes (from jspwiki developers). I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira >>> Issue Tracker [#2]. Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on >>> the vote. thanks in advance, juan pablo [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD [#2] >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 === Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. The tag to be voted upon: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 Source and binary files, with RAT report: http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ Checksums: JSPWiki-2.9.1-inc
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Hi all, the current tally, right now, is: +1 binding from Ant Elder (IPMC) +1 binding from Siegfried Goeschl (Mentor) +5 non binding from PPMC (all votes casted on jspwiki-dev@i.a.o) We still need one more +1 binding vote to be able to release, so we'd be most grateful if someone could take a look at it. thx in advance! br, juan pablo On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ant, > > thanks for the vote :-) > > Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 > entries, being the reasons behind each one: > - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in > NOTICE > > - "Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation." entry: legal's > advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE > > - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 > License, which in section 4.b states "If you distribute, publicly display, > publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative > Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...]" > > - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed > in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative > work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL "You may add Your own > attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside > or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such > additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the > License." > > Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are > there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a > handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in > NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific > dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects > using it) > > Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. > It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to > start graduation discuss soon thereafter. > > @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at > jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote > > > br, > juan pablo > > [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs > [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution > [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. >> >> I give it a +1. >> >> There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation >> DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the >> source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these >> missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, >> or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next >> time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't >> needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. >> Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think >> that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the >> next release. >> >>...ant >> >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki >> > 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. >> > >> > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on >> the >> > developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 >> non-binding >> > votes (from jspwiki developers). >> > >> > I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release >> > candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira >> Issue >> > Tracker [#2]. >> > >> > Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on >> the >> > vote. >> > >> > thanks in advance, >> > juan pablo >> > >> > >> > [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD >> > [#2] >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 >> > === >> > >> > Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed >> > artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. >> > >> > The tag to be voted upon: >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 >> > >> > Source and binary files, with RAT report: >> > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ >> > >> > Checksums: >> > >> > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip >> > MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d >> > SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b >> > SHA512: >> > >> 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0e
Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating (2nd RC)
Hi Ant, thanks for the vote :-) Regarding the NOTICE file, specifically which comments? Right now has 4 entries, being the reasons behind each one: - fckconfig.js entry: published under MPL 2.0, so it requires to be in NOTICE - "Portions of this code donated by BaseN Corporation." entry: legal's advice [#1] was to keep this entry in NOTICE - SilkIconSet entry: published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License, which in section 4.b states "If you distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work or any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You must keep intact all copyright notices [...]" - Slimbox: published under MIT license so shouldn't be there, as pointed in [#2]. However, as it's been modified, I thought of it as a derivative work and, it fell under section 4.d of the AL "You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License." Please note that I'm not saying they *should* be there, only why they are there. If there's anything wrong on that file we'll correct it ASAP (btw, a handy way to check if other projects are including specifics entries in NOTICE files for 3rd party libraries is to search for an specific dependency at [#4] and then checking the svn's NOTICE file of the projects using it) Regarding the missing DISCLAIMER, our distribution target didn't catch it. It's already fixed on trunk, although our plan is release 2.9.1 in order to start graduation discuss soon thereafter. @general: aside from Ant's vote, we've got another couple of votes at jspwiki-dev, so the tally right now is 5PPMC +1 votes, 1 +1 IPMC vote br, juan pablo [#1]: http://s.apache.org/7Hs [#2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps [#3]: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution [#4]: https://analysis.apache.org/dependencies/index On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ant elder wrote: > Hi JSPWiki, I'm from the Incubator PMC and looking at your release. > > I give it a +1. > > There are a couple of nits. One is that it looks like the Incubation > DISCLAIMER text is missing from the binary zip. It is there in the > source artifact and tag though and we've let releases go with these > missing before so i don't think this is a blocker, fix it next time, > or better, graduate from the Incubator now so its not needed next > time. The NOTICE file still has some comments that probably aren't > needed there and they could be moved somewhere else like the README. > Again many Incubator releases have similar issues so i don't think > that should be a blocker and i can help you get that updated for the > next release. > >...ant > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev for a 2nd RC of Apache JSPWiki > > 2.9.1-incubating [#1]. > > > > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the > > developer mailing list. After the voting timeframe, we have 3 non-binding > > votes (from jspwiki developers). > > > > I'd therefore like to ask now the general incubator to check our release > > candidate. The release notes (fixed issues) are available at the Jira > Issue > > Tracker [#2]. > > > > Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the > > vote. > > > > thanks in advance, > > juan pablo > > > > > > [#1] http://s.apache.org/UDD > > [#2] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12321249 > > === > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (subversion tag and signed > > artifacts). Binaries are provided for convenience only. > > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_1_incubating_rc2 > > > > Source and binary files, with RAT report: > > http://people.apache.org/~juanpablo/releases/2.9.1-incubating-4-rc2/ > > > > Checksums: > > > > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-bin.zip > > MD5:58b7e2fd9290612762825683e81ca22d > > SHA1: 5eb4cfa7c7b00e2a002573c72f1e83c15f708e2b > > SHA512: > > > 0e1487d09044e0ce900194b42ff3e465ee96ebde1a75c0603715ec42bbf425b950c901bff87bbadf43173d3c91ced170ab0eebe4525706344642e68db069ba18 > > > > JSPWiki-2.9.1-incubating-4-src.zip > > MD5:707b52ce9ca32fe012bcc3b1a79d8f96 > > SHA1: 41619359a04d49a2f5b58b8ba1a5d0c186fbbb1c > > SHA512: > > > 2c4f6e0b9e163d2b3ae60a091993598ed6e315a7f7b4c08a9232cbd0c1eccba4259818e0e9ab8a86350a0109924be21cc0627e8a549bbd52b14ca7b40dcccee0 > > > > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache JSPWiki 2.9.1-incubating > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > > [ ] -1 Do
