Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Yogesh Kanitkar
I am also having similar issue. could any one suggest what do we need to do. 


On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:40:59 -0700, Scott Serr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Mark Creamer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 When I run glxinfo | grep direct, it returns: error: couldn't find RGB GLX
 visual.
 
 
 
 I would try changing
 
Driver  nvidia
 
 to
 
Driver  nv
 
 and run
 
opengl-update xorg-x11
 
 and that way at least you will see if it has anything to do with the
 nvidia driver.
 
 
 
 snip
 
 I'm having alot better luck with nvidia 6111 than the current 6629
 version -- on two systems, my Athlon64 notebook with 440MX Go
 whatever... and a P4 with a Nvidia Quattro 380XL (something) at work.
 6629 won't even drop me to a sain VC after I break out of a doinked X.
 
 I masked:
 
 # more /etc/portage/package.mask
 =media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r1
 =media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.6629-r1
 =media-video/nvidia-settings-1.0.6629
 =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-nvidia-1.0.6629
 =media-video/mjpegtools-1.6.2-r3
 
 
 --
 gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 


-- 
-Yogesh Kanitkar

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Simon Stelling
Hi,
Yogesh Kanitkar wrote:
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module!
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***
(II) UnloadModule: nvidia
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
I am using linux on Amd64 Kernal 2.6.7-gentoo-r11. I might have
relatively new kernal header  installed.
newer nvidia packages have problems with kernel 2.6.9 when you have SMP 
in the kernel. update your kernel and everything will work again :)

I know the exact same settings in xorg.conf was working fine with my
monitor. I think the problem happened after updating nvidia-kernal .
Greetings,
blubb
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Yogesh Kanitkar
I am having trouble updating kernal. the problem is with kernal
configuration. I am a newbee and dont know much about the kernal
configuration especially on Amd64. can some one please share there
kernal config for 2.6.9. I have had many failed attempts. i even tried
to use the old 2.6.7 config and did  make oldconfig . some how i am
not able to build a stable kernel.

thanks for the suggestion  quick reply. 

-yogesh

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:04:39 +0100, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Yogesh Kanitkar wrote:
  (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module!
  (EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***
  (II) UnloadModule: nvidia
  (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
 
 
  I am using linux on Amd64 Kernal 2.6.7-gentoo-r11. I might have
  relatively new kernal header  installed.
 
 newer nvidia packages have problems with kernel 2.6.9 when you have SMP
 in the kernel. update your kernel and everything will work again :)
 
  I know the exact same settings in xorg.conf was working fine with my
  monitor. I think the problem happened after updating nvidia-kernal .
 
 Greetings,
 
 blubb
 
 --
 gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 


-- 
-Yogesh Kanitkar

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Barry . Schwartz
Yogesh Kanitkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am having trouble updating kernal. the problem is with kernal
 configuration. I am a newbee and dont know much about the kernal
 configuration especially on Amd64. can some one please share there
 kernal config for 2.6.9. I have had many failed attempts. i even tried
 to use the old 2.6.7 config and did  make oldconfig . some how i am
 not able to build a stable kernel.

Probably you should be making a 2.6.10 kernel, not 2.6.9.

By a failed attempt, what do you mean?  Trouble compiling the kernel,
or you can compile it but it doesn't work correctly?  If it doesn't
work correctly, can you give more details?



pgpb9UWPQt2yj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Creamer, Mark
Does a kernel upgrade (such as from 2.6.9 to 2.6.10) involve a complete 
recompile, or is there an
easier way that sort-of keeps all existing settings regarding USE flags, 
modules, etc.?

mc

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

Yogesh Kanitkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am having trouble updating kernal. the problem is with kernal
 configuration. I am a newbee and dont know much about the kernal
 configuration especially on Amd64. can some one please share there
 kernal config for 2.6.9. I have had many failed attempts. i even tried
 to use the old 2.6.7 config and did  make oldconfig . some how i am
 not able to build a stable kernel.

Probably you should be making a 2.6.10 kernel, not 2.6.9.

By a failed attempt, what do you mean?  Trouble compiling the kernel,
or you can compile it but it doesn't work correctly?  If it doesn't
work correctly, can you give more details?



This e-mail transmission contains information that is intended to be 
confidential and privileged.  If you receive this e-mail and you are not a 
named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, 
print, retain, copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of 
the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please reply 
to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected.  After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any 
attachments from your computer system.  Your assistance in correcting this 
error is appreciated.  Thank you.  Cintas Corporation.


--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Barry . Schwartz
Creamer, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does a kernel upgrade (such as from 2.6.9 to 2.6.10) involve a complete 
 recompile, or is there an
 easier way that sort-of keeps all existing settings regarding USE flags, 
 modules, etc.?

Copy your /usr/src/linux-whatever/.config file from the old kernel's
sources to the new kernel's sources and run make oldconfig.  This
usually works.  If there are new features it will ask you if you want
them.  It won't ask you about stuff you already selected for the old
kernel.  Compile the new kernel and install it and its modules just
like the old kernel.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.chemoelectric.org
I have directed that in the future I sign each letter. -- Rumsfeld


pgpQDoE0VIEzX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Barry . Schwartz
I wrote:
 Creamer, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Does a kernel upgrade (such as from 2.6.9 to 2.6.10) involve a complete 
  recompile, or is there an
  easier way that sort-of keeps all existing settings regarding USE flags, 
  modules, etc.?
 
 Copy your /usr/src/linux-whatever/.config file from the old kernel's
 sources to the new kernel's sources and run make oldconfig.  This
 usually works.  If there are new features it will ask you if you want
 them.  It won't ask you about stuff you already selected for the old
 kernel.  Compile the new kernel and install it and its modules just
 like the old kernel.

I left out --

Don't forget to make /usr/src/linux a symbolic link to the new
kernel's sources.


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.chemoelectric.org
I have directed that in the future I sign each letter. -- Rumsfeld


pgpV4fyscFjwA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Peter Humphrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Copy your /usr/src/linux-whatever/.config file from the old kernel's
 sources to the new kernel's sources and run make oldconfig.  This
 usually works.  If there are new features it will ask you if you want
 them.  It won't ask you about stuff you already selected for the old
 kernel.  Compile the new kernel and install it and its modules just
 like the old kernel.
 Don't forget to make /usr/src/linux a symbolic link to the new
 kernel's sources.

I find it useful to copy /usr/src/linux/.config to /boot/config-version , 
with /boot on a separate partition. Then I just run
genkernel all --kernel-config=/boot/config-version
and copy the .config, and that makes sure I can recompile any kernel I need, 
even if I zap the entire installation and start again.

As Barry said, make oldconfig first ensures that no new options go 
unnoticed.

(This is where I'm told in no uncertain fashion why genkernel is bad ;-) 
Well, I'm happy to learn.)

-- 
Rgds
Peter Humphrey

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-25 Thread Barry . Schwartz
Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Copy your /usr/src/linux-whatever/.config file from the old kernel's
  sources to the new kernel's sources and run make oldconfig.  This
  usually works.  If there are new features it will ask you if you want
  them.  It won't ask you about stuff you already selected for the old
  kernel.  Compile the new kernel and install it and its modules just
  like the old kernel.
  Don't forget to make /usr/src/linux a symbolic link to the new
  kernel's sources.
 
 I find it useful to copy /usr/src/linux/.config to /boot/config-version , 
 with /boot on a separate partition. Then I just run
 genkernel all --kernel-config=/boot/config-version
 and copy the .config, and that makes sure I can recompile any kernel I need, 
 even if I zap the entire installation and start again.
 
 As Barry said, make oldconfig first ensures that no new options go 
 unnoticed.
 
 (This is where I'm told in no uncertain fashion why genkernel is bad ;-) 
 Well, I'm happy to learn.)

Configuring kernels is more tedious than it is difficult.  As usual,
it gets less tedious the more times you have done it.  I've done it
lots of times with a lot of changes and a lot of options I didn't
understand.  Accept that sometimes your new kernel won't do the job.

How I actually make new kernels is I have my kernel set to embed a
copy of the .config file, so I go into the new /usr/src/linux/ and
type zcat /proc/config.gz  .config.  Then I run oldconfig, which
not only asks about any new features but also removes features not
supported.  This can easily happen to me, because I switch back and
forth between hardened-dev-sources and my own creations; when I switch
from hardened to my own I often give up some feature that hardened has
patched into it.  (I usually use hardened-dev-sources only if it has
the version of grsecurity and PaX that I want.  Otherwise I patch a
kernel myself and pay little attention to feature-adding patches.)

I have a little program, written in Icon, that copies the kernel, its
config file, and System.map to /boot, giving them long names that are
unique and informative.  The new names are constructed from an a
string that's embedded in the kernel itself; my program extracts this
string.  The program also creates a grub.conf.NEW with the new kernel
at the top; I inspect this and then move it to grub.conf.  Usually I
also hand copy System.map to /boot/System.map, although if I remember
correctly the System.map in /usr/src/linux takes precedence.  Or maybe
I just don't know what I'm talking about.  :)


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.chemoelectric.org
I have directed that in the future I sign each letter. -- Rumsfeld


pgpxlsIjwqc9t.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-23 Thread NY Kwok
Note that the nv driver is great for 2D but runs 3D in software mode. 
Will not give you good opengl performance, if that's what you're after. 
Otherwise, it's really good.
On 23/02/2005, at 11:21 PM, Robert Longbottom wrote:

Hmm, it seems a bit odd that agp should be disabled, but I wouldn't 
expect
that to stop it working althogether, just cause a bit of a slowdown.

You might like to try changing nv back to nvidia and starting X again.
you should be able to check the X log file which is usually in
/var/log/xorg.log (or thereabouts).  There may be some failure messages
that point to the problem that the nvidia drivers are having
Robert.
On Wed, February 23, 2005 12:13 pm, Mark Creamer said:
Here's my output of same:
bash-2.05b$ lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
nvidia   4052892  0
bash-2.05b$ dmesg|grep -i nvidia
nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86_64 NVIDIA Kernel Module  1.0-6629  Wed 
Nov
3
11:43:48 PST 2004

bash-2.05b$ dmesg|grep -i agpgart
agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 1919M
agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xe000
Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
bash-2.05b$ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/cards/0
Model:   GeForce FX 5700LE
IRQ: 225
Video BIOS:  ??.??.??.??.??
Card Type:   AGP
bash-2.05b$ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status:  Disabled
bash-2.05b$ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/host-bridge
Host Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8385 [K8T800 AGP] Host 
Bridge
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates:   8x 4x
Registers:   0x1f000a1b:0x
bash-2.05b$ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/card
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates:   8x 4x
Registers:   0x1f000e1b:0x

On Wednesday 23 February 2005 07:05 am, Robert Longbottom wrote:
On Wed, February 23, 2005 11:54 am, Mark Creamer said:
I corrected the monitor specs first, rebooted. No change. Then I
changed
the
driver to nv as Barry suggested, and resolution settings look great.
Now,
do
I leave it that way? I want to make sure I'm getting the full
performance
out
of my nvidia card.
It's a e-GeForce FX 5700LE, 256MB DDR AGP
in my xorg.conf, I notice that the line Boardname is Unknown 
Board.
Does that matter, or is it just informational?

Thanks
I'm sure you've already checked this, but you do have the nvidia 
kernel
module loaded correctly don't you?  check the output of lsmod if 
you're
not sure.

Also, there should be some messages in dmesg when the driver loads 
(try
'dmesg |grep -i nvidia') and also about agpgart, I think these appear
when
Xorg starts (dmesg|grep -i agpgart)

Also, you can check the contents of /proc/driver/nvidia/ once the 
module
has been loaded - it should give you some info about what type of 
card
it
thinks you have and whether or not AGP is working and what method it 
is
using,etc ,etc.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] robert $ dmesg|grep -i nvidia
nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86_64 NVIDIA Kernel Module  1.0-6629  Wed
Nov
3 11:43:48 PST 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED] robert $ dmesg|grep -i agpgart
agpgart: Detected AGP bridge 0
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 941M
agpgart: AGP aperture is 128M @ 0xe000
Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones
agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at :00:00.0.
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :00:00.0 into 8x mode
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :01:00.0 into 8x mode
agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at :00:00.0.
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :00:00.0 into 8x mode
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :01:00.0 into 8x mode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] robert $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/cards/0
Model:   GeForce FX 5200
IRQ: 16
Video BIOS:  04.34.20.16.00
Card Type:   AGP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] robert $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
Status:  Enabled
Driver:  AGPGART
AGP Rate:8x
Fast Writes: Disabled
SBA: Enabled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] robert $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/host-bridge
Host Bridge: PCI device 1106:0282 (VIA Technologies, Inc.)
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates:   8x
Registers:   0x1f000a1a:0x0b02
[EMAIL PROTECTED] robert $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/card
Fast Writes: Supported
SBA: Supported
AGP Rates:   8x 4x
Registers:   0x1f000e1b:0x1f000302


--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Mark Creamer
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list


--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list


[gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-22 Thread Mark Creamer
I've been following the suggestions made here as well as the documentation on 
xorg.conf and nvidia. I continue to have the same issue though. The color 
depth is off - my desktop background is grainy, and if I open more than one 
window, like Firefox and a terminal, the colors on the inactive window change 
to like 8 colors displayed.

Here is my xorg.conf file:
Section ServerLayout
 Identifier X.org Configured
 Screen  0  Screen0 0 0
 InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer
 InputDeviceKeyboard0 CoreKeyboard
EndSection

Section Files
 RgbPath  /usr/lib/X11/rgb
 ModulePath   /usr/lib/modules
 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/misc/
 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/TTF/
 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/Type1/
 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/CID/
 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/75dpi/
 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/100dpi/
EndSection

Section Module
 Load  extmod
# Load  dri
 Load  dbe
 Load  record
 Load  xtrap
 Load  glx
 Load  type1
 Load  freetype
EndSection

Section InputDevice
 Identifier  Keyboard0
 Driver  kbd
EndSection

Section InputDevice
 Identifier  Mouse0
 Driver  mouse
 Option Protocol auto
 Option Device /dev/mouse
EndSection

Section Monitor
 Identifier   Monitor0
 VendorName   Monitor Vendor
 ModelNameMonitor Model
EndSection

Section Device
### Available Driver options are:-
### Values: i: integer, f: float, bool: True/False,
### string: String, freq: f Hz/kHz/MHz
### [arg]: arg optional
#Option DigitalVibrance # i
#Option NoFlip  # [bool]
#Option Dac8Bit # [bool]
#Option NoLogo  # [bool]
#Option UBB # [bool]
#Option Stereo  # i
#Option SWcursor# [bool]
#Option HWcursor# [bool]
#Option VideoKey# i
#Option NvAGP   # i
#Option IgnoreEDID  # [bool]
#Option NoDDC   # [bool]
#Option ConnectedMonitor# str
#Option ConnectedMonitors   # str
#Option TVStandard  # str
#Option TVOutFormat # str
#Option RenderAccel # [bool]
#Option CursorShadow# [bool]
#Option CursorShadowAlpha   # i
#Option CursorShadowXOffset  # i
#Option CursorShadowYOffset  # i
#Option UseEdidFreqs# [bool]
#Option FlatPanelProperties  # str
#Option TwinView# [bool]
#Option TwinViewOrientation  # str
#Option SecondMonitorHorizSync  # str
#Option SecondMonitorVertRefresh  # str
#Option MetaModes   # str
#Option UseInt10Module  # [bool]
#Option NoTwinViewXineramaInfo  # [bool]
#Option NoRenderExtension   # [bool]
#Option Overlay # [bool]
#Option CIOverlay   # [bool]
#Option ForceEmulatedOverlay  # [bool]
#Option TransparentIndex# i
#Option OverlayDefaultVisual  # [bool]
#Option NvEmulate   # i
#Option NoBandWidthTest # [bool]
#Option CustomEDID-CRT-0# str
#Option CustomEDID-CRT-1# str
#Option CustomEDID-DFP-0# str
#Option CustomEDID-DFP-1# str
#Option CustomEDID-TV-0 # str
#Option CustomEDID-TV-1 # str
#Option TVOverScan  # f
#Option IgnoreDisplayDevices  # str
#Option MultisampleCompatibility  # [bool]
#Option RegistryDwords  # str
#Option RegistryBinary  # str
#Option NoPowerConnectorCheck  # [bool]
#Option AllowDFPStereo  # [bool]
#Option XvMCUsesTextures# [bool]
#Option HorizSync   # str
#Option VertRefresh # str
#Option AllowGLXWithComposite  # [bool]
 Identifier  Card0
 Driver  nvidia
 VendorName  nVidia Corporation
 BoardName   Unknown Board
 BusID   PCI:1:0:0
EndSection

Section Screen
 Identifier Screen0
 Device Card0
 MonitorMonitor0
 SubSection Display
  Depth   24  
  Modes   1600x1200 
 EndSubSection
EndSection

When I run glxinfo | grep direct, it returns: error: couldn't find RGB GLX 
visual.

Thanks for any help you can provide!

-- 
Mark Creamer

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-22 Thread Barry . Schwartz
Mark Creamer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Section Screen
  Identifier Screen0
  Device Card0
  MonitorMonitor0
  SubSection Display
   Depth   24  
   Modes   1600x1200 
  EndSubSection
 EndSection

Your monitor can handle 1600x1200 resolution?  I would try 1280x1024 or
1152x864.  Maybe your monitor is barfing.



-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.chemoelectric.org
I have directed that in the future I sign each letter. -- Rumsfeld


pgpp8YDJnhWxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-22 Thread Mark Creamer
I checked the manual, and it says 1280x1024 @ 85Hz is recommended. I set the 
1280x1024, but didn't see anyplace to set the refresh rate. Anyway, after a 
reboot, same result so far

On Tuesday 22 February 2005 10:08 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mark Creamer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Section Screen
   Identifier Screen0
   Device Card0
   MonitorMonitor0
   SubSection Display
Depth   24
Modes   1600x1200
   EndSubSection
  EndSection

 Your monitor can handle 1600x1200 resolution?  I would try 1280x1024 or
 1152x864.  Maybe your monitor is barfing.

-- 
Mark Creamer

--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-amd64] problem with X configuration

2005-02-22 Thread Barry . Schwartz
Mark Creamer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I run glxinfo | grep direct, it returns: error: couldn't find RGB GLX 
 visual.

I would try changing

   Driver  nvidia

to

   Driver  nv

and run

   opengl-update xorg-x11

and that way at least you will see if it has anything to do with the
nvidia driver.

 I checked the manual, and it says 1280x1024 @ 85Hz is recommended. I set the 
 1280x1024, but didn't see anyplace to set the refresh rate. Anyway, after a 
 reboot, same result so far

Here's an excerpt from my xorg.conf that might help you figure it out:

Section Monitor
   Identifier  BenQ FP951 LCD monitor
   VendorName  BenQ
   ModelName   FP951
   HorizSync   30-82
   VertRefresh 56-76
EndSection


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.chemoelectric.org
I have directed that in the future I sign each letter. -- Rumsfeld


pgpXis9shUeDB.pgp
Description: PGP signature