mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19
I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32. I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. When I try the LoadModule command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the mod_jk.dll file the server would not start. If I comment out that one LoadModule command the server starts. I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so endings. Is this a change in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different mod_jk.dll file for Win32? -Ellis Teer __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19
on 4/13/01 8:36 PM, "Ellis Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32. > > I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. When I try the LoadModule > command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the mod_jk.dll file > the server would not start. If I comment out that one LoadModule command the > server starts. > > I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so endings. Is this > a > change in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different mod_jk.dll > file for Win32? > > -Ellis Teer This is a recording. You must post user questions to the user list. This is not a user list. This is the general list. The user list you need is the Tomcat user list. The reason is because that is a Tomcat question and you should post to the user list. This message will self destruct in 5 seconds. Beep. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19
Thanks Jon, I monitor this list. Even the entire CVS binaries conversation =). I also heard that recording before when others have incorrectly posted here. Then I do a fool thing like posting to the wrong one. Since I screwed up and posted here I thought I would add something. As an end user, if had to choose, I would much prefer to get each needed .jar and put together an application rather than each application bringing along its own .jars and its dependencies when I already have them. -Ellis Teer On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:56:04 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote: >on 4/13/01 8:36 PM, "Ellis Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32. >> >> I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. When I try the >>LoadModule >> command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the >>mod_jk.dll file >> the server would not start. If I comment out that one LoadModule >>command the >> server starts. >> >> I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so >>endings. Is this >> a >> change in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different >>mod_jk.dll >> file for Win32? >> >> -Ellis Teer > > >This is a recording. You must post user questions to the user list. >This is >not a user list. This is the general list. The user list you need is >the >Tomcat user list. The reason is because that is a Tomcat question >and you >should post to the user list. This message will self destruct in 5 >seconds. >Beep. > > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- e_teer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/14/2001 _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]